ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05760846MLAS4Updated Aug 12, 2026

Bimanual Motor Skill Learning in Acute Stroke

An interventional study of REAplan® and Dextrain Manipulandum® in Stroke, Acute and Stroke, Subacute, sponsored by University Hospital of Mont-Godinne. Recruiting at 2 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Sponsored by University Hospital of Mont-Godinne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2023; still recruiting 3 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The subacute phase of stroke provides a window into how a lesion perturbs sensorimotor functions prior to reorganisation driven by plasticity and neurorehabilitation. The recovery from motor impairment has been extensively studied, but it is currently unknown whether motor skill learning (MSkL) is enhanced or impaired during acute stroke, especially bimanual motor skill learning (bim-MSkL), which likely requires more motor-attentional-cognitive resources than unimanual MSkL.

The goals of this project are: to determine the neural substrates critical to achieve proximal and distal bimanual motor skill learning (bim-MSkL) by specifying whether (sub)acute stroke to different brain areas (cortical and subcortical) induce specific deficits in bimanual and/or distal bim-MSkL, which behavioral components are involved in bim-MSkL, and whether damage to the motor, sensory and inter-hemispheric pathways specifically impairs proximal and/or distal bim-MSkL.

Read the detailed description

Over 3 consecutive days, the patients will be evaluated and will train on the rehabilitation robot REAplan® (http://www.axinesis.com/) to assess proximal bim-MSkL and on the manual dexterity tool Dextrain Manipulandum (https://www.dextrain.com/) to assess distal bim-MSkL.

For proximal bim-MSkL, patients will train over the 3 days on the serious game Circuit on the bimanual REAplan® and will be randomised to two different bimanual versions. By this means, the investigators will explore the components of bim-MSkL in acute stroke patients.

The motor skill learning setup (Circuit) that was developed and successfully used in healthy individuals and stroke patients has already been implemented in the REAplan® environment and will be used as innovative serious games based on a speed/accuracy trade-off (SAT), allowing a detailed analysis of motor skill learning components (speed, accuracy, SAT, movement smoothness, dynamics...). For the serious game Circuit, who based on motor skill learning, the subjects will have to practice a complex circuit and move a cursor as quickly and accurately as possible by controlling the handles of the robot with both arms.

For distal bim-MSkL, patients will train on a complex sequence of finger movements involving both hands. Each day, several successive repetitions of the sequence will be displayed, corresponding to one block. 3 to 6 blocks will be repeated, each separated by 30 sec of rest. After training on the third day, a new sequence will be repeated for 3 blocks to assess generalization.

To explore the role of different brain structures in bim-MskL, Voxel-based Lesion Symptom Mapping (VLSM) based on high-resolution brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, will be used to analyse the relationship between tissue damage and proximal/distal bim-MskL scores on a voxel-by-voxel basis.

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) will quantify the integrity of several white matter tracts, allowing through correlation analyses to unveil the white matter tracts crucial to achieve proximal and/or distal bim-MskL.

In addition, several "classical" clinical scales and tests will be used to evaluate overall motor-sensory-cognitive functions.

In addition to the (sub)acute stroke patients, a group of healthy individuals who will not undergo MRI (n=60) will be enrolled as control group. Subjects in this group will also be randomized 1/1 in the two versions of the bimanual Circuit task on the REAplan® robot.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Acute
  • Stroke, Subacute

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Motor Skill Learning
  • Upper limb
  • Acute stroke
  • Rehabilitation
  • Subacute stroke
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital of Mont-Godinne is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

ACUTE STROKE PATIENTS:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • acute stroke (\< 21 days)
  • aged 18-90 years
  • with a demonstrated stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) lesion on brain imaging

Exclusion Criteria:

  • " classical " contre-indication to MRI (non-MR-compatible pacemaker, pregnancy, non-MR-compatible implanted devices, claustrophobia, etc ...)
  • difficulty in understanding or executing commands
  • drug/alcohol abuse
  • severe aphasia / cognitive deficits interfering with study
  • inability to complete the tasks (i.e. full paralysis of the arm)
  • multiple strokes / dementia / psychiatric condition

HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-90 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medical history with a previous stroke / relevant neurological deficit
  • drug/alcohol abuse
  • psychiatric condition/ dementia
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bimanual Circuit version 1

    Training on the REAplan® robot with a serious game based on proximal motor skill learning (bim-MSkL) with the bimanual version 1 of the Circuit task and training on the Dextrain Manipulandum with a serious game based on distal bim-MSkL

    Device: REAplan® · Device: Dextrain Manipulandum®

  • Experimental
    Bimanual Circuit version 2

    Training on the REAplan® robot with a serious game based on motor skill learning (MSkL) with bimanual version 2 of the Circuit task and training on the Dextrain Manipulandum with a serious game based on distal bim-MSkL

    Device: REAplan® · Device: Dextrain Manipulandum®

Interventions

  • DeviceREAplan®

    motor skill learning with the REAplan® rehabilitation robot, to be performed with both arms

  • DeviceDextrain Manipulandum®

    motor skill learning with the Dextrain Manipulandum® dexterity tool to be performed with both hands

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. bimanual Speed/Accuracy Trade-off (bi-SAT), bimanual Speed/Accuracy Trade-off measured by the REAplan® robot

    bimanual Speed/Accuracy Trade-off: mathematical computation of the relationship between speed and accuracy

    Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)

  2. bimanual Coordination factor (bi-CO), bimanual Coordination factor measured by the REAplan® robot

    bimanual Coordination factor, mathematical measure of the phase coherence between speeds of both arms

    Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)

  3. bi-Force, bimanual force measured by the REAplan® robot

    bimanual forces, forces exerted in the wrong direction by each arm (Newtons)

    Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)

  4. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), bimanual root mean square error measured by the Dextrain Manipulandum

    Tracking error between the actual applied force and the target force

    Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)

  5. Bimanual Dexterity Coordination Index measured by the Dextrain Manipulandum

    bimanual Coordination factor, mathematical measure of the phase coherence between speeds of both thumb-index clamps

    Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reaction time measured by the Dextrain Manipulandum

    time between the target appearance and when the force applied exceeds threshold

    Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)

  2. Rise time measured by the Dextrain Manipulandum

    time between the reaction time and reaching the plateau

    Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)

  3. Coactivation measured by the Dextrain Manipulandum

    binary measure of unasked fingers activated above the force threshold

    Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)

  4. Hold time measured by the Dextrain Manipulandum

    time of plateau maintenance

    Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)

  5. Voxel-based Lesion Symptom Mapping (VLSM)

    Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI)

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

    Fractional Anisotropy

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Test (FMA-UE)

    Tests impairments of the upper limb after stroke. Range: 0-66. A higher score means less impairment.

    Time frame: Day1

  8. Arm Motor Ability (AMA) test

    Measure disabilities of the upper limb after stroke. Range: 0-100. A higher score means less disabilities in activities of daily living.

    Time frame: Day 1

  9. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Tests the short-term memory, visuospatial skills, executive functions, attention, concentration, working memory, language and orientation in time and space. Range: 0-30, higher score means no cognitive impairment.

    Time frame: Day 1

  10. Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Visual Analog Scale to evaluate fatigue = a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. Range : 0- 10. A higher score means a higher level of fatigue.

    Time frame: Day 1

  11. Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension (SAFE) test

    A prognostic determinant of the function of the hemiparetic upper limb (UL) after a stroke. For each of the 2 subitems, the range is 0-5. A score of 5 means normal power. A score of 0 means no contraction possible.

    Time frame: Day 1

  12. Modified Ashworth Scale (mAS)

    clinical measure of spasticity. For each of the 8 subitems, the range is 0-4. A higher score means a higher level of spasticity

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data Management Plan REDCap

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: The data will become available during the beginning of the study and for 20 years.

Access criteria: Login user of the Hospital of CHU UCL Namur -Site Godinne

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2028, 59 months after the start.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 59 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 22, 2023
First posted
Mar 8, 2023
StartActual
Apr 17, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2028
CompletionEst.
Oct 2028
Last update
Aug 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05760846
Lead sponsor
University Hospital of Mont-Godinne
Responsible party
Pr Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD (Principal Investigator, University Hospital of Mont-Godinne) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 8, 2023
Start date
Apr 17, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Study contacts

Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD
Contact
yves.vandermeeren@uclouvain.be
+32 81 42 33 21
Coralie van Ravestyn, MSc
Contact
coralie.vanravestyn@uclouvain.be
+32 81 34 06
Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD
principal investigator · UCLouvain IONS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion