ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05732922ORCHARDUpdated Mar 30, 2025

ORCHARD- Optimising Home Assessment of Rural Patients

An interventional study of A sphygmanometer, a digital thermometer, a pulse oximeter and a peak flow meter will be given to participants to use during their telemedicine consultations with health care providers. in Organ Transplant, Cancer and Inborn Errors of Metabolism, sponsored by University of Aberdeen. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-30.

Sponsored by University of Aberdeen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project assesses feasibility of providing medically vulnerable rural patients with Medical-Self-Assessment-Boxes containing equipment to use at home during telephone and video consultations (telemedicine) with GPs and other healthcare professionals. COVID-19 has caused an upsurge in primary care telemedicine which the investigators believe can be sustained and optimized to make things better for medically vulnerable rural patients beyond the pandemic. The investigators will achieve this by equipping the participants to self-measure and report key clinical measurements (e.g. blood pressure, temperature, oxygen levels) during telemedicine consultations. Before conducting a major evaluation of the Medical-Self-Assessment-Box for medically vulnerable rural patients the investigators must establish three things: First, to show the investigators can issue a Medical-Self-Assessment-Box to medically vulnerable rural patients and enable them to use it properly. Second, to determine that patients can use the Medical-Self-Assessment-Box effectively during telemedicine consultations. Third, to show that it is possible to measure how well the Medical-Self-Assessment-Box is working by counting how often the boxes are being used and whether use is appropriate and helpful. The knowledge gained will provide the investigators with the information needed to develop a funding proposal to evaluate Medical-Self-Assessment-Boxes for medically vulnerable rural patients in the whole of the UK.

02

Conditions studied

  • Organ Transplant
  • Cancer
  • Inborn Errors of Metabolism
  • Immunosuppression
  • COPD Asthma
  • Sickle Cell Disease

Keywords

  • telemedicine
  • rurality
  • diagnostic equipment
  • vulnerable patients
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 60 across 7,703 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Aberdeen is the lead sponsor of 176 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ● Solid organ transplant recipient

    • On the COVID-19 shielding list
    • People with specific cancers

      • People with cancer who had chemotherapy within the last 2 years
      • People with lung cancer that have had radical radiotherapy within the last two years
      • People with cancer of the blood or bone marrow such as leukaemia, lymphoma or myeloma who are at end stage treatment
      • People that have had immunotherapy or other continuing antibody treatments for cancer within the last two years
      • People that had other targeted cancer treatment which can affect the immune system, such as protein kinase inhibitors or PARP inhibitors within the last two years
      • People who had bone marrow or stem cell transplants in the last 6 months, or who are still taking drugs
    • People with severe respiratory conditions including all cystic fibrosis, severe asthma, and severe
    • People with rare diseases and inborn errors of metabolism that significantly increase the risk of infections (such as SCID, homozygous sickle cell anaemia)
    • People in immunosuppression therapies sufficient to significantly increase risk of infection

Inclusion criteria for GPs:

  • A GP working at the pilot study practice and carried out telemedicine consultations with participants
  • A GP who can provide

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People whose GP feels they are not able to participate in the research. People unable to consent to participate. Non-English speakers

Exclusion criteria for GPs:

A GP that cannot provide informed consent

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Participants will be receiving their standard medical care.

  • Active comparator
    Intervention

    Participants will be receiving the intervention on top of their standard medical care.

    Device: A sphygmanometer, a digital thermometer, a pulse oximeter and a peak flow meter will be given to participants to use during their telemedicine consultations with health care providers.

Interventions

  • DeviceA sphygmanometer, a digital thermometer, a pulse oximeter and a peak flow meter will be given to participants to use during their telemedicine consultations with health care providers.

    A sphygmanometer, a digital thermometer, a pulse oximeter and a peak flow meter will be given to participants in the intervention arm to use during their telemedicine consultations with health care providers.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Short questionnaire

    The questionnaire will assess use of equipment, perception of how helpful the equipment was for the consultation and the reasons why it was helpful.

    Time frame: 6 months (given at the end of every TM consultation)

  2. Interviews

    Qualitative data collected at the end of the study according to a topic guide.

    Time frame: 1 day (end of study interview)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of consultations face to face

    Number of face to face consultations

    Time frame: 6 months (every time there is a consultation)

  2. Number of consultations TM

    Number of telemedicine consultations

    Time frame: 6 months (every time there is a consultation)

  3. Hospital admissions elective

    Number of elective hospital admissions

    Time frame: 6 months (every time there is an admission)

  4. Hospital admissions emergency

    Number of emergency hospital admissions

    Time frame: 6 months (every time there is an admission)

  5. Ambulance service call-outs

    Number of Scottish ambulance service call-outs

    Time frame: 6 months (every time there is a call-out)

  6. Ambulance service paramedics

    Number of face-to-face paramedic assessment

    Time frame: 6 months (every time there is an assessment)

  7. Survival

    Survival at six months

    Time frame: 6 months (assessed at the end of the study)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Aberdeen
    Aberdeen, Aberdeen City AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2023 to primary completion in Aug 2023, 6 months.

Of 1,981 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52. This study's 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,056 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 25, 2022
First posted
Feb 17, 2023
StartActual
Feb 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2023
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2023
Last update
Mar 30, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05732922
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2023
Start date
Feb 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2023
Completion
Aug 31, 2023
Last update
Mar 30, 2025

Study contacts

Peter Murchie
principal investigator · University of Aberdeen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion