ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05691231Updated Dec 22, 2025

Long-Term Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the NuVasive Simplify Disc at Two Levels

An observational study in Cervical Disc Disease and Degenerative Disc Disease, sponsored by NuVasive. Enrolling by invitation at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-22.

Sponsored by NuVasive (part of Globus Medical) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
158
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective, multicenter post-market clinical follow-up study to evaluate the 10-year long-term safety and effectiveness of the Simplify Disc at two levels in subjects who were enrolled in the IDE study (NCT03123549) and/or post approval study (NCT04980378).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Disc Disease
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
03

In context

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

462 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration; 100 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 158 is above the median of 119 across 170 observational studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

NuVasive is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

First submitted before NuVasive became part of Globus Medical.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes subjects treated with the NuVasive Two Level Simplify Disc in IDE study (NCT03123549) and followed in the PAS (NCT04980378).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject was enrolled in the Simplify Disc IDE (NCT03123549) and/or PAS (NCT04980378) at a participating study site
  2. Patient understands the conditions of enrollment and is willing sign an form to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject had an SSI at the index level during the IDE study (NCT03123549) or the PAS (NCT04980378)
  2. Subject was withdrawn or withdrew consent to participate in the IDE study (NCT03123549) or PAS (NCT04980378)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
158 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Simplify Disc

    Extended follow-up of subjects treated with the Simplify Disc during IDE study NCT03123549 and followed in the post-approval study NCT04980378.

    Device: NuVasive Simplify Cervical Artificial Disc

Interventions

  • DeviceNuVasive Simplify Cervical Artificial Disc

    Simplify Disc is a weight-bearing cervical artificial disc implant consisting of PEEK (polyetheretherketone) endplates and one semi-constrained, fully articulating, mobile Zirconia Toughened Alumina ceramic (ZTA) core.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Composite Success Rate

    Individual success is defined as at least a 15 point improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) Score at 120 months compared with baseline, maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at 120 months compared with baseline, no additional surgical procedure at the index level within 120 months, and the absence of a serious adverse event classified as implant-associated or implant/surgical procedure-associated within 120 months. A subject must meet each criterion to be considered an overall study success. NDI scale is reported in a range from 0 - 100, with 0 consistent with best ability to function and 100 with worst ability to function.

    Time frame: 10 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of subjects meeting the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for NDI at each annual timepoint

    Neck Disability Index; scale is reported in a range from 0-100, with 0 consistent with best ability to function and 100 worst ability to function.

    Time frame: 10 years

  2. Percentage of subjects meeting MCID for neck and arm pain questionnaire for each of the following pain locations: neck pain, arm pain, left arm pain, right arm pain.

    Neck and arm pain questionnaire, scale is reported in a range from 0 to 10, with 0 consistent with no pain and 10 with most pain

    Time frame: 10 years

  3. Motor status at each annual timepoint compared to baseline

    A change of one or more grade levels in muscle strength will be regarded as clinically significant.

    Time frame: 10 years

  4. Sensory status at each annual timepoint compared to baseline

    Sensation will be graded as normal or abnormal (diminished or absent). Any changes from abnormal to normal or absent to diminished will be regarded as clinically significant improvement.

    Time frame: 10 years

  5. SF-36® Health Survey at each annual timepoint compared to baseline

    The SF-36 is a multipurpose survey with 36 questions. The questions were combined, scored and weighted to create mental and physical functioning and overall health-related quality of life. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. Scores range from 0-100.

    Time frame: 10 years

  6. Dysphagia Handicap Index1 (DHI) at each annual timepoint compared to baseline

    DHI is scored from 0-100, with a higher score indicative of a less desirable outcome.

    Time frame: 10 years

  7. Disc height at each annual timepoint will be compared to baseline

    Average disc height is calculated as the simple average of the anterior and posterior disc heights

    Time frame: 10 years

  8. Adjacent level disc degeneration (ALDD) at each annual timepoint will be compared to baseline

    ALDD is graded in accordance with definitions adapted from Kellgren and Lawrence: None; Doutbtful;Minimal;Moderate;Severe

    Time frame: 10 years

  9. Displacement or migration of the Simplify Disc at each annual timepoint will be compared to the post-op timepoint in the IDE study (NCT03123549)

    Device migration assesses significant movement of the implant postoperatively. Changes of \>3 mm will be considered significant due to the margin of error in radiographic determination of displacement distances.

    Time frame: 10 years

  10. Range of motion (ROM) at each annual timepoint compared to baseline

    Changes in Global Range of Motion will be calculated by subtracting the range of motion measured at one time point from the baseline range of motion. Change in Global Range of Motion will be reported in units of degrees.

    Time frame: 10 years

  11. Rate of adverse events attributable to Simplify Disc, or use of additional NuVasive instruments, implants, or technologies at each annual timepoint

    Number of adverse events related to Simplify Disc or additional NuVasive products

    Time frame: 10 years

  12. Patient satisfaction and perceived effect at each annual timepoint

    Patient questionnaire assessing satisfaction with treatment and perceived effect of treatment. Success for each satisfaction question will be defined as either a "Definitely True" or "Mostly True" response. Success for the perceived effect question will be defined as either a "Completely Recovered," "Much Improved," or "Slightly Improved" response.

    Time frame: 10 years

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05691231
Lead sponsor
NuVasive
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 19, 2023
Start date
Jan 18, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 10, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
May 10, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 22, 2025

Study contacts

Kyle Malone
study director · NuVasive

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion