ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04171856Updated Aug 12, 2026

Exploring Motor Learning in Acute Stroke Through Robotics

An interventional study of REAplan(R) in Stroke, Acute, sponsored by University Hospital of Mont-Godinne. Recruiting at 2 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Sponsored by University Hospital of Mont-Godinne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2020; still recruiting 6 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
245
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The acute phase of stroke is characterized by an enhancement of neural plasticity which supports rapid motor recovery. It is unclear whether acute stroke patients can acquire new motor skills with their affected upper limb. The aims of this research program are:

  1. To test the capacity of acute stroke patients (\< 21 days) to learn and retain a complex unimanual motor skill.
  2. To explore whether acute stroke to different brain regions (quantified with brain MRI) induces specific deficits in motor skill learning.
  3. To compare acute stroke patients with healthy individuals and with chronic stroke patients.
Read the detailed description

Over 3 consecutive days, the subjects will be evaluated and will train on the rehabilitation robot REAplan® (http://www.axinesis.com/). They will practice 2 serious games on the robot.

In order to differentiate the effect of motor control recovery from that of MskL, the acute stroke patients will be randomised 4/1 to "MskL" (n=120) ,to "motor control recovery" (n=30) or to "conventional" group (n=15) with a minimisation software. The experimental design will be similar except that the "motor control recovery" group will practice the serious game EASY instead of CIRCUIT (see below) and the "conventional" group will practice conventional therapy instead of CIRCUIT. The performances on both EASY \& CIRCUIT will be compared between groups (subjects in both groups will perform the EASY \& CIRCUIT tasks).The total time of rehabilitation will be the same.

The motor skill learning setup (CIRCUIT + EASY) that we developed and successfully used in healthy individuals and stroke patients has already been implemented in the REAplan environment and will be used as innovative serious games based on a speed/accuracy trade-off (SAT), allowing a detailed analysis of motor skill learning components (speed, accuracy, SAT, movement smoothness, dynamics...). For the serious game CIRCUIT, who based on motor skill learning, the subjects will have to practice a complex circuit and move as a cursor quickly and accurately as possible by controlling the handle of the robot with their affected hand/arm. For the other task EASY (a brick busters serious game), the aim will be to go back and forth between walls presented in different locations. The CONVENTIONAL therapy will consist in classical exercices focused in the upper limb administered by occupational therapist.

The subacute stroke phase is a unique opportunity to investigate the role of brain structures in motor learning/control. Compared to chronic impairments (> 6 months post-stroke), the subacute phase provides a window into how a lesion perturbs sensorimotor functions prior to reorganisation driven by plasticity and neurorehabilitation. To clarify the role of different brain structures in MskL, Voxel-based Lesion Symptom Mapping (VLSM) based on high-resolution brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, will be used to analyse the relationship between tissue damage and MskL scores on a voxel-by-voxel basis.

In addition, several "classical" clinical scales and tests will be used to evaluate overall motor-sensory-cognitive functions. The subjects will practice serious games on the robot REAplan (R), requiring movements with the affected arm (unimanual tasks).

And, we used a Dextrain® tool which allows quantification of key components of manual dexterity : forces, selectivity (independance of fingers movement) and coactivation of the fingers.Moreover, we added a Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as a tool for predicting recovery of motor function after stroke.

In addition to the (sub)acute stroke patients, 4 others groups will be recruited for this study : a group of acute stroke patients who will receive "conventional rehabilitation" and be shortly tested on the robot (N=15), a group of chronic stroke patients (stroke > 6 months) who will not be hospitalized and will not undergo MRI (N=30), a group of healthy individuals who will not undergo MRI (N=50) and a group of patients with a transient global amnesia which is a sudden, temporary episode (\<24hours) of memory loss (N=15).

Subjects in these 4 groups will be randomized 1/1 in the two arms ("MSkL" versus "motor control recovery" arms), except the patients with a TGA who will be included in the "MSkL" arm only.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Acute

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Acute stroke
  • Motor skill learning
  • Upper limb
  • Rehabilitation
  • Subacute stroke
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 245 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital of Mont-Godinne is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

ACUTE STROKE PATIENTS:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • acute stroke (> 21 days)
  • aged 18-90 years
  • with a stroke lesion on brain imaging

Exclusion Criteria:

  • " classical " contre-indication to MRI (non-MR-compatible pacemaker, pregnancy, non-MR-compatible implanted devices, claustrophoby, etc ...)
  • difficulty in understanding or executing commands
  • drug/alcohol abuse
  • severe aphasia / cognitive deficits interfering with study
  • inability to voluntarily move the affected arm (i.e. complete paralysis of the arm)
  • multiple strokes / dementia / psychiatric condition

PATIENTS WITH TRANSIENT GLOBAL AMNESIA:

Clinical diagnosis, criteria of Hodge \& Warlow (1990):

  • Anterograde amnesia observed by a witness
  • No alteration of consciousness or loss of identity
  • Cognitive dysfunction limited to amnesia
  • Lack of focused neurological deficit or argument for a comitiality
  • Absence of head trauma
  • Symptom resolution within 24 hours
  • Possible existence of vegetative symptoms

Inclusion criteria:

  • Transient global amnesia
  • 8-90 years old
  • Be able to perform 3 consecutive sessions on a rehabilitation robot

Exclusion criteria:

  • Severe aphasia / cognitive deficits interfering with study
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Alcohol / drug addiction
  • Exclusion criteria related to MRI

HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-90 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medical history with a previous stroke/neurological deficit
  • drug/alcohol abuse
  • psychiatric condition/ dementia

CHRONIC STROKE PATIENTS:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • chronic stroke (>6 months)
  • aged 18-90 years
  • with a stroke lesion on brain imaging

Exclusion Criteria:

  • difficulty in understanding or executing commands
  • drug/alcohol abuse
  • severe aphasia / cognitive deficits interfering with study
  • inability to voluntarily move the affected arm (i.e. complete paralysis of the arm)
  • multiple strokes / dementia / psychiatric condition
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
245 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Motor Skill Learning (CIRCUIT)

    Intervention: training on the REAplan robot with a serious game based on motor skill learning (MSkL) serious game, the CIRCUIT.

    Device: REAplan(R)

  • Active comparator
    Motor control recovery (EASY)

    Training on the REAplan robot with a serious game that requires similar type and amount of movements but does not rely on motor skill learning (EASY), a brick buster game.

    Device: REAplan(R)

  • Active comparator
    Conventional

    Training sessions with classical exercices focused on the upper limb administered by occupation therapist.

    Device: REAplan(R)

Interventions

  • DeviceREAplan(R)

    motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robot, to be perfomed with the affected arm

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change in SAT (CIRCUIT)

    Speed/ Accuracy Trade-off

    Time frame: change between Baseline Day1 and Day3 (acute) + between Baseline Day1 and 3/6 and 12 months post-stroke (subacute - chronic)

  2. total distance travelled (EASY)

    total distance travelled between the walls of the brick busters (in cm)

    Time frame: change between Baseline Day1 and Day3 (acute) + between Baseline Day1 and 3/6 and 12 months post-stroke (subacute - chronic)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Test

    Tests impairments of the upper limb after stroke

    Time frame: change between Baseline Day1 and Day3 (acute) + between Baseline Day1 and 3/6 and 12 months post-stroke (subacute - chronic)

  2. Arm Motor Ability (AMA) test

    Measure disabilities of the upper limb after stroke

    Time frame: change between Baseline Day1 and Day3 (acute) + between Baseline Day1 and 3/6 and 12 months post-stroke (subacute - chronic)

  3. Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Visual Analog Scale to evaluate fatigue between 0 and 10. The maximum value (10) indicate a high level of fatiguability.

    Time frame: change between Baseline Day1 and Day3 (acute) + between Baseline Day1 and 3/6 and 12 months post-stroke (subacute - chronic)

  4. Voxel-based Lesion Symptom Mapping (VLSM)

    High-resolution 3D-MRI, diffusion MRI (DWI) \& perfusion MRI (PWI with Arterial SPin Labelling technique) will be acquired. The stroke areas will be drawn with MRIcron as volumes of interest (VOI) in native space and compared.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Dextrain®

    Quantitative assessment of the manual dexterity : fingers strength and selectivity, coactivation.

    Time frame: change between Baseline Day1 and Day3 (acute) + between Baseline Day1 and 3/6 and 12 months post-stroke (subacute - chronic)

  6. Grober and Buschke test (16 items) (for patients with trasient global amnesia)

    Assessement of episodic verbal memory

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised

    Measure of visuospatial memory (for patients with trasient global amnesia)

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Forces of the upper limb on the REAplan robot (CIRCUIT, EASY, REACHING)

    To evaluate the Force of the upper limb after stroke (Newton)

    Time frame: change between Baseline Day1 and Day3 (acute) + between Baseline Day1 and 3/6 and 12 months post-stroke (subacute - chronic)

  9. Spectral Arc Lenght on the REAplan robot (CIRCUIT, EASY, REACHING)

    Movement smoothness quantification

    Time frame: change between Baseline Day1 and Day3 (acute) + between Baseline Day1 and 3/6 and 12 months post-stroke (subacute - chronic)

  10. Total distance of the upper limb on the REAplan robot (CIRCUIT, EASY, REACHING)

    Measure of total distance traveled during the training (cm)

    Time frame: change between Baseline Day1 and Day3 (acute) + between Baseline Day1 and 3/6 and 12 months post-stroke (subacute - chronic)

  11. transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

    Measure of the prediction recovery after stroke

    Time frame: correlation with the measure realized Day 1 with progression of the motor skill learning (change between Baseline Day1 and Day 3)

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — the precise IPD plan has to be worked out if an easy and user-friendly solution is available, we intend to make the data available (after anonymisation of personal data).

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: The data will become available during thebeggining of the study and for 20 years.

Access criteria: Login user of the Hospital of CHU UCL Namur -Site Godinne

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2030, 124 months after the start.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 124 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 12, 2019
First posted
Nov 21, 2019
StartActual
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2030
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2040
Last update
Aug 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04171856
Lead sponsor
University Hospital of Mont-Godinne
Responsible party
Pr Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD (Principal Investigator, University Hospital of Mont-Godinne) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 21, 2019
Start date
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completion
May 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2040 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Study contacts

Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD
Contact
yves.vandermeeren@uclouvain.be
+32 81 42 33 21
Eloïse Gerardin, MSc
Contact
eloise.gerardin@uclouvain.be
+32 81 42 33 48
Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD
principal investigator · UCLouvain IONS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion