An observational study in Syncope and Fall, sponsored by Istituto Auxologico Italiano. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-15.
Sponsored by Istituto Auxologico Italiano · Observational
Syncope is the most frequent cause of transient loss of consciousness. Falls are very common in older people. If the falls are unexplained and not accidental, it is likely that the patient had a syncope event and showed a lack of awareness for loss of consciousness. The management of unexplained falls is the same as that of syncope. There is a gap between the best available scientific evidence provided by the guidelines and the need to disseminate these concepts in clinical practice. The absence of a systematic comprehensive approach to fainting and falls results in higher health and social costs, unnecessary hospitalizations and diagnostic procedures, prolonged hospital stays, lower diagnostic rates, and higher rates of misdiagnosis and symptomatic recurrence.
Aim of the study The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy (adherence) of a diagnostic protocol and the costs of a comprehensive guideline-based approach to the management of fainting and falls in a population of consecutive patients referred to a dedicated multidisciplinary outpatient facility.
Primary endpoint:
Secondary endpoints:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:
Aims of the study.
To assess the effectiveness (adherence) of a patient flow pathway and cost of a guideline-based global approach to the management of faints and falls in patients referred to dedicated multidisciplinary outpatient facilities. We will considerer the following endpoints:
Primary-endpoint:
I. Point and interval prevalence estimation of patients with unexplained falls among those who underwent fall diagnostic assessment at initial presentation and then moved to faint pathway for prosecution of diagnostic assessment and its determinants.
Secondary endpoints:
I. Point and interval estimate of the agree proportion between initial presentation and final diagnosis in patients initially assigned to faint and those with unexplained falls.
II. Descriptive comparison between patients initially assigned to faint and those with unexplained falls in terms of diagnostic assessment and adherence rate to the recommendations of the guidelines
III. Descriptive cost analysis of the faint and fall protocol (costs of investigations per patient).
Moreover, all previous analysis will be performed also for predefined age subgroups (≥75, 74-65 and 64-40 years).
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:
Patients' flow Each included patient will undergo to the faint and fall protocol, to assess the effectiveness of a patients' flow pathways (shown in the figure 1) developed in accordance with the most recent guidelines on syncope of the European Society of cardiology (1) and of guidelines on falls of the American and British Geriatrics Societies (2). The detailed flow pathway is described in the Appendix.
201 studies on the registry are indexed under Syncope; 36 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 340 is above the median of 250 across 84 observational studies indexed under Syncope.
Browse Syncope studies →Istituto Auxologico Italiano is the lead sponsor of 202 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with faint or fall referred to a Syncope Unit for diagnosis and therapy
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Consecutive patients aged ≥40 years referred to the Faint \& Fall Clinics for assessment of an episode of faint or fall.
Diagnostic Test: Diagnostic pathway
Each included patient will undergo to the faint and fall protocol, to assess the effectiveness of a patients' flow pathways developed in accordance with the most recent guidelines on syncope of the European Society of cardiology and of guidelines on falls of the American and British Geriatrics Societies.
Unexplained falls
Point and interval prevalence estimation of patients with unexplained falls, among those who underwent fall diagnostic assessment at initial presentation and then moved to faint pathway for prosecution of diagnostic assessment and its determinants.
Time frame: 1 year
Final diagnosis
Point and interval estimate of the agree proportion between initial presentation and final diagnosis in patients initially assigned to faint and those with unexplained falls.
Time frame: 1 year
Comparison
Descriptive comparison between patients initially assigned to faint and those with unexplained falls in terms of diagnostic assessment and adherence rate to the recommendations of the guidelines
Time frame: 1 year
Costs
Descriptive cost analysis of the faint and fall protocol (costs of investigations per patient).
Time frame: 1 year
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Istituto Auxologico Italiano →