CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05702593Updated Feb 9, 2023

Immediate Effects of Hamstring Stretching Alone or Combined With Myofascial Release

An interventional study of Static stretching and Myofascial Release in Hamstring Injury, Masseter and Myofascial Release, sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-09.

Sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2023), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2022, registered Jan 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To assess the immediate effects of hamstring stretching alone or combined with myofascial release of the hamstring muscle on masseter muscle activity, pressure pain threshold, active mouth opening, hamstring flexibility, and forward head flexed posture in recreationally active participants. The young, healthy, recreationally active adults aged 18-25 years were included in the study. The participants were randomly separated into two groups of equal number. Static stretching alone was applied to one group and this was combined with myofascial release techniques (SSMR) for the other group. Masseter muscle activity was assessed using a NORAXON® surface electromyography device. Both pre-and post-intervention, mechanical pressure algometer was used to measure the pressure pain threshold, hamstring flexibility was evaluated using the maximum hip flexion and active knee extension test, the maximum mouth opening (MMO) was measured with the millimetric ruler, and forward flexed posture was evaluated using the tragus to wall distance test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hamstring Injury
  • Masseter
  • Myofascial Release
  • Stretching
  • Surface EMG
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
03

In context

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

609 studies on the registry are indexed under Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; 160 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 46 across 434 interventional studies indexed under Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.

Browse Temporomandibular Joint Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University is the lead sponsor of 228 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals who had no previous hamstring injury
  • Individuals had a Straight Leg Raise test \<80°
  • Individuals had a pressure-pain threshold difference between two symmetrical points not exceeding 2 kg/cm2
  • Individuals who had no previous hamstring injury had no deviation during mouth opening and closing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute low back pain or musculoskeletal pain in the lower extremities
  • recent spinal surgery
  • previous whiplash injury
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Surface EMG Data Collection

    For each subject, EMG activity was recorded from the left and right superficial masseter muscles using a multichannel EMG device.The EMG recordings were obtained with three repetitions during mandibular rest, and maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) in intercuspation (isometry) pre and post-treatment. The EMG data were recorded for 5 seconds, and three trials with 30 seconds of rest between contractions were performed \[Tosato, SENIAM\].

    Procedure: Static stretching · Procedure: Myofascial Release

  • Other
    Pressure pain threshold

    The pressure pain threshold was measured using a mechanical pressure algometer (model Baseline® Dolorimeters - Fabrication Enterprises Inc) with a contact head of 1 cm2 area.

    Procedure: Static stretching · Procedure: Myofascial Release

  • Other
    Maximum Active Mouth Opening (MMO)

    A tape measure was used to determine the maximum active mouth opening (MMO).

    Procedure: Static stretching · Procedure: Myofascial Release

  • Other
    Hamstring Flexibility

    The Maximal Hip Flexion Active Knee Extension (MHFAKE) Test, which is an adapted active knee extension test, was performed to evaluate the hamstring flexibility of the participant.

    Procedure: Static stretching · Procedure: Myofascial Release

  • Other
    Tragus Wall Distance

    Tragus wall distance measurement was used to evaluate spinal mobility.

    Procedure: Static stretching · Procedure: Myofascial Release

  • Experimental
    Static stretching

    The participant was positioned supine for static stretching to be applied to the hamstring muscles

    Procedure: Static stretching

  • Experimental
    Myofascial Release

    For hamstring muscles, the participants were asked to assume a long sitting position on a firm, flat surface with their arms behind their backs and their body weight on their palms.

    Procedure: Myofascial Release

Interventions

  • ProcedureStatic stretching

    The participant was positioned supine for static stretching to be applied to the hamstring muscles. The physiotherapist flexed the participant's hip to the point where resistance to the movement was first observed, with the knee extended.At this point, after waiting for 40 seconds, it was returned to the previous position. This application was made on both sides \[Bretischwerdt\]. The technique was repeated three times, with a 15-second rest interval between each repetition.

  • ProcedureMyofascial Release

    For hamstring muscles, the participants were asked to assume a long sitting position on a firm, flat surface with their arms behind their backs and their body weight on their palms. A foam roller was placed under the hamstring muscles and slowly moved the tuberositas ischii popliteus back and forth with pressure for 4 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. superficial masseter muscles EMG activity

    For each subject, EMG activity was recorded from the left and right superficial masseter muscles using a multichannel EMG device.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Pressure pain threshold

    The pressure pain threshold was measured using a mechanical pressure algometer (model Baseline® Dolorimeters - Fabrication Enterprises Inc) with a contact head of 1 cm2 area.The participant was positioned lying supine while the pressure pain threshold of the masseter muscle's central trigger point was assessed on both sides. Pressure was applied perpendicular to the masseter, gradually and continuously at a rate of about 1 kg/cm/s. The participants were requested to let the examiner know as soon as pain started to be felt. With a 2-min rest period between each experiment, three pressure pain threshold measures were taken. The average value of the three trials was calculated and used in the analysis.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Maximum Active Mouth Opening

    A tape measure was used to determine the maximum active mouth opening (MMO). The participants were measured while laying flat on their back with the head resting on a table, the cervical spine in a neutral position, the knees slightly bent, and the upper limbs lying parallel to the torso. The subjects were instructed to open the mouth as wide as possible without inflicting discomfort. The distance between the upper and lower central incisors was measured and recorded in millimetres. For the primary analysis, the mean value of three trials was calculated.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Hamstring Flexibility

    The Maximal Hip Flexion Active Knee Extension (MHFAKE) Test, which is an adapted active knee extension test, was performed to evaluate the hamstring flexibility of the participant. The subject was instructed to keep the hip in maximal flexion by clutching the thigh to the chest, with the hands holding the opposite elbows, and then to actively extend the knee until reaching the point of maximal tolerable stretch of the hamstring muscle or the point where pain was reported. The contralateral leg was fixed by the clinician. The angle of inclination of the mid-shin was measured at the endpoint of maximal stretch with the handheld inclinometer.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  5. Tragus Wall Distance

    Tragus wall distance measurement was used to evaluate spinal mobility. The participants were instructed to stand with their feet shoulder-width apart, and heels, hips, and shoulders against the wall. Then, before each measurement, the participants were asked to "stand with good posture, look straight ahead, and hold this position until the measurement is taken". The participants were then told to take a self-selected position for the head and neck that reflected their perception of "good posture". The distance between the tragus and the wall was measured and the participant was repositioned away from the wall before each measurement

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Caglar Soylu
    Ankara, Keçiören 06010, Turkey
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05702593
Lead sponsor
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Responsible party
caglar soylu (Assistant Professor, Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2023
Start date
Jul 22, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 22, 2023
Completion
Feb 20, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 9, 2023

Study contacts

Caglar Soylu, PhD
Contact
caglar.soylu@sbu.edu.tr
+905078593595

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion