An observational study in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis and BLyS Polymorphism, sponsored by University of Cagliari. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-21.
Sponsored by University of Cagliari · Observational
A variant of the TNFSF13B gene, commonly referred to as BAFF-var has been associated with an increased risk of developing immune-mediated diseases, such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).
This polymorphism leads to the production of higher levels of BAFFs, that in turns are associated with more severe disease, high anti-Sm and anti-dsDNA titre, complement consumption, and increased risk of flare in SLE, and higher disease activity in RA.
This is a prospective study aiming to explore the immunological basis of a potential role of BAFF-var as a prognostic biomarker for response to belimumab and rituximab, the main B-depletive treatments, in SLE and RA patients, respectively. More in detail, the study aims to evaluate if the condition of BAFF-var carrier in SLE and RA patients, treated respectively, with belimumab plus standard of care or rituximab influences immunological, molecular and clinical variables, such as: (a) soluble BAFF (BAFFs) cytokine, (b) mRNA-BAFF (c) miRNA-15a (d) B-cell subpopulations (d) disease activity, as assessed by standardized clinimetric tools.
BACKGROUND
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) are multisystem immune-mediated disease characterized by a complex pathogenesis, where an abnormal activation of the humoral immune response, with overproduction of autoantibodies, demonstrated to have a pivotal role.
B lymphocyte stimulator (BAFF) is a cytokine and drug target that is primarily produced by monocytes and neutrophils. It is essential for B-cell activation, differentiation and survival. Overexpression of BAFF was demonstrated to be associated with more severe pattern of SLE and correlate to more frequent positivity for anti-Sm (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.3, 2.2), high titre anti-dsDNA (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1, 2.2), lower C3 (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0, 1.8), higher proteinuria (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4, 2.4) and increased risk of flare (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.29, 2.68). Similarly, high levels of BAFF have been observed in blood and synovial fluid of RA patients and were demonstrated to correlate with higher disease activity in RA.
Belimumab and rituximab are the prototypical form of B-cell targeted therapies currently approved for SLE and RA, respectively.
Belimumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody directed against BAFF, is the first biological drug licensed and approved for use in combination with standard immunosuppressants in SLE. Data from RCTs demonstrated that higher disease activity, anti-dsDNA positivity, low complement and corticosteroid treatment may predict a higher benefit to belimumab. However, around 40% of subjects did not achieve an adequate response.
Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that of selectively inhibit the CD20 receptor on the surface of B lymphocytes. The use of RTX, preferably in combination with methotrexate, is indicated in patients with RA unresponsive to treatment with traditional immunosuppressants. Although greater efficacy was recorded in patients with positivity for autoantibodies (e.g. rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide), also in this case a about 30-40% of patients is inadequately responsive.
A variant of TNFSF13B gene encoding for BAFF (BAFF-var), especially common across Sardinia (allele frequency, 26.5%) and progressively less common in southern (5.7% in Italy, 5.0% in Spain and Portugal) and northern Europe (1.8% in the UK and Sweden), was associated with autoimmune diseases, including SLE and RA. The causal variant was identified as an insertion-deletion variant, yielding a shorter transcript that escaped microRNA inhibition and increased production of soluble BAFF, which in turn up-regulated humoral immunity. In particular, BAFF-var was associated with increased level of soluble BAFF (effect size 0.77 standard deviations (SD); P= 8.47 x10-150), IgG (0.31 SD, p=1.68x10-12), IgA (0.31 SD, p=7.64x10-9), IgM (0.31 SD, p=4.70x10-8), as well as increased number of total B cell (0.18 SD, P=4.23x10-12) and several subtypes, including the CD24+CD27+ (comprising un-switched and switched memory) (0.22 SD, P=2.94x10-10) as the strongly associated. Further, transcriptome data demonstrated BAFF-var as an expression quantitative trait locus that increases TNFSF13B expression (P = 2.37×10-13). However, the elevated mRNA levels could explain only 24-27% of the effect on protein, indicating that an increase in translation level was also probably involved. In this regard, data indicate that BAFF-var raises soluble BAFF levels by favoring the production of a shorter transcript that is less inhibited by microRNA, such as miR-15a6.
Knowing the effective influence of BAFF-var in the immunological, molecular and clinical modifications induced by BAFF-inhibition has a crucial importance In the prospective of a personalized medicine in SLE and RA patients.
OBJETVIES
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 155 across 1,057 observational studies indexed under Arthritis.
Browse Arthritis studies →University of Cagliari is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
A real-life monocentric cohort of consecutive patients affected by SLE and RA (recruited in the Rheumatology Unit, University Clinic of Cagliari), who started treatment with, respectively, belimumab or rituximab at the enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug: Belimumab in SLE patients / Rituximab in RA patients
Drug: Belimumab in SLE patients / Rituximab in RA patients
Belimumab and Rituximab are the the investigated treatments, respectively in the SLE and RA group. They are administrated according to the approved indications and in compliance with the current recommendations and the good clinical practice, independently to the aim of the present observational study.
BAFFs
Comparison of BAFFs level before and after treatment in BAFF-var carrier and no BAFF-var carrier
Time frame: 12 months
mRNA-BAFF e miRNA-15a
Comparison of mRNA-BAFF e miRNA-15a levels before and after treatment in BAFF-var carrier and no BAFF-var carrier
Time frame: 12 months
B-cell subpopulations
B-cell phenotyping before and after treatment in BAFF-var carrier and no BAFF-var carrier
Time frame: 12 months
Delta PGA in SLE patients
Comparison of Physician Global Assessment of disease activity (PGA) on a VAS scale before and after treatment in BAFF-var carrier and no BAFF-var carrier
Time frame: 12 months
SLE responder index (SRI) in SLE patients
defined by a 4-point reduction in SELENA-SLEDAI score, no new BILAG A organ domain score and ≤ 1 new BILAG B score, and no increase ≥ 0.3 in PGA score vs. baseline;
Time frame: 12 months
Achievement of clinical remission ins SLE patients
Defined by SLEDAI-2k=0, PGA ≤ 0.5, prednisone (or equivalent) dosage ≤ 7.5mg daily
Time frame: 12 months
Delta PGA in RA patients
Comparison of Physician Global Assessment of disease activity (PGA) on a VAS scale before and after treatment in BAFF-var carrier and no BAFF-var carrier
Time frame: 12 months
Delta DAS-28 in RA patients
Comparison of DAS 28 before and after treatment in BAFF-var carrier and no BAFF-var carrier
Time frame: 12 months
EULAR response in RA patients
Response to treatment according to the EULAR criteria
Time frame: 12 months
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Cagliari