CClinicalTrials.gg
SuspendedNCT05653921Updated Jan 7, 2026

Prospective Study to Validate the Imaging Biomarker for NCP (R33)

An observational study in Dry Eye Syndromes and Corneal Disease, sponsored by Tufts Medical Center. Suspended at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-07.

Sponsored by Tufts Medical Center · Observational

Why this study was suspended
PI si leaving institution. This study will likely be transferred to USF but study activity is not continuing at TMC.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
438
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is establish the reliability and clinical utility of microneuromas as identified via in vivo confocal microscopy as the diagnostic biomarker for NCP.

Read the detailed description

Dry Eye Disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by a loss of homeostasis of the tear film, and accompanied by ocular symptoms, in which tear film instability and hyperosmolarity, ocular surface inflammation and damage, and neurosensory abnormalities.

Neuropathic corneal pain (NCP), an ocular and severe type of neuropathic pain describes patients with symptoms of ocular discomfort out of proportion with clinical signs. The lack of clinical signs observed by standard ophthalmic examination has resulted in underdiagnosis of NCP or misdiagnosis as dry eye disease. Thus, having a biomarker for NCP is critical to identify and treat these patients. No biomarker or clinical signs exists to identify NCP patients.

Investigating corneal neurosensory abnormalities could help to diagnose NCP and potentially differentiate these patients from those with DED. In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) allows for real-time optical biopsies at a quasi-histological level, allowing for assessment of corneal nerves. IVCM non-invasive diagnostic imaging across NCP, DED, and healthy individuals will be analyzed to validate corneal microneuromas as a biomarker for NCP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye Syndromes
  • Corneal Disease
03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 191 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 438 is above the median of 90 across 171 observational studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Tufts Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 194 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (53%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

We will not be limiting the inclusion of the NCP or DED groups for this study. We will be recruiting from two Cornea Clinics in diverse large cities of Boston and Philadelphia. Thus, the sample collected from this group is expected to be representative of the population for each of these groups. We will be limiting inclusion of the control group to those age and sex matched controls as described above. This will allow for the conclusions drawn from this study to be more applicable in clinical practice. Without an age and sex matched control group, one could attribute differences in IVCM to these two variables instead of the disease(s).

Inclusion criteria

All Subjects:

  1. 18 years of age or older
  2. Ability to consent
  3. Best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better in each eye

Dry Eye Disease Group:

  1. Chief complaint is ocular surface discomfort or dry eye disease, but subject reports no ocular pain on OPAS questionnaire
  2. Symptoms lasting at least 3 months
  3. Presence of at least two of the following within the same eye:

    1. Anesthetized Schirmer score =/\< 10mm
    2. Corneal staining of >3/15 based on NEI scale
    3. Tear break up time \< 10 seconds

Neuropathic Corneal Pain Group:

  1. Chief complain is ocular surface discomfort or dry eye disease
  2. Symptoms lasting at least 3 months
  3. All of the following in both eyes:

    1. Corneal staining of less than or equal to 3/15 based on NEI scale
    2. Tear break up time =/> 10 seconds
  4. Must have at least 25% peripheral pain
  5. Subject reported discomfort prior to drop response testing of at least 3 out of 10

Control Group:

  1. No symptoms of ocular surface discomfort or dry eye disease
  2. All of the following in both eyes

    1. Anesthetized Schirmer score > 10 mm
    2. Corneal staining of less than or equal to 3/15 based on NEI scale
    3. Tear break up time > 10 seconds
  3. The same sex and within 5 years of age of a patient within the NCP group.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or nursing
  2. Irregular corneal disease
  3. Ocular surgery in the past 3 months
  4. Ocular infection in the past 3 months
  5. Active ocular allergies
  6. Participation in a study that could potentially impact the IVCM in the opinion of the investigator
  7. Current use of corneal nerve regeneration therapy that has been on-going for 3 months or more.
  8. For NCP group only, patients for whom their pain and symptoms can be attributed to other causes in the opinion of the investigator
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
438 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Dry Eye Disease Group

    Symptoms of ocular surface discomfort or dry eye disease for at least 3 months, supported by clinical exam findings. Reported quality of life is not effected by ocular pain.

    Other: In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)

  • Neuropathic Corneal Pain Group

    Symptoms of ocular surface discomfort or pain for at least 3 months, that are reported to have a significant impact on quality of life and ability to perform daily activities.

    Other: In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)

  • Control Group

    No symptoms of ocular surface discomfort or dry eye disease.

    Other: In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)

Interventions

  • OtherIn vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)

    In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) allows for visualization of the corneal structures at the cellular level, allowing for assessment of corneal nerves. With a magnification of 800 times, it makes it possible to detect and quantify changes in the epithelial layers and sub-basal nerve plexus.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence of microneuromas as assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).

    The obtained sequence of IVCM imaging scans of both eyes will be evaluated for findings of microneuromas; defined as either observed presence or absence of microneuroma

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intra-subject repeatability; Presence of the microneuroma biomarker in the same participant at 2 weeks

    Confirmation of presence of microneuroma on IVCM at 2 weeks in participants with IVCM finding of microneruoma at Visit 1

    Time frame: From Day 1 to 2 weeks

  2. Establish the reference interval for the microneuroma biomarker

    Quantification of microneuromas as assessed by IVCM in each cohort (Normal vs. NCP vs. DED)

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) questionnaire results correlation to microneuromas; OPAS reported quality of life score compared across the 3 cohorts.

    Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) questionnaire: 27-item quantitative questionnaire designed to provide an assessment of the symptoms and quality of life effect of ocular pain. The 27 items of the OPAS questionnaire are graded on a scale of 0 to 10, or 10 to 100, where 0 indicates none and 10 or 100 indicate maximum. Higher scores indicate greater impact of ocular pain on quality of life dimensions.

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Hyperosmolar functional nerve tests in correlation to microneuromas; hyperosmolar functional nerve tests results compared cross cohorts

    Using the Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Symptoms of ocular comfort and dryness at the time in question will be graded for each eye verbally on a scale of 0-10, where 0=excellent comfort, no dryness and 10=extremely uncomfortable, extremely dry. A single drop of hypertonic sodium chloride solution (Muro 128®, 5%) at room temperature will be instilled into each eye. After 20 seconds, participants will be asked to grade their ocular comfort and dryness symptoms as described in the VAS procedure again allowing assessment of changes in sensation due to the hyperosmolar drop and activation of the polymodal nociceptors

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. Test the utility of already configured AI software to diagnose NCP patients

    categorical variables of NCP and DED as diagnosed by the AI system and the classification of subjects into the NCP and DED groups based on inclusion criteria set by the study

    Time frame: Day 1 to 2 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Tufts Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bujang MA, Adnan TH. Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct;10(10):YE01-YE06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18129.8744. Epub 2016 Oct 1. PubMed 27891446 ↗
  • Ferrari G, Nallasamy N, Downs H, Dana R, Oaklander AL. Corneal innervation as a window to peripheral neuropathies. Exp Eye Res. 2013 Aug;113:148-50. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Jun 14. PubMed 23769950 ↗
  • Nichols KK, Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL. The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease. Cornea. 2004 Nov;23(8):762-70. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000133997.07144.9e. PubMed 15502475 ↗
  • Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Messmer EM, Foulks GN, Nichols KK, Baenninger P, Geerling G, Figueiredo F, Lemp MA. Correlations between commonly used objective signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of dry eye disease: clinical implications. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;92(2):161-6. doi: 10.1111/aos.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 28. PubMed 23279964 ↗
  • Nichols KK, Bacharach J, Holland E, Kislan T, Shettle L, Lunacsek O, Lennert B, Burk C, Patel V. Impact of Dry Eye Disease on Work Productivity, and Patients' Satisfaction With Over-the-Counter Dry Eye Treatments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jun 1;57(7):2975-82. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19419. PubMed 27273596 ↗
  • Devigili G, Tugnoli V, Penza P, Camozzi F, Lombardi R, Melli G, Broglio L, Granieri E, Lauria G. The diagnostic criteria for small fibre neuropathy: from symptoms to neuropathology. Brain. 2008 Jul;131(Pt 7):1912-25. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn093. Epub 2008 Jun 4. PubMed 18524793 ↗
  • Classification of Chronic Pain, Part III: Pain Terms, A Current List with Definitions and Notes on Usage. Second ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994
  • Dieckmann G, Koseoglu N, Moein HR, Kataguiri P, Hamrah P. Epidemiological factors of neuropathic corneal pain. IASP: The 18th World Congress on Pain; 2018; Boston, MA.
  • Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20. PubMed 28736335 ↗
  • Yu J, Asche CV, Fairchild CJ. The economic burden of dry eye disease in the United States: a decision tree analysis. Cornea. 2011 Apr;30(4):379-87. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181f7f363. PubMed 21045640 ↗
  • Lopez MJ, Jamali A, Dieckmann G, et al. Corneal Pain Has a Negative Impact on the Quality of Life of Patients with Neuropathic Corneal Pain. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2018;59(9):138-138
  • Lopez MJ, Abbouda A, Pondelis N, et al. The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy as Valuable Tools in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Corneal Neuropathic Pain. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2017;58(8):1013-1013.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05653921
Lead sponsor
Tufts Medical Center
Collaborators
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 16, 2022
Start date
Dec 16, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 7, 2026

Study contacts

Pedram Hamrah, MD
principal investigator · Tufts Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is suspended, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion