ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05664815amniOSTUpdated Sep 19, 2024

Human Amniotic Membrane (hAM) for Stage II Maxillomandibular Osteonecrosis Management

A Phase 2 interventional study of Human Amniotic Membrane and Conventional/Standard treatment in Osteonecrosis Due to Drugs, Jaw, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon. Recruiting at 5 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to demonstrate, during the first standard surgical management of patients with stage II MRONJ, the effect of the implantation of a cryopreserved hAM on the maxillomandibular bone, on the healing of the oral mucosa.

Read the detailed description

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) is a complication of taking anti-tumor (anti-angiogenic) and bone anti-resorptive treatments (biphosphonates, Denosumab) which impact bone healing and renewal capacities, which can lead to bone necrosis. It affects 1 to 10% of patients and is classified into 4 stages.

There is no reference document for their management, which requires antibiotics, local antiseptics and tissue debridement sometimes associated with sequestrectomy. The objective of treatment is very often to obtain healing of the oral mucosa to cover the exposed bone. Without treatment, stage II MRONJ can progress to stage III, with orostoma, pathological fractures and extra-fistula.

The human amniotic membrane (hAM) has poor (even no) immunogenicity and exerts an anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, antimicrobial, antiviral and analgesic effect. It is a source of multipotent stem cells and growth factors that promote tissue regeneration.

A pioneering, non-comparative study reports the use of hAM in MRONJ with very encouraging results in terms of re-epithelialization, absence of pain and infection (Ragazzo 2018). Recently, the same team published a retrospective study where 49 patients (stage 1 to 3) were included, including 27 treated with hAM (Ragazzo 2021). They report a significant improvement in quality of life and pain in the treated group.

hAM would provide a new approach in the treatment of stage II MRONJ by acting on: the quality and speed of mucosal healing, pain, even infection and regeneration of the underlying bone.

This study aims to demonstrate, during the first standard surgical management of patients with stage II MRONJ, the effect of the implantation of a cryopreserved hAM on the maxillomandibular bone, on the healing of the oral mucosa three months after the operation.

In second objectives will be evaluated: pain, complications at the site of healing of the mucosa (erythema, abscess, purulent discharge, diffuse infection of soft tissues (cellulitis), orostoma, suborbital abscess, mandibular fracture), oral health -dental/quality of life and new bone formation at subsequent visits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteonecrosis Due to Drugs, Jaw

Browse trials for

03

In context

Osteonecrosis

286 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteonecrosis; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 66 is close to the median of 68 across 151 interventional studies indexed under Osteonecrosis.

Browse Osteonecrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon is the lead sponsor of 450 studies on the registry; 97 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women over the age of 18
  • Patient treated in the context of a tumor pathology during which he received treatment with bisphosphonates, Denosumab or anti-angiogenics, and/or, very often, switch of treatment or combination. Current treatment or mention of treatment in patient history
  • MRONJ stage II certified clinically and radiologically. Also in the maxilla, stage II MRONJ without bucco-sinus communication after excision of the necrotic bone. Similarly, if a tooth with antral roots must be extracted and creates a bucco-sinus communication, if a MRONJ results, it will be stage II
  • Patients with stage II MRONJ of childbearing age with current or patients already
  • Signature of the to participate indicating that the subject has understood the purpose and the procedures required by the study, that he agrees to participate in the study as well as to comply with the requirements and restrictions inherent in this study
  • Affiliation to a French social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme

NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • of less than 6 months assessed by oncologists
  • Existence of an evolving cervico-facial neoplasia or an evolving oral neoplastic process informed by oncologists
  • History of oral and/or cervico-facial radiotherapy
  • Allergy to one of these two antibiotics: amoxicillin-clavulanic acid or clindamycin-metronidazole combination
  • Patient for surgery due to his state of health, with general anesthesia or local anesthesia.
  • MRONJ stage I and stage III
  • Stage II MRONJ in patients with only osteoporosis
  • Patients receiving treatments that may affect bone and/or mucous tissue as well as their metabolism: Patients on long-term therapy or
  • Patients with other diseases that may affect bone and/or mucous tissue as well as their metabolism: Bone diseases (such as brittle bone disease or Osteogenesis imperfecta, primary bone tumors in the maxilla or mandible (osteosarcoma, sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma ,...), any other malignant bone tumour; metabolic diseases with bone repercussions (Paget's disease, osteomalacia,...)
  • Patients of childbearing age without contraception
  • Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
  • Subject unlikely to cooperate in the study and/or low cooperation anticipated by the investigator
  • Subject not affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Patient under guardianship, curatorship or imprisonment
  • Patient who notified his refusal to participate in the research
  • Patient who participates in another clinical research

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • During surgery: Discovery of an interrupting MRONJ with damage to the basilar edge (which corresponds to stage III).
  • During surgery: Following a sequestrectomy discovery of spontaneous or ongoing healing.
  • During the inclusion period: Patient to benefit from invasive "dental" surgeries directly related to bone exposure and in conjunction with taking risky molecules (factors favoring the occurrence of MRONJ): dental avulsions, curettage apical granulomas or cysts, endodontic treatments, or alveolar bone procedure (regularization of ridges).
  • During the inclusion period: Patient with all over the mandible.
  • During the inclusion period: State of health of the patient which deteriorates due to his cancer during the inclusion period.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
66 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Application of human amniotic membrane (hAM)

    After conventional/standard treatment, hAM will be applied in a single layer against the bone defect before closure.

    Biological: Human Amniotic Membrane

  • Active comparator
    Conventional/standard treatment

    Conventional/standard surgery.

    Other: Conventional/Standard treatment

Interventions

  • BiologicalHuman Amniotic Membrane

    After conventional/standard treatment, hAM will be applied in a single layer against the bone defect with, if possible, a burial of a few millimeters under the mucous edges. With the idea of apprehending a possible dose effect, the hAM will be adapted to the size of the bone/mucous defect, mesenchymal side against the bone. For closure after hAM grafting : 2 options are possible: Edge-to-edge closure if sufficient mucosal laxity, Edge rapprochement by cross points. If necessary: possible incision of the periosteum to give laxity to the mucosa.

    Also known as: hAM, amnion

  • OtherConventional/Standard treatment

    Surgical procedure: Endo-oral approach: * Trimming of the mucous edges if they are necrotic or inflamed (granulation tissue) * For the bone: either simple sequestrectomy (the mobile sequestered bone is grabbed using forceps); either reaming until bleeding is obtained; either resection with the rongeur; either monobloc resection of the entire necrotic fragment with a saw or with a piezzotome (ultrasound); or a combination of different techniques. Rq: the resection of the necrotic bone (according to the practices of the center) will operate until the appearance of an "apparently healthy" bone (bone bleeding, clean appearance of the bone site) * Closure of the mucosa with possible incision of the periosteum to provide laxity: Suture points by points separated in one plane with non-absorbable braided thread of the 3.0 "silk thread" type and round needle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with re-apparition of bone exposure

    Number of patients with re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area

    Time frame: Between Day 1 post-surgery and Month 3 post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit

    Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area

    Time frame: Day 0 (the day of the surgery) or Day 1 post-surgery

  2. Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit

    Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area

    Time frame: Visit 1 (7 to 10 days post-surgery)

  3. Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit

    Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area

    Time frame: Visit 2 (14 to 15 days post-surgery)

  4. Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit

    Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area

    Time frame: Visit 3 (One month post-surgery),

  5. Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit

    Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area

    Time frame: Visit 5 (6 months post-surgery)

  6. Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit

    Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area

    Time frame: Visit 6 (12 months post-surgery)

  7. To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale

    Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage.

    Time frame: Day 0 or Day 1 (if hospitalized patient)

  8. To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale

    Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage.

    Time frame: Visit 1 (7 to 10 days post-surgery)

  9. To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale

    Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage.

    Time frame: Visit 2 (14 to 15 days post-surgery)

  10. To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale

    Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage.

    Time frame: Visit 3 ( 1 Month post-surgery)

  11. To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale

    Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage.

    Time frame: Visit 4 (3 Month post-surgery),

  12. To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale

    Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage.

    Time frame: Visit 5 (6 Month post-surgery)

  13. To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale

    Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage.

    Time frame: Visit 6 ( 12 Month post-surgery)

  14. Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing

    On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of: * Minor complications: pain and/or erythema and/or abscess and/or purulent discharge, * Major complications: diffuse soft tissue infection (cellulitis), orostoma, suborbital abscess, mandibular fracture.

    Time frame: Day 0 or Day 1 post-surgery (if hospitalized patient)

  15. Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing

    On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of: * Minor complications: pain and/or erythema and/or abscess and/or purulent discharge, * Major complications: diffuse soft tissue infection (cellulitis), orostoma, suborbital abscess, mandibular fracture.

    Time frame: visit 1 (7 to 10 days post-surgery)

  16. Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing

    On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of: * Minor complications: pain and/or erythema and/or abscess and/or purulent discharge, * Major complications: diffuse soft tissue infection (cellulitis), orostoma, suborbital abscess, mandibular fracture.

    Time frame: Visit 2 (14 to 15 days post-surgery)

  17. Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing

    On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of: * Minor complications: pain and/or erythema and/or abscess and/or purulent discharge, * Major complications: diffuse soft tissue infection (cellulitis), orostoma, suborbital abscess, mandibular fracture.

    Time frame: Visit 3 (Month1 post-surgery)

  18. Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing

    On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of: * Minor complications: pain and/or erythema and/or abscess and/or purulent discharge, * Major complications: diffuse soft tissue infection (cellulitis), orostoma, suborbital abscess, mandibular fracture.

    Time frame: Visit 4 ( 3 Month post-surgery)

  19. Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing

    On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of: * Minor complications: pain and/or erythema and/or abscess and/or purulent discharge, * Major complications: diffuse soft tissue infection (cellulitis), orostoma, suborbital abscess, mandibular fracture.

    Time frame: Visit 5 (6 Month post-surgery)

  20. Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing

    On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of: * Minor complications: pain and/or erythema and/or abscess and/or purulent discharge, * Major complications: diffuse soft tissue infection (cellulitis), orostoma, suborbital abscess, mandibular fracture.

    Time frame: Visit 6 (Month 12 post-surgery)

  21. quality of life related to oral health

    Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score

    Time frame: Day 0 or Day +1 post-surgery (if hospitalized patient)

  22. quality of life related to oral health

    Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score

    Time frame: Visit1 (7 to10 days post-surgery)

  23. quality of life related to oral health

    Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score

    Time frame: Visit 2 (14 to 15 days post-surgery)

  24. quality of life related to oral health

    Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score

    Time frame: V3 (Month 1 post-surgery),

  25. quality of life related to oral health

    Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score

    Time frame: Visit 4 ( Month 3 post-surgery)

  26. quality of life related to oral health

    Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score

    Time frame: Visit 5 (Month 6 post-surgery)

  27. quality of life related to oral health

    Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score

    Time frame: Visit 6 (Month 12 post-surgery)

  28. Proportion of subjects with new bone formation

    Presence of newly formed bone assessed by cone-beam imaging

    Time frame: Visit 4 (Month 3)

  29. Proportion of subjects with new bone formation

    Presence of newly formed bone assessed by cone-beam imaging

    Time frame: Visit 5 (Month 6)

07

Study locations

1 of 5 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05664815
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 27, 2022
Start date
Sep 22, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Study contacts

Florelle GINDRAUX, PhD
Contact
fgindraux@chu-besancon.fr
033381218998
Aurélien LOUVRIER, MD, PhD
principal investigator · CHU de Besançon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion