An interventional study of Balloon guide catheters (BGCs) and Standard guide catheter in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Large Vessel Occlusion and Thrombectomy, sponsored by Changhai Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-16.
Sponsored by Changhai Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
A multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE) clinical trial of endovascular treatment among selected AIS.
The PROTECT-MT study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE) trial, and aims to determine the effectiveness of balloon guide catheter(BGC) as compared to standard guide catheter on functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score at Day 90) in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion.
Primary Endpoints
Functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, at 90 days (±14 days) .
Secondary Endpoints
Safety Endpoints:
2,653 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 936 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 329 is above the median of 120 across 1,799 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.
Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →Changhai Hospital is the lead sponsor of 354 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Balloon guide catheters (BGCs)
Procedure: Balloon guide catheters (BGCs)
Standard guide catheter
Procedure: Standard guide catheter
MT procedure with Balloon guide catheters (BGCs)
MT procedure with standard guide catheter
Functional outcome
defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score shift
Time frame: 90 days
Dichotomized mRS
Dichotomized mRS (0-1 versus 2-6,0-2 versus 3-6,0-3 versus 4-6,0-4 versus 5-6,0-5 versus 6)
Time frame: 90 days
Change in stroke severity
NIHSS
Time frame: 24 hours post treatment
Change in stroke severity
NIHSS
Time frame: 7 days post treatment or discharge (whichever occurs first).
Final infarct volume
Final infarct volume at 5-7 days post treatment
Time frame: 5-7 days post treatment
Technical success rate
defined as successfully navigating the guide catheter into the target vessel, and finishing the mechanical thrombectomy procedure without changing to another guide catheter
Time frame: 24 hours after mechanical thrombectomy
Reperfusion outcome
(eTICI 2b or greater ,eTICI 2c or greater, eTICI 3)in Final angiogram.
Time frame: 24 hours after mechanical thrombectomy
Reperfusion outcome
(eTICI 2b or greater ,eTICI 2c or greater, eTICI 3) after First pass
Time frame: 24 hours after mechanical thrombectomy
Time from groin puncture to successful reperfusion
eTICI 2b or greater, eTICI 2c or greater
Time frame: 24 hours after mechanical thrombectomy
Revascularization quality
Percentage of subjects with acceptable revascularization quality (eTICI 2b or greater, eTICI 2c or greater) within 45 min of access
Time frame: 24 hours after mechanical thrombectomy
Thrombectomy attempt (final)
Number of thrombectomy attempts (final)
Time frame: 24 hours after mechanical thrombectomy
Occurrence of emboli to a new territory
Occurrence of emboli to a new territory
Time frame: 24 hours after mechanical thrombectomy
Death
Deaths at 90 days (±14 days) post treatment
Time frame: 90 days
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)
Intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 7 days post treatment or discharge (whichever occurs first)
Time frame: 7 days post treatment or discharge (whichever occurs first)
SAE
Other serious adverse events (SAEs) adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee
Time frame: 90 days
perioperative complications
Any peri-procedural complications, including vessel dissection, arterial perforation, and femoral access complications, etc.
Time frame: Perioperative period
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Data can be shared with bona fide researchers after the publication of the main results, based on a submitted protocol to Oriental Collaboration group on Emerging Advanced therapy for Neurovascular diseases Consortium.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan
Time frame: Data sharing will be available from 12 months after the publication of the main results.
Access criteria: The data sharing will be only for the purposes of health and medical research and within the constraints of the consent under which the data were originally gathered. The Custodian of the Collection will not consider any Proposals for data sharing that unblind, or potentially unblind, randomised comparisons in active / ongoing trials. Requesters should be employees of a recognised academic institution, health service organisation, commercial research organisation or from the pharmaceutical industry. Requesters must have experience in medical research. Requesters must be able to demonstrate through their peer review publications in the area of interest their ability to carry out the proposed use of the requested dataset from a Collection. The Requesters must not have a conflict of interest that may potentially influence their interpretation of any analyses.
Data sharing details ↗ · www.ocin.org.cn
Ran from Feb 2023 to primary completion in Mar 2024, 13 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.