CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05723484GIFTUpdated Aug 6, 2025

Comparing a Novel Point-of-care Cytokine Biomarker Lateral Flow Test With Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Bacterial Vaginosis

An observational study in STI, sponsored by University of Cape Town. Completed at 3 sites in 3 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-06.

Sponsored by University of Cape Town · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
675
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

  1. To evaluate the performance of a lateral flow POC test, namely the Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT), for identifying women with inflammatory STIs and BV, who are at higher risk of HIV infection and reproductive complications;
  2. To evaluate how the GIFT device can be integrated in a feasible, acceptable, and cost-effective way into routine care.
Read the detailed description

DIAGNOSTIC Study

Design:

The study is a multicentre, multidisciplinary, cross sectional, prospective clinically based research project.

The first component is a diagnostic study which will enrol 225 women attending family planning services in each of the three study sites in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Madagascar. Vaginal samples from the women will be applied to the GIFT device and results will be compared with the composite NAAT reference test for STIs and Nugent score test for BV to determine the performance of the device to detect STIs/BV. Women will attend only one study visit but will be recalled for treatment if required.

The second component to develop a feasible, acceptable and economically feasible STI/BV management algorithm which includes the use of the GIFT device to be integrated into national guidelines (hereafter referred to as the "integration study") is composed of four activities with different study designs: 1.User experiences and/or perceptions of the GIFT device involving qualitative focus group discussions and in-depth interviews, and a quantitative questionnaire for health care professionals; 2. Discrete choice experiment; 3 Development of a decision tree classification algorithm; 4. Economic evaluation of the defined management algorithms.

Study Sites:

  1. Cape Town, South Africa; Desmond Tutu Health Foundation (DTHF) Masiphumelele
  2. Harare, Zimbabwe; Chitungwiza Primary Health Care Clinics
  3. Antananarivo, Madagascar; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Gynéco-Obstétrique de Befelatanana

Diagnostic Device:

The GIFT device is an immune-based lateral flow test for reproductive-aged, non-pregnant in resource-limited settings attending sexual reproductive health (family planning) clinics, community health centers, hospitals, and mobile clinics. The test involves the qualitative detection of genital inflammation caused by asymptomatic STIs and BV in self- or clinician-collected lateral vaginal wall swabs, with results available in less than 20 minutes.

Diagnostic Study Objectives:

Primary objectives To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the GIFT device at the point-of-care in non-pregnant sexually active women aged 18-35 years accessing family planning services in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Madagascar.

Secondary objectives To assess the predictive values of the GIFT device at the point-of-care in non-pregnant sexually active women aged 18-35 years accessing family planning services in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Madagascar; To assess the performance of the GIFT device at the point-of-care in non-pregnant sexually active women aged 18-35 years accessing family planning services in each of the countries; To assess the performance of the device versus syndromic management without any laboratory testing (standard of care in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Madagascar); To determine the robustness of the device by comparing results read by clinicians with those read by laboratory professionals, and with the results obtained using an automated reader; To evaluate the accuracy of the GIFT device by comparing the GIFT device results with ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) results using previously validated concentration cut-offs as the gold standard, including validation of the GIFT cytokine concentration cut-offs for each cytokine biomarker.

Exploratory objectives Determine if other determinants (such as intermediate microbiota (Nugent 4-6), age, parity, sexual activity) improve the prediction of STI/BV status in women; To use 16S rRNA gene sequencing and vaginal bacteria specific quantitative NAATs to evaluate the proportion of cases of genital inflammation explained by vaginal dysbiosis that was not diagnosed as an STI or BV by NAATs or Nugent scoring; To explore the performance of the device in the presence of vaginal Candida spp colonisation.

INTEGRATION Study To evaluate how the GIFT device can be integrated in a feasible, acceptable, and cost-effective way into routine care (the "integration study"), four activities will be conducted: 1. User experiences and/or perceptions of the GIFT device; 2. Discrete choice experiment; 3 Development of a decision tree classification algorithm; 4. Economic evaluation of the defined management algorithms.

Objectives:

Primary objective To evaluate how the GIFT device could be integrated into routine care.

Secondary objectives To qualitatively and quantitatively assess the user-experience, usability, and acceptability of the GIFT device at the point of care; To examine patient preferences for various STI management aspects (attributes) to inform the development of STI management algorithms that integrate the GIFT device; To generate algorithms that integrate the GIFT device to optimise case finding and STIs/vaginal infection management in women, using the complete dataset from the study; To determine the cost and budget impact of the identified screening or diagnostic algorithm with the GIFT device, and to model the cost- effectiveness of different strategies of integration of GIFT into care.

02

Conditions studied

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Diagnostic:

Non-pregnant, sexually active women aged 18-35 years accessing family planning services.

Integration:

  • Local or regional policy makers: maximum 36
  • Healthcare professionals: maximum 40
  • Pregnant and non-pregnant, sexually active women of 18-35 years attending family planning services: maximum 45
  • Pregnant and non-pregnant, sexually active women of 18-35 years attending family planning services: up to 200 participants per site for discrete choice experiment
  • Data from pregnant and non-pregnant, sexually active women of 18-35 years attending family planning services recruited in diagnostic study
  • Healthcare workers from diagnostic study sites

Eligibility criteria

Diagnostic Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-35 years old
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent to participate in the study
  • Self-reported to be sexually active
  • Not pregnant (determined by pregnancy test)
  • Accessing family planning service

Integration Inclusion Criteria:

For all: Willing and able to provide informed consent to participate in the study

User experiences/perceptions activity:

  • Local or regional policy makers, programmers and other opinion leaders and decision makers
  • Healthcare professionals at health facilities
  • Women who are eligible for the diagnostic study (including pregnant and menstruating women), but who are not part of the diagnostic study
  • 18-35 years old
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent to participate in the study
  • Self-reported to be sexually active
  • Accessing family planning service diagnostic study

Discrete choice experiments:

  • Women who are eligible for the diagnostic study (including pregnant and menstruating women), who are either part of, or not part of, the diagnostic study
  • 18-35 years old
  • Self-reported to be sexually active
  • Accessing family planning service diagnostic study

Decision tree classification algorithm:

  • Data from diagnostic study participants

Economic evaluation:

  • Healthcare professionals at health facilities involved in GIFT device implementation able to complete timesheets

Diagnostic Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<18 years or >35 years
  • Refusal by a participant to participate in the study
  • Treatment for any STI/BV in the past 30 days
  • Pregnancy
  • Enrolled in a study which does not allow co-enrolment in other studies

Integration Exclusion Criteria:

For all: Not willing or able to provide informed consent to participate in the study

User experiences/perceptions activity:

  • Non-relevant policy makers
  • Healthcare professionals at health facilities not included in diagnostic study

Women who are:

  • Part of the diagnostic study
  • \<18 years or >35 years
  • Treated for any STI/BV in the past 30 days
  • Pregnant
  • Enrolled in a study which does not allow co-enrolment in other studies

Discrete choice experiments:

Women who are:

  • \<18 years or >35 years
  • Treated for any STI/BV in the past 30 days
  • Pregnant
  • Enrolled in a study which does not allow co-enrolment in other studies

Decision tree classification algorithm:

  • Participants for whom there are no diagnostic study data

Economic evaluation:

  • Healthcare professionals not at study sites, not involved in GIFT device implementation, and/or not able to complete timesheets
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
675 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Interventions

  • DeviceGIFT Device

    The GIFT device - immune-based lateral flow test for reproductive-aged, non-pregnant in resource-limited settings attending sexual reproductive health (family planning) clinics, community health centers, hospitals, and mobile clinics. The test involves the qualitative detection of genital inflammation caused by asymptomatic STIs and BV in self- or clinician-collected lateral vaginal wall swabs, with results available in less than 20 minutes.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity for the GIFT device

    Detecting the presence of any STI or BV with 95% confidence intervals, using NAATs and Nugent scoring in a composite reference standard.

    Time frame: Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023

  2. How the GIFT device could be integrated into routine care

    Integration into healthcare guidelines

    Time frame: Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023

Secondary outcomes

  1. Positive and negative predictive values of the GIFT device

    predictive values of the GIFT device in each country and likelihood ratios, using NAATs and Nugent scoring as a composite reference standard

    Time frame: Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023

  2. Overall sensitivity of NAAT and Nugent scoring

    Specificity and predictive values in each country using NAATs and Nugent scoring

    Time frame: Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023

  3. Overall sensitivity

    Specificity and predictive values in each country and likelihood ratios of syndromic management, using NAATs and Nugent scoring as composite reference standards

    Time frame: Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023

  4. Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values in each country and likelihood ratios calculated with both methods

    GIFT device and syndromic management using NAATs and Nugent scoring as composite reference standards

    Time frame: Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023

  5. Positive and negative agreement proportion and Kappa coefficient between results readings of 1/clinician and technician

    2/clinician and automated reader; 3/technician and automated reader

    Time frame: Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023

  6. Positive and negative agreement proportion and Kappa coefficient between results readings of GIFT device and cytokine ELISA measurements

    GIFT device and cytokine ELISA measurements

    Time frame: Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023

  7. User experiences

    Perceptions of GIFT device

    Time frame: Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023

  8. User preferences

    different STI management strategies based on patient preferences for various attributes of STI management using GIFT device

    Time frame: Start- quarter 2/2023; End- quarter 1/2024

  9. Optimal case finding and STI management strategies

    Using diagnostic study results

    Time frame: Start: - quarter 1/2024; End- quarter 4/2024

  10. Cost and budget impact

    Economic evaluation for the budget impact analysis to create strategies of integrating the GIFT device into standard of care

    Time frame: Start- quarter 3/2023; End- quarter 2/2024

Other outcomes

  1. Expository Endpoint: Post-estimation classifications

    (% of women correctly classified, fit of the model) from logistic regression models.

    Time frame: Start- quarter 3/2023; End- quarter 4/2024

06

Study locations

3 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Gynéco-Obstétrique de Befelatanana
    Antananarivo, Madagascar
  • Desmond Tutu Health Foundation
    Cape Town, Western Cape 7975, South Africa
  • Chitungwiza Primary Health Care Clinics
    Harare, Zimbabwe
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Ramboarina S, Crucitti T, Gill K, Bekker LG, Harding-Esch EM, van de Wijgert JHHM, Huynh BT, Fortas C, Harimanana A, Mayouya Gamana T, Randremanana RV, Mangahasimbola R, Dziva Chikwari C, Kranzer K, Mackworth-Young CRS, Bernays S, Thomas N, Anderson D, Tanko FR, Manhanzva M, Lurie M, Khumalo F, Sinanovic E, Honda A, Pidwell T, Francis SC, Masson L, Passmore JA; GIFT study group. Novel point-of-care cytokine biomarker lateral flow test for the screening for sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis: study protocol of a multicentre multidisciplinary prospective observational clinical study to evaluate the performance and feasibility of the Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT). BMJ Open. 2024 May 1;14(5):e084918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084918. PubMed 38692732 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — De-identified study data will be made available to the study team only.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05723484
Lead sponsor
University of Cape Town
Collaborators
Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health Ltd, Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Institut Pasteur, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Hitotsubashi University
Responsible party
Jo-An Passmore (Professor, University of Cape Town) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2023
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023
Completion
Dec 31, 2023
Last update
Aug 6, 2025

Study contacts

Jo-Ann Passmore, Professor
principal investigator · University of Cape Town

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion