ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05696912RIDUpdated Feb 21, 2024

Functional Tests to Resolve Unsolved Rare Diseases. Rares.

An interventional study of Ex-vivo approach concerning 25 patients and In-vitro approach concerning 25 patients in Intellectual Disability, Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome and Cystic Fibrosis, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-21.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2025, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rares diseases are a heterogeneous group of conditions which need important tools for diagnosis.

The use of high-throughput sequencing is able to diagnose half of the patients. For the other part it is impossible to conclude due to the presence of variants of unknown significance (VOUS). Functional analysis are needed to bring strong argument to reclassify variants as pathogenic or benign. The main objective is to evaluate the diagnosis yield of this strategy.

Read the detailed description

The main objective is the improvement of the diagnosis of rare genetic diseases. The investigator lab is expert for diagnosis of some rare diseases such as neurodevelopmental disorder, albinism, cystic fibrosis and congenital heart defect. Actually with implementation of high-throughput sequencing for diagnosis, a high number of genetic variants are found and need to be interpretated. The ACMG classification is used to classify variants with argument of variant frequency, predicted effect on protein and in-silico prediction. Functional evidence is a strong argument to help classify VOUS. The investigators propose the use of RNA-Seq, minigene and luciferase assay for study of VOUS to bring argument to classify them as benign or pathogenic.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intellectual Disability
  • Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome
  • Cystic Fibrosis
  • Congenital Heart Defect
  • Periventricular Nodular Heterotopia
  • Neurodegeneration With Brain Iron Accumulation (NBIA)
  • Albinism

Keywords

  • Variant of unknown significance
  • Functional genetics
  • Translational research
  • RNAseq
  • Gene expression regulation
03

In context

Intellectual Disability

387 studies on the registry are indexed under Intellectual Disability; 105 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 58 across 248 interventional studies indexed under Intellectual Disability.

Browse Intellectual Disability studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 806 studies on the registry; 197 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Minor and adult patient.
  • Registered for the social security system.
  • signed by patient or parent of a minor patient.
  • Patient affected by one of the rare diseases studied (albinism, congenital heart defect, cystic fibrosis, neurodevelopmental disease)
  • Patient bearing variants of unknown significance (VOUS)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in research protocol.
  • Patient under administrative supervision
  • Pregnant or nursing women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Ex-vivo and In-vitro approach

    Ex-vivo approach concerning 25 patients with blood sample in PAXgene tubes or skin biopsy and RNA-Seq analysis. In-vitro approach concerning 25 patients without specific samples needed for analysis in minigene or luciferase assay

    Genetic: Ex-vivo approach concerning 25 patients · Genetic: In-vitro approach concerning 25 patients

Interventions

  • GeneticEx-vivo approach concerning 25 patients

    Ex-vivo approach concerning 25 patients with blood sample in PAXgene tubes or skin biopsy and RNA-Seq analysis

  • GeneticIn-vitro approach concerning 25 patients

    In-vitro approach concerning 25 patients without specific samples needed for analysis in minigene or luciferase assay

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of VOUS reclassified as pathogenic (class 5) or benign (class 1)

    It's the proportion of VOUS that could be definitively reclassified as pathogenic (class 5) or benign (class 1) according to the ACMG classification (Richards et al., 2015 and Appendix 1). Indeed currently only variants considered as pathogenic or probably pathogenic make it possible to confirm a diagnosis and to propose genetic offer genetic counseling to families and perform a prenatal diagnosis. This is an evaluation that will be carried out at the end of the analyses carried out

    Time frame: Inclusion visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pre-analysis process : Time of sample transport to the laboratory

    Time of transport to the laboratory. To calculate this time, the time of collection and the time of receipt by the and the time of reception by the molecular genetics technician will be recorded

    Time frame: Inclusion visit

  2. Pre-analysis process : Quality of RNA extraction (RNA Integrity Number, RIN)

    RNA quality measurement by RIN (RNA integrity number): very good \>7, good \>/=5, poor \<5. Only RNA with RIN \>5 will be retained.

    Time frame: Inclusion visit

  3. Praticability :Characteristics and number of CPU (Central Processing Unit)

    Evaluation of bioinformatic ressources by measure of number of CPU needed and turnaround time for processing data

    Time frame: Inclusion visit

  4. Praticability : Training time of Biologists for interpretation

    Evaluation of training time needed to interpret the data

    Time frame: Inclusion visit

  5. Global cost

    Evaluation of cost of global analyse and each test

    Time frame: Inclusion visit

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2025, 25 months after the start.

Of 155 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Intellectual Disability, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 25 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 158 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 7, 2022
First posted
Jan 25, 2023
StartActual
Jan 30, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2025
CompletionEst.
Feb 2025
Last update
Feb 21, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05696912
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 25, 2023
Start date
Jan 30, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 21, 2024

Study contacts

Vincent MICHAUD
Contact
vincent.michaud@chu-bordeaux.fr
+335 57 82 01 93
Ndeye-Fatou NGOM
Contact
ndeye-fatou.ngom@chu-bordeaux.fr
Vincent MICHAUD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Bordeaux

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion