ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05697562Updated Dec 18, 2025

Evaluation of Superior Rectal Arterial Embolization in Hemorrhoidal Disease

An interventional study of Rubber band ligatures (RBL) and Superior Rectal Artery Embolization (SRAE) in Hemorrhoids, sponsored by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel. Recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-18.

Sponsored by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

SRAE is a promising treatment of bleeding HD as a minimally invasive approach without sphincter damage nor direct mucosal anorectal trauma. Feasibility, efficacy and safety were studied in several trials. A randomized controlled study should confirm the benefits of this technique and will define its therapeutic role in HD.

Embolization and DG-HAL are based on the same concept of vascular occlusion of hemorrhoidal branches of the rectal artery. Furthermore, DG-HAL and RBL are equally effective procedures. The assumption is that treatment with SRAE is not inferior in comparison to RBL or DG HAL in respectively patients without or with antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy in terms of symptom control and bleeding (non-inferiority study).

Read the detailed description

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the most common anorectal pathology. Therapeutic management of HD ranges from conservative treatment and instrumental treatment to surgical approach. Beside these, certain minimally invasive techniques such as radiofrequency ablation, laser coagulation and Superior Rectal Artery Embolization (SRAE) are gaining interest. SRAE is a promising treatment of bleeding HD as a minimally invasive approach without sphincter damage nor direct mucosal anorectal trauma. Feasibility, efficacy and safety were studied in several trials. A randomized controlled study should confirm the benefits of this technique and will define its therapeutic role in HD. Embolization and DG-HAL are based on the same concept of vascular occlusion of hemorrhoidal branches of the rectal artery. Furthermore, DG-HAL and RBL are equally effective procedures. The assumption is that treatment with SRAE is not inferior in comparison to RBL or DG HAL in respectively patients without or with antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy in terms of symptom control and bleeding (non-inferiority study).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemorrhoids

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hemorrhoids

238 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhoids; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 100 across 183 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhoids.

Browse Hemorrhoids studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel is the lead sponsor of 375 studies on the registry; 107 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients referred for Hemorrhoidal disease with bleeding are eligible. Significant bleeding is defined as a HBS of ≥ 5.
  • Age > 18 years old;
  • Sexes eligible for study: all
  • Hemorrhoidal disease grade I-III according the Goligher classification with rectal bleeding as predominant symptom
  • History of prior instrumental treatment of HD does not prohibit inclusion
  • Able to understand and read Dutch, French or English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Permanent hemorrhoidal prolapse/grade IV hemorrhoidal disease
  • Rectal prolapse
  • History of proctological surgery for HD
  • Acute complicated course of HD i.e. acute thrombosis (fluxio hemorrhoidalis or perianal hematoma)
  • Anal stenosis, congenital of acquired
  • Chronic anal fissure
  • Active rectal inflammation, including peri-anal abscess (e.g. Inflammatory Bowel Disease, infectious,…)
  • History of colorectal or anal cancer
  • History of rectal or sigmoidal resection
  • Portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis C
  • Radiation rectitis
  • Neurological disease involving anal sphincter musculature
  • Severe psychiatric disorder
  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy to iodinated contrast agents
  • Colorectal neoplasia as the cause of bleeding (excluded with a (virtual) colonoscopy in the last year)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    anticoagulation group with DG HAL

    Procedure: Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (DG-HAL)

  • Active comparator
    anticoagulation group with SRAE

    Procedure: Superior Rectal Artery Embolization (SRAE)

  • Placebo comparator
    no anticoagulation group with RBL

    Procedure: Rubber band ligatures (RBL)

  • Active comparator
    no anticoagulation group with SRAE

    Procedure: Superior Rectal Artery Embolization (SRAE)

Interventions

  • ProcedureRubber band ligatures (RBL)

    This instrumental technique is realized during consultation. A rubber band is applied on top of each hemorrhoidal complex via a proctoscope. This banding causes an ulceration which heals with resulting fibrosis. The patient can receive a maximum of 3 RBL during each session, which can be repeated up to 3 times at a 6 weeks interval.

  • ProcedureSuperior Rectal Artery Embolization (SRAE)

    This technique is realized under local anesthesia during a one-day hospitalization. The interventional radiologist will perform the procedure in the angiography room. After local anesthesia right femoral artery puncture is performed and a 4 F or 5 F introducer sheath is placed using the Seldinger technique. With an appropriate 4 or 5 F catheter the superior rectal artery is catheterized. With a microcatheter the different branches are selectively occluded with microcoils. The endpoint of embolization is reached when all SRA branches above the pubic ramus are embolized, with cessation of flow distally or a static column of contrast. The procedure can be repeated with addition of the embolization of the middle rectal wall artery (MRA) in case of failure after 12 weeks.

  • ProcedureDoppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (DG-HAL)

    The procedure is performed in lithotomy position with a modified proctoscope including a Doppler transducer (THD device) under anesthesia during a one-day hospitalization. This transanal Doppler guidance enables accurate detection and targeted suture ligation of the SRAs Following gel lubrication, the proctoscope is inserted through the anal canal reaching the low rectum, about 6-7 cm from the anal verge. After identification of the best place for artery ligation, the Doppler system is turned off. The artery will be directly ligated with a Z-stitch at the site of the best Doppler signal.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. symptom control

    the main objective is to control the symptoms, for this the Hemorrhoidal Bleeding Score is to be used

    Time frame: from baseline to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptom control

    a secondary objective is to control the symptoms, for this the Hemorrhoidal Bleeding Score is to be used

    Time frame: from baseline to 12 months

  2. Patient reported effectiveness

    a secondary objective is to report patient effectiveness, this will be measured using Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Haemorrhoidal Impact and Satisfaction score (PROM-HISS)

    Time frame: from baseline till 12 months

  3. Patient reported effectiveness

    a secondary objective is to report patient effectiveness, this will be measured using the 5-level EQ-5D-5L score

    Time frame: from baseline till 12 months

  4. clinical effectiveness

    a secondary objective is to report clinical effectiveness, this will be measured using the Goligher score

    Time frame: from baseline till 12 months

  5. prevalence of complications

    a secondary objective is to report the prevalence of complications, this will be measured using among others the pain score reported by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: from baseline till 12 months

  6. prevalence of re-interventions

    a secondary objective is to report the prevalence of re-interventions, this will be measured among others with the pain score reported by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: from baseline till 12 months

  7. prevalence of fecal incontinence

    a secondary objective is to report the prevalence of fecal incontinence, this will be measured using the Jorge-wexner score

    Time frame: from baseline till 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2030, 90 months after the start.

Of 65 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hemorrhoids, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 90 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 70 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 21, 2022
First posted
Jan 26, 2023
StartActual
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
Last update
Dec 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05697562
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2023
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 18, 2025

Study contacts

Magali Surmont
Contact
magali.surmont@uzbrussel.be
+32 2 477 ext. 60 01
Virgini Van Buggenhout
Contact
virgini.vanbuggenhout@uzbrussel.be
+32 2 477 ext. 50 14

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion