ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06714110Updated Dec 22, 2025

A Review of Precice Intramedullary Limb Lengthening (IMLL) System for Limb Lengthening Procedures in Children.

An observational study in Limb Length Discrepancy, sponsored by NuVasive. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 0 Months to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-22.

Sponsored by NuVasive (part of Globus Medical) · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
0 Months to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will look at how safe and effective limb lengthening surgeries are for the femur and tibia in children 12 years old and younger. We will examine any complications from the surgery, the results of X-rays, and feedback from patients. The study will involve the Precice Intramedullary Limb Lengthening (IMLL) System and external fixator devices for limb lengthening.

Read the detailed description

As a retrospective chart review, all patients involved in this study will have undergone surgery for their limb length discrepancy according to the standard of care of the practitioner using either the Precice IMLL or an external fixator. Under this protocol, available patient outcomes, plain radiographs, and complications will be obtained from the existing medical records of all eligible index surgeries. An index surgery is defined as the first limb lengthening surgery performed by a study investigator on the index bone with either the Precice IMLL or an external fixator. Each patient may have up to 4 eligible index surgeries (right and left femur, right and left tibia) and be included in both the Precice IMLL and external fixator groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Limb Length Discrepancy

Keywords

  • Precice IMLL
  • external fixator
  • Limb length discrepancy surgery
  • index bone
  • femur
  • tibia
  • surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

NuVasive is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

First submitted after NuVasive became part of Globus Medical.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Months to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pediatric (12 years and under) population

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All potential index surgeries must meet the inclusion criteria below in order to be considered for enrollment:

    1. Patient was 12 years of age or younger at the time of the index surgery.
    2. Diagnosis of femoral or tibial limb length discrepancy greater than or equal to 2.0 cm.
    3. Limb length discrepancy secondary to congenital or acquired etiologies.
    4. Patients received limb lengthening treatment of the femur or tibia with the Precice IMLL System or an external fixator limb lengthening device.
    5. Minimum medullary canal diameter ≥6 mm in the treated bone - Precice IMLL System treatment group only.
    6. Closed or nonfunctioning physeal growth plates in the treated bone - Precice IMLL System treatment group only.
    7. Minimum of 12 months of follow-up.
    8. Available medical and radiographic records preoperatively through consolidation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Index surgeries will be excluded from consideration for the study if they meet any of the following criteria:

    1. Patients with unresolved limb lengthening-related adjacent joint contractures (loss of range of motion), subluxation, or dislocation prior to the index surgical procedure.
    2. Patients with uncorrected coronal or sagittal plane angular malalignment following the index surgical procedure.
    3. Patients with unresolved complications related to previous limb lengthening on the index or different limbs, including unhealed pin sites and/or residual bone infection (from external fixator devices) on the index limb.
    4. Patients with femoral head osteonecrosis from a previous implantation of a femoral nail prior to the index surgical procedure.
    5. Patients with a previous implantation of a femoral or tibial nail across an open physeal growth plate prior to the index surgical procedure.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Precice IMLL System

    Patients 12 years of age or younger received Precice IMLL for correction of limb length discrepancy.

    Device: Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Device

  • External Fixator

    Patients 12 years of age or younger received an external fixator for correction of limb length discrepancy.

    Device: External Fixator Limb Lengthening Device

Interventions

  • DeviceIntramedullary Limb Lengthening Device

    The Precice IMLL System is composed of the Precice nail, screws, and uses an external remote controller (ERC) for rod distraction. The Precice IMLL System is designed to fit the anatomy of long bones and is intended to be placed internally in an intramedullary manner. It achieves limb correction through gradual lengthening or compression and providing intramedullary fixation for fractures of long bones.

  • DeviceExternal Fixator Limb Lengthening Device

    External fixator devices consist of an external frame (ring, half-ring, monolateral, and rail); bone fixation is accomplished by the transcutaneous bone fixations implants (pins, wires, cables, screws), and the lengthening is accomplished by the vertical components (struts). Generally, femoral lengthening devices are monolateral and tibial lengthening devices have ring or half-ring frames. The external fixators are made of a variety of materials, including stainless steel, titanium, carbon fiber, and aluminum.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bone (femur or tibia) lengthening

    Achievement of targeted limb length

    Time frame: At least 1 yr post-op

  2. Osteotomy Healing

    Assessment of osteotomy healing using the following descriptors: * Premature healing: Defined as osteotomy healing before the target length is achieved. * Healed (consolidated): Defined as the presence of full corticalization (ossified) of regenerate bone of three of four cortices seen on AP and lateral radiographs. * Delayed union (consolidation): Defined as bone union taking greater than 6 months but with progressive improvement on radiographs and the osteotomy eventually healed. * Partial union (consolidation): Defined as incomplete bone healing, i.e., radiographic healing at only 1 or 2 cortices on AP and lateral views. * Nonunion (pseudarthrosis): Defined as lack of complete healing within 6 months of the end of the lengthening period.

    Time frame: At least 1 yr post-op

  3. Frequency of device related complications

    Review of investigator-reported device-related complications

    Time frame: Post-op through at least 1 year post-op

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Paley Institute
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33407, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2026, 16 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 7, 2024
First posted
Dec 3, 2024
StartActual
Mar 13, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Dec 22, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06714110
Lead sponsor
NuVasive
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 3, 2024
Start date
Mar 13, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 22, 2025

Study contacts

Kyle Malone
study director · Globus Medical

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion