CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05662111CALCIFADEUpdated Mar 2, 2026

Treatment of Ectopic Calcification in Fahr's Disease or Syndrome

A Phase 2 interventional study of Etidronate and Placebo in Fahr Disease, Fahr Syndrome and Primary Familial Brain Calcification, sponsored by UMC Utrecht. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-02.

Sponsored by UMC Utrecht · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2023; still recruiting 3 years 6 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Fahr's disease or syndrome are neurodegenerative diseases in which patients present with bilateral vessel associated calcifications in the basal ganglia. The clinical penetration of Fahr's disease or syndrome is incomplete and heterogeneous comprising of neuropsychiatric signs, cognitive decline, movement disorders, and various other signs (migraine, speech disorders, pain, seizures). The symptoms start between 30 and 50 years and are (slowly) progressive. Symptomatic patients have an increased risk for dependence in activities of daily living and impaired quality of life.

Currently, disease-modifying therapies are not available for patients with Fahr's disease or syndrome. However, in a small case series it was shown that alendronate was effective in the clinical treatment of several patients with Fahr's disease or syndrome. Now the time has come to investigate the effectiveness of treatment with bisphosphonates in patients with Fahr's disease or syndrome in a randomized controlled trial.

Read the detailed description

Fahr's disease, scientifically known as primary familial brain calcification (PFBC), is a neurodegenerative disease in which all patients present with bilateral vessel associated calcifications in the basal ganglia in the absence of other secondary causes of brain calcifications. When a secondary cause is identified, the term Fahr's syndrome is often used. Dominantly-inherited PFBC is associated with mutations in four genes; solute carrier family 20 member 2 (SLC20A2), xenotropic and polytropic retrovirus receptor 1 (XPR1), platelet-derived growth factor b (PDGFB) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor b (PDGFRB). Recessively inherited PFBC is associated with mutations in two genes; myogenesis-regulating glycosidase (MYORG) and junctional adhesion molecule 2 (JAM2). Mutations in the known genes account for half of patients, suggesting genetic heterogeneity, with new genes yet to be discovered. The estimated minimal prevalence in studies with PFBC diagnosed with genetic and imaging studies is 2.1 to 6.6 per 1,000 suggesting that PFBC is actually not a rare disorder and is underdiagnosed. The clinical penetration of Fahr's disease or syndrome is incomplete and heterogeneous comprising of neuropsychiatric signs (depression, anxiety, psychosis), cognitive decline, movement disorders (ataxia, dystonia, Parkinsonism) and various other signs (migraine, speech disorders, pain, seizures). The symptoms start between 30 and 50 years and are (slowly) progressive. Symptomatic patients have an increased risk for dependence in activities of daily living and impaired quality of life.

Histology shows small vessel and capillary calcifications, vascular insufficiency and blood-brain barrier damage. Neural pathology has been described and there are indications that calcifications could interfere with neural circuitry. It is not known how mutations in different genes lead to a common pathology. Yet PFBC belongs to a group of genetic diseases that due to different types of faulty phosphor metabolism leads to a shortage of inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi). PPi is the strongest inhibitor of ectopic calcification in the body. PPi can be replaced by etidronate, a stable molecular homologue of PPi and a well known bisphosphonate that has been used widely. Presently, the rare genetic diseases Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum (PXE), Generalized Arterial Calcification of Infancy (GACI) and Arterial Calcification due to Cluster of Designation 73 (CD73) deficiency (ACDC) are successfully treated with this medication. In PFBC, it was shown that due to mutations in the SLC20A2 gene the Pi Transporter 2 (PiT2) is compromised. The PiT2 transporter plays an important role in the maintenance of Pi homeostasis which is essential for adenosine triphosphate synthesis. Another mutation, XPR1 is responsible for phosphate efflux and mutations here lead to calcium deposition in endothelial cells. Recently, it was shown that mutations in the PDGFB and PDGFRB genes cause osteoblast like cells to mediate in the calcification process, as was also shown in PXE, GACI and ACDC patients.

Currently, disease-modifying therapies are not available for patients with Fahr's disease or syndrome. However, in a small case series it was shown that alendronate was effective in the clinical treatment of several patients with Fahr's disease or syndrome. Now the time has come to investigate the effectiveness of treatment with bisphosphonates in patients with Fahr's disease or syndrome in a randomized controlled trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fahr Disease
  • Fahr Syndrome
  • Primary Familial Brain Calcification
03

In context

Lead sponsor

UMC Utrecht is the lead sponsor of 350 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age of 18 years or over,
  2. Clinical diagnosis of Fahr's disease or syndrome. No international accepted diagnostic criteria for Fahr's disease or syndrome exist yet. It is diagnosed mostly based on the clinical presentation. For the present study the following criteria are used:

    1. Clinical symptoms consistent with a clinical diagnosis of Fahr's disease or syndrome.
    2. Bilateral calcifications of the basal ganglia as seen on the computed tomography (CT) scan of the head. To rule out basal ganglia calcifications due to aging, a CT based calcification score will be used as proposed by Nicolas et al. Calcification is graded from 0 (no calcification) to 5 (serious and confluent) in specific locations of the brain; lenticular, caudate, thalamus nuclei, subcortical white matter, cortex, cerebellar hemispheres, vermis, midbrain, pons, and medulla. The total calcification score (ranging from 0 to 80) is obtained by adding all location-specific points, where a score higher than the age-specific threshold points at Fahr's disease or syndrome.

      Furthermore, the next criteria are supportive for the clinical diagnosis of PFBC:

    3. Frequently, the family history is consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance. A positive family history with at least one relative in the first or second degree with symptoms of PFBC is supportive for the clinical diagnosis of PFBC.
    4. The presence of a (likely) pathogenic mutation in one of the PFBC-related genes is supportive for the clinical diagnosis of PFBC. Mutations in up to now 4 known genes are associated with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance: solute carrier family 20 member 2 (SLC20A2) (OMIM#213600), xenotropic and polytropic retrovirus receptor 1 (XPR1) (OMIM#616413), platelet-derived growth factor b (PDGFB) (OMIM#615483), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor b (PDGFRB) (OMIM#615007). Autosomal recessively inherited PFBC is associated with mutations in two genes: myogenesis-regulating glycosidase (MYORG) (OMIM#618317) and junctional adhesion molecule 2 (JAM2) (OMIM#618824).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria are:

  1. unable or unwilling to sign an informed consent,
  2. severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of \<30 ml/min/1.73m2 calculated using CKD-EPI equation),
  3. contraindication to receiving oral medication (for example severe dysphagia),
  4. known abnormality of the oesophagus that would interfere with the passage of the drug (for example oesophageal strictures or achalasia),
  5. known sensitivity to etidronate,
  6. pregnancy, women with an active pregnancy wish \<1 year, or women who are breastfeeding at the time of inclusion,
  7. inability to undergo a Dutch neuropsychological assessment (for example, non-fluent Dutch speakers or severe visual, hearing or motor impairment),
  8. any other medical or social condition that puts the subject at risk of harm during the study or might adversely affect the interpretation of the study data,
  9. use of bisphosphonates during the last 5 years,
  10. hypocalcaemia (calcium \<2.20 mmol/L),
  11. 25-OH vitamin D deficiency \<35 nmol/L. After correction of hypocalcaemia or vitamin D deficiency, a participant is again suitable for participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
98 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Etidronate

    Etidronate 20 mg/kg for two weeks on and ten weeks off during 12 months

    Drug: Etidronate

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo for two weeks on and ten weeks off during 12 months

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugEtidronate

    The dosage of etidronate is 20 mg/kg for twee weeks and ten weeks off. Etidronate is given in capsules of 200 mg. Etidronate capsules are administered orally. During the study, participants will receive etidronate in four periods of two weeks during the twelve months of follow-up.

    Also known as: Etidronate disodium

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo is given in capsules and are administered orally. During the study, participants will receive placebo in four periods of two weeks during the twelve months of follow-up.

    Also known as: Etidronate disodium

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall cognitive functioning

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; range 0-30, higher scores mean better outcome)

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Memory

    Composite z-score of Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (RBMT) Stories immediate and delayed recall, Rey complex figure test immediate and delayed recall

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Attention and speed of information processing

    Composite z-score of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale third edition (WAIS-III) Digit Span Forward, Trail Making Test A (TMT-A), Stroop I and II

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Executive functioning

    Composite z-score of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale third edition (WAIS-III) Digit Span Backward, Trail Making Test B (TMT-B), Stroop III, semantic and letter fluency

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Social cognition

    Facial Expressions of Emotion - Stimuli and Tests (FEEST; scored based on normative data)

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mobility

    Condensed version of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), which is a composite test of gait and balance (range 0-28, higher scores mean better outcome)

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Mobility

    Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, part III (UPDRS; range 0-56, higher scores mean worse outcome)

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Neuropsychiatric symptoms

    Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI; range 0-144, higher scores mean worse outcome)

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Activities of daily living

    Katz-15 scale (range 0-15, higher scores mean worse outcome)

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Quality of life questionnaire

    36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36; range 0-100, higher scores mean better outcome)

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Brain calcification volume

    Volume of calcification quantified in computed tomography scan (milliliters)

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
    Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CX, Netherlands
    • Birgitta MG Snijders, MD · Contact
    Recruiting
  • University College London Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
    • Angelina Manoharan · Contact · +44 20 3456 7890
    • Amit Batla, MD PhD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Snijders BM, Mathijssen G, Peters MJ, Emmelot-Vonk MH, de Jong PA, Bakker S, Crommelin HA, Ruigrok YM, Brilstra EH, Schepers VP, Spiering W, van Valen E, Koek HL. The effects of etidronate on brain calcifications in Fahr's disease or syndrome: rationale and design of the randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind CALCIFADE trial. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Feb 7;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03039-7. PubMed 38326858 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data can be shared with other researchers upon request. Due to the fact that Fahr's disease or syndrome is rare, not all data will be published openly, since this data might be traceable to an individual person.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05662111
Lead sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Collaborators
Netherlands Brain Foundation
Responsible party
H.L. Koek, MD, PhD (Principal Investigator, UMC Utrecht) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 22, 2022
Start date
Apr 3, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 2, 2026

Study contacts

Huiberdina L Koek, MD PhD
Contact
h.l.koek@umcutrecht.nl
0031 88 75 55555
Huiberdina L Koek, MD, PhD
principal investigator · UMC Utrecht

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion