CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05682885ELYBSUpdated Jan 22, 2025

The Effectiveness of Lymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery

An interventional study of Lymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema and Lymphedema Arm, sponsored by Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-22.

Sponsored by Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluate the effectiveness of lymphatic bypass supermicrosurgery (LBS) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) compare to ALND alone to prevent breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL).

Read the detailed description

In the intervention group, LBS was performed after ALND with the intima-to-intima coaptation using the supermicrosurgery technique. The anastomosis is done between the afferent lymphatic vessel to the recipient's vein, or if possible, from the afferent to the efferent lymphatic vessel. The upper extremity lymphedema (UEL) index and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography are utilized to evaluate the development of lymphedema.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema
  • Lymphedema Arm

Keywords

  • Lymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery
  • Primary Lymphedema Prevention
  • Axillary Lymph Node Dissection
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Breast cancer patient aged >18 years old
  • Breast cancer patient with clinically ALNs metastases (cN1 or cN2).
  • Breast cancer patient with no clinical metastasis and tumor size ≥5cm or no sentinel lymph node biopsy facility in the hospital.
  • Any breast cancer patients that receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stage IV breast cancer patients who do not show clinical and radiological improvement after primary systemic therapy.
  • Breast cancer patients with previous surgeries such as mastectomy, axillary lymph node biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and ALND.
  • Breast cancer patients with prior breast, chest wall, axillary, or neck radiotherapy.
  • Breast cancer patients with preoperative lymphatic system abnormality detected by ICG lymphography.
  • Breast cancer patients with iodine allergy, asthma, decreased kidney function, pregnancy, and lactation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Axillary lymph node dissection with LBS

    70 subjects will be needed for each group. A standard mastectomy or lumpectomy incision is made and ALND will be done in the same incision. The lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes will be resected using a near-infrared (NIR) camera. To locate lymphatic vessels, a microscope with ICG lymphography navigation is employed. LBS was performed by making intima-to-intima anastomosis between the afferent lymphatic vessels and the recipient's veins, or to the efferent lymphatic vessels. The anastomosis patency will be assessed by observing the ICG fluorescent flow. After surgery, follow-up will be done every 2 months and every 3 months in the second year. UEL index, ICG lymphography, and quality of life evaluation will be done. The cumulative incidence of BCRL, the free survival time of BCRL, and subclinical lymphedema (SCL) progression will be reported descriptively. BCRL risk factors and collateral lymphatic pathway will be observed as well.

    Procedure: Lymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery

  • No intervention
    Axillary lymph node dissection without LBS

    70 subjects will be needed for each group. A standard mastectomy or lumpectomy incision is made and ALND will be done in the same incision. After primary breast cancer removal, a standard ALND level I, II, and if necessary, level III is performed. After surgery, follow-up will be done every 2 months and every 3 months in the second year. History taking, physical examination, radiology and histopathology examination, UEL index, and ICG lymphography evaluation will be done during follow-up. Each subject will complete the lymphedema quality of life questionnaire. The cumulative incidence of BCRL, the free survival time of BCRL, and SCL progression will be reported descriptively. BCRL risk factors and collateral lymphatic pathway will be observed as well.

Interventions

  • ProcedureLymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery

    Axillary Lymph Node Dissection with Lymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative incidence of BCRL

    BCRL definition: Post operation subject condition with presence of minimum DB 2 with one or both symptoms (swelling, heaviness), and increment of UEL index \>10% compared to pre operation OR Post operation subject condition with presence of ≥ DB 2 with minimum area 30% in one arm region in one of the arm lymphatic pathway (anterior or posterior), without presence of symptoms (swelling or heaviness), and increment of UEL index \>10% compared to pre operation

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. BCRL and SCL progression-free survival rate

    Percentage of subjects who do not progress to subclinical lymphedema or lymphedema during the research.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Collateral lymphatic pathway

    The number of lymphatic pathways flow into the region: supraclavicular, internal mammary, and contralateral axillary and supraclavicular nodes based on the ICG lymphography.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Quality of life lymphedema

    Assessment of lymphedema quality of life score after the surgery using the lymphedema quality of life score questionnaire that is self-reported by the subjects every 2 months and every 3 months in the second year. Calculation of the lymphedema quality of life score is the summation of the score from each question. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. A higher score indicates lower lymphedema quality of life.

    Time frame: 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Association of body mass index (BMI) with BCRL

    BMI was calculated by weight (kilograms) and height (centimeters). Categorized based on Asia Pacific classification are overweight (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m\^2) and no overweight (BMI \< 23 kg/m\^2). Measured at one time point.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Association of number of axillary lymph nodes metastases with BCRL

    The number of metastases lymph nodes and classified into \>3 lymph nodes and ≤3 lymph nodes. Measured at one time point.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Association of number of taxane chemotherapy with BCRL

    Taxane chemotherapy data from the subject's medical record and categorized into yes or no. Measured at one time point.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Association of regional lymph node radiation with BCRL

    Regional lymph node radiation data from the subject's medical record and categorized into yes or no. Measured at one time point

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Association of axillary fat weight with BCRL

    Axillary fat weight in grams is taken at the time of surgery. Measured at one time point.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital
    Jakarta, 11420, Indonesia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brahma B, Yamamoto T. Breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL): An overview of the literature and updates in microsurgery reconstructions. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;45(7):1138-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 4. PubMed 30638810 ↗
  • Brahma B, Putri RI, Reuwpassa JO, Tuti Y, Alifian MF, Sofyan RF, Iskandar I, Yamamoto T. Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis in Breast Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema: A Short-Term Clinicopathological Analysis from Indonesia. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021 Oct;37(8):643-654. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723940. Epub 2021 Mar 1. PubMed 33648010 ↗
  • Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Doi K, Oshima A, Yoshimatsu H, Todokoro T, Ogata F, Mihara M, Narushima M, Iida T, Koshima I. Indocyanine green-enhanced lymphography for upper extremity lymphedema: a novel severity staging system using dermal backflow patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Oct;128(4):941-947. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268cd9. PubMed 21681123 ↗
  • Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto N, Kikuchi K, Todokoro T, Iida T, Koshima I. Dynamic Indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography for breast cancer-related arm lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Dec;73(6):706-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318285875f. PubMed 24322632 ↗
  • Brahma B, Putri RI, Karsono R, Andinata B, Gautama W, Sari L, Haryono SJ. The predictive value of methylene blue dye as a single technique in breast cancer sentinel node biopsy: a study from Dharmais Cancer Hospital. World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Feb 7;15(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1113-8. PubMed 28173818 ↗
  • Akita S, Nakamura R, Yamamoto N, Tokumoto H, Ishigaki T, Yamaji Y, Sasahara Y, Kubota Y, Mitsukawa N, Satoh K. Early Detection of Lymphatic Disorder and Treatment for Lymphedema following Breast Cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Aug;138(2):192e-202e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002337. PubMed 27465179 ↗
  • Ishiura R, Yamamoto T, Saito T, Mito D, Iida T. Comparison of Lymphovenous Shunt Methods in a Rat Model: Supermicrosurgical Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis versus Microsurgical Lymphaticovenous Implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jun;139(6):1407-1413. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003354. PubMed 28538568 ↗
  • Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Hara H, Mihara M, Narushima M, Koshima I. Upper extremity lymphedema index: a simple method for severity evaluation of upper extremity lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;70(1):47-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182275d23. PubMed 21734534 ↗
  • Suami H. Anatomical Theories of the Pathophysiology of Cancer-Related Lymphoedema. Cancers (Basel). 2020 May 23;12(5):1338. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051338. PubMed 32456209 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All of the individual participant data collected during the trial will be shared. The researcher provides a methodologically sound proposal. The proposal should be directed to bbrahma@dharmais.co.id. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05682885
Lead sponsor
Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital
Responsible party
Bayu Brahma (Principal Investigator, Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 12, 2023
Start date
Oct 6, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 18, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 22, 2025

Study contacts

Bayu Brahma, MD
principal investigator · Dharmais Hospital National Cancer Center, Indonesia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion