ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05664581Updated Jul 18, 2025Results posted

A Study to Assess the Adverse Events and Effectiveness of Rapid Acoustic Pulse (RAP) Device for the Appearance of Cellulite in Adult Participants

A Phase 4 interventional study of Rapid Acoustic Pulse in Cellulite, sponsored by Zeltiq Aesthetics. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-18.

Sponsored by Zeltiq Aesthetics (part of AbbVie) · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Cellulite is the rippling or dimpling of the skin most commonly located on the thighs and buttocks of women. Its appearance and texture are often likened to that of "cottage cheese" or an orange peel. Rapid Acoustic Pulse (RAP) is an electrohydraulic (EH) device developed to improve the appearance of cellulite through microscopic disruption of the connection between the skin and underlying tissue leading to a reduction in the severity of dimples and ridges. The purpose of this study is to assess adverse events and effectiveness of RAP in adults seeking treatment of cellulite.

RAP is an FDA approved device for the short-term improvement in the appearance of cellulite in the buttocks and thighs. Participants 18-50 years of age seeking treatment of cellulite will be enrolled. Up to 15 participants will be enrolled in the study at 1 site in the United States.

Participants will receive 3 separate cellulite treatment sessions. Each treatment session will consist of RAP treatment delivered to bilateral thigh and/or buttock areas using the same treatment settings for both sides. The study duration is up to 72 weeks.

There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cellulite

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Rapid Acoustic Pulse
  • RAP
  • Cellulite
03

In context

Cellulite

71 studies on the registry are indexed under Cellulite; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 34 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Cellulite.

Browse Cellulite studies →

Lead sponsor

Zeltiq Aesthetics is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 29 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (100%) have results posted.

First submitted after Zeltiq Aesthetics became part of AbbVie.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants seeking treatment of cellulite in the thigh and/or buttock areas.
  • Areas of moderate to severe cellulite on bilateral thigh and/or buttock using the Cellulite Dimple - At Rest Scale at Baseline with grades of 2 or 3 based on review of photos taken under the same lightening conditions planned for the trial.
  • Participant will not have had invasive or energy-based cellulite (liposuction, subcision, RF, laser, ESWT, cryo-lipolysis, muscle stimulation, etc.) treatments in the treatment areas in the prior 12 months.
  • Participant will not have used topical based cellulite treatments for prior 3 months and will not use during the trial
  • Participant will not have used spray-on tanning treatments for 3 months prior to or during the term of the trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metal or plastic implants (vascular stent, or implants in the hips, knees, etc.) in the treatment areas.
  • Active electronic implants such as pacemakers, defibrillators
  • History of coagulopathy and/or on anticoagulant medication
  • Skin disorders (skin infections or rashes, psoriasis, etc.) in the treatment areas.
  • Medical disorder that would hinder wound healing or immune response.
  • Any surgical procedure in the treatment areas in the prior 3 months or planned during the duration of the study.
  • Any other condition/disease/situation which, as deemed by the PI, would preclude participant from safely participating in or completing the study visits or that may confound study results.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rapid Acoustic Pulse (RAP)

    Participants will receive 3 separate RAP cellulite treatments sessions.

    Device: Rapid Acoustic Pulse

Interventions

  • DeviceRapid Acoustic Pulse

    Transdermal Rapid Acoustic Pulse Treatments

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Before and After Side-by-side Photographs Correctly Identified by At Least 2 of 3 Blinded Reviewers From the Independent Physician Reviewer (IPR) Panel

    Photographs of the treatment areas were taken at baseline, and at 12-weeks after post-final treatment to determine if the RAP treatment had the effect of improvement in the appearance of cellulite. The photographs were assessed by blinded independent reviewers (IPR) to correctly identify the 12-weeks post-treatment photographs from randomly placed side-by-side comparison of before and after photographs. Reported here is the percentage (%) of images that were correctly identified by at least 2 out of 3 blinded independent reviewers.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks post-final treatment

  2. Number of Participants With Device-related or Treatment-related: Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Adverse Device Events (ADEs), Serious ADEs (SADEs), Unanticipated AEs or Unanticipated ADEs

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the participant to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. A SAE resulted in death, was life threatening, required hospitalization, was a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a birth defect, or was an event that required medical intervention. An ADE was defined as any AE with a reasonable possibility (definitely, probably, possibly, or remotely related) that the event may have been caused by the study device only.

    Time frame: Week 1 up to 52 weeks post-final treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" Responses to the Participant Satisfaction Survey in the Improvement in Appearance of Cellulite

    The study participant responded to the Participant Satisfaction Survey statement, "In comparison to the pre-treatment photo, the 12 week photograph of the treatment area appears improved." Response choices to this statement were "Strongly Agree", "Agree", "Neutral", "Disagree", and "Strongly Disagree", with "Strongly Agree" representing the greatest perceived improvement in the appearance of cellulite. Reported here is the number of participants who responded with "Agree" or "Strongly Agree." Data are reported for response to photographs on the left and right side of the body.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks post-final treatment

07

Results

Posted Jul 18, 2025

Participant flow

Fourteen participants were enrolled at 1 study site in the United States.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Participants
Started14
Completed12
Not completed2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Before and After Side-by-side Photographs Correctly Identified by At Least 2 of 3 Blinded Reviewers From the Independent Physician Reviewer (IPR) Panel

Photographs of the treatment areas were taken at baseline, and at 12-weeks after post-final treatment to determine if the RAP treatment had the effect of improvement in the appearance of cellulite. The photographs were assessed by blinded independent reviewers (IPR) to correctly identify the 12-weeks post-treatment photographs from randomly placed side-by-side comparison of before and after photographs. Reported here is the percentage (%) of images that were correctly identified by at least 2 out of 3 blinded independent reviewers.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12 weeks post-final treatment
Reported as:
Number · % of images identified correctly
Percentage of Before and After Side-by-side Photographs Correctly Identified by At Least 2 of 3 Blinded Reviewers From the Independent Physician Reviewer (IPR) Panel
% of images identified correctlyAll Participants
Percentage of Before and After Side-by-side Photographs Correctly Identified by At Least 2 of 3 Blinded Reviewers From the Independent Physician Reviewer (IPR) Panel71.4 (41.9 to 91.6)
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Device-related or Treatment-related: Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Adverse Device Events (ADEs), Serious ADEs (SADEs), Unanticipated AEs or Unanticipated ADEs

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the participant to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. A SAE resulted in death, was life threatening, required hospitalization, was a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a birth defect, or was an event that required medical intervention. An ADE was defined as any AE with a reasonable possibility (definitely, probably, possibly, or remotely related) that the event may have been caused by the study device only.

Time frame:
Week 1 up to 52 weeks post-final treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Device-related or Treatment-related: Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Adverse Device Events (ADEs), Serious ADEs (SADEs), Unanticipated AEs or Unanticipated ADEs
ParticipantsAll Participants
AEs2
SAEs0
ADEs2
SADEs0
Unanticipated AEs2
Unanticipated ADEs0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" Responses to the Participant Satisfaction Survey in the Improvement in Appearance of Cellulite

The study participant responded to the Participant Satisfaction Survey statement, "In comparison to the pre-treatment photo, the 12 week photograph of the treatment area appears improved." Response choices to this statement were "Strongly Agree", "Agree", "Neutral", "Disagree", and "Strongly Disagree", with "Strongly Agree" representing the greatest perceived improvement in the appearance of cellulite. Reported here is the number of participants who responded with "Agree" or "Strongly Agree." Data are reported for response to photographs on the left and right side of the body.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12 weeks post-final treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" Responses to the Participant Satisfaction Survey in the Improvement in Appearance of Cellulite
participantsAll Participants
Number of Participants With "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" Responses to the Participant Satisfaction Survey in the Improvement in Appearance of Cellulite5

Adverse events

Collected over All-cause mortality and adverse event tables include events reported from first treatment up to 52 weeks post-final treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Participants0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)2/14 (14.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAll Participants
Application Site DiscolorationGeneral disorders2/14
BlisterSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/14

Baseline characteristics

Safety Population

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)All Participants
Mean39.5 ± 5.06
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Participants
Female14
Male0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Participants
Hispanic or Latino2
Not Hispanic or Latino12
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Innovation Research Center
    Pleasanton, California 94588, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05664581
Lead sponsor
Zeltiq Aesthetics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 23, 2022
Start date
Dec 14, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 26, 2024
Completion
Jul 26, 2024
Results posted
Jul 18, 2025
Last update
Jul 18, 2025

Study contacts

Zeltiq Aesthetics
study director · Zeltiq Aesthetics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion