ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05688553Updated Jan 18, 2023

The Effects of Using Flexi-bar for Balance and Strength Training on the Balance and Muscle in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

An interventional study of Flexi-bar and balance and strength training in Flexi-bar, Vibration and Balance Training, sponsored by Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-18.

Sponsored by Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
65 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aging of the neuromuscular system may lead to an increased risk of falls in older adults. There are external and internal factors for falls, and lower limb muscle strength and balance are important internal factors for falls in the elderly. And can be improved through exercise. Therefore, an important interventional goal in interventional exercises to prevent falls in the elderly is to promote balance and increase lower extremity muscle strength.

Flexi-bar is a device that provides vibration stimulation. Studies have shown that a 5Hz frequency can be generated when shaken and transmitted to the whole body. Flexi bar is now widely used in fitness centers or rehabilitation therapy to improve muscle strength and balance. Vibration activates the tonic reflex, enhances the excitability of alpha and gamma motor neurons and enhances motor unit synchronization, and this active vibration training helps increase muscle coordination as it induces the tonic reflex and stimulates the proprioception of the joint Feelings, these physiological changes can lead to more effective proprioceptive feedback that improves balance. And because the vibration causes the agonist and antagonist muscles to contract alternately to regulate the instability during the movement. In recreational athletes, the use of a flexi bar in a single-legged position can effectively induce lower extremity muscle activation.

A 12-week combination of balance and strength training in older adults has been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of falls in older adults in previous studies.

Since the effect of adding Flexi bar on the basis of balance and strength training is unknown, the purpose of this study was to investigate the experimental group and the control group with the same exercise posture and training time, Flexi bar + BST Is it better for the balance and muscle strength of the elderly than simple BST?

02

Conditions studied

  • Flexi-bar
  • Vibration
  • Balance Training
  • Community-dwelling
  • Community Older
  • Strength Training
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 288 studies on the registry; 57 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

•Elderly people aged 65 to 85 in the community who can move on their own without the need for support from others.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vulnerable groups: those who lack sufficient decision-making ability due to age, intellectual or physical (physiological) status, or who are vulnerable to undue influence, coercion, or inability to make decisions of free will due to their environment, identity, or socioeconomic status, People living in nursing homes and racially disadvantaged groups, etc.
  • Have been diagnosed with mental illness and cognitive impairment
  • Those who have had severe cardiovascular-related diseases such as unstable angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction and are not suitable for vigorous exercise
  • Those with a history of epilepsy
  • Those with severe pain in the lower extremity joints during the pre-test and unable to complete the above-mentioned lower extremity muscle strength or balance test.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Flexi-bar group

    Device: Flexi-bar

  • Active comparator
    balance and strength group

    Other: balance and strength training

Interventions

  • DeviceFlexi-bar

    two groups, experimental group intervention Flexi-bar with balance and strength training

  • Otherbalance and strength training

    the control group intervention only balance and strength training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change from baseline gait and balance at 12 weeks

    Functional gait assessment

    Time frame: baseline , up to 12 weeks( post test)

  2. change from baseline dynamic balance at 12 weeks

    Y-Balance Test

    Time frame: baseline , up to 12 weeks( post test)

  3. change from baseline balance at 12 weeks

    Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test

    Time frame: baseline , up to 12 weeks( post test)

Secondary outcomes

  1. change from baseline lower strength at 12 weeks (1)

    Chair standing test

    Time frame: baseline , up to 12 weeks( post test)

  2. change from baseline lower strength at 12 weeks(2)

    hand held dynamometer

    Time frame: baseline , up to 12 weeks( post test)

  3. change from baseline ankle plantar flexor strength at 12 weeks

    ankle plantar flexion test

    Time frame: baseline , up to 12 weeks( post test)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Xinqiang Li Activity Center
    Kaohsiung City, 830, Taiwan
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 37 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 23, 2022
First posted
Jan 18, 2023
StartActual
Nov 7, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Jan 18, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05688553
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 18, 2023
Start date
Nov 7, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 18, 2023

Study contacts

HSU TZ RUEI, Associate
Contact
st990533@gmail.com
0970947904
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital sport medicine
Contact
(07) 312-1101 ext. 6643.6644

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion