ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05717062BRAVIOUpdated Jun 27, 2025

Broad-spectrum Rapid Antidote: Varespladib IV to Oral Trial for Snakebite (BRAVIO)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Varespladib intravenous form and varespladib-methyl- oral form in Snakebite and Envenoming, Snake, sponsored by Ophirex, Inc.. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-27.

Sponsored by Ophirex, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Nov 2024, 1 year 11 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry; the sponsor requested a delay in submitting them in Mar 2025.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter,randomized,double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a continuous rate infusion (CRI) of IV varespladib followed by transition to the oral dosage form, varespladib-methyl, concurrently with SOC, in participants bitten by venomous snakes.

Note: Funding Source - FDA-OOPD

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of intravenous varespladib followed by oral varespladib, concurrently with standard of care (SOC), in participants bitten by venomous snakes.

Approximately 140 male and female eligible participants will be enrolled and randomized to receive active varespladib or placebo (in addition to SOC)

Randomization will be stratified by the presence or absence of neurotoxicity (SSS nervous system subscore of 0-1 or ≥ 2) at Baseline, and by receipt of antivenom prior to screening, resulting in 4 strata in total.

02

Conditions studied

  • Snakebite
  • Envenoming, Snake

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Envenoming, Snakebite, varespladib
  • antidote
  • snake
03

In context

Snake Bites

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Snake Bites; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 140 is above the median of 70 across 18 interventional studies indexed under Snake Bites.

Browse Snake Bites studies →

Lead sponsor

Ophirex, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Is a male or female ≥ 18 years of age with venomous snakebite.
  2. Patients must have known or suspected venomous snakebite. In India, enrollment will be restricted to patients bitten by suspected or confirmed Russell's viper (Daboia russelii) or krait (Bungarus spp.) In the U.S., any snakebite that meets all other criteria may be eligible.
  3. Participants must meet one of two categories of inclusion criteria:

    1. Category 1: The participant is enrolled within 5 hours of venomous snakebite or symptom onset with an SSS score of ≥2 in one system and ≥1 in another system (2+1).

      OR

    2. Category 2: The participant has a suspected or confirmed bite from an elapid and is enrolled within 10 hours of bite or symptom onset with moderate to severe cranial nerve or skeletal muscle weakness.
  4. Is willing (or legally authorized representative is willing) to provide prior to initiation of any study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Has history of or is suspected to have CVA or intracranial bleeding of any kind, acute coronary syndrome, MI, or severe pulmonary hypertension.
  2. Has known history of inherited bleeding or coagulation disorder.
  3. Is, at Screening Visit, using the following anticoagulants: warfarin/coumadin, argatroban, bilvalirudin, lepirudin, apixaban, dabigatran, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticlodipine or another anticoagulant agent not specifically listed, or has used heparin, enoxaparin, fondaparinux, or other low molecular weight heparin or any antiarrhythmic drugs within 14 days prior to treatment.
  4. Has a history of chronic liver disease such as chronic active viral hepatitis, alcohol- related liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, hemochromatosis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, hepatitis.
  5. Reports or has known pre-existing renal impairment or chronic kidney disease.
  6. Has a known allergy or significant adverse reaction to varespladib or varespladib-methyl.
  7. Is considered by the Investigator to be unable to comply with protocol requirements due to geographic considerations, psychiatric disorders, or other compliance concerns.
  8. Is pregnant, has a positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) pregnancy test or not willing to use a highly effective method of for 14 days after initial treatment, or is breast-feeding.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
140 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Varespladib Intravenous Form (IV) + Varespladib Oral tablet (LY315920) + SOC

    Participants will receive intravenous (IV) infusion of varespladib at dose of 0.45 milligrams per kilogram per hour (mg/kg/hr) for six hours. This infusion will continue until when the participant meets clinical criteria for transition to oral drug, -If criteria are met, they will be transitioned to varespladib-methyl (initial dose of 500 mg) then continued oral dosing q12 (once every 12 hours) of 250 mg for the remainder of the study period. Participants that do not meet the criteria for transitioning to the oral drug will remain on the IV infusion at 0.45 mg/kg/hr (along with SOC) and assessed twice a day until they meet criteria for transition to oral drug.

    Drug: Varespladib intravenous form · Drug: varespladib-methyl- oral form

  • Active comparator
    Placebo Intravenous (IV) + Placebo Oral + SOC

    Participants will receive intravenous (IV) infusion of placebo matched to varespladib for six hours. This infusion will continue until the participant meets clinical criteria for transition to oral drug. If criteria are met, they will be transitioned to the oral placebo then continued oral dosing for the remainder of the study period. Participants that do not meet the criteria for transitioning to the oral drug will remain on the IV infusion (along with SOC) and assessed twice a day until they meet criteria for transition to oral drug.

    Drug: Placebo intravenous form · Drug: Placebo - oral form

Interventions

  • DrugVarespladib intravenous form

    This is a lyophilized drug contained in 100 mg vials to be reconstituted in Water for Injection (WFI), followed by dilution into 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection.

    Also known as: LY315920

  • Varespladib-methyl (LY333013) is an immediate-release, oval, white, film-coated tablet at a dosage strength of 250 mg for oral administration.

    Also known as: LY333013

  • DrugPlacebo intravenous form

    The intravenous placebo will be saline (0.9%). Blinding will be ensured by covering the bag containing the investigational product with opaque covers.

  • DrugPlacebo - oral form

    Oral placebo is supplied as a white film-coated oval tablet to match the appearance of the LY333013 250 mg tablet and contains a subset of the excipients present in the active tablet formulation: lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, and magnesium stearate

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. For subjects bitten by vipers: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of an abbreviated Snakebite Severity Score

    For subjects bitten by vipers: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of an abbreviated Snakebite Severity Score (SSS) composed of local wound, hematologic, and neurologic subscores from Baseline (pre-dosing) to Day 14. The independent p-values from subjects bitten by elapids and subjects bitten by vipers will be analyzed using Fisher's combined probability test to obtain a single global p-value for testing the primary endpoint. The Snakebite Severity Scale is a tool used to measure the severity of envenoming, a higher score indicates worse symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 14

  2. For subjects bitten by elapids: Time to complete head-lift recovery defined by a 5-second head-lift of 5 seconds.

    The independent p-values from subjects bitten by elapids and subjects bitten by vipers will be analyzed using Fisher's combined probability test to obtain a single global p-value for testing the primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 14

Secondary outcomes

  1. Area under the curve of the composite outcome of pulmonary, cardiovascular, local wound, hematologic, renal, and nervous system sections of the SSS from Baseline to Day 7, among patients randomized within 5 hours from bite.

    The SSS is a tool developed to measure the severity of snakebite envenoming. Each category is graded from 0 to 3 or 4 (depending on the body category) and a higher score indicates worse signs or symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 7

  2. Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) score at Day 3 and Day 7.

    Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is a brief, interview-format questionnaire that is used to assess functional disability and any changes in performance of activities. The patient provides 3 activities. The patient then provides a rating for each item on an 11-item ordinal scale, where 0 is "unable to perform activity" and 10 is "able to perform activity at the same level as before injury or problem." The range of possible single activity scores is 0 to 10 and the range of possible total score is 0 to 10 (0 is unable to perform and 10 is perform as before injury/illness).

    Time frame: Day 3 and Day 7

  3. Complete Snakebite Severity Scale Score (SSS) recovery, from baseline to Day 28.

    Complete snakebite severity score (SSS) recovery, defined as a composite score of 0 for the pulmonary, cardiovascular, local wound, hematologic, renal, and nervous system sections of the SSS at Day 28. The SSS is a tool developed to measure the severity of snakebite envenoming. Each category is graded from 0 to 3 or 4 (depending on the body category) and a higher score indicates worse signs or symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 28

  4. Total Antivenom Requirement, measured in number of vials of antivenom administered to the subject, from baseline (pre-dosing) through Day 28

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 28

  5. Duration of Hospitalization from baseline (pre-dosing) through Day 28

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 28

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • Banner University Medical Center - Phoenix
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • Arizona Poison & Drug Information Center
    Tucson, Arizona 85721, United States
  • Desert Regional Medical Center
    Palm Springs, California 92262, United States
  • Antelope Valley Medical Center
    Rosamond, California 93560, United States
  • UF Health Shands Hospital
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
  • University of South Florida/Tampa General Hospital
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Emergency Medicine, University of Kentucky
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso
    El Paso, Texas 79905, United States
  • UT Health San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2023 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 17 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 20, 2023
First posted
Feb 8, 2023
StartActual
May 30, 2023
Primary completionActual
Nov 28, 2024
CompletionActual
Feb 24, 2025
Results delay requested
Mar 26, 2025
Last update
Jun 27, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05717062
Lead sponsor
Ophirex, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2023
Start date
May 30, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 28, 2024
Completion
Feb 24, 2025
Last update
Jun 27, 2025

Study contacts

Timothy Platts-Mills, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Ophirex, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Varespladib methyl

Start the discussion