CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05750251Updated Nov 25, 2024

Effect of Upper Eyelid Surgeries on Corneal Characteristics

An observational study in Eyelid Diseases and Ptosis, Eyelid, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-25.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
13
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective observational study is to learn about the impact of conventional eyelid correction surgery on the eye's health and function in ptosis and eyelid retraction patient. The main questions it aims to answer are: •

  1. Changes in corneal topography, higher-order corneal aberrations, corneal biomechanical characteristics, and corneal epithelial thickness before and after the surgery
  2. Influence of corneal refraction examinations , vision change, and tear film function after the surgery

Fifty participants will undergo conventional eyelid correction surgery by the same ophthalmologist (YH Wei) and non-invasive examinations before and after the surgery. The patient will be separate to 2 groups, including 30 with correction for ptosis and 20 with correction for eyelid retraction. The research will collect information of the operated eye and fellow eye, and the data will be compared between operated and fellow eye and with the other group.

Read the detailed description

The position of the upper eyelid affects the health and function of the eye. Ptosis can obstruct the vision, and eyelid retraction can result in the loss of proper protection of the ocular surface. Through conventional upper eyelid correction surgery, the height of the upper eyelid can be adjusted to a proper position. However, after upper eyelid surgery, the pressure of the upper eyelid on the corneal surface may change, affecting corneal topography, higher-order corneal aberrations, corneal biomechanical characteristics, and corneal epithelial thickness. These changes may affect postoperative vision and visual quality. The impact of upper eyelid surgery on corneal refraction and corneal biomechanical characteristics remains inconclusive in current studies, and the impact on corneal epithelial thickness is even less investigated. This is a prospective observational study, expecting to enroll 50 patients who have undergone upper eyelid surgery, including 30 for ptosis correction and 20 for eyelid retraction correction. Non-invasive examinations will be used to assess changes in corneal topography, higher-order corneal aberrations, corneal biomechanical characteristics, and corneal epithelial thickness before and after the surgery to understand the impact of upper eyelid surgery on the ocular surface and the possible mechanism or influencing factors of postoperative vision changes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Eyelid Diseases
  • Ptosis, Eyelid

Keywords

  • Blepharoplasty
03

In context

Eyelid Diseases

26 studies on the registry are indexed under Eyelid Diseases; 3 are open to participants now.

Browse Eyelid Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,563 studies on the registry; 569 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants from 20-year-old to 80-year old who need eyelid correction surgery, Group 1 : Ptosis patient with marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1) ≦ 2-2.5 mm and levator muscle fundction (LMF) ≧ 8 mm; Group 2 : Eyelid retraction patient with upper scleral show. The population excluded patients with pregnancy, previous corneal surgery, corneal scar, pterygium, keratoconus, significant ocular surface disease, or wearing rigid contact lens.

Inclusion criteria

Group 1:

  • marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1) ≦ 2-2.5 mm
  • levator muscle function (LMF) ≧ 8 mm

Group 2:

  • with upper scleral show

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • previous corneal surgery
  • with corneal scar
  • pterygium
  • keratoconus
  • significant ocular surface disease
  • wearing rigid contact lens
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
3 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Ptosis patient

    Undergo conventional ptosis correction surgery, including levator muscle resection surgery and Müller's muscle-conjuctival resection surgery

    Procedure: levator muscle resection surgery · Procedure: Müller's muscle-conjuctival resection surgery

  • Eyelid retraction patient

    Undergo conventional ptosis correction surgery, including full-thickness anterior blepharotomy surgery

    Procedure: full-thickness anterior blepharotomy surgery

Interventions

  • Procedurelevator muscle resection surgery

    conventional ptosis surgery

  • ProcedureMüller's muscle-conjuctival resection surgery

    conventional ptosis surgery

  • Procedurefull-thickness anterior blepharotomy surgery

    conventional eyelid retraction surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from best corrected visual acuity at 3 months after the surgery

    Assess best corrected visual acuity by qualified optometrists, with Landolt C chart-based examination Record as decimal visual acuity

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  2. Change from intraocular pressure at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure intraocular pressure with tonometers in unit of mmHg

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  3. Change from eyeball axial length at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure eyeball axial length with A-scan in unit of mm

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  4. Change from slit lamp examination at 3 months after the surgery

    Assess local findings with a slit lamp by same and only ophthalmologist, Dr. YH Wei

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  5. Change from margin to reflex distance (MRD) at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure margin to reflex distance with a ruler in unit of mm by same and only ophthalmologist, Dr. YH Wei MRD-1: from the corneal light reflex to the level of the center of the upper-eyelid margin MRD-2: from the corneal light reflex to the central portion of the lower eyelid

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  6. Change from levator muscle function (LMF) at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure levator muscle function with a ruler in unit of mm by same and only ophthalmologist, Dr. YH Wei LMF: the distance the eyelid travel from downgaze to upgaze while the frontalis muscle is held inactive at the brow

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  7. Change from lagophthalmos at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure lagophthalmos with a ruler in unit of mm by same and only ophthalmologist, Dr. YH Wei

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  8. Change from basal tear volume at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure basal tear volume with Schirmer's test in unit of mm/5 minutes Schirmer's test: small paper strip with rulers printed is placed over the temporal one-third of the lower lid margin and inserted inside the inferior conjunctival fornices under local infiltrating anesthesia. The strips are removed after 5 minutes and the amount of tears produced in that time is measured by reading off of the length of wetting in millimeters.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  9. Change from ocular surface disease index (OSDI) at 3 months after the surgery

    Interview participants with OSDI questionnaire to assesses dry eye symptoms and the effects on vision-related function by same and only ophthalmologist, Dr. YH Wei

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  10. Change from tear break up time at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure tear break up time with Oculus Keratograph 5M (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) in unit of sec

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  11. Change from corneal biomechanical characteristics at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure corneal biomechanical characteristics with Oculus Corvis ST tonometer (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany)

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  12. Change from corneal topography at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure corneal topography with Tomey TMS topographer (TOMEY, Nuremberg, Germany) and record as topography map.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  13. Change from higher-order corneal aberrations at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure higher-order corneal aberrations with Tracey iTrace wavefront aberrometer and corneal topography (TRACEY, Texas, USA), using beam of light projected into the eyes. The wavefront of the reflected light is captured by the machine and collected the distortion and aberration of the cornea.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

  14. Change from corneal epithelial thickness at 3 months after the surgery

    Measure corneal epithelial thickness with anterior segment optical coherence tomography in unit of micrometer (Visionix USA, Illinois, USA)

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, 100, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aksu Ceylan N, Yeniad B. Effects of Upper Eyelid Surgery on the Ocular Surface and Corneal Topography. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 23;52(1):50-56. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.63255. PubMed 35196840 ↗
  • Savino G, Battendieri R, Riso M, Traina S, Poscia A, D'Amico G, Caporossi A. Corneal Topographic Changes After Eyelid Ptosis Surgery. Cornea. 2016 Apr;35(4):501-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000729. PubMed 26751993 ↗
  • Ozturk Karabulut G, Fazil K. Corneal Topographical Changes After Muller's Muscle-conjunctival Resection Surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;35(2):177-181. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001203. PubMed 30130332 ↗
  • Zloto O, Matani A, Sagiv O, Prat D, Ben Artsi E, Leshno A, Priel A, Ben Simon GJ. Changes in Refraction and Visual Acuity after Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty versus Posterior Approach Ptosis Procedures. Ophthalmic Res. 2020;63(6):588-592. doi: 10.1159/000506951. Epub 2020 Mar 5. PubMed 32135543 ↗
  • Altin Ekin M, Karadeniz Ugurlu S. Prospective analysis of visual function changes in patients with dermatochalasis after upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;30(5):978-984. doi: 10.1177/1120672119857501. Epub 2019 Jun 17. PubMed 31203659 ↗
  • Bhattacharjee K, Misra D, Singh M, Deori N. Long-term changes in contrast-sensitivity, corneal topography and higher-order aberrations after upper eyelid blepharoplasty: A prospective interventional study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2906-2910. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_907_20. PubMed 33229668 ↗
  • Li X, Liu C, Mao Z, Liang X, Li Z, Liu X, Gong R, Huang D. Effect of congenital blepharoptosis on corneal biomechanical properties and changes after ptosis surgery. Eye (Lond). 2020 Jun;34(6):1055-1062. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0586-9. Epub 2019 Sep 26. PubMed 31558826 ↗
  • Sommer F, Untch E, Spoerl E, Herber R, Pillunat LE, Terai N. Effect of upper eyelid blepharoplasty on corneal biomechanical, topographic and tomographic parameters 4 weeks after surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;42(1):113-121. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02006-6. Epub 2021 Sep 3. PubMed 34478004 ↗
  • Dogan AS, Acar M, Kosker M, Arslan N, Gurdal C. Alterations in corneal epithelial thickness in patients with congenital myogenic eyelid ptosis. Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;38(1):53-57. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0419-9. Epub 2016 Dec 26. PubMed 28025794 ↗
  • Yamamoto R, Ono T, Toyono T, Shirakawa R, Noda M, Yoshida J, Miyai T. Assessment of Long-Term Anterior and Posterior Topographic Changes in the Cornea After Ptosis Surgery Using Fourier Harmonic Analysis. Cornea. 2021 Apr;40(4):440-444. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002429. PubMed 33881809 ↗
  • Kanclerz P, Khoramnia R, Wang X. Current Developments in Corneal Topography and Tomography. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 13;11(8):1466. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081466. PubMed 34441401 ↗
  • Grubbs JR Jr, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Huynh K, Davis RM. A review of quality of life measures in dry eye questionnaires. Cornea. 2014 Feb;33(2):215-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000038. PubMed 24326332 ↗
  • Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 May;118(5):615-21. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.5.615. PubMed 10815152 ↗
  • Ang M, Baskaran M, Werkmeister RM, Chua J, Schmidl D, Aranha Dos Santos V, Garhofer G, Mehta JS, Schmetterer L. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018 Sep;66:132-156. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 7. PubMed 29635068 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05750251
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 1, 2023
Start date
Feb 6, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 10, 2023
Completion
Jul 10, 2023
Last update
Nov 25, 2024

Study contacts

Yi-Hsuan Wei, PhD
study chair · National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion