ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05637619Updated Jul 26, 2024

Natural Dentition, Prosthesis and Antagonist Wear 3D Analysis

An observational study in Wear, Tooth, Dental Prosthesis Complication and Wear, Occlusal, sponsored by Implantology Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-26.

Primary conditionTooth AttritionRegistry: Tooth WearReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Tooth Wear — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Tooth Attrition
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Tooth Attrition, a narrower term within Tooth Wear.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Implantology Institute · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2024, 2 years 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2022; still recruiting 4 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
36
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Wear resistance is one of the most important physical properties of teeth, and wear resistance of zirconia against artificial acrylic, enamel and composite resin denture teeth has not been clearly established.

Implant-supported dental restorations present a higher threshold for occlusion perception when compared to natural teeth, which can occlusal overload mechanisms or lead to wear of rehabilitation materials or the antagonist arch.

In clinical conditions, however, many other factors influence the complex interaction between dental enamel and opposing substrates: patient-related factors such as dietary habits, dysfunctional occlusion, masticatory forces, and bruxism contribute to accelerated enamel loss of antagonist teeth.

Read the detailed description

It will be our intention to perform a prospective study and proof-of-concept to assess wear in natural dentition, Full arch implant supported rehabilitation (FAISR) and opposing arches. Wear according to type of rehabilitation and of opposing arch, technical complications, parafunction and number of placed implants will be assessed.

Intra-oral digital acquisition will be performed at pre-defined intervals. Changes over time will be assessed through a previously described digital superimposition methodology volumetric changes determined.

Patients will be scanned using an intraoral dental scanner (T0)

Patients will be recalled at every 4-months (T1), 8-months (T2) and 12-months (T3) visits for re-scanning and from there every 6-months

Scanned images will be compared using a metrology software to determine maximum vertical wear of teeth and root mean square wear.

02

Conditions studied

  • Wear, Tooth
  • Dental Prosthesis Complication
  • Wear, Occlusal

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tooth wear
  • Full arch Implant
  • 3D scanner
  • Prosthesis
  • Screw retained
  • Zirconia
  • Hybrid Acrylic
03

In context

Tooth Attrition Reclassified

14 studies on the registry are indexed under Tooth Attrition; 5 are open to participants now.

Browse Tooth Attrition studies →

Lead sponsor

Implantology Institute is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Compared within Tooth Attrition, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Tooth Wear. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Control Group: Healthy Patients, Dentate

Experimental Groups : Patients from a dental office that did a full-mouth (maxilla or mandible) implant-supported rehabilitation and made the final rehabilitation in either monolithic zirconia or hybrid-acrylic material

Eligibility criteria

Dentate Group :

Inclusion criteria

  • fully dentate (with at least 10 teeth ) and do not have any tooth mobility;
  • at least 12months follow up

Exclusion criteria

  • missing more than 4 teeth, extensive caries, bonded orthodontic brackets

Edentulous Group:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Maxilla or Mandible Implant full-mouth implant restoration
  • Monolithic ceramic or hybrid-acrylic restoration
  • at least12 months Follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heavy bruxists
  • Patients that changed the full arch rehabilitation during the study (ex: framework fracture or lab reparation)
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Dentate Patients

    Patients with natural dentition - maxilla and mandible

    Behavioral: Dentate Patients

  • Zirconia

    Patients that have a full-mouth (maxilla or mandible) dental implant supported rehabilitation restored with monolithic zirconia biomaterial

    Device: Monolithic Zirconia

  • Hybrid Acrylic

    Patients that have a full-mouth (maxilla or mandible) dental implant supported rehabilitation restored with acrylic material (hybrid acrylic)

    Device: Hybrid-Acrylic

Interventions

  • DeviceMonolithic Zirconia

    Maxillary or/and mandibular screw retained zirconia monolithic prostheses supported by at least 4 implants

  • DeviceHybrid-Acrylic

    Maxillary or/and mandibular screw retained hybrid prostheses supported by at least 4 implants;

  • BehavioralDentate Patients

    Dentate Patients with natural dentition or tooth supported crowns

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wear of teeth and materials of restorations

    Measure in different groups occlusal tooth wear from insertion (baseline) to 4, 8 and 12 months post-insertion Scanned images will be compared using a metrology software to determine maximum vertical wear of teeth and root mean square wear.

    Time frame: at least 12 months follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Wear of different antagonists

    Measure occlusal tooth wear of antagonists from insertion (baseline) to 4, 8 and 12 months post-insertion Scanned images will be compared using a metrology software to determine maximum vertical wear of teeth and root mean square wear.

    Time frame: at least 12 months follow-up

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Artur Simões
    Lisboa, 1070-061, Portugal
    Recruiting
    • Artur Simões · Contactartursimoes@institutoimplantologia.com · 217210980
    • Marta Nuncio · Contact21 721 0980
    • Artur Simões, Msc · Principal investigator
    • João Caramês, Phd · Principal investigator
    • Duarte Marques, Phd · Principal investigator
    • Ricardo Pinto, Msc · Principal investigator
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05637619
Lead sponsor
Implantology Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 5, 2022
Start date
Jan 1, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 26, 2024

Study contacts

João M Caramês, Phd
study director · Implantology Institute
Duarte N Marques, Phd
study director · Implantology Institute
Artur F Simões, Msc
principal investigator · Implantology Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion