ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05666388RESFITUpdated Dec 28, 2022

Rescue Stenting in the Severe Atherosclerotic Stenosis After the Failure of Intravenous Thrombolysis

An interventional study of Rescue stenting in Ischemic Stroke, Acute, Stent Stenosis and Thrombosis, sponsored by Can Tho Stroke International Services Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Vietnam. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-28.

Sponsored by Can Tho Stroke International Services Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2020, registered Dec 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is the standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who present to the hospital within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. However, IV thrombolysis, even bridging thrombolysis (combining intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy) has limited efficacy among patients who had occlusive lesions associated with highgrade arterial stenosis requiring revascularization to improve neurological deficits. The investigators evaluated whether rescue stenting results in good outcomes among patients after the failure of intravenous thrombolysis and bridging thrombolysis.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is the second most common cause of death worldwide, with an annual mortality rate of approximately 5.5 million. Depending on the timing of presentation, intravenous (IV) administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator can be an effective treatment, but is most effective when used between 3 and 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Bridging thrombolysis, which describes the combination of IV thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, can lead to long-term functional independence after 90 days with higher recanalization success rates than IV thrombolysis alone without increased risk. The HERMES meta-analysis of fve trials (MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, REVASCAT, SWIFT PRIME, and EXTEND IA) indicated the potential benefits of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in case of proximal circulation occlusions. The recanalization failure rate of this treatment, defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score of 2a or worse, remained high, ranging from 13% to 29%, and most patients experienced poor clinical outcomes. Permanent stent placement has been suggested as a potential approach for achieving successful recanalization, which is the goal of endovascular therapy in the early management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage associated with the combined use of IV thrombolysis and a loading dose of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) increases when rescue stenting is applied. The investigators hypothesize that stent deployment might serve as a feasible treatment for large artery occlusion after the failure of intravenous thrombolysis and bridging thrombolysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ischemic Stroke, Acute
  • Stent Stenosis
  • Thrombosis

Keywords

  • Ischemic stroke
  • Rescue stenting
  • Intravenous thrombolysis
  • Dual antiplatelet therapy
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 120 across 1,776 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Can Tho Stroke International Services Hospital is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Acute ischemic stroke who underwent rescue stenting for large vessel occlusions underlying severe atherosclerotic stenosis after the failure of intravenous alteplase therapy.
  • Absence of intracranial hemorrhage.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥ 2
  • Initiation to rescue stenting beyond 24 hours after symptom onset
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rescue stenting (RESFIT)

    Rescue stenting in the severe atherosclerotic stenosis after the failure of intravenous thrombolysis (RESFIT)

    Procedure: Rescue stenting

Interventions

  • ProcedureRescue stenting

    Rescue stenting in the severe atherosclerotic stenosis after the failure of intravenous thrombolysis (RES

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of hemorrhagic transformation

    Hemorrhagic transformation was accessed by CT scan or MRI.

    Time frame: 24 hours after rescue intracranial stenting.

  2. The rate of good outcomes at 3-month follow-up

    The good 3-month outcome rate was accessed by modified Rankin Score (mRS) \< 3.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Can Tho SIS Hospital
    Cần Thơ, 900000, Vietnam
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tran CC, Le MT, Baxter BW, Nguyen-Luu G, Ngo MT, Nguyen-Dao NH, Duong-Hoang L, Mai-Van M, Nguyen MD. Rescue intracranial stenting in acute ischemic stroke: a preliminary Vietnamese study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Oct;26(19):6944-6952. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202210_29875. PubMed 36263574 ↗
  • Sallustio F, Koch G, Rocco A, Rossi C, Pampana E, Gandini R, Meschini A, Diomedi M, Stanzione P, Di Legge S. Safety of early carotid artery stenting after systemic thrombolysis: a single center experience. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:904575. doi: 10.1155/2012/904575. Epub 2011 Aug 8. PubMed 21860810 ↗
  • Kwon DH, Jang SH, Park H, Sohn SI, Hong JH. Emergency Cervical Carotid Artery Stenting After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke. J Korean Med Sci. 2022 May 16;37(19):e156. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e156. PubMed 35578588 ↗
  • Stracke CP, Fiehler J, Meyer L, Thomalla G, Krause LU, Lowens S, Rothaupt J, Kim BM, Heo JH, Yeo LLL, Andersson T, Kabbasch C, Dorn F, Chapot R, Hanning U. Emergency Intracranial Stenting in Acute Stroke: Predictors for Poor Outcome and for Complications. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 3;9(5):e012795. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012795. Epub 2020 Mar 3. PubMed 32122218 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2020 to primary completion in Aug 2022, 27 months.

Of 572 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ischemic Stroke, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's 27 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 653 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 17, 2022
First posted
Dec 27, 2022
StartActual
May 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2022
CompletionActual
Nov 30, 2022
Last update
Dec 28, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05666388
Lead sponsor
Can Tho Stroke International Services Hospital
Responsible party
Dr. Cuong Tran Chi (Director - Doctor, Can Tho Stroke International Services Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 27, 2022
Start date
May 1, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2022
Completion
Nov 30, 2022
Last update
Dec 28, 2022

Study contacts

Cuong C Tran, Doctor
study chair · Can Tho Stroke International Services General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion