CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05701748Updated Jan 29, 2025

EEG to Monitor Propofol Anesthetic Depth in Infants and Toddlers

An interventional study of Stimuli in Electroencephalography Spectral Edge Frequency and Anesthetic Depth, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Months to 24 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-29.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Months to 24 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is monitor anesthetic depth of children undergoing propofol anesthesia using electroencephalography (EEG). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. EEG spectral edge frequency (SEF95) readings where 50% of patients do not respond to three stimuli.
  2. The propofol blood concentration that corresponds to each of the three EEG SEF95 readings Participants will undergo EEG monitoring, stimuli (placement of oral pacifier, electrical stimulation, and laryngoscopy), and blood collection.
Read the detailed description

Sevoflurane inhalation and propofol intravenous anesthesia are the mainstays of delivering general anesthesia in children. Propofol anesthesia in children is gaining popularity due to fewer respiratory complications, less post-operative nausea vomiting and emergence delirium, compared to sevoflurane. However, unlike sevoflurane, the pharmacodynamics of propofol is less studied in infants and toddlers, particularly the biomarker for propofol brain effect site concentration (Ce), indicative of anesthetic depth. The lack of a real-time biomarker often results in over- or under-dosing of propofol in clinical practice. The goal of this study is to utilize electroencephalography (EEG) as the biomarker of propofol effect site concentration and clinical anesthetic depth, thereby improving the safety and efficacy of propofol anesthesia in this population. In infants and toddlers receiving propofol anesthesia, EEG will be recorded while the patient undergoes three stimuli used to assess anesthetic depth (placement of oral pacifier, electrical stimulation, and laryngoscopy). The EEG index (spectral edge frequency-SEF95) where 50% of patients (ED50) do not respond to each of the three stimuli will be determined as the biomarker of propofol clinical anesthetic depth. In the same cohort, the regression between EEG SEF95 and plasma propofol levels will be determined to assess relationship between EEG SEF95 and propofol Ce.

02

Conditions studied

  • Electroencephalography Spectral Edge Frequency
  • Anesthetic Depth
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is the lead sponsor of 480 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Months to 24 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children 3 to 24 month old undergoing surgery.
  2. Planned laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation or laryngeal mask airway (LMA) placement for clinical care.
  3. Planned propofol anesthesia for anesthesia maintenance.
  4. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA ) \< III.
  5. Muscle relaxant not indicated per planned clinical care for laryngoscopy/intubation or LMA.
  6. Anticipated surgery duration approximately \< 2h40min

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients undergoing emergency surgery.
  2. Known severe neurological disease which might result in abnormal EEG SEF.
  3. Deformities of forehead (difficult EEG sensor placement).
  4. Known difficult airway.
  5. Allergy to propofol.
  6. Attending anesthesiologist on record caring for patient plans to administer additional IV medication besides propofol during study phase.
  7. Currently on anti-seizure medication (might alter propofol pharmacodynamics).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EEG SEF95 values in response to stimuli

    EEG SEF95 values that correspond to the three stimuli being applied, separately enrolled and analyzed for the 3-12mo and 13-24 age groups.

    Other: Stimuli

Interventions

  • OtherStimuli

    placement of oral pacifier, electrical stimulation, and laryngoscopy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. EEG SEF95 value where 50% of infants do not respond to placement of oral pacifier

    Observation in OR and EEG data analysis

    Time frame: Once SEF95 stabilizes at oral pacifier target SEF95 +/- 1Hz for at least one minute

  2. EEG SEF95 value where 50% of infants do not respond to electrical stimulation

    Observation in OR and EEG data analysis

    Time frame: Once SEF95 stabilizes at electrical stimulation target SEF95 +/- 1Hz for at least one minute

  3. EEG SEF95 value where 50% of infants do not respond to laryngoscopy

    Observation in OR and EEG data analysis

    Time frame: Once SEF95 stabilizes at laryngoscopy target SEF95 +/- 1Hz for at least one minute

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation of propofol blood concentration with EEG SEF95

    Blood collection and testing

    Time frame: Once SEF95 stabilizes for at least one minute

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brioni JD, Varughese S, Ahmed R, Bein B. A clinical review of inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane: from early research to emerging topics. J Anesth. 2017 Oct;31(5):764-778. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2375-6. Epub 2017 Jun 5. PubMed 28585095 ↗
  • Chidambaran V, Costandi A, D'Mello A. Propofol: a review of its role in pediatric anesthesia and sedation. CNS Drugs. 2015 Jul;29(7):543-63. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0259-6. Erratum In: CNS Drugs. 2018 Sep;32(9):873. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0561-1. PubMed 26290263 ↗
  • Morse J, Hannam JA, Cortinez LI, Allegaert K, Anderson BJ. A manual propofol infusion regimen for neonates and infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Sep;29(9):907-914. doi: 10.1111/pan.13706. Epub 2019 Aug 12. PubMed 31325395 ↗
  • Sepulveda P, Cortinez LI, Saez C, Penna A, Solari S, Guerra I, Absalom AR. Performance evaluation of paediatric propofol pharmacokinetic models in healthy young children. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;107(4):593-600. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer198. Epub 2011 Jul 9. PubMed 21743068 ↗
  • Oberer C, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Frei FJ, Erb TO. Respiratory reflex responses of the larynx differ between sevoflurane and propofol in pediatric patients. Anesthesiology. 2005 Dec;103(6):1142-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200512000-00007. PubMed 16306725 ↗
  • Chandler JR, Myers D, Mehta D, Whyte E, Groberman MK, Montgomery CJ, Ansermino JM. Emergence delirium in children: a randomized trial to compare total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil to inhalational sevoflurane anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Apr;23(4):309-15. doi: 10.1111/pan.12090. PubMed 23464658 ↗
  • Sneyd JR, Carr A, Byrom WD, Bilski AJ. A meta-analysis of nausea and vomiting following maintenance of anaesthesia with propofol or inhalational agents. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998 Jul;15(4):433-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1998.00319.x. PubMed 9699101 ↗
  • Sarner JB, Levine M, Davis PJ, Lerman J, Cook DR, Motoyama EK. Clinical characteristics of sevoflurane in children. A comparison with halothane. Anesthesiology. 1995 Jan;82(1):38-46. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199501000-00006. PubMed 7832332 ↗
  • Lerman J, Sikich N, Kleinman S, Yentis S. The pharmacology of sevoflurane in infants and children. Anesthesiology. 1994 Apr;80(4):814-24. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199404000-00014. PubMed 8024136 ↗
  • Kim TK, Niklewski PJ, Martin JF, Obara S, Egan TD. Enhancing a sedation score to include truly noxious stimulation: the Extended Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (EOAA/S). Br J Anaesth. 2015 Oct;115(4):569-77. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev306. PubMed 26385665 ↗
  • Fuentes R, Cortinez I, Ibacache M, Concha M, Munoz H. Propofol concentration to induce general anesthesia in children aged 3-11 years with the Kataria effect-site model. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Jun;25(6):554-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12657. Epub 2015 Apr 16. PubMed 25880448 ↗
  • Xu T, Kurth CD, Yuan I, Vutskits L, Zhu T. An approach to using pharmacokinetics and electroencephalography for propofol anesthesia for surgery in infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2020 Dec;30(12):1299-1307. doi: 10.1111/pan.14021. Epub 2020 Oct 28. PubMed 32965066 ↗
  • Purdon PL, Sampson A, Pavone KJ, Brown EN. Clinical Electroencephalography for Anesthesiologists: Part I: Background and Basic Signatures. Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;123(4):937-60. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000841. PubMed 26275092 ↗
  • Chan MTV, Hedrick TL, Egan TD, Garcia PS, Koch S, Purdon PL, Ramsay MA, Miller TE, McEvoy MD, Gan TJ; Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) 6 Workgroup. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on the Role of Neuromonitoring in Perioperative Outcomes: Electroencephalography. Anesth Analg. 2020 May;130(5):1278-1291. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004502. PubMed 31764163 ↗
  • Yuan I, Xu T, Skowno J, Zhang B, Davidson A, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Sommerfield D, Zhang J, Song X, Zhang M, Zhao P, Liu H, Jiang Y, Zuo Y, de Graaff JC, Vutskits L, Olbrecht VA, Szmuk P, Kurth CD; BRAIN Collaborative Investigators. Isoelectric Electroencephalography in Infants and Toddlers during Anesthesia for Surgery: An International Observational Study. Anesthesiology. 2022 Aug 1;137(2):187-200. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004262. PubMed 35503999 ↗
  • FDA. Propofol FDA https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/019627s062lbl.pdf. Accessed
  • Yuan I, Xu T, Kurth CD. Using Electroencephalography (EEG) to Guide Propofol and Sevoflurane Dosing in Pediatric Anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin. 2020 Sep;38(3):709-725. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2020.06.007. PubMed 32792193 ↗
  • Hayashi K, Shigemi K, Sawa T. Neonatal electroencephalography shows low sensitivity to anesthesia. Neurosci Lett. 2012 May 31;517(2):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.04.028. Epub 2012 Apr 19. PubMed 22542892 ↗
  • Davidson AJ, Wong A, Knottenbelt G, Sheppard S, Donath S, Frawley G. MAC-awake of sevoflurane in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Aug;18(8):702-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02664.x. PubMed 18613929 ↗
  • Zbinden AM, Maggiorini M, Petersen-Felix S, Lauber R, Thomson DA, Minder CE. Anesthetic depth defined using multiple noxious stimuli during isoflurane/oxygen anesthesia. I. Motor reactions. Anesthesiology. 1994 Feb;80(2):253-60. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199402000-00004. PubMed 8311307 ↗
  • Inomata S, Kihara S, Yaguchi Y, Baba Y, Kohda Y, Toyooka H. Reduction in standard MAC and MAC for intubation after clonidine premedication in children. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Nov;85(5):700-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.5.700. PubMed 11094583 ↗
  • Dixon W. The up-and-down method for small samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1965;60(312):967-978.
  • Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jul;107(1):144-52. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267514.42592.2a. PubMed 17585226 ↗
  • Gorges M, Zhou G, Brant R, Ansermino JM. Sequential allocation trial design in anesthesia: an introduction to methods, modeling, and clinical applications. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Mar;27(3):240-247. doi: 10.1111/pan.13088. Epub 2017 Feb 17. PubMed 28211193 ↗
  • Kataria BK, Ved SA, Nicodemus HF, Hoy GR, Lea D, Dubois MY, Mandema JW, Shafer SL. The pharmacokinetics of propofol in children using three different data analysis approaches. Anesthesiology. 1994 Jan;80(1):104-22. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199401000-00018. PubMed 8291699 ↗
  • Coppens MJ, Eleveld DJ, Proost JH, Marks LA, Van Bocxlaer JF, Vereecke H, Absalom AR, Struys MM. An evaluation of using population pharmacokinetic models to estimate pharmacodynamic parameters for propofol and bispectral index in children. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jul;115(1):83-93. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821a8d80. PubMed 21555936 ↗
  • Absalom A, Amutike D, Lal A, White M, Kenny GN. Accuracy of the 'Paedfusor' in children undergoing cardiac surgery or catheterization. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Oct;91(4):507-13. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg220. PubMed 14504151 ↗
  • Rigouzzo A, Girault L, Louvet N, Servin F, De-Smet T, Piat V, Seeman R, Murat I, Constant I. The relationship between bispectral index and propofol during target-controlled infusion anesthesia: a comparative study between children and young adults. Anesth Analg. 2008 Apr;106(4):1109-16, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318164f388. PubMed 18349180 ↗
  • Sahinovic MM, Struys MMRF, Absalom AR. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Dec;57(12):1539-1558. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0672-3. PubMed 30019172 ↗
  • Olbrecht VA, Jiang Y, Viola L, Walter CM, Liu H, Kurth CD. Characterization of the functional near-infrared spectroscopy response to nociception in a pediatric population. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Feb;28(2):103-111. doi: 10.1111/pan.13301. Epub 2017 Dec 27. PubMed 29280254 ↗
  • Hammer GB, Litalien C, Wellis V, Drover DR. Determination of the median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2001;11(5):549-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00731.x. PubMed 11696118 ↗
  • Yuan I, Landis WP, Topjian AA, Abend NS, Lang SS, Huh JW, Kirschen MP, Mensinger JL, Zhang B, Kurth CD. Prevalence of Isoelectric Electroencephalography Events in Infants and Young Children Undergoing General Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):462-471. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004221. PubMed 31107263 ↗
  • Disma N, Veyckemans F, Virag K, Hansen TG, Becke K, Harlet P, Vutskits L, Walker SM, de Graaff JC, Zielinska M, Simic D, Engelhardt T, Habre W; NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network; Austria; Belgium; Croatia; Czech Republic; Denmark; Estonia; Finland; France; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Ireland; Italy; Latvia; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Malta; Netherlands; Norway; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Switzerland; Turkey; Ukraine; United Kingdom. Morbidity and mortality after anaesthesia in early life: results of the European prospective multicentre observational study, neonate and children audit of anaesthesia practice in Europe (NECTARINE). Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jun;126(6):1157-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Apr 1. PubMed 33812668 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 11, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 22, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05701748
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2023
Start date
Feb 3, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Jan 1, 2025
Last update
Jan 29, 2025

Study contacts

Ian Yuan, MD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion