ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05616247ECALCUpdated Feb 28, 2025

Efficacy of the Expectancy Challenge Alcohol Literacy Curriculum on Reducing College Student Alcohol Use and Harms

An interventional study of ECALC and ECALC Plus Weekly Boosters in Alcohol Use, Underage and Harmful; Use, Alcohol, sponsored by University of Central Florida. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-28.

Sponsored by University of Central Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
360
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The current project uses a web-based program called the Expectancy Challenge Alcohol Literacy Curriculum (ECALC) to reduce alcohol use and associated harms among college students. Participants complete the interactive program in 50 minutes, and then provide daily, real-time data on expectancies and alcohol use for 3 weeks after intervention, and again for one week at 13 and 25 weeks after intervention. One group will also receive biweekly boosters delivered via smart phone to assess their impact on intervention decay over time. It is hypothesized that ECALC effects may decay over time, and that biweekly boosters will prevent this decay. Access to the ECALC is available on request from the principal investigator.

Read the detailed description

The Expectancy Challenge Alcohol Literacy Curriculum (ECALC) is a 50-minute interactive program, and the only non-experiential expectancy challenge that has been successful in significantly reducing alcohol use and harms among college students. In studies focused on mandated students, fraternity and sorority members, and first year college students, ECALC has produced larger effect sizes than experiential expectancy challenge and all widely used programs. ECALC outcome studies have thus far been limited to four weeks, but the design of ECALC suggests that effects might be sustained for much longer. The primary aim of the proposed project is to conduct an RCT designed to evaluate duration of ECALC effects over the course of 6 months, and to assess the impact of smart phone-delivered boosters on maintenance and enhancement of effects. Participants will be problematic drinking college students recruited from first time in college new students. Students will be randomly assigned to ECALC only, ECALC plus boosters, or assessment only control. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) will be used to track alcohol use and expectancies for one week at baseline, three weeks post-intervention, and one-week intervals at 3 and 6 months. It is hypothesized that students who complete ECALC will demonstrate immediate changes in alcohol expectancies, and subsequently, this will drive lower alcohol use and lower rates of alcohol-related problems (relative to the assessment only control students). It is also hypothesized that changes in expectancies and reduction in alcohol use may decay over time among students who do not receive boosters, while biweekly boosters will promote maintenance or enhancement of effects. This study allows for the examination of (1) duration of ECALC effects up to 6 months, and (2) the impact of biweekly boosters delivered via smart phones. In addition, use of EMA to collect real time data on expectancies and alcohol use over the course of 6 months will allow us to (3) map potential changes in expectancies in relation to alcohol use during this critical period of transition. If successful, this project will validate the use of ECALC as an efficient and effective program for reducing alcohol use and drinking-related harms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Use, Underage
  • Harmful; Use, Alcohol

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • College Alcohol Use
  • Expectancies
  • Expectancy Challenge
  • Expectancy Challenge Alcohol Literacy Curriculum
  • Alcohol-Related Harms
  • Underage Alcohol Use
03

In context

Underage Drinking

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Underage Drinking; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 360 is close to the median of 360 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Underage Drinking.

Browse Underage Drinking studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Central Florida is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Full-time Fist Year College Student
  • AUDIT-C score = 5 or higher (women), 7 or higher (men).
  • Fluent English speaker
  • Able to consent to participate in research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not a Student enrolled at University of Central Florida
  • Pregnant
  • AUDIT score =15 or higher
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
360 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ECALC

    Cognitive Behavioral Program to Change Expectancy Processes

    Behavioral: ECALC

  • Experimental
    ECALC Plus Weekly Boosters

    Cognitive Behavioral Program to Change Expectancy Processes with Weekly Booster Content Delivered by Mobile Device

    Behavioral: ECALC Plus Weekly Boosters

  • No intervention
    Control

    Control Group Presentation on Body Image

Interventions

  • BehavioralECALC

    Expectancy Challenge Alcohol Literacy Curriculum Cognitive Behavioral Intervention

  • BehavioralECALC Plus Weekly Boosters

    Expectancy Challenge Alcohol Literacy Curriculum Cognitive Behavioral Intervention Plus Weekly Booster Content Delivered by Mobile Device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Alcohol Expectancies Measured Weekly with CEOA

    Expected effects of alcohol use measured with self-report survey. The survey is the 38 item Comprehensive Effects of Alcohol Scale (CEOA), a validated measure of alcohol expectancies. Participants complete the CEOA online on their mobile device and enter responses to each item. Scores range from 0 to 114 with higher scores indicating greater expectation of effects of consuming alcohol.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, and 26

  2. Change from Baseline in Alcohol Use Measured Weekly with Retrospective Self-report Measure

    Self-reported alcohol use, quantity and frequency of consumption in standard drink format. Participants complete an online survey on their mobile device and enter the number of standard drinks consumed each day and number of hours spent drinking each day over the previous week.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, and 26

  3. Change from Baseline in Alcohol-related Harms Measured Weekly with Retrospective Self-report Survey

    Self-reported Negative consequences associated with alcohol use measured with self-report survey. Participants complete an online survey on their mobile device. The survey is the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. A 48-item validated measure with scores ranging from 0 to 67, higher scores indicate more harms.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, and 26

  4. Change from Baseline in Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Measured Weekly with Self-report Survey

    Attitudes toward personal appearance measured with self-report survey. Participants complete an online survey on their mobile device. The survey is the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4. A 22-item validated measure with scores ranging from 0 to 110, higher scores indicate more sociocultural emphasis on personal appearance and body image.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, and 26

  5. Change from Baseline in Alcohol Expectancies Measured Daily with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)

    Expected effects of alcohol use measured with 8 item self-report survey. Participants complete an online survey on their mobile device and enter responses to items each day. Scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater expectation of effects of consuming alcohol. Items were selected from the Comprehensive Expected Effects of Alcohol Scale (CEOA).

    Time frame: Daily for Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, and 26

  6. Change from Baseline in Alcohol Use Measured Daily with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)

    Self-reported alcohol use, quantity and frequency of consumption in standard drink format. Participants complete an online survey on their mobile device and enter the number of standard drinks consumed each day.

    Time frame: Daily for Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, and 26

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Didentified data will be placed in NIH approved data repository (currently https://cos.io/our-products/osf/).

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data available May 01, 2026 Availability indefinite

Access criteria: Access will be open.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05616247
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 15, 2022
Start date
Sep 22, 2022
Primary completion
May 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 28, 2025

Study contacts

Michael E Dunn, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Central Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion