ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05684198PRISTINEUpdated Dec 3, 2025

NPWT vs Primary Closure in SSI Prevention for Emergency Laparotomies for Peritonitis

An interventional study of subcutaneous NPWT in Peritonitis, Surgical Site Infection and Infections, sponsored by Medical University of Gdansk. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-03.

Sponsored by Medical University of Gdansk · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) compared with primary closure (PC) in surgical site infection (SSI) prevention for laparotomy for peritonitis.

Read the detailed description

Surgical site infection is a particularly common morbidity in contaminated surgeries leading to prolonged length of hospital stay, healing time, and a significant financial burden on healthcare systems.

Hence, the objective of PRISTINE trial is to compare the effectiveness of subcutaneous NPWT with PC for SSI prevention in patients who, due to wound contamination, are prone to infection. Moreover, with a further cost analysis, the investigators aim to evaluate the rationale for the implementation of routine preventive NPWT for laparotomy for diffuse peritonitis.

Patients qualified for an emergency laparotomy for peritonitis in University Clinical Centre (UCC) Division of Oncological, Endocrine and General Surgery will be identified. Prior to laparotomy, participants will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to subcutaneous NPWT or PC. The assigned intervention will be performed intraoperatively, after fascia closure.

All participants will receive an empirical antibiotic therapy regimen consisting of tazobactam/piperacillin or ciprofloxacin+ metronidazole. Participants will be followed-up postoperatively for one year.

In case of an SSI all participants, regardless of their initial allocation, will be treated according to the standard of care with prolonged NPWT and targeted antibiotic therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peritonitis
  • Surgical Site Infection
  • Infections
  • Wound Infection

Keywords

  • laparotomy
  • NPWT
  • primary closure
  • vacuum-assisted closure
  • VAC
03

In context

Peritonitis

167 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritonitis; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 79 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Peritonitis.

Browse Peritonitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Gdansk is the lead sponsor of 133 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • qualified for an emergency laparotomy for peritonitis
  • gave written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • qualified for open abdomen treatment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    subcutaneous NPWT

    The peritoneum and fascia will be closed as in the PC arm. Subsequently, patients will be treated with commercially available vacuum-assisted closure systems (provided by Smith\&Nephew or Hartmann) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Following fascia closure, the NPWT foam will be adjusted to the wound size to fill the wound cavity without causing excessive wound dehiscence. Subsequently, the foam will be placed in the subcutaneous tissue. The foam will not be fixated on the skin with sutures. The wound will be sealed with adhesive film. In case of air leak in problematic areas such as the navel or ostomy, ostomy paste will be used to create a tighter seal. Continuous pressure of 120 mmHg will be applied. On the 3rd day postop, the dressing will be removed and closure by secondary intention will be performed.

    Device: subcutaneous NPWT

  • No intervention
    primary closure

    The peritoneum will be closed as a separate layer with a 2-0 multifilament absorbable suture. Subsequently, the fascia will be closed with a continuous suture using absorbable monofilament 0 sutures. Subcutaneous tissue will be rinsed twice with hypochlorite solution following peritoneal closure and fascial closure. Interrupted subcutaneous closure will be performed with absorbable multifilament 2-0 sutures. Following skin disinfection with an alcohol solution, the skin will be closed with non-absorbable monofilament 2-0 or 3-0 sutures using the interrupted mattress technique. Conventional Cosmopor® sterile gauze dressings will be applied. Unless the dressing material will be saturated, the dressing will remain unchanged until 3rd day post-op.

Interventions

  • Devicesubcutaneous NPWT

    Following fascia closure, NPWT system will be inserted into subcutaneous tissue, continuous negative pressure of 120 mmHg will be applied.

    Also known as: vacuum-assisted wound closure, Vivano, Renasys

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effective wound closure by 30th day post-op

    definitive wound closure, not followed by secondary wound dehiscence

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Time to end of surgical treatment of the wound

    Time of last out-patient visit ending the process of treating surgical wound

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of stay

    postoperative length of hospital stay

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Time to heal

    time to full epithelialisation of the wound

    Time frame: 120 days

  3. Volume of wound drainage

    Volume of wound drainage collected in a NPWT or drainage collector

    Time frame: 60 days

  4. Time of secondary NPWT treatment

    Duration of NPWT therapy administered if SSI occured

    Time frame: 60 days

  5. Post-operative morbidity

    occurrence of adverse events and complications following surgery measured with Clavien-Dindo scale (grade I to V; grade I represents any deviation from the normal post-operative course not requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention and grade 5 represents patient's death)

    Time frame: 60 days

  6. SSI presence or absence

    Surgical Site Infection according to Centre for Disease Control (CDC) criteria: Infection occurring within the first 30 post-operative days with at least one of the following: * Purulent drainage from the incision * Organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue from the incision * Incision is deliberately opened by a surgeon AND at least one of the following signs/symptoms of infection: 1. Pain or tenderness 2. Localized swelling 3. Redness 4. Heat * Diagnosis of SSI by the surgeon or attending physician Due to the inability to implement CDC for wounds treated with NPWT, the investigators have included additional SSI criteria: the absolute necessity to prolong NPWT after 3rd day postop, an anergic wound morphology or slough.

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Pain level

    Pain measured with Visual Analogue Scale every 8h (subjective pain strength scale from 0 to 10; 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain)

    Time frame: 7 days

  8. Scar quality

    Measured with Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). This scale ranges from 0 (representing normal skin) to 13 (representing worst scar imaginable). VSS provides the assessment of the following wound characteristics: pigmentation (0-2), vascularity (0-3), pliability (0-5), height (0-3).

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Cost

    Cost of hospitalisation and outpatient visits

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UCC Division of Oncological, Transplant and General Surgery
    Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship 80952, Poland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05684198
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 13, 2023
Start date
Jan 11, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2025
Completion
Nov 1, 2025
Last update
Dec 3, 2025

Study contacts

Piotr Spychalski, MD PhD
principal investigator · MUG Division of General Surgery
Katarzyna M Polomska
principal investigator · Medical University of Gdansk (MUG)
Jaroslaw Kobiela, Prof.
principal investigator · MUG Division of General Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion