ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04996264BRAVOUpdated Jul 1, 2025Results posted

Broad-spectrum Rapid Antidote: Varespladib Oral for Snakebite

A Phase 2 interventional study of Varespladib Methyl and Placebo in Snakebites, Envenoming and Envenoming, Snake, sponsored by Ophirex, Inc.. Completed at 16 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 5 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-01.

Sponsored by Ophirex, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
95
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of varespladib-methyl, concurrently with standard of care (SOC), in subjects bitten by venomous snakes.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of varespladib-methyl, concurrently with SOC, in subjects bitten by venomous snakes.

Approximately 110 male and female eligible subjects will be enrolled and randomized to receive active varespladib-methyl or placebo (in addition to SOC) in a 1:1 ratio (approximately 36 per group). There will be no stratification by type of snakebite, though randomization will be stratified by age group (5 to 11 years, 12 to 17 years, and ≥ 18 years) and by the presence or absence of severe neurologic symptoms defined by yes/no neurologic system subscore of the snakebite severity score of ≥ 2.

Effective treatments for snakebite envenoming represents a deadly and unmet global medical need. While antivenoms comprise the SOC for treatment of snakebites, they suffer from several limitations including specificity of each antivenom for specific species of snake, limited access to antivenom in rural areas, practical storage requirements, and delays in administration. Treatment of snakebite envenoming with the small-molecule drug varespladib-methyl, which targets secreted phospholipase A₂ (sPLA₂) present in more than 95% of snake venoms, has the potential to overcome several limitations of serum-based antivenoms that underpin traditional SOC.

This study in the United States and India will provide coverage of a broad spectrum of venomous snake genera, including elapids, pit vipers, and potentially exotics such as vipers and colubrids if encountered over the course of the study. The study is designed to cover differing geographies and differing sPLA₂ structures. Study sites have been and will be selected based on demonstrated historical incidence of snake bites from species deemed relevant to this study, to ensure a broad range of envenoming toxins are expected to be encountered in potential study subjects.

The study design allows for both treatment arms (varespladib-methyl and placebo) to receive SOC (e.g., antivenom) concurrently. Thus, critically ill adult and pediatric subjects may receive emergency treatment in a timely manner while being evaluated for the potential clinical benefit associated with inhibition of venom sPLA₂ and inflammatory sPLA2s by varespladib-methyl.

Because subjects with severe snakebites are admitted to emergency departments, this study was designed to screen, enroll, and administer treatment in a single visit at the hospital upon admission. Because varespladib-methyl is administered orally, subjects who demonstrate substantial improvement and are eligible for discharge from the hospital may continue investigational product treatment in an outpatient setting.

Risks associated with the control (placebo) arm of this study include the same risks associated with SOC (antivenom).

02

Conditions studied

  • Snakebites
  • Envenoming
  • Envenoming, Snake
  • Envenomation, Snake

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • envenoming
  • venom
  • snakebite
  • snakebite severity score
  • varespladib
  • snake
  • antidote
  • LY333013
  • sPLA2
03

In context

Snake Bites

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Snake Bites; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 95 is above the median of 70 across 18 interventional studies indexed under Snake Bites.

Browse Snake Bites studies →

Lead sponsor

Ophirex, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Is a male or female subject ≥ 5 years of age with venomous snakebite and must present with an initial SSS of

    • 2 points in any SSS category other than gastrointestinal and 1 or more additional points in any other SSS category other than gastrointestinal or
    • ≥ 3 in any SSS category other than gastrointestinal.

    SSS scoring should be performed for inclusion assessment without waiting for receipt of Baseline hematological laboratory results. Gastrointestinal scores should not be used for inclusion.

  2. Index event (snakebite) must be symptomatic and must have occurred within 10 hours of eligibility assessment.
  3. Must meet one of two categories of inclusion criteria:

    Category 1: The patient has not yet completed first dose of antivenom:

    SSS inclusion score* of ≥2 in one system and ≥1 in another system (2+1) OR ≥3 in at least one system.

    OR

    Category 2: The patient has completed an initial dose of antivenom:

    SSS inclusion score* of ≥2 in one system and ≥1 in another system (2+1) OR ≥3 in at least one system AND CGI-I score of ≥5 (i.e., minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse).

  4. Is willing (or legally authorized representative is willing) to provide prior to initiation of any study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Has received antivenom treatment for envenoming prior to enrollment in this study.
  2. Is considered by the investigator to have a upper GI bleed evidenced by hematemesis, "coffee-ground" emesis or nasogastric aspirate, or hematochezia thought to originate from upper GI tract.
  3. Has history of cerebrovascular accident or intracranial bleeding of any kind, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, or severe pulmonary hypertension.
  4. Has known history of inherited bleeding or coagulation disorder.
  5. Is, at Screening Visit, using the following anticoagulants: warfarin/coumadin, argatroban, bivalirudin, lepirudin, apixaban, dabigatran, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticlopidine or another anticoagulant agent not specifically listed, or has used heparin, enoxaparin, fondaparinux, or other low molecular weight heparin or antiarrhythmic drugs within 14 days prior to treatment.
  6. Has a history of chronic liver disease such as chronic active viral hepatitis, alcohol-related liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, hemochromatosis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, or hepatitis.
  7. Reports or has known pre-existing renal impairment or chronic kidney disease (defined as Stage 4 or receiving dialysis or hemofiltration).
  8. Has a known allergy or significant adverse reaction to varespladib-methyl or related compounds.
  9. Is considered by the Investigator to be unable to comply with protocol requirements due to geographic considerations, psychiatric disorders, or other compliance concerns.
  10. Is pregnant, has a positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) pregnancy test or not willing to use a highly effective method of for 14 days after initial treatment, or is breast-feeding.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
95 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Varespladib-methyl

    Varespladib-methyl is an immediate-release (IR), oval, white, film-coated tablet at a dosage strength of 250 mg for oral administration. Scaled pediatric doses of varespladib-methyl are supplied as 50 mg IR capsules for oral administration. Adult subjects will receive an initial loading dose of 500 mg (2 × 250 mg oral tablet) varespladib-methyl upon randomization, followed by dosing with 250 mg varespladib-methyl (1 × 250 mg oral tablet) approximately 12 hours later, and subsequent twice daily (BID) dosing with 1 × 250 mg varespladib-methyl oral tablets for the remainder of the 7-day treatment period. Tablets may be administered via naso- or orogastric tubes in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Pediatric subjects (5 to \< 18 years) will be administered doses of varespladib-methyl determined by allometric scaling, provided as 50 mg capsules. Age-appropriate capsules may be administered via naso- or orogastric tubes in patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

    Drug: Varespladib Methyl · Drug: Standard of care (SOC)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    The oral placebo is supplied as a white film-coated oval tablet to match the appearance of the varespladib-methyl 250 mg tablet and contains a subset of the excipients present in the active tablet formulation: lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, and magnesium stearate. Placebo for scaled pediatric dosing is supplied as an immediate-release capsule to match the varespladib-methyl 50 mg capsule, and contains the excipients lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, and magnesium stearate. The dosing of placebo will match that of varespladib-methyl.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Standard of care (SOC)

Interventions

  • Varespladib-methyl (LY333013) is an IR, oval, white, film-coated tablet at a dosage strength of 250 mg for oral administration. Scaled pediatric doses of varespladib-methyl (LY333013) are supplied as 50 mg IR capsules for oral administration.

    Also known as: LY333013

  • DrugPlacebo

    The oral placebo is supplied as a white film-coated oval tablet to match the appearance of the varespladib-methyl 250 mg tablet and contains a subset of the excipients present in the active tablet formulation: lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, and magnesium stearate. Placebo for scaled pediatric dosing is supplied as an IR capsule to match the varespladib-methyl 50 mg capsule, and contains the excipients lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, and magnesium stearate.

  • DrugStandard of care (SOC)

    SOC (including antivenom) will continue to be administered throughout the subject's participation in the study according to the protocol and the judgment of the Investigator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the Combined Pulmonary, Cardiovascular, Hematologic, Nervous System, and Renal Subscores of the Snakebite Severity Score (SSS)

    Change from baseline (pre-dosing) to 6 and 9 hours after the first dose, in the combined pulmonary, cardiovascular, hematologic symptoms, nervous system, and renal subscores of the SSS. The values from each of these subscores will be totaled. The average of the 6- and 9-hour scores will be used as the post-treatment value. The Snakebite Severity Scale (SSS) is a tool used to measure the severity of envenoming based on up to 7 body categories: pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous, and renal system (graded at levels from Grade 0 to Grade 3), local wound, and hematological, (graded at levels from Grade 0 to Grade 4). A higher score indicates worse symptoms. The minimum score for the five item SSS is 0 and the maximum score is 16, with the higher score indicating worse symptoms. For the primary outcome we are focusing only on 5 subscores, that does not include the local wound nor the gastrointestinal subscores.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 and 9 hours after first dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Local Wound, Pulmonary, Cardiovascular, Hematologic Symptoms, Renal, and Nervous System Sections of the SSS

    Baseline (pre-dosing) through Day 7 in the AUC of the local wound, pulmonary, cardiovascular, hematologic symptoms, nervous, and renal system sections of the SSS. The Snakebite Severity Scale (SSS) is a tool used to measure the severity of envenoming based on 7 body categories: pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous, and renal effects (graded at levels from Grade 0 to Grade 3), local wound and hematological, (graded at levels from Grade 0 to Grade 4). A higher score indicates worse symptoms. The maximum score for the SSS is 23. For this outcome, the maximum score is 20 and if this score was present for the entire first week (168 hours) the maximum AUC is 3,370. The minimum AUC is a score of 3 at baseline and a score of 0 at three hours, which gives an AUC of 5.25.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 7

  2. Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a scale that goes from 0 to 10 with 10 being the worst possible pain. This measure is an AUC measure that is calculated from 0 to 48 hours using trapezoidal function in which the mean score for any given 2 periods of time is multiplied by the elapsed duration of time between those two periods. Each of these mean scores are summed to calculate the AUC. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 480.

    Time frame: From Baseline through Day 3

  3. Clinician Global Impression - Improvement

    Clinician Global Impression - Improvement focus on improvement for Day 2. The scale is a 1 to 7 score with 1 indicating very much improved and 7 indicating very much worse.

    Time frame: Day 2

  4. All-cause Mortality

    The number of patients experiencing the event (death). The all-cause mortality will be censored at Day 60.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 28

  5. Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) Score

    PSFS total score on Day 7. The PSFS is a 3-item instrument which assesses functional abilities. The total score ranges from 0 to 10 with a lower score indicating greater functional difficulties.

    Time frame: Day 7

  6. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Score

    Change from baseline (pre-dosing) through Day 28 in NPRS score in patients able to respond pre-dosing through Day 28. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 28

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Investigational Product (IP)

    Adverse events will be assessed from the time of signing informed consent to 28 days after initiating study drug.

    Time frame: 28 Days after the initiation of study drug

07

Results

Posted Jul 1, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVarespladib-methylPlacebo
Started4550
Completed4143
Not completed47
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject43
Withdrew: 1 left ama01
Withdrew: Subject changed hospitals01
Withdrew: Unable to complete due to work01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in the Combined Pulmonary, Cardiovascular, Hematologic, Nervous System, and Renal Subscores of the Snakebite Severity Score (SSS)

Change from baseline (pre-dosing) to 6 and 9 hours after the first dose, in the combined pulmonary, cardiovascular, hematologic symptoms, nervous system, and renal subscores of the SSS. The values from each of these subscores will be totaled. The average of the 6- and 9-hour scores will be used as the post-treatment value. The Snakebite Severity Scale (SSS) is a tool used to measure the severity of envenoming based on up to 7 body categories: pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous, and renal system (graded at levels from Grade 0 to Grade 3), local wound, and hematological, (graded at levels from Grade 0 to Grade 4). A higher score indicates worse symptoms. The minimum score for the five item SSS is 0 and the maximum score is 16, with the higher score indicating worse symptoms. For the primary outcome we are focusing only on 5 subscores, that does not include the local wound nor the gastrointestinal subscores.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 and 9 hours after first dose
Reported as:
Mean · Snakebite Severity Score
Change in the Combined Pulmonary, Cardiovascular, Hematologic, Nervous System, and Renal Subscores of the Snakebite Severity Score (SSS)
Snakebite Severity ScoreVarespladib-methylPlacebo
Change in the Combined Pulmonary, Cardiovascular, Hematologic, Nervous System, and Renal Subscores of the Snakebite Severity Score (SSS)1.1 ± 0.31.5 ± 0.2
SecondaryArea Under the Curve (AUC) of the Local Wound, Pulmonary, Cardiovascular, Hematologic Symptoms, Renal, and Nervous System Sections of the SSS

Baseline (pre-dosing) through Day 7 in the AUC of the local wound, pulmonary, cardiovascular, hematologic symptoms, nervous, and renal system sections of the SSS. The Snakebite Severity Scale (SSS) is a tool used to measure the severity of envenoming based on 7 body categories: pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous, and renal effects (graded at levels from Grade 0 to Grade 3), local wound and hematological, (graded at levels from Grade 0 to Grade 4). A higher score indicates worse symptoms. The maximum score for the SSS is 23. For this outcome, the maximum score is 20 and if this score was present for the entire first week (168 hours) the maximum AUC is 3,370. The minimum AUC is a score of 3 at baseline and a score of 0 at three hours, which gives an AUC of 5.25.

Time frame:
Baseline through Day 7
Reported as:
Mean · Snakebite severity score X hours
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Local Wound, Pulmonary, Cardiovascular, Hematologic Symptoms, Renal, and Nervous System Sections of the SSS
Snakebite severity score X hoursVarespladib-methylPlacebo
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Local Wound, Pulmonary, Cardiovascular, Hematologic Symptoms, Renal, and Nervous System Sections of the SSS421 ± 45430 ± 44
SecondaryArea Under the Curve (AUC) of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a scale that goes from 0 to 10 with 10 being the worst possible pain. This measure is an AUC measure that is calculated from 0 to 48 hours using trapezoidal function in which the mean score for any given 2 periods of time is multiplied by the elapsed duration of time between those two periods. Each of these mean scores are summed to calculate the AUC. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 480.

Time frame:
From Baseline through Day 3
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale * hours
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
scores on a scale * hoursVarespladib-methylPlacebo
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)170 ± 17173 ± 18
SecondaryClinician Global Impression - Improvement

Clinician Global Impression - Improvement focus on improvement for Day 2. The scale is a 1 to 7 score with 1 indicating very much improved and 7 indicating very much worse.

Time frame:
Day 2
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Clinician Global Impression - Improvement
score on a scaleVarespladib-methylPlacebo
Clinician Global Impression - Improvement2.3 ± 0.22.4 ± 0.2
SecondaryAll-cause Mortality

The number of patients experiencing the event (death). The all-cause mortality will be censored at Day 60.

Time frame:
Baseline through Day 28
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All-cause Mortality
ParticipantsVarespladib-methylPlacebo
All-cause Mortality00
SecondaryPatient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) Score

PSFS total score on Day 7. The PSFS is a 3-item instrument which assesses functional abilities. The total score ranges from 0 to 10 with a lower score indicating greater functional difficulties.

Time frame:
Day 7
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) Score
score on a scaleVarespladib-methylPlacebo
Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) Score5.89 ± 0.295.86 ± 0.29
SecondaryNumeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Score

Change from baseline (pre-dosing) through Day 28 in NPRS score in patients able to respond pre-dosing through Day 28. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

Time frame:
Baseline through Day 28
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Score
score on a scaleVarespladib-methylPlacebo
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Score6.4 ± 0.26.1 ± 0.2
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Investigational Product (IP)

Adverse events will be assessed from the time of signing informed consent to 28 days after initiating study drug.

Time frame:
28 Days after the initiation of study drug
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Investigational Product (IP)
ParticipantsVarespladib-methylPlacebo
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Investigational Product (IP)1928

Adverse events

Collected over Death was assessed up to 60 days, all other adverse events were assessed up to 28 Days after initiation of study drug.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Varespladib-methyl0/45 (0%)1/45 (2.2%)19/45 (42.2%)
Placebo0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)28/50 (56%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventVarespladib-methylPlacebo
HypotensionVascular disorders1/450/50
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventVarespladib-methylPlacebo
Abnormal labsBlood and lymphatic system disorders7/457/50
Nausea and vomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/457/50
headacheNervous system disorders2/455/50
InfectionsInfections and infestations2/455/50
Anemia and ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/453/50
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/451/50

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Varespladib-methylPlaceboTotal
<=18 years6410
Between 18 and 65 years334376
>=65 years639
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Varespladib-methylPlaceboTotal
Mean37.6 ± 18.641.9 ± 15.939.9 ± 17.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Varespladib-methylPlaceboTotal
Female101121
Male353974
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Varespladib-methylPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino123
Not Hispanic or Latino414788
Unknown or Not Reported314
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Varespladib-methylPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian303060
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American224
White101727
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported213
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Varespladib-methylPlaceboTotal
United States141933
India313162
08

Study locations

16 sites
  • University of Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • Loma Linda University Medical Center
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
  • University of Florida Health
    Jacksonville, Florida 32209, United States
  • Agusta University Medical Center
    Augusta, Georgia 30912, United States
  • University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
  • LSU LA Poison Control Center
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center - Jackson
    Jackson, Mississippi 39216, United States
  • Duke University Hospital Durham, NC
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Government medical College
    Kozhikode, Calicut, India
  • Father Muller medical College Hospital
    Mangalore, Karnataka 575002, India
  • K R Hospital Mysore medical College and Research Institute
    Mysore, Karnataka, India
  • Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute
    Thrissur, Kerala, India
  • Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research
    Puducherry, Puducherry, India
  • S.P. Medical College Snakebite Research Cell
    Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
  • Calcutta National Medical College
    Kolkata, West Bengal, India
  • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
    Chandigarh, India
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Varespladib. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2011;11(2):137-43. doi: 10.2165/11533650-000000000-00000. PubMed 21446779 ↗
  • Alangode A, Rajan K, Nair BG. Snake antivenom: Challenges and alternate approaches. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;181:114135. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114135. Epub 2020 Jul 3. PubMed 32628928 ↗
  • Albulescu LO, Xie C, Ainsworth S, Alsolaiss J, Crittenden E, Dawson CA, Softley R, Bartlett KE, Harrison RA, Kool J, Casewell NR. A therapeutic combination of two small molecule toxin inhibitors provides broad preclinical efficacy against viper snakebite. Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 15;11(1):6094. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19981-6. PubMed 33323937 ↗
  • Anderson BO, Moore EE, Banerjee A. Phospholipase A2 regulates critical inflammatory mediators of multiple organ failure. J Surg Res. 1994 Feb;56(2):199-205. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1994.1032. PubMed 8121178 ↗
  • Arce-Bejarano R, Lomonte B, Gutierrez JM. Intravascular hemolysis induced by the venom of the Eastern coral snake, Micrurus fulvius, in a mouse model: identification of directly hemolytic phospholipases A2. Toxicon. 2014 Nov;90:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Aug 1. PubMed 25088177 ↗
  • Bittenbinder MA, Zdenek CN, Op den Brouw B, Youngman NJ, Dobson JS, Naude A, Vonk FJ, Fry BG. Coagulotoxic Cobras: Clinical Implications of Strong Anticoagulant Actions of African Spitting Naja Venoms That Are Not Neutralised by Antivenom but Are by LY315920 (Varespladib). Toxins (Basel). 2018 Dec 4;10(12):516. doi: 10.3390/toxins10120516. PubMed 30518149 ↗
  • Bryan-Quiros W, Fernandez J, Gutierrez JM, Lewin MR, Lomonte B. Neutralizing properties of LY315920 toward snake venom group I and II myotoxic phospholipases A2. Toxicon. 2019 Jan;157:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.11.292. Epub 2018 Nov 14. PubMed 30447275 ↗
  • Bulfone TC, Samuel SP, Bickler PE, Lewin MR. Developing Small Molecule Therapeutics for the Initial and Adjunctive Treatment of Snakebite. J Trop Med. 2018 Jul 30;2018:4320175. doi: 10.1155/2018/4320175. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30154870 ↗
  • Chippaux JP. Estimate of the burden of snakebites in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analytic approach. Toxicon. 2011 Mar 15;57(4):586-99. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.12.022. Epub 2011 Jan 9. PubMed 21223975 ↗
  • Fernandez ML, Quartino PY, Arce-Bejarano R, Fernandez J, Camacho LF, Gutierrez JM, Kuemmel D, Fidelio G, Lomonte B. Intravascular hemolysis induced by phospholipases A2 from the venom of the Eastern coral snake, Micrurus fulvius: Functional profiles of hemolytic and non-hemolytic isoforms. Toxicol Lett. 2018 Apr;286:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.11.037. Epub 2017 Nov 29. PubMed 29197624 ↗
  • Fontana Oliveira IC, Gutierrez JM, Lewin MR, Oshima-Franco Y. Varespladib (LY315920) inhibits neuromuscular blockade induced by Oxyuranus scutellatus venom in a nerve-muscle preparation. Toxicon. 2020 Nov;187:101-104. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.08.023. Epub 2020 Sep 2. PubMed 32889027 ↗
  • Gerardo CJ, Vissoci JRN, Evans CS, Simel DL, Lavonas EJ. Does This Patient Have a Severe Snake Envenomation?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review. JAMA Surg. 2019 Apr 1;154(4):346-354. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5069. PubMed 30758508 ↗
  • Gutierrez JM, Calvete JJ, Habib AG, Harrison RA, Williams DJ, Warrell DA. Snakebite envenoming. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Sep 14;3:17063. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.63. PubMed 28905944 ↗
  • Gutierrez JM, Lewin MR, Williams DJ, Lomonte B. Varespladib (LY315920) and Methyl Varespladib (LY333013) Abrogate or Delay Lethality Induced by Presynaptically Acting Neurotoxic Snake Venoms. Toxins (Basel). 2020 Feb 20;12(2):131. doi: 10.3390/toxins12020131. PubMed 32093386 ↗
  • Halilu S, Iliyasu G, Hamza M, Chippaux JP, Kuznik A, Habib AG. Snakebite burden in Sub-Saharan Africa: estimates from 41 countries. Toxicon. 2019 Mar 1;159:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 27. PubMed 30594637 ↗
  • Kazandjian TD, Petras D, Robinson SD, van Thiel J, Greene HW, Arbuckle K, Barlow A, Carter DA, Wouters RM, Whiteley G, Wagstaff SC, Arias AS, Albulescu LO, Plettenberg Laing A, Hall C, Heap A, Penrhyn-Lowe S, McCabe CV, Ainsworth S, da Silva RR, Dorrestein PC, Richardson MK, Gutierrez JM, Calvete JJ, Harrison RA, Vetter I, Undheim EAB, Wuster W, Casewell NR. Convergent evolution of pain-inducing defensive venom components in spitting cobras. Science. 2021 Jan 22;371(6527):386-390. doi: 10.1126/science.abb9303. PubMed 33479150 ↗
  • Le Geyt J, Pach S, Gutierrez JM, Habib AG, Maduwage KP, Hardcastle TC, Hernandez Diaz R, Avila-Aguero ML, Ya KT, Williams D, Halbert J. Paediatric snakebite envenoming: recognition and management of cases. Arch Dis Child. 2021 Jan;106(1):14-19. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319428. Epub 2020 Oct 28. PubMed 33115713 ↗
  • Lewin M, Samuel S, Merkel J, Bickler P. Varespladib (LY315920) Appears to Be a Potent, Broad-Spectrum, Inhibitor of Snake Venom Phospholipase A2 and a Possible Pre-Referral Treatment for Envenomation. Toxins (Basel). 2016 Aug 25;8(9):248. doi: 10.3390/toxins8090248. PubMed 27571102 ↗
  • Lewin MR, Gilliam LL, Gilliam J, Samuel SP, Bulfone TC, Bickler PE, Gutierrez JM. Delayed LY333013 (Oral) and LY315920 (Intravenous) Reverse Severe Neurotoxicity and Rescue Juvenile Pigs from Lethal Doses of Micrurus fulvius (Eastern Coral Snake) Venom. Toxins (Basel). 2018 Nov 17;10(11):479. doi: 10.3390/toxins10110479. PubMed 30453607 ↗
  • Lewin MR, Gutierrez JM, Samuel SP, Herrera M, Bryan-Quiros W, Lomonte B, Bickler PE, Bulfone TC, Williams DJ. Delayed Oral LY333013 Rescues Mice from Highly Neurotoxic, Lethal Doses of Papuan Taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus) Venom. Toxins (Basel). 2018 Sep 20;10(10):380. doi: 10.3390/toxins10100380. PubMed 30241297 ↗
  • Longbottom J, Shearer FM, Devine M, Alcoba G, Chappuis F, Weiss DJ, Ray SE, Ray N, Warrell DA, Ruiz de Castaneda R, Williams DJ, Hay SI, Pigott DM. Vulnerability to snakebite envenoming: a global mapping of hotspots. Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):673-684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31224-8. Epub 2018 Jul 17. PubMed 30017551 ↗
  • Pach S, Le Geyt J, Gutierrez JM, Williams D, Maduwage KP, Habib AG, Gustin R, Avila-Aguero ML, Ya KT, Halbert J. Paediatric snakebite envenoming: the world's most neglected 'Neglected Tropical Disease'? Arch Dis Child. 2020 Dec;105(12):1135-1139. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319417. Epub 2020 Sep 30. PubMed 32998874 ↗
  • PARRISH HM. SNAKE VENENATION IN ILLINOIS. IMJ Ill Med J. 1965 Jun;127:671-7. No abstract available. PubMed 14295634 ↗
  • Prasarnpun S, Walsh J, Awad SS, Harris JB. Envenoming bites by kraits: the biological basis of treatment-resistant neuromuscular paralysis. Brain. 2005 Dec;128(Pt 12):2987-96. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh642. Epub 2005 Sep 29. PubMed 16195243 ↗
  • Ruha AM, Kleinschmidt KC, Greene S, Spyres MB, Brent J, Wax P, Padilla-Jones A, Campleman S; ToxIC Snakebite Study Group. The Epidemiology, Clinical Course, and Management of Snakebites in the North American Snakebite Registry. J Med Toxicol. 2017 Dec;13(4):309-320. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0633-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3. PubMed 28975491 ↗
  • Salvador GHM, Gomes AAS, Bryan-Quiros W, Fernandez J, Lewin MR, Gutierrez JM, Lomonte B, Fontes MRM. Structural basis for phospholipase A2-like toxin inhibition by the synthetic compound Varespladib (LY315920). Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 20;9(1):17203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53755-5. PubMed 31748642 ↗
  • Sankar J, Nabeel R, Sankar MJ, Priyambada L, Mahadevan S. Factors affecting outcome in children with snake envenomation: a prospective observational study. Arch Dis Child. 2013 Aug;98(8):596-601. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303025. Epub 2013 May 28. PubMed 23716133 ↗
  • Schulte J, Domanski K, Smith EA, Menendez A, Kleinschmidt KC, Roth BA. Childhood Victims of Snakebites: 2000-2013. Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5):e20160491. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0491. PubMed 27940763 ↗
  • Seifert SA, Boyer LV, Benson BE, Rogers JJ. AAPCC database characterization of native U.S. venomous snake exposures, 2001-2005. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009 Apr;47(4):327-35. doi: 10.1080/15563650902870277. PubMed 19514880 ↗
  • Snyder DW, Bach NJ, Dillard RD, Draheim SE, Carlson DG, Fox N, Roehm NW, Armstrong CT, Chang CH, Hartley LW, Johnson LM, Roman CR, Smith AC, Song M, Fleisch JH. Pharmacology of LY315920/S-5920, [[3-(aminooxoacetyl)-2-ethyl-1- (phenylmethyl)-1H-indol-4-yl]oxy] acetate, a potent and selective secretory phospholipase A2 inhibitor: A new class of anti-inflammatory drugs, SPI. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Mar;288(3):1117-24. PubMed 10027849 ↗
  • Sorensen J, Kald B, Tagesson C, Lindahl M. Platelet-activating factor and phospholipase A2 in patients with septic shock and trauma. Intensive Care Med. 1994 Nov;20(8):555-61. doi: 10.1007/BF01705721. PubMed 7706567 ↗
  • Tasoulis T, Isbister GK. A Review and Database of Snake Venom Proteomes. Toxins (Basel). 2017 Sep 18;9(9):290. doi: 10.3390/toxins9090290. PubMed 28927001 ↗
  • Uhl W, Beger HG, Hoffmann G, Hanisch E, Schild A, Waydhas C, Entholzner E, Muller K, Kellermann W, Vogeser M, et al. A multicenter study of phospholipase A2 in patients in intensive care units. J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Mar;180(3):323-31. PubMed 7874343 ↗
  • Vaiyapuri S, Vaiyapuri R, Ashokan R, Ramasamy K, Nattamaisundar K, Jeyaraj A, Chandran V, Gajjeraman P, Baksh MF, Gibbins JM, Hutchinson EG. Snakebite and its socio-economic impact on the rural population of Tamil Nadu, India. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 21;8(11):e80090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080090. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24278244 ↗
  • Williams DJ, Faiz MA, Abela-Ridder B, Ainsworth S, Bulfone TC, Nickerson AD, Habib AG, Junghanss T, Fan HW, Turner M, Harrison RA, Warrell DA. Strategy for a globally coordinated response to a priority neglected tropical disease: Snakebite envenoming. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Feb 21;13(2):e0007059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007059. eCollection 2019 Feb. No abstract available. PubMed 30789906 ↗
  • Xie C, Albulescu LO, Bittenbinder MA, Somsen GW, Vonk FJ, Casewell NR, Kool J. Neutralizing Effects of Small Molecule Inhibitors and Metal Chelators on Coagulopathic Viperinae Snake Venom Toxins. Biomedicines. 2020 Aug 20;8(9):297. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8090297. PubMed 32825484 ↗
  • Zinenko O, Tovstukha I, Korniyenko Y. PLA2 Inhibitor Varespladib as an Alternative to the Antivenom Treatment for Bites from Nikolsky's Viper Vipera berus nikolskii. Toxins (Basel). 2020 May 29;12(6):356. doi: 10.3390/toxins12060356. PubMed 32485836 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2021 to primary completion in Jun 2023, 21 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2025, 2 years after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 30, 2021
First posted
Aug 9, 2021
StartActual
Aug 15, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jun 7, 2023
CompletionActual
Jun 8, 2023
Results first posted
Jul 1, 2025
Last update
Jul 1, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04996264
Lead sponsor
Ophirex, Inc.
Collaborators
Premier Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 9, 2021
Start date
Aug 15, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 7, 2023
Completion
Jun 8, 2023
Results posted
Jul 1, 2025
Last update
Jul 1, 2025

Study contacts

Matthew Lewin, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Ophirex, Inc.
Timothy F Platts-Mills, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Ophirex, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Varespladib methyl

Start the discussion