CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05736679Updated May 23, 2025

EaveTubes for Vector Control

An interventional study of In2Care EaveTube in Malaria, sponsored by University of Notre Dame. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Côte D'Ivoire. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 10 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-23.

Sponsored by University of Notre Dame · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,870
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether In2Care EaveTubes (ETs) as a stand-alone tool can reduce malaria in an area where transmission is driven by insecticide-resistant Anopheles gambiae. Children who live in homes with ETs will be monitored for malaria infection and compared to children living in homes without ETs in Côte d'Ivoire where there is universal coverage of long lasting insecticide nets and pyrethroid resistance is high.

Read the detailed description

In2Care EaveTubes (ETs) are an inexpensive, new vector control product under World Health Organization (WHO) evaluation informed by mosquito ecology to efficiently target malaria vectors. By installing ETs in the walls of the house at eave level that funnel the natural airflow, mosquitoes are drawn in by the same heat and odor cues that typically attract them through the eaves. Once inside an ET, mosquitoes come into contact with insecticide-treated netting placed inside the ET.

The aim of this study is to test whether ETs as stand-alone tool have an effect on the epidemiology of malaria in villages where houses have been modified with the ET intervention. This prospective 2-arm cluster randomized control trial based on a WHO Vector Control Advisory Group approved protocol will include 17 intervention clusters and 17 control clusters. Both arms will have pyrethroid-treated bednets. Based on the population census, 55 households per cluster with eligible children will be randomly selected for recruitment into the active detection cohorts. In the intervention arm, we will enroll eligible children who reside in ET-treated houses. In the control arm, we will enroll children residing in villages without ET-treated houses. The intervention and control cohorts will be followed for 4 months for baseline covariate measurements and 24 months of a clinical follow up period. During case detection visits, blood samples will be taken from all febrile children and tested for malaria infection with rapid diagnostic tests. To assess the impact of the ET on mosquito density, entomological measurements will be conducted monthly in 20 clusters (10 ET, 10 Control) in 10 randomly selected households per cluster. To estimate the infectiousness of malaria vectors, sporozoite rates will be measured in subsets of the collected mosquito samples.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malaria

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • EaveTubes
  • Housing
  • Malaria control
  • LLINs
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Malaria
  • Vector-borne diseases
  • Mosquito vectors
  • Incidence
03

In context

Malaria

1,299 studies on the registry are indexed under Malaria; 86 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,870 is above the median of 220 across 1,027 interventional studies indexed under Malaria.

Browse Malaria studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Notre Dame is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Village Level Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 80% of Households (HHs) must be suitable for EaveTube(ET) installation.
  • ≥70% of HHs willing to have ETs installed.
  • No participation in the previous Screening + ETs cluster randomized control trial (cRCT).
  • Received standard pyrethroid-only long lasting insecticide nets(LLINs) (Permanet 2.0).
  • 100-300 HHs per village.
  • ≥2 km apart from another village.

Village Level Exclusion Criteria:

  • \< 80% of HHs suitable for ET installation.
  • \<70% of HHs willing to have ETs installed.
  • Villages being treated by indoor residual spray (IRS) and/or new generation bed net campaigns.
  • Participation in previous Screening + ET cRCT.
  • \<100 and >300 households per village.
  • \<2 km from another village.

Household Level Inclusion Criteria

  • HHs must be suitable for ET installation.
  • Provision of consent from heads of HH.

Household Level Exclusion Criteria

  • HH not suitable for ET installation (e.g. houses with poor quality thatch roofing or very large eaves or wall gaps, houses in substantial disrepair, unfinished houses under construction, poorly constructed houses, ).
  • No provision of consent from heads of HH.

Individual Level Inclusion Criteria

  • Children aged ≥ 6 months to \< 8 years old at time of enrollment (so all participants are under 10 years old for the duration of clinical follow-up).
  • Provision of written, informed consent by parents/care givers.
  • Children must reside in villages enrolled in the study and in ETs-treated HHs.
  • Hemoglobin at baseline of >7 mg/dL.

Individual Level Exclusion Criteria

  • Children aged \< 6 months or ≥ 8 years old at time of enrollment.
  • No provision of written, informed consent by parents/care givers for child participation.
  • Expected to be non-resident during a significant part of the transmission season.
  • Hemoglobin at baseline of ≤7 mg/dL, have a known chronic disease, or who have signs of clinical decompensation.
  • Participation in another clinical trial investigating a drug, vaccine, medical device or procedure.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,870 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    In2Care EaveTube

    EaveTube installation with deltamethrin treated netting; in addition to standard of care (standard pyrethroid-only bednets)

    Device: In2Care EaveTube

  • No intervention
    Control

    Standard of care (standard pyrethroid-only bednets)

Interventions

  • DeviceIn2Care EaveTube

    In2Care® EaveTubes (ETs) comprise 15 cm diameter, 20 cm long ventilation tubes with removable netting inserts that are placed in the wall under the roof of houses where they attract malaria mosquitoes at night, block them from entering the house, and contaminate them with a lethal dose of insecticide. In2Care® ET netting inserts have an electrostatically charged coating treated with bio-actives in powder form, which kills insecticide-resistant mosquitoes through high active ingredient dose transfer.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence rate of malaria infection

    Measured by active infection and clinical malaria case detection in cohorts of 55 children (between 6 months and 10 years old) per cluster, 17 clusters per arm on a biweekly basis in peak transmission season and monthly basis in low transmission season.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical malaria incidence

    Measured in children between 6 months to 10 years old living in the study cohorts using passive case detection via the existing community health workers and health centers.

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Malaria parasitemia

    Measured in children between 6 months to 10 years old in the cohorts of 55 children.

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Prevalence of moderate (defined as 7 - 9.9 g/dL hemoglobin) to severe anemia (<7 g/dL hemoglobin)

    Measured in children under 5 years of age in the cohorts of 55 children four times: at the start and end of the rainy season (April and November respectively) of Year 1 and Year 2.

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Mean numbers of female malaria mosquitoes (An. gambiae s.l., An funestus s.l.) captured in study houses

    Measured by CDC light traps in 20 clusters, 10 houses per cluster on a monthly basis.

    Time frame: 24 months

  5. Malaria parasite sporozoite rate

    Assessed in 10% of all anophelines captured by CDC light trap.

    Time frame: 24 months

  6. Entomological Inoculation Rates

    Measured in each study arm as the product of the anopheline vector density and sporozoite rate.

    Time frame: 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Cost-effectiveness of EaveTubes compared to the previously applies Screening + EaveTubes intervention, and compared to other vector control interventions such as LLINs and IRS.

    Cost modelling will assess cost-effectiveness of EaveTubes compared to the previously applies Screening + EaveTubes intervention, and compared to other vector control interventions such as long lasting insecticide nets and indoor residual spray.

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. User acceptance of EaveTubes

    Assessments of willingness to participate and adoption of EaveTubes at the end of the study period through questionnaires and willing to pay surveys.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institut Pierre Richet
    Bouaké, Côte D'Ivoire
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Andriessen R, Snetselaar J, Suer RA, Osinga AJ, Deschietere J, Lyimo IN, Mnyone LL, Brooke BD, Ranson H, Knols BG, Farenhorst M. Electrostatic coating enhances bioavailability of insecticides and breaks pyrethroid resistance in mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 29;112(39):12081-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510801112. Epub 2015 Aug 31. PubMed 26324912 ↗
  • Barreaux AMG, Brou N, Koffi AA, N'Guessan R, Oumbouke WA, Tia IZ, Thomas MB. Semi-field studies to better understand the impact of eave tubes on mosquito mortality and behaviour. Malar J. 2018 Aug 22;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2457-4. PubMed 30134907 ↗
  • Barreaux AMG, Oumbouke WA, Tia IZ, Brou N, Koffi AA, N'guessan R, Thomas MB. Semi-field evaluation of the cumulative effects of a "Lethal House Lure" on malaria mosquito mortality. Malar J. 2019 Aug 30;18(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2936-2. PubMed 31470873 ↗
  • Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, Battle K, Moyes CL, Henry A, Eckhoff PA, Wenger EA, Briet O, Penny MA, Smith TA, Bennett A, Yukich J, Eisele TP, Griffin JT, Fergus CA, Lynch M, Lindgren F, Cohen JM, Murray CLJ, Smith DL, Hay SI, Cibulskis RE, Gething PW. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):207-211. doi: 10.1038/nature15535. Epub 2015 Sep 16. PubMed 26375008 ↗
  • Bradley J, Rehman AM, Schwabe C, Vargas D, Monti F, Ela C, Riloha M, Kleinschmidt I. Reduced prevalence of malaria infection in children living in houses with window screening or closed eaves on Bioko Island, equatorial Guinea. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080626. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24236191 ↗
  • Carey JR, Muller HG, Wang JL, Papadopoulos NT, Diamantidis A, Koulousis NA. Graphical and demographic synopsis of the captive cohort method for estimating population age structure in the wild. Exp Gerontol. 2012 Oct;47(10):787-91. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Jul 7. PubMed 22776134 ↗
  • Hayes RJ, Bennett S. Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;28(2):319-26. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.2.319. PubMed 10342698 ↗
  • Kirby MJ, Ameh D, Bottomley C, Green C, Jawara M, Milligan PJ, Snell PC, Conway DJ, Lindsay SW. Effect of two different house screening interventions on exposure to malaria vectors and on anaemia in children in The Gambia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 Sep 19;374(9694):998-1009. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60871-0. Epub 2009 Sep 3. PubMed 19732949 ↗
  • Koffi AA, Ahoua Alou LP, Adja MA, Chandre F, Pennetier C. Insecticide resistance status of Anopheles gambiae s.s population from M'Be: a WHOPES-labelled experimental hut station, 10 years after the political crisis in Cote d'Ivoire. Malar J. 2013 May 4;12:151. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-151. PubMed 23641777 ↗
  • Koffi AA, Ahoua Alou LP, Kabran JP, N'Guessan R, Pennetier C. Re-visiting insecticide resistance status in Anopheles gambiae from Cote d'Ivoire: a nation-wide informative survey. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 16;8(12):e82387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082387. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24358177 ↗
  • Krajacich BJ, Slade JR, Mulligan RF, LaBrecque B, Alout H, Grubaugh ND, Meyers JI, Fakoli LS 3rd, Bolay FK, Brackney DE, Burton TA, Seaman JA, Diclaro JW 2nd, Dabire RK, Foy BD. Sampling host-seeking anthropophilic mosquito vectors in west Africa: comparisons of an active human-baited tent-trap against gold standard methods. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Feb;92(2):415-21. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0303. Epub 2014 Nov 24. PubMed 25422393 ↗
  • Lengeler C. Insecticide-treated bednets and curtains for preventing malaria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000363. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000363. PubMed 10796535 ↗
  • Lindsay SW, Snow RW. The trouble with eaves; house entry by vectors of malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1988;82(4):645-6. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(88)90546-9. No abstract available. PubMed 3256125 ↗
  • Lwetoijera DW, Kiware SS, Mageni ZD, Dongus S, Harris C, Devine GJ, Majambere S. A need for better housing to further reduce indoor malaria transmission in areas with high bed net coverage. Parasit Vectors. 2013 Mar 7;6:57. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-57. PubMed 23497471 ↗
  • Oumbouke WA, Tia IZ, Barreaux AMG, Koffi AA, Sternberg ED, Thomas MB, N'Guessan R. Screening and field performance of powder-formulated insecticides on eave tube inserts against pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae s.l.: an investigation into 'actives' prior to a randomized controlled trial in Cote d'Ivoire. Malar J. 2018 Oct 22;17(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2517-9. PubMed 30348154 ↗
  • Oumbouke WA, Pignatelli P, Barreaux AMG, Tia IZ, Koffi AA, Ahoua Alou LP, Sternberg ED, Thomas MB, Weetman D, N'Guessan R. Fine scale spatial investigation of multiple insecticide resistance and underlying target-site and metabolic mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae in central Cote d'Ivoire. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 15;10(1):15066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71933-8. PubMed 32934291 ↗
  • Pinder M, Conteh L, Jeffries D, Jones C, Knudsen J, Kandeh B, Jawara M, Sicuri E, D'Alessandro U, Lindsay SW. The RooPfs study to assess whether improved housing provides additional protection against clinical malaria over current best practice in The Gambia: study protocol for a randomized controlled study and ancillary studies. Trials. 2016 Jun 3;17(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1400-7. PubMed 27255167 ↗
  • Snetselaar J, Njiru BN, Gachie B, Owigo P, Andriessen R, Glunt K, Osinga AJ, Mutunga J, Farenhorst M, Knols BGJ. Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: prototyping and evaluation against Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis under semi-field conditions in western Kenya. Malar J. 2017 Jul 4;16(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1926-5. PubMed 28778169 ↗
  • Sternberg ED, Ng'habi KR, Lyimo IN, Kessy ST, Farenhorst M, Thomas MB, Knols BG, Mnyone LL. Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania. Malar J. 2016 Sep 1;15(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1499-8. PubMed 27586055 ↗
  • Sternberg ED, Cook J, Alou LPA, Assi SB, Koffi AA, Doudou DT, Aoura CJ, Wolie RZ, Oumbouke WA, Worrall E, Kleinschmidt I, N'Guessan R, Thomas MB. Impact and cost-effectiveness of a lethal house lure against malaria transmission in central Cote d'Ivoire: a two-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Feb 27;397(10276):805-815. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00250-6. PubMed 33640067 ↗
  • Tusting LS, Ippolito MM, Willey BA, Kleinschmidt I, Dorsey G, Gosling RD, Lindsay SW. The evidence for improving housing to reduce malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Malar J. 2015 Jun 9;14:209. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0724-1. PubMed 26055986 ↗
  • Tusting LS, Bottomley C, Gibson H, Kleinschmidt I, Tatem AJ, Lindsay SW, Gething PW. Housing Improvements and Malaria Risk in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multi-Country Analysis of Survey Data. PLoS Med. 2017 Feb 21;14(2):e1002234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002234. eCollection 2017 Feb. PubMed 28222094 ↗
  • Wanzirah H, Tusting LS, Arinaitwe E, Katureebe A, Maxwell K, Rek J, Bottomley C, Staedke SG, Kamya M, Dorsey G, Lindsay SW. Mind the gap: house structure and the risk of malaria in Uganda. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0117396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117396. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25635688 ↗
  • Sperling S, Cordel M, Gordon S, Knols BGJ, Rose A. Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: Videographic observations of mosquito behaviour in Tanzania with a simple and rugged video surveillance system. Malariaworld J. 2017 Jul 1;8:9. eCollection 2017. PubMed 34532232 ↗
  • Waite JL, Lynch PA, Thomas MB. Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: a modelling assessment of potential impact on transmission. Malar J. 2016 Sep 2;15(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1505-1. PubMed 27590602 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05736679
Lead sponsor
University of Notre Dame
Collaborators
Institut Pierre Richet, In2Care
Responsible party
John Grieco (Research Professor, University of Notre Dame) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 21, 2023
Start date
Mar 23, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 23, 2025

Study contacts

John P Grieco, PhD
principal investigator · University of Notre Dame

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion