ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05725226Updated May 21, 2024

Comparison Between 6Fr Vs 4Fr Double J Stent

An interventional study of Double J Stent 6Fr x 26cms and Double J Stent 4Fr x26cms in Renal Stone and Ureter Stone, sponsored by Tribhuvan University, Nepal. Completed at 1 site in Nepal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-21.

Sponsored by Tribhuvan University, Nepal · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Double J (DJ) Stenting is a commonly done procedure in endourology to ensure ureteric patency following Urological Interventions. DJ stents are available in various sizes. This study is focused on comparing two different sizes of DJ Stents, one standard sized 6Fr and other small sized 4Fr. DJ stents are uncomfortable to the patients and few studies have indicated that small size of stents are might be less troublesome. Through this study we plan to establish a relation between different symptoms and size of DJ stents. Study will be conducted at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH),Maharajgunj.All adults with sterile urine culture prior to stenting will be taken into consideration. Informed consent will be taken and two randomized groups of 6Fr and 4Fr will be formed and data entry done in MS Excel and analysis done by SPSS. The study is expected to take duration of 12months. Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) will evaluate the symptoms on third day and seventh day of stent placement and on Day of stent removal. We expect 4Fr stent to be superior to 6Fr for reduction of stent related symptoms.

Read the detailed description

The concept of the endoscopic access to the renal collecting systems for the diagnosis and treatment of upper urinary tract diseases was firstly introduced by V. Marshall who first described in 1964 the navigation in the renal pelvis with a rudimental flexible fiberscope. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) by means of flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURSs) is considered one of the first-line treatment options for the active removal of renal stones. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy (URSL) with the holmium laser is an effective and safe method for treating ureterolithiasis. After RIRS, one of the technical aspect is the placement of a double-J stent. The underlying rationale of ureteric stent is to allow the urinary flow to bypass internal or external obstructions, which impair its drainage. 'Double-J' refers to the most common type of stent design that was initially introduced by Finney in 1978. The term 'double-J' refers to the 'J' shape of each end of the stent, which is designed to anchor the stent and prevent its displacement. The mean size of normal ureter is 1.8mm with a standard deviation of 0.9 mm. The standard size for double J stents is typically 6 Fr. Few studies have been done comparing standard 6Fr and smaller sized DJ stent. One study published in March 2018 has shown 4Fr stent superior to 5Fr and 6Fr stent. A Randomised Control Trial (RCT) published in July 2018 has shown 4.8 Fr stent superior to 6Fr stent. To assess ureteral stent-related symptoms, Joshi et al. described and validated the Ureteral Stent Related Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) in 2003. This self-administered questionnaire includes questions in six sections: urinary symptoms, body pain, general health, work performance, sexual matters, and additional problems. The total score is the sum of all questions. This questionnaire can define and compare stent-related symptoms.

DJ stent cause significant side effects. Dysuria, urinary frequency and urgency were reported by 40%, 50% and 55% of the patients, respectively. Flank pain, gross hematuria and fever was reported by 32%, 42% and 15% respectively. Anxiety and sleep disturbance were reported by 24% and 20% respectively, and 45% of patients reported impairment in their quality of life. Decreased libido was reported by 45%, and sexual dysfunction by 42% of men and 86% of women. With few studies showing small sized DJ stent causing less symptoms that standard 6Fr stents; our study aims to ascertain whether the previous studies were in line to change the standard size of DJ stent from 6Fr to smaller size, possibly 4Fr. 6Fr DJ stent is commonly used in our center. This study is aimed to compare standard size of DJ stent with small size in TUTH.

All cases of urinary tract stones requiring endourologic intervention will be sampled for study and cases meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomized via simple random sampling and computer generated numbers enclosed in a sealed envelope opened just prior to surgery, into two groups: Group A 6Fr and Group B 4Fr. All cases will receive a single dose of ceftriaxone intraoperatively. RIRS will be done using Ureteral Access Sheath (UAS) 9.5-11.5 Fr. DJ Stent 4Fr or 6Fr will be used and length of DJ Stent will be 26cm. Stent will be removed on the 14th postoperative day. Symptoms will be assessed on day 3, day 7 and on the day of stent removal. Stone Clearance will be assured after 1 month with ultrasonography of abdomen.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Stone
  • Ureter Stone
03

In context

Nephrolithiasis

324 studies on the registry are indexed under Nephrolithiasis; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 110 is above the median of 92 across 257 interventional studies indexed under Nephrolithiasis.

Browse Nephrolithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Tribhuvan University, Nepal is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age> 18yrs
  • Sterile Urine culture prior to surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral DJ stenting
  • Pregnancy
  • Ureteral Strictures
  • Complicated Surgery: Trauma, Bleeding
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
110 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1 : 6Fr

    Procedure: RIRs/URSL Confirmation of Renal/ Ureteric Stone with CT Urography Preanesthetic Check up and SterileUrine Culture obtained prior to surgery Perioperative Care: Inj. Ceftriaxone 1gm IV stat dose , RIRS/ URSL performed using LASER Holmium lithotripsy 6Fr Double J stent is inserted to maintain the ureteric patency USSQ score obtained on Post operative Day 3, Day 7 and on the day of stone removal (Day 14) USG Abdomen and Pelvis is done on post operative Day 30 to confirm stone clearance.

    Device: Double J Stent 6Fr x 26cms

  • Experimental
    Group 2: 4Fr

    Procedure: RIRs/URSL Confirmation of Renal/ Ureteric Stone with CT Urography Preanesthetic Check up and SterileUrine Culture obtained prior to surgery Perioperative Care: Inj. Ceftriaxone 1gm IV stat dose , RIRS/ URSL performed using LASER Holmium lithotripsy 4Fr Double J stent is inserted to maintain the ureteric patency USSQ score obtained on Post operative Day 3, Day 7 and on the day of stone removal (Day 14) USG Abdomen and Pelvis is done on post operative Day 30 to confirm stone clearance.

    Device: Double J Stent 4Fr x26cms

Interventions

  • DeviceDouble J Stent 6Fr x 26cms

    Surgery will be performed by expert Urologist.

  • DeviceDouble J Stent 4Fr x26cms

    Surgery will be performed by expert Urologist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) scores following 6Fr vs 4Fr Double J stenting

    Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire score will be obtained by requesting the participants to fill the questionnaire. The questionnaire will be filled on post operative Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14. The maximum possible score is 169 and minimum score is 33. Higher score indicates poor performance of Double J stent.

    Time frame: 14 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. To analyze the demographic pattern of patients undergoing URSL and RIRS in TUTH

    All demographic data are entered prior to surgery.

    Time frame: 1day, on the date of admission

  2. To compare the pain score, urinary symptoms, general health, sexual symptoms and work performance following 6Fr and 4Fr Double J Stenting

    Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire score is the sum of the scores of pain symptoms, urinary symptoms, general health symptoms, work performance symptoms and sexual symptoms. All these components will also be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 14 days

  3. To compare stone clearance following 6Fr and 4Fr Double J stenting

    Stone Clearance will be confirmed by ultrasonography done post operatively on Day 30.

    Time frame: Post operative day 30

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH), Institute of Medicine
    Kathmandu, Bagmati 977, Nepal
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05725226
Lead sponsor
Tribhuvan University, Nepal
Responsible party
Prajwal Khatiwada (Resident Doctor in General Surgery Department, Tribhuvan University, Nepal) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 13, 2023
Start date
Apr 7, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 21, 2023
Completion
Dec 21, 2023
Last update
May 21, 2024

Study contacts

Pawan Rj Chalise, MCh Urology
study chair · Head of Department, Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant Surgery, TUTH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion