ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05765214Updated Mar 13, 2025

Impact of Colorectal Cancer and Nutrition Education Program Among Minority Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

An interventional study of Intervention Group (IG) in Colorectal Cancer and Type 2 Diabetes, sponsored by Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-13.

Sponsored by Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 2,338 studies in Colorectal Neoplasms with a site in United States — 422 open to participants now, 630 under way, 30 of them phase 3. Colorectal Neoplasms · United States.

Planned enrollment
706th of 1,931
120 · median 64
Started
2023
with 138 others
No phase
533 of 2,338
96 open now
Primary completion
2025-12
later than 67 of 627 live
Registered
1,868th of 2,338
by date

Among the 2,338 studies in Colorectal Neoplasms with a site in United States, this one is the 706th largest by planned enrollment of the 1,931 interventional ones, is one of 139 that started in 2023, is one of 533 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 67 of the 627 other live ones, and was the 1,868th registered.

By phase

2,338 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 1551 · 101 open
No phasethis study533 · 96 open
Phase 2509 · 64 open
Observational325 · 69 open
Phase 1/2266 · 68 open
Phase 3117 · 17 open
Phase 419 · 4 open
Phase 2/315 · 2 open
Other kind3 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 1981; this study’s year is marked. 139 started in 2023.

Size and results

Median enrollment 64 across the 1,931 interventional studies, 221 across the 324 observational. Of the 1,562 that completed or were terminated, 548 (35%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 2,338 studies in Colorectal Neoplasms with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this observation study is to deliver an education program designed to increase knowledge of colorectal cancer prevention and nutrition education in minorities with Type 2 diabetes. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What factors are associated with colorectal cancer screening among patients with type 2 diabetes?
  • Will implementing a customized patient-centered, culturally appropriate colorectal cancer education, and nutrition education program reduce the risk for colorectal cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes?
  • What is the impact of a patient-centered, culturally appropriate colorectal cancer education, and nutrition education intervention program on colorectal cancer screening and dietary indices among patients with type 2 diabetes compared to outcomes with patients who do not receive the intervention (usual care)?

Participants randomized to the intervention group will:

  • receive a customized patient-centered, culturally appropriate education program
  • participate in eight (8) education sessions
  • be given booklet with colorectal cancer education and nutrition education to use as a workbook

Researchers will compare colorectal cancer knowledge, perceptions, self-care, and social norms scores and dietary indices of the intervention group to the control group immediately and 6-months post intervention to see if the education program increased colorectal cancer knowledge and screenings and changes in dietary habits.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of death in the United States (US)1. In 2019, over 140,000 adults were newly diagnosed with CRC and over 50,000 died.Furthermore, colorectal cancer disproportionately affects minorities and individuals with diabetes. Research has proven that interventions can increase cancer screening rates and improve lifestyle choices that put minorities at higher risk for developing colorectal cancer and diabetes.

This proposal will assess the impact of a colorectal cancer and nutrition education program among minority patients with type 2 diabetes by carrying out three aims.

Aim 1: Examine factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among patients with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this objective is to identify factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among patients with type 2 diabetes by comparing patients who have received screening verses those who have not. It is hypothesized that patients with type 2 diabetes who have not met colorectal cancer screening guidelines have low socioeconomic status (income 100% below poverty level, lack health insurance, speak language other than English, less education); have fewer provider visits; are not married; and have poor health and health risk factors (uncontrolled diabetes, multiple comorbidities (3+), BMI>30, depression, smoking and alcohol use history) compared to patients with type 2 diabetes who have met screening guidelines.

Aim 2:Implement a customized patient-centered, culturally appropriate colorectal cancer education, and nutrition education program aimed at reducing the risk for colorectal cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes at a community health center. The aim of this objective is to deliver a customized patient-centered, culturally appropriate education program on (i) colorectal cancer (knowledge, perceptions, self-care, social norms; and colorectal cancer screening) and (ii) healthy nutrition based on dietary guidelines for colorectal cancer risk reduction and complementary to type 2 diabetes dietary guidelines, among minority patients at a community health center.

Aim 3: Assess the impact of a patient-centered, culturally appropriate colorectal cancer education, and nutrition education intervention program on colorectal cancer screening and dietary indices among patients with type 2 diabetes; and compare outcomes with patients who do not receive the intervention (usual care). The first objective of this aim is to measure change in knowledge and perceptions about colorectal cancer, and colorectal cancer screening immediately and 6 months post intervention. It is hypothesized that patients in the intervention group will have (1) higher knowledge and higher perception scores compared to those receiving usual care and (2) 25% higher rate of colorectal cancer screening 12 months after the intervention, compared to those receiving usual care. The aim's second objective is to measure the change in dietary indices associated with colorectal cancer (fiber, fruits, vegetables, calcium, red meat, processed meat, fat, and alcohol consumption)and overall diet quality immediately and 6 months post intervention. It is hypothesized that patients who receive a patient-centered culturally appropriate nutrition education intervention program will be more likely to meet dietary guidelines for fiber, fruits, vegetables, calcium, red meat, processed meat, fat, and alcohol consumption and overall diet quality compared those receiving usual care.

A five-phase study will be carried out at the Kedren Community Health Center (KCHC) in South Los Angeles that had a patient population of 48.4% African American and 47.5% Hispanic in 2020. Surveys and electronic health record will be used to recruit patients and provide study data. The impact of an education program will be assessed by comparing an intervention verses a control group, and change in knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors related to nutrition and colorectal cancer screening over time.

A major anticipated outcome is increasing the rate of colorectal cancer screening among diabetic patients at KCHC. Another outcome is improving dietary choices among study participants. One or more manuscripts will be prepared for publication and findings will be presented at professional conferences and community forums.

03

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

  • nutrition education
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diabetes type 2 diagnosis
  • Age 35-75
  • Any gender
  • African American race (Hispanic or non-Hispanic)
  • Hispanic ethnicity (any race)
  • Have had at least one visit to KCHC in the past 2 years
  • Have complete address and telephone number in the electronic health records. Although USPSTF and American Cancer Society screening guidelines recommend starting screening at age 45, our intervention will include patients age 35-44 due to the reported incidence of CRC at an earlier age among diabetic patients 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of colorectal cancer
  • History of colectomy
  • History of colonic polyps (ICD-10 Z86.010)
  • History of radiation treatment for another cancer (abdominal prostate, skin etc)
  • History of Crohn's disease
  • Ulcerative colitis
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • \<10 year
  • Cognitive impairment or inability to comprehend or provide consent to participate in the study
  • Being institutionalized
  • Participating in another diet program
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group (IG)

    Participants randomized to the IG will receive a customized patient-centered, culturally appropriate education program. Patients randomized to the IG will participate in eight (8) education sessions. A booklet with colorectal cancer education and nutrition education will be developed and print materials given to the participants to use as a workbook.

    Behavioral: Intervention Group (IG)

  • No intervention
    Usual Care (UC)

    Patients randomized to UC group will continue to receive care at the clinic without any intervention from the study team.

Interventions

  • BehavioralIntervention Group (IG)

    In general, the education will cover: (i) Colorectal cancer - knowledge, perceptions, self-care, and social norms (CRC-KPSS): Knowledge; Perceptions (perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers); Self-care; and Social norms; and information on colorectal cancer screening (ii) Healthy nutrition colorectal for cancer risk reduction and complementary to diabetes guideline (increasing consumption of fiber, fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and calcium; reducing red and processed meat, fat, added sugars and alcohol)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. CRC-KPSS change and screening uptake

    Change in colorectal cancer knowledge, perceptions, self-care, and social norms; improved dietary quality and change in colorectal cancer screening uptake

    Time frame: immediately and 6-months post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Charles R. Drew University
    Los Angeles, California 90059, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 31 months after the start.

Of 898 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Colorectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 31 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 955 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 1, 2023
First posted
Mar 13, 2023
StartActual
May 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 2026
Last update
Mar 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05765214
Lead sponsor
Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 13, 2023
Start date
May 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 13, 2025

Study contacts

Lucy Kibe, DrPH
principal investigator · Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion