ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05695456CLE-EoEUpdated Jun 27, 2024

Targeted Elimination Diet in EoE Patients Following Identification of Trigger Nutrients Using Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of personalized exclusion diet based on CLE and empiric exclusion diet in Eosinophilic Esophagitis, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-27.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2022; still recruiting 4 years 8 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 10 studies in Eosinophilic Esophagitis with a site in Belgium — 2 open to participants now, 4 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Eosinophilic Esophagitis · Belgium.

Planned enrollment
10th of 10
25 · median 146
Started
2022
with 2 others
Phase 1/2
Only one
of the 10
Registered
7th of 10
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 10
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Among the 10 studies in Eosinophilic Esophagitis with a site in Belgium, this one is the 10th largest by planned enrollment, is one of 3 that started in 2022, is the only one in phase 1/2, and was the 7th registered.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis

235 studies on the registry are indexed under Eosinophilic Esophagitis; 53 are open to participants now.

Browse Eosinophilic Esophagitis studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 10 studies in Eosinophilic Esophagitis with a site in Belgium are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 2 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Belgium have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Belgium →

Who these studies take

Of the 42 Eosinophilic Esophagitis studies recruiting now, 12 (29%) set no upper age limit and 27 (64%) stop at 75 or younger; 27 take children under 18; 7 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 70 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 10 studies in Eosinophilic Esophagitis with a site in Belgium, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Using confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), gastrointestinal allergic reactions to certain foods in the duodenum will be evaluated on a cellular level. After that, a personalized exclusion diet will be followed based on the CLE results for 6 weeks, sham-controlled, in a cross-over fashion. Gastroscopy with esophageal biopsies will be repeated after each diet.

Read the detailed description

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an antigen driven esophagitis, that is characterized by symptoms of dysphagia often leading to food impaction, and that leads to strictures and esophageal motility disorders, with a significant impact on quality of life. Current treatment options include proton pump inhibitors (PPI's) and topical steroids, and also the empiric 6-food elimination diet (6FED). In this diet, the 6 most frequently implicated foods are excluded and reintroduced one by one (milk, gluten containing grains, egg, soy, nuts, fish \& shellfish). However, this is a complicated and long process, including several endoscopies with esophageal biopsies.

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a technique that allows to detect gastrointestinal allergic reactions in the duodenum, and to visualize them on a molecular level in real-time. The CLE probe is passed through the working channel of a standard gastroscope, up against the duodenal mucosa. After intravenous injection of fluorescein as contrast medium, the duodenal epithelium is visualized on a cellular level, including food protein mediated extravasation of fluorescein into the lumen. The 6 foods of the 6FED are sprayed on the epithelium one by one, after which a reaction is awaited. Previous use of CLE has shown that more than half of Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients reacts to one or more foods during CLE.

In this double blind randomized cross-over study the effect a personalized elimination diet, based on the reaction during CLE, is compared to a sham diet, in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, and insufficient response or intolerance to PPI's. Both diets will be followed for 6 weeks, after which gastroscopy with esophageal biopsies will be repeated. Patients that do not have a reaction to the 6 foods will act as controls, following a control diet with milk and gluten in a cross-over fashion.

03

Conditions studied

  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Keywords

  • confocal laser endomicroscopy
  • 6-food elimination diet
  • personalized exclusion diet
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis, with peak eosinophil count of >15 eos/HPF and symptoms of dysphagia at least 2 days per week
  • Patients have had a trial of high-dose PPI for at least 8 weeks, with either documented non-response or intolerance to the medication
  • Patients aged between 18 and 70 years old
  • Signed written
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis, with peak eosinophil count of >15 eos/HPF and symptoms of dysphagia at least 2 days per week
  • Patients have had a trial of high-dose PPI for at least 8 weeks, with either documented non-response or intolerance to the medication
  • Patients aged between 18 and 70 years old
  • Signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • IgE-mediated food anaphylaxis for 1 of the trigger nutrients
  • History of major gastrointestinal surgery complicating esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy
  • Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) Los Angeles grade C or D
  • Esophageal strictures, too narrow to pass with a normal gastroscope
  • Endoscopic dilation in the esophagus in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion
  • Celiac disease
  • Recent use (within two weeks) of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), systemic histamine-receptor antagonists, mast cell stabilizers, opioids.
  • Proton pump inhibitors must be either stopped for at least 4 weeks, or continued on a stable dosage throughout the study period.
  • should be stopped for at least 4 weeks.
  • Allergy to fluorescein, Xylocain or Propofol
  • Pregnant or lactating women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    CLE positive patients real/sham

    In this arm, participants who reacted to one or two nutrients during CLE will follow a personalized exclusion diet consistent of the nutrient to which they reacted, after which they will follow a sham diet in a blinded cross-over fashion.

    Other: personalized exclusion diet based on CLE

  • Sham comparator
    CLE positive patients sham/real

    In this arm, participants who reacted to one or two nutrients during CLE will follow a sham diet for 6 weeks, and than a personalized exclusion diet consistent of the nutrient to which they reacted, in a blinded cross-over fashion.

    Other: personalized exclusion diet based on CLE

  • Sham comparator
    CLE negative patients

    In this arm, participants who did not react to one of the nutrients during CLE will follow a control diet consistent of milk exclusion for 6 weeks, after which they will follow a gluten exclusion diet for 6 weeks, or the other way around.

    Other: empiric exclusion diet

Interventions

  • Otherpersonalized exclusion diet based on CLE

    personalized exclusion diet based on CLE

  • Otherempiric exclusion diet

    exclusion diet with milk or gluten-containing grains

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in response

    Difference in response (defined as normalization of peak eosinophil count in esophageal mucosal biopsies \<15 eosinophils/HPF) in patients undergoing duodenal CLE-targeted elimination diet compared to the sham diet

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Further histological outcomes

    Difference in deep remission (defined as reduction of peak eosinophil count \<6 eosinophils/HPF) before and after the targeted elimination diet respectively, compared with the sham diet

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Further histological outcomes

    Difference in peak eosinophil count (eosinophils/HPF) before and after the targeted elimination diet, compared with the sham diet

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Symptomatic changes in patients undergoing duodenal CLE-targeted elimination diet compared to the sham diet

    difference in symptoms using the DSQ (dysphagia symptom questionnaire), with a score from 0 (meaning no symptoms) to 10 (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. endoscopic changes in patients undergoing duodenal CLE-targeted elimination diet compared to the sham diet

    Difference in endoscopic reference score (EREFS) ranging from E0R0E0F0S0 (no endoscopic abnormalities) to E2R2E2F2S2 (worse endoscopic features)

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. change in esophageal and duodenal permeability parameters 1

    using ussing chamber experiments, where human biopsies our mounted in between two chambers, and the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) is measured across the chambers

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. change in esophageal and duodenal permeability parameters 2

    using ussing chamber experiments, where human biopsies our mounted in between two chambers, and the transepithelial flux of a high molecular weight protein is measured by labeling the molecule with a fluorescent dye.

    Time frame: 2 years

  7. Baseline and post-exposure duodenal mast cell and eosinophil counts on histology

    Baseline and post-exposure duodenal mast cell and eosinophil counts on histology

    Time frame: 2 years

  8. Differences in duodenal permeability measures in CLE positive, CLE negative EoE patients and healthy controls before and after nutrient application 1

    using ussing chamber experiments, where human biopsies our mounted in between two chambers, and the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) is measured across the chambers

    Time frame: 2 years

  9. Differences in duodenal permeability measures in CLE positive, CLE negative EoE patients and healthy controls before and after nutrient application 2

    using ussing chamber experiments, where human biopsies our mounted in between two chambers, and the transepithelial flux of a high molecular weight protein is measured by labeling the molecule with a fluorescent dye.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Jan Tack
    Leuven, Vlaams Brabant 3000, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Jan Tack, MD PhD · Contactjan.tack@kuleuven.be · +3216345514
    • Karlien Raymenants, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 34 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2022
First posted
Jan 25, 2023
StartActual
Feb 16, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 2024
Last update
Jun 27, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05695456
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 25, 2023
Start date
Feb 16, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 27, 2024

Study contacts

Jan Tack, MD PhD
Contact
jan.tack@kuleuven.be
+3216345514

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion