CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05639686Updated Mar 23, 2023

TIVA vs TXA in Sinus Surgery to Evaluate Operative Blood Loss and Surgical Field Quality

An interventional study of Tranexamic acid injection and Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Rhinosinusitis Chronic, Sinus Cancer and Sinus Polyp, sponsored by Our Lady of the Lake Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-23.

Sponsored by Our Lady of the Lake Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this interventional study is to compare the efficacy (surgical field quality and intra-operative blood loss) or cost of TIVA alone to general inhalational anesthetics with intravenous TXA in patient participants who are undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  • Is the surgical field quality better when using TIVA alone compared to general inhalational anesthetics with intravenous TXA?
  • Is one method more financially advantageous to the participant and the institution compared to the other method?

Participants will be randomized into one of the two anesthesia cohorts prior to sinus surgery. One group will be given total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) alone and the other will be given intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) followed by general inhalational anesthesia.

Researchers will compare the TIVA group to the TXA group to see if one group exhibits a better surgery field viewing quality through a subjective evaluation and measurement of blood loss and also which anesthesia regimen is most cost effective upon conducting a cost analysis.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to prospectively compare surgical field quality and intraoperative blood loss between patients treated with perioperative intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) followed by general inhalational anesthesia (sevoflurane, isoflurane, or desflurane) to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) alone, which consists of propofol and remifentanil. A secondary objective would be to perform a cost analysis between these two groups to determine whether one method is financially more advantageous than the other.

This study will be a prospective double-blinded randomized control trial consisting of patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery to assess intraoperative blood loss, surgical field quality, and cost of the medications administered. The control group will receive total intravenous anesthesia without tranexamic acid during surgery. The study group will receive preoperative tranexamic acid with general inhaled anesthetics during surgery (detailed below). Randomization will be conducted via a pre-determined permuted block system (e.g. AABB, ABAB, BBAA, AABB, etc, where A is TIVA and B is general inhalational anesthetics with preoperative TXA). Subjects who consent to participate will be assigned to the A or B arm depending on whichever arm is listed next in the order.

Subjects will be informed about the study and consented during pre-operative clinic visits. The patient consent and HIPAA authorization forms will be presented at that time where the subject can read about the study followed by any verbal conversation or questions needed between the subject and the study team. This will be done in a private patient room setting. The subject will be notified that participation in the study is completely voluntary and that their medical care will not be affected regardless of their decision to participate. Of note, if patients decline to participate, they will undergo general anesthesia using TIVA without TXA, as this is the standard choice at our institution. Subjects will not receive payment or compensation for their participation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rhinosinusitis Chronic
  • Sinus Cancer
  • Sinus Polyp
  • Encephalocele

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rhinosinusitis

330 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinosinusitis; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Rhinosinusitis.

Browse Rhinosinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Our Lady of the Lake Hospital is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • adults (age ≥18 years)
  • will undergo endoscopic sinus surgery at Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center
  • includes patients who are undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for myriad of indications, such as chronic rhinosinusitis, sinonasal tumors, and encephalocele repairs.
  • includes patients who undergo both complete functional endoscopic sinus surgery, or FESS (i.e maxillary antrostomy, sphenoethmoidectomy, and frontal sinusotomy), as well as those who are undergoing limited functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (i.e. anything less than a complete FESS).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<18 years of age
  • history of bleeding or coagulation disorder
  • currently receiving anticoagulation therapy
  • underlying condition with increased risk of thrombosis (e.g. antiphospholipid syndrome),
  • history of thromboembolic disorder
  • history of chronic kidney disease
  • known allergy to tranexamic acid
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA)

    Patients will be induced with fentanyl 1-2µg/kg, propofol 2mg/kg, and lidocaine 1mg/kg. After orotracheal intubation, anesthesia will be maintained with propofol 150mg/kg/min, remifentanil 0.05-2µg/kg/min, and rocuronium or succinylcholine as indicated. This is standard of care for this procedure. Within 10 minutes of induction, patients in the control group will be administered a 100mL bolus of normal saline as placebo.

    Drug: Total Intravenous Anesthesia

  • Experimental
    Transexemic Acid (TXA) and Inhalational Anesthesia

    Patients will be induced with fentanyl 1-2µg/kg, propofol 2mg/kg, lidocaine 1mg/kg. After orotracheal intubation, anesthesia will be maintained with isoflurane 1.5-2% or sevoflurane 1-2%, as well as rocuronium or succinylcholine as indicated. Again standard of care procedure is applied. Within 10 minutes of induction, patients in the study group will be administered 15mg/kg TXA suspended in 100mL of normal saline intravenously.

    Drug: Tranexamic acid injection · Drug: Inhalational isoflurane

Interventions

  • DrugTranexamic acid injection

    Within 10 minutes of general anesthetic induction, 15mg/kg TXA suspended in 100mL of normal saline will be administered intravenously.

    Also known as: tranexamic acid (TXA)

  • DrugTotal Intravenous Anesthesia

    Within 10 minutes of induction, patients in the control (TIVA) group will be administered a 100mL bolus of normal saline as placebo.

    Also known as: total intravenous anesthesia (propofol, remifentanil)

  • DrugInhalational isoflurane

    Inhalational isoflurane or sevoflurane will be administered as a general anesthetic at the induction of the surgical procedure.

    Also known as: Inhalational anesthesia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical Field Quality

    Surgical field quality during surgery

    Time frame: Field quality measured Every 30 minutes over 4.5 hours of time using the Boezaart grading system.

  2. Intraoperative Blood loss

    Intraoperative blood loss at completion of surgery

    Time frame: Measured once at the conclusion of surgery by measuring the total amount of fluid in the suction canisters minus the total amount of irrigation used

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost Effectiveness between TIVA and TXA

    Comparison of cost of medications used for the TIVA arm to the arm with general anesthetics and TXA will be determined.

    Time frame: Analysis Within 1 year of the procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Our Lady of the Lake Hospital
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05639686
Lead sponsor
Our Lady of the Lake Hospital
Collaborators
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans
Responsible party
Leslie Son (Research Scientist, Our Lady of the Lake Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2022
Start date
Jan 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 23, 2023

Study contacts

Christine LeBoeuf, DNP
Contact
christine.leboeuf@fmolhs.org
225-765-5956
Leslie S Son, PhD
Contact
Lson@lsuhsc.edu
225-757-4165
Stephen Hernandez, MD
principal investigator · LSU Health Sciences Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion