An observational study in Surgery and Failure to Rescue, sponsored by University of Cape Town. Recruiting at 1 site in South Africa. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-23.
Sponsored by University of Cape Town · Observational
'Failure to rescue' describes the preventable death of a patient following the absence of timely identification and treatment of a complication after surgery. The absence of systems contributes to the higher mortality post-surgery in Africa compared to high-income countries. To mitigate this, a complex quality improvement (QI) intervention has been designed focusing on improving five main areas of patient management following surgery termed as '5 Rs to Rescue'. The study will take place in 20 centers in 4 countries - Ethiopia, South Africa, Tanzania, and Uganda. This a multi-center, mixed methods, cluster trial with a baseline assessment to evaluate the efficacy of the QI intervention. To study is aimed to evaluate whether implementation of the '5 Rs to Rescue' quality improvement intervention increases surveillance for patients at risk of 'failure to rescue' after surgery in hospitals in Africa.
The '5 Rs to Rescue' includes:
INTRODUCTION 'Failure to rescue' describes the preventable death of a patient following a complication after surgery. Patients who develop complications after surgery, such as haemorrhage or infection, begin to deteriorate physiologically and become acutely unwell. This is usually identified by careful monitoring of the patient's basic 'vital signs' which include pulse rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure and consciousness level. However, if physiological deterioration is not identified and treated in a timely manner, it will progress and lead to organ dysfunction and then organ failure. This will ultimately lead to cardio-respiratory arrest and the death of the patient. 'Failure to rescue' can be used as a key concept in delivering safe and effective perioperative care as well as a healthcare quality metric in general. The first African Surgical Outcomes Study (ASOS-1) showed that 'failure to rescue' is the mode of death in 19 out of 20 deaths following surgery across Africa. Hospitals in high-income countries use early warning systems to monitor patients after surgery and trigger the escalation of care for patients who are critically ill to ensure prompt treatment. However, these systems do not exist in many resource-poor African hospitals where nurse: patient ratios can be as high as 1:35 and limit capacity-to-rescue within the system. Furthermore, in many African hospitals early warning systems are not used to monitor patients following surgery. These factors contribute to the higher mortality post-surgery in Africa compared to high-income countries. As patient outcomes tend to improve when enhanced monitoring increases the identification and treatment of critically ill patients, the study has co-produced a complex intervention with healthcare staff, community engagement and involvement (CEI) partners, and the Institute for Health Improvement (IHI) across four African countries (Ethiopia, South Africa, Tanzania and Uganda) to improve the capacity-to-rescue. This is a multi-centre, cluster trial with a baseline assessment to evaluate the efficacy of the '5 Rs to Rescue' quality improvement intervention using a mixed-methods process evaluation of the trial intervention. The intervention focuses on improving five main areas of patient management following surgery: 1) Risk assessment, 2) Recognition of patient deterioration, 3) Response to patient deterioration, 4) Reassessment following intervention to manage deterioration, and 5) Reflection on care provided following a patient's death. The complex quality improvement (QI) intervention is known as '5 Rs to Rescue'. Ultimately, the researchers intend to conduct a large international cluster randomised trial of the '5 Rs to Rescue' intervention comparing patient important outcomes for patients undergoing major surgery between intervention and usual care hospitals. The study hopes to demonstrate that the intervention can decrease 'failure to rescue' in Africa, and improve postoperative survival.
University of Cape Town is the lead sponsor of 116 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Surgical wards of participating hospitals in four African countries (Ethiopia, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda).
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
High-risk patients (ASOS Surgical Risk Calculator Score \>10) having surgery, defined as ≥7 high risk patients having surgery per week.
Other: Implementation of the '5 Rs to Rescue'
Quality improvement intervention increases surveillance for patients at risk of 'failure to rescue' after surgery
Report site specific interventions and findings that explain how and why the 5R's to Rescue Quality Improvement Programme was effective or not in reducing in-hospital death after surgery.
The complex QI intervention is known as '5 Rs to Rescue'. Ultimately, the study intends to conduct a large international cluster randomised trial of the '5 Rs to Rescue' intervention comparing patient important outcomes for patients undergoing major surgery between intervention and usual care hospitals. The study is aiming to demonstrate that the '5 Rs to Rescue' intervention can decrease 'failure to rescue' in Africa, and improve postoperative survival.
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: Undecided
Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2026, 17 months after the start.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.