CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05773222Updated Aug 20, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban in Korean Frail Atrial Fibrillation Patient

An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,002
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, and its prevalence is increasing with the aging population [1]. As the prevalence of AF is significantly rising among the population over 70-80 years old and considering the population is at high risk of AF complications such as stroke, oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is necessary among these subjects [1-3]. OAC decreases the risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolism with improved mortality among AF patients. The introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) has led to more effective and safe anticoagulation therapy among Asian patients [4,5]. Among different types of NOAC, the prescription of apixaban has been increasing based on robust safety data. The ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation), phase three clinical trial on apixaban., showed efficacy and safety of apixaban compared to warfarin among 18,000 patients worldwide [6]. However, this study only included 5.5% (986) Asian patients.

Of patients requiring OAC, those of old age, low body weight, or decreased renal function are at 'high risk' of stroke, systemic thromboembolism, and major bleeding events [4, 7-9]. In Korea, among patients prescribed with NOAC due to AF, 35-40% were older than the age of 75 years old, 35% had bodyweight ≤ 60kg and 25-30% had decreased renal function (Creatinine clearance ≤ 60ml/min) [10]. Although apixaban has proved safe in old age, low bodyweight decreased renal function in ARISTOTLE subgroup analyses, the efficacy and safety data on Asian AF patients with high-risk factors is limited [11-14].

In this study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apixaban among high-risk Korean patients in old age, low bodyweight or decreased renal function using a multicenter observational study design

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,002 is above the median of 300 across 1,363 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,860 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

A. Arm Label: prospective, multicenter, non-interventional observational study B. Arm type: no intervention

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient must be ≥19 years.
  2. Patient has non-valvular atrial fibrillation necessitating the use of apixaban for stroke prevention.
  3. Subjects satisfies single dose reduction criterion for apixaban; (1) age 80 years or older (2) body weight 60kg or lower (3) serum creatinine 1.5mg/dL or higher.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is vulnerable (according to Korean Good Clinical Practice definition) or disagree with the study.
  2. Patient had a history of clinical events, defined as primary and secondary outcomes of the study, prior to study registration after taking apixaban.
  3. Patient satisfies two or more dose reduction criteria for apixaban.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,002 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • DrugApixaban

    Single Group Assignment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stroke

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  2. Systemic embolism

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  3. Major bleeding

    ISTH criteria

    Time frame: up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Death from any cause

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  2. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  3. Composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding

    ISTH criteria

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  4. Any bleeding

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  5. Other adverse events including liver or kidney function abnormalities

    Time frame: up to 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Seoul National university Hostpital
    Seoul, Jongno-gu 03080, South Korea
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05773222
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Responsible party
Eue-Keun Choi (professor, Seoul National University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 17, 2023
Start date
Aug 12, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 26, 2023
Completion
May 26, 2023
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion