ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05661383COBRAUpdated Jul 24, 2025

Olfactory and Brain Stimulations in Treatment-resistant Depression

An interventional study of Non-invasive brain stimulation protocol (intermittent theta burst protocol (iTBS)) combined with pleasant odors delivered during the iTBS procol. and Non-invasive brain stimulation protocol (intermittent theta burst protocol (iTBS)) delivered alone. in Treatment-resistant Depression, sponsored by Hôpital le Vinatier. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-24.

Sponsored by Hôpital le Vinatier · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 9 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 23 studies in Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant with a site in France — 9 open to participants now, 10 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant · France.

Planned enrollment
14th of 21
80 · median 119
Started
2024
with 3 others
No phase
14 of 23
6 open now
Registered
16th of 23
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 23
Hôpital le Vinatier

Among the 23 studies in Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant with a site in France, this one is the 14th largest by planned enrollment of the 21 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2024, is one of 14 with no phase, and was the 16th registered.

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

448 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; 147 are open to participants now.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant studies →

Open to participants now

9 of the 23 studies in Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

3 more — sign in →

All 9 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 114 Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant studies recruiting now, 26 (23%) set no upper age limit and 76 (67%) stop at 75 or younger; 1 takes children under 18; 13 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 23 studies in Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group controlled trial. The aim of this research project is to compare the clinical benefits achieved in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) following two types of intervention: iTBS active alone or iTBS active combined with olfactory stimulations.

Read the detailed description

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the most widespread psychiatric disorder, affecting 5% of adults according to the World Health Organization. Anhedonia, defined as the loss of the ability to experience pleasure, is one of the key symptoms of depression, possibly due to a dysfunction of the reward system. Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been demonstrated as an emerging treatment option for treatment-resistant depression. One explanation is that iTBS could work through modulating the reward system (increasing dopamine release). One way to improve the therapeutic benefits of non-invasive brain stimulation is to combine it with other therapeutic strategies. Interestingly, olfactory training -daily short-term exposure to pleasant odors- improves significantly depressive symptoms in MDD patients. Indeed, the olfactory system and the reward system are closely related through the olfactory tubercle, which is in the ventral striatum and directly connected to the ventral tegmental area.

The general aim of this research project is to test whether a combination of iTBS targeting the left DLPFC with an olfactory training can improve treatment outcome in MDD, compared to iTBS targeting the left DLPFC alone.

The investigators hypothesize that combining iTBS treatment on DLPFC with hedonic olfactory stimulation potentiates the effect of iTBS treatment administered alone on depressive symptoms, especially anhedonia (physical, social or olfactory). Moreover, the investigators also hypothesize that the superiority of the combined approach is underpinned by greater modulation of connectivity activity and strength between brain regions involved in dopaminergic transmission, compared with iTBS alone.

03

Conditions studied

  • Treatment-resistant Depression

Keywords

  • Depression
  • brain stimulation
  • anhedonia
  • odor
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • had a primary diagnosis of single-episode or recurrent non-psychotic major depressive disorder according to , fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria;
  • scored 20 or over on the MADRS (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) (Montgomery and Åsberg, 1979) and scored higher than 2 on the MADRS item 8 anhedonia factor score;
  • a stable antidepressant medication for 4 weeks prior to inclusion; be able to speak and read French;
  • sign a consent form before intervention.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a pre-existing condition that affects olfaction including congenital anosmia, upper respiratory tract infection, nasal and/or sinus disease, brain injury or nasal surgery; a neurological disease;
  • other comorbid psychiatric disorders or substance abuse (except tobacco);
  • to TMS (medical devices implanted or metallic foreign body in the head);
  • pregnant or lactating mothers (controlled by urine pregnancy tests);
  • measure of protection or guardianship of justice.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    iTBS active combined with an olfactory stimulation

    Non-invasive brain stimulation protocol (intermittent theta burst protocol (iTBS)) combined with pleasant odors delivered during the iTBS procol.

    Device: Non-invasive brain stimulation protocol (intermittent theta burst protocol (iTBS)) combined with pleasant odors delivered during the iTBS procol.

  • Active comparator
    iTBS active alone

    Non-invasive brain stimulation protocol (intermittent theta burst protocol (iTBS)) delivered alone.

    Device: Non-invasive brain stimulation protocol (intermittent theta burst protocol (iTBS)) delivered alone.

Interventions

  • DeviceNon-invasive brain stimulation protocol (intermittent theta burst protocol (iTBS)) combined with pleasant odors delivered during the iTBS procol.

    Device: MagPro X100 (MagVenture, Mag2Health, France) iTBS protocol targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: 50 consecutive sessions allocated on 10 days (i.e., 5 sessions per working day, 1 hour apart, for 2 weeks). One iTBS session: burst of 3 pulses at 50 Hz repeated at 200 ms intervals for 2 s (i.e., at 5 Hz) at an intensity of 90% of rMT. A 2 s train of iTBS will be repeated every 10 s for a total of 1800 pulses per session. Pleasant odorants will be delivered using passive diffusers placed in the room dedicated to the iTBS protocol, during the all-treatment duration. During the inclusion phase, 10 odors known to be pleasant will be presented to the subject. The 3 best rated by the subject will be chosen for olfactory stimulations. During the iTBS session, a randomly selected odor from the 3 will be presented at the same time as the iTBS treatment.

  • DeviceNon-invasive brain stimulation protocol (intermittent theta burst protocol (iTBS)) delivered alone.

    Device: MagPro X100 (MagVenture, Mag2Health, France) iTBS protocol targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: 50 consecutive sessions allocated on 10 days (i.e., 5 sessions per working day, 1 hour apart, for 2 weeks). One iTBS session: burst of 3 pulses at 50 Hz repeated at 200 ms intervals for 2 s (i.e., at 5 Hz) at an intensity of 90% of rMT. A 2 s train of iTBS will be repeated every 10 s for a total of 1800 pulses per session.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in MADRS score before and after intervention to characterized the number of depressed patients who reach remission criteria (MADRS ≤ 10) in each group

    MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detect changes due to intervention. The scale consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total possible score of 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. Remission is defined as a Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score less than or equal to 10 at the end of 50 sessions of iTBS

    Time frame: 4 times : before the Intervention (J0), immediately following the end of the Intervention (J15), 1 (M1) and 3 months (M3) after the end of the Intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Group differences in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score changes

    MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detect changes due to intervention. The scale consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total possible score of 60. Higher scores indicating a more severe depression.

    Time frame: 4 times : Before the Intervention (J0), immediately following the end of the Intervention (J15), 1 (M1) and 3 months (M3) after the end of the Intervention.

  2. Group differences in Beck Depressive Inventory (BDI) score changes

    BDI is a 21-item validated instrument for the self-report of depressive symptoms, with individual item scores summed to yield a total possible BDI score that ranges from 0-63. Higher scores indicating a more severe depression

    Time frame: 4 times : before the Intervention (J0), immediately following the end of the Intervention (J15), 1 (M1) and 3 months (M3) after the end of the Intervention.

  3. Group differences in European Test of Olfactory Capabilities (ETOC) score changes

    The ETOC is an olfactory test based on standardized odorants. It consists in the presentation of 16 odors at supraliminal concentrations. For each trial, 4 tubes are presented to the patient, but only one contains the odor. The participant has to find which one contains it. Then, the patient has to identify the odor between 4 propositions. Both tests are rated on 16. Another test will be performed to assess olfactory hedonic judgment. It consists of the presentation of 10 odors known to be pleasant. Hedonicity of each odor will be rated on an analog scale from 1 to 9 (1 for "Not at all pleasant", 5 for "Neutral" and 9 for "Extremly pleasant").

    Time frame: 2 times : Before the Intervention (J0), immediately following the end of the Intervention (J15)

  4. Group differences in the Chapman Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS)

    The SAS is a 40-items 'true/false' self-report questionnaire designed to measure social anhedonia that refers to a marked preference for solitary activities. Scores can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating less ability to experience pleasure from social and interpersonal experiences.

    Time frame: 4 times : before the Intervention (J0), immediately following the end of the Intervention (J15), 1 (M1) and 3 months (M3) after the end of the Intervention.

  5. the Chapman Physical Anhedonia Scale (PAS) score changes

    The PAS is a 61-items 'true/false' self-report questionnaire designed to measure physical anhedonia that refers to the inability to experience physical pleasures related to food, touch, smells, sex, temperature, movements, sounds and physical sensations. Scores can range from 0 to 61 with higher scores indicating less ability to experience pleasure from pleasant physical stimuli.

    Time frame: 4 times : before the Intervention (J0), immediately following the end of the Intervention (J15), 1 (M1) and 3 months (M3) after the end of the Intervention.

  6. Group differences in conditioned motor evoked potential (MEP) peak-to-peak amplitude changes

    Dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to probe effective connectivity between the left DLPFC and the left M1. Conditioned MEP amplitude evoked by dual-site TMS and measured with surface EMG is compared to MEP amplitude evoked by TMS applied over M1 alone.

    Time frame: 2 times : before the Intervention (J0), immediately following the end of the Intervention (J15)

  7. Group differences in functional connectivity changes in the targeted brain network

    Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is used to probe functional connectivity changes in the targeted brain region and related network following non-invasive brain stimulation intervention.

    Time frame: 2 times : before the Intervention (J0), immediately following the end of the Intervention (J15)

  8. Group differences in the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) score changes

    The CTQ is a self-administered 28-item scale to measure abuse and neglect suffered in childhood on five subscales: emotional, physical / sexual abuse, and emotional / physical neglect. Each subscale scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The score for each subscale classifies the severity of the abuse and neglect as: "none to minimal," "low to moderate," "moderate to severe" and "severe to extreme".

    Time frame: 1 time : Before the Intervention (J0)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Imbert L, Neige C, Dumas M, Bensafi M, Mandairon N, Brunelin J. Combining pleasant Olfactory and BRAin stimulations in treatment-resistant depression (COBRA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 17;15:1451096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451096. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39744036 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Describe the IPD sharing plan, including what IPD are to be shared with other researchers.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 36 months after the start.

Of 136 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 79. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 140 studies reached it within 50 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 88.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 23, 2022
First posted
Dec 22, 2022
StartActual
Jan 27, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 27, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 2, 2027
Last update
Jul 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05661383
Collaborators
Fondation de France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 22, 2022
Start date
Jan 27, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 27, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2025

Study contacts

SARTELET Lydie
Contact
lydie.sartelet@ch-le-vinatier.fr
0437915531 ext. +33
BRUNELIN JEROME, PhD
principal investigator · hospital le vinatier

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion