An interventional study of STAR-Caregivers Virtual Training & Follow-up (STAR-VTF) in Caregiver Burden, Alzheimer Disease and Dementia, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-21.
Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The goal of this pilot study is to improve the STAR-Caregivers Virtual Training \& Follow-up (STAR-VTF) intervention for Latino caregivers of people living with dementia. The main objectives are to: (1) culturally adapt STAR-VTF online training modules, (2) pilot test Latino caregivers' responses to the adapted online training modules, and (3) develop an online survey to collect caregiver outcomes in a future study. Participants will receive the STAR-VTF intervention and asked to complete online surveys and participate in an exit interview to provide feedback on their experience.
The objectives of this study are to: (1) culturally and linguistically adapt the STAR-Caregivers Virtual Training \& Follow-up (STAR-VTF) online training modules for Latino caregivers of people living with dementia (PLWD), (2) pilot test Latino caregivers' responses to the adapted online training modules, and (3) develop a REDCap survey to pragmatically collect caregiver outcomes in a future study.
The study will use a single-arm pilot trial design with Latino caregivers of PLWD. The investigators will assess self-reported outcomes at baseline and 6-8 weeks post-enrollment using a REDCap survey. Outcome measures will include the Revised Memory and Problem Behavior Checklist and Preparedness for Caregiving Scale. In addition, the investigators will assess caregivers' perceived usability of the online training modules and will conduct qualitative interviews 6-8 weeks post-enrollment. The interviews will assess caregiver satisfaction with and acceptability of the adapted online training modules.
The investigators expect to enroll up to 20 participants. The primary objective of this study is to pilot test the adapted online training modules. Therefore, it is not powered to detect an effect of the intervention.
500 studies on the registry are indexed under Caregiver Burden; 164 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 71 across 402 interventional studies indexed under Caregiver Burden.
Browse Caregiver Burden studies →University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,433 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.
Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (86%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criterion:
Participants will receive the STAR-VTF intervention.
Behavioral: STAR-Caregivers Virtual Training & Follow-up (STAR-VTF)
For 6-8 weeks, caregivers will complete online training modules asynchronously. Caregivers will be instructed to complete one module per week. The content of the modules is as follows: Module 1 introduces caregivers to the behavioral treatment of dementia, realistic expectations, and effective communication; Module 2 covers the ABC (antecedents, behaviors, consequences) approach to problem-solving, including rationale and development of an ABC plan; Module 3 instructs caregivers to review the ABC plan and revise as needed; Module 4 covers pleasant events and managing negative thinking; Module 5 instructs caregivers to review the ABC plan, pleasant activities schedule, and to revise as needed; Module 6 covers coping with caregiving and maintaining gains. Each module takes about 45 minutes to complete. The modules use text, pictures, and illustrations with a voiceover presentation. Caregivers will receive the online training modules in their preferred language (English or Spanish).
Change in Baseline Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist Score at 6 Weeks (Overall Caregiver Reaction)
The Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist is a 24-item scale measuring caregiver reaction to memory, depression, and disruptive behavior problems. Each item asks about a problem the care recipient is experiencing. For each problem the care recipient experiences, caregivers are asked to rate how much the problem upsets the caregiver on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Scores for caregiver reaction are calculated by taking the sum of the individual items. Total scores can range from 0 to 96, with higher scores reflect caregivers being more upset when memory and behavior problems happen. We report the change in scores by subtracting the total score at baseline from the total score at 6 weeks. The possible range for the change in total scores is from -96 to 96. A negative change indicates that caregivers' reaction has improved, while a positive change indicates that caregivers' reaction has worsened.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Baseline Preparedness for Caregiving Scale Score at 6 Weeks
In the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale, caregivers rate how prepared they are for various aspects of caregiving. The instrument contains 8 items that ask caregivers how well prepared they believe they are to provide physical care, emotional support, deal with the stress of caregiving, and set up in-home support services. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all prepared) to 4 (very well prepared). The score is calculated by taking the average of all items answered. We report the change in average scores by subtracting the average score at baseline from the average score at 6 weeks. The possible range for the change in average scores is from -4 to 4. A negative change indicates that caregivers' preparedness has worsened, while a positive change indicates that caregivers' preparedness has improved.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks
System Usability Scale
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
Time frame: Week 1
System Usability Scale
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
Time frame: Week 2
System Usability Scale
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
Time frame: Week 3
System Usability Scale
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
Time frame: Week 4
System Usability Scale
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
Time frame: Week 5
System Usability Scale
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
Time frame: Week 6
| Milestone | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| Started | 16 |
| Completed | 15 |
| Not completed | 1 |
The Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist is a 24-item scale measuring caregiver reaction to memory, depression, and disruptive behavior problems. Each item asks about a problem the care recipient is experiencing. For each problem the care recipient experiences, caregivers are asked to rate how much the problem upsets the caregiver on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Scores for caregiver reaction are calculated by taking the sum of the individual items. Total scores can range from 0 to 96, with higher scores reflect caregivers being more upset when memory and behavior problems happen. We report the change in scores by subtracting the total score at baseline from the total score at 6 weeks. The possible range for the change in total scores is from -96 to 96. A negative change indicates that caregivers' reaction has improved, while a positive change indicates that caregivers' reaction has worsened.
| units on a scale | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| Change in Baseline Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist Score at 6 Weeks (Overall Caregiver Reaction) | -6.90 ± 14.35 |
In the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale, caregivers rate how prepared they are for various aspects of caregiving. The instrument contains 8 items that ask caregivers how well prepared they believe they are to provide physical care, emotional support, deal with the stress of caregiving, and set up in-home support services. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all prepared) to 4 (very well prepared). The score is calculated by taking the average of all items answered. We report the change in average scores by subtracting the average score at baseline from the average score at 6 weeks. The possible range for the change in average scores is from -4 to 4. A negative change indicates that caregivers' preparedness has worsened, while a positive change indicates that caregivers' preparedness has improved.
| score on a scale | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| Change in Baseline Preparedness for Caregiving Scale Score at 6 Weeks | 0.63 ± 0.73 |
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
| units on a scale | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| System Usability Scale | 77.8 ± 10.8 |
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
| units on a scale | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| System Usability Scale | 77.7 ± 12.9 |
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
| units on a scale | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| System Usability Scale | 74.6 ± 19.2 |
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
| units on a scale | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| System Usability Scale | 73.7 ± 16.3 |
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
| units on a scale | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| System Usability Scale | 75.8 ± 14.3 |
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the usability of and caregivers' satisfaction with the modules. Caregivers rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." A single score is calculated by converting each item's score to a 0-4 scale, summing the adjusted scores, and then multiplying by 2.5 to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and caregiver satisfaction. General interpretive ranges suggest excellent usability (score of 85 and above), good usability (scores of 70-84), average usability (scores of 50-69), and poor usability (scores below 50).
| units on a scale | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| System Usability Scale | 79.2 ± 14.5 |
Collected over 2 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAR-VTF | 0/16 (0%) | 0/16 (0%) | 0/16 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| Mean | 51.2 ± 13.2 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| Female | 12 |
| Male | 4 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 16 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
| Preparedness for Caregiving Scale(units on a scale) | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| Mean | 1.98 ± 0.33 |
| Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (Overall Caregiver Reaction)(units on a scale) | STAR-VTF |
|---|---|
| Mean | 40.40 ± 16.48 |
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.