ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05585905Updated May 18, 2026Results posted

Virtual Reality in Pediatric Dentistry

An interventional study of Virtual Reality and Basic Behavior Guidance Techniques in Behavior, Child and Anxiety, Dental, sponsored by University of Southern California. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-18.

Sponsored by University of Southern California · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dental Fear and Anxiety is an emotional experiences affecting many children and adolescents which can lead to behavioral problems in the dental setting. The purpose of the proposed study is to investigate the effect of virtual reality on anxiety, behavior, and pain in children undergoing restorative dental procedures. Children enrolled in the study will include patients ages 6-18 who are healthy and require two or more dental sealants (at least one sealant per side). The participants in the study will serve as their own control using a split-mouth cross-over randomized control clinical trial design and will be randomly assigned to receive virtual reality or traditional behavior guidance techniques first during dental sealant placement. The objectives of this study are to explore the associations between the use of virtual reality distraction during dental sealant placement with anxiety based on the change in heart rate, compared with to the control group. This model will include treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction term as well as a treatment sequence variable. This is a pilot study. Data analyzed will be changed in heart rate between baseline and sealant placement using virtual reality or behavior guidance technique.. No statistical analysis will be conducted except mean and range.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial with a crossover design. Patients who are visiting the clinic for a comprehensive or periodic dental exam and are found to require two or more dental sealants (at least one sealant per side). The study subjects will include children ages 6-18 who are ASA I or II, as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification system. The proposed sample size for the study is 40 participants.

The children who are enrolled in the study will serve as both the experimental group and their own control. This is a split mouth design in which children who are enrolled in the study will serve as both the experimental group and their own control. After the child and parent are scheduled for the dental sealant appointment, they will be randomly assigned to receive the virtual reality system as a distraction technique for the first half or the latter half of the appointment (for research purposes). During the time when virtual reality is not used, traditional basic behavior guidance techniques will be used, as is the standard of care.

The virtual reality system being used for research purposes is the RelieVR by Applied VR which includes the goggle headset only. The VR experience will be an immersive experience where the child will interact with the system and navigate their way through a game that will involve bright colors, cartoon-like characters and settings with age-appropriate content. The VR system will be worn for approximately 5-10 minutes during the dental sealant application.

The behavior, and anxiety will be analyzed at specific steps of the procedure including:

  • Baseline (patient sitting in the chair prior to treatment)
  • During sealant placement with Virtual Reality distraction
  • During sealant placement with basic behavior guidance techniques
  • Post Operative (patient sitting upright in chair, 5 minutes after procedure)

The patient's anxiety will be evaluated with a change in heart rate.

Additionally, at the end of each appointment for the duration of the study, the provider will assign the patient a Frankl behavior score 1-5, and record it in the patient's chart, as is the standard of care. The provider will also complete a Healthcare Provider Questionnaire through Qualtrics.

The demographic factors will be collected from the patient's medical chart. The parent will be asked "how many hours of "screen time" (TV, computer, video games, tablet use), would you say that your child is allowed per week?". Parents and patients will also be asked to complete a satisfaction survey post-treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Behavior, Child
  • Anxiety, Dental

Keywords

  • Virtual Reality
  • Dental
  • Local Anesthesia
  • Nitrous Oxide
  • Anxiety
  • Pain
03

In context

Child Behavior

224 studies on the registry are indexed under Child Behavior; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 140 across 197 interventional studies indexed under Child Behavior.

Browse Child Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southern California is the lead sponsor of 791 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 70 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 32 (46%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 6-18
  • Present to the Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry Pediatric Dental Clinic and Children's Dental Health Clinic at Long Beach Memorial Hospital for an initial or periodic exam, and are determined to require two or more dental sealants (at least one sealant per half mouth)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Children with visual, auditory, or tactile deficits that would interfere with the ability to complete the experimental tasks

  • Children who are unable to tolerate the RelievRx by AppliedVR will be screened after consenting to research participation by trying on the VR goggles and stating that they are comfortable and willing to proceed with wearing them during their dental appointment.
  • Examples of children who may be unable to tolerate the VR goggles may include:

    • Children who wear glasses and are unable to comfortably adjust the system over their glasses
    • Children who experience dizziness, motion sickness or other discomfort during use
  • Children who remove the VR goggles prior to dental sealant application
  • Children who require pharmacological means to complete dental treatment (nitrous oxide, sedative drugs or general anesthesia)
  • Children with a significant medical history of seizure disorders as flickering from devices can trigger epileptic episodes.
  • Children with developmental disabilities
  • Children with a psychiatric disorder, organic brain syndrome, mental retardation, or other known cognitive/neurological disorders
  • Children that are not English or Spanish speaking
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual Reality

    The virtual reality system being used for research purposes is the RelievRx by AppliedVR which is an immersive virtual reality device that includes a goggle headset and remote control. The VR experience will be an immersive experience where the child will interact with the system and navigate their way through a game that will involve bright colors, cartoon-like characters, and settings with age-appropriate content.

    Device: Virtual Reality

  • Active comparator
    Basic Behavior Guidance Techniques

    The control sample will include basic behavior guidance techniques and is standard of care. The use of basic behavior guidance techniques is common in pediatric dentistry and is not unique to this study.

    Behavioral: Basic Behavior Guidance Techniques

Interventions

  • DeviceVirtual Reality

    The VR system will be worn for approximately 5-10 minutes during dental sealant application

  • BehavioralBasic Behavior Guidance Techniques

    Basic behavior guidance techniques will be used as a distraction technique when the VR system is not used during the dental sealant application

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Beats Per Minute Change With VR

    Behavior and anxiety measured by changed in heart rate were scored at baseline and during sealant placement with virtual reality

    Time frame: Time from is from baseline until sealant placement with VR

  2. Beats Per Minute Change With BBG

    Behavior and anxiety measured by changed in heart rate were scored at baseline and during sealant placement with basic behavior guidance.

    Time frame: Time from is from baseline until sealant placement with BBG

07

Results

Posted May 18, 2026

Participant flow

Patients were offered enrollment when treatment planned for sealants

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVirtual Reality (VR) With Right Side Seals First, Then Basic Behavior Guidance (BBG) With Left SideVR With Left Side Seals First, Then BBG With Seals on Right SideBBG With Right Side Sealants First, Then VR With Left Side SealantBBG With Left Side Sealants First, Then VR With Right Side Sealant
Started4484
Completed4474
Not completed0010
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0010

Outcome measures

PrimaryBeats Per Minute Change With VR

Behavior and anxiety measured by changed in heart rate were scored at baseline and during sealant placement with virtual reality

Time frame:
Time from is from baseline until sealant placement with VR
Reported as:
Mean · Beats per minute
Beats Per Minute Change With VR
Beats per minuteVirtual Reality (VR) With Right Side Seals First, Then Basic Behavior Guidance (BBG) With Left SideVR With Left Side Seals First, Then BBG With Seals on Right SideBBG With Right Side Sealants First, Then VR With Left Side SealantBBG With Left Side Sealants First, Then VR With Right Side Sealant
Beats Per Minute Change With VR-2 (-9 to 2)-6.25 (-9 to -4)-8.8 (-18 to 4)-6.25 (-12 to -3)
PrimaryBeats Per Minute Change With BBG

Behavior and anxiety measured by changed in heart rate were scored at baseline and during sealant placement with basic behavior guidance.

Time frame:
Time from is from baseline until sealant placement with BBG
Reported as:
Mean · Beats per minute
Beats Per Minute Change With BBG
Beats per minuteVirtual Reality (VR) With Right Side Seals First, Then Basic Behavior Guidance (BBG) With Left SideVR With Left Side Seals First, Then BBG With Seals on Right SideBBG With Right Side Sealants First, Then VR With Left Side SealantBBG With Left Side Sealants First, Then VR With Right Side Sealant
Beats Per Minute Change With BBG-2 (-13 to 8)-2.75 (-10 to 1)-3 (-14 to 15)-0.5 (-16 to 7)

Adverse events

Collected over No SAEs or AEs were collected or monitored. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Virtual Reality (VR) With Right Side Seals First, Then Basic Behavior Guidance (BBG) With Left Side———
VR With Left Side Seals First, Then BBG With Seals on Right Side———
BBG With Right Side Sealants First, Then VR With Left Side Sealant———
BBG With Left Side Sealants First, Then VR With Right Side Sealant———

Baseline characteristics

The numbers listed are the number of participants in each group which were randomly selected. The study was a pilot study.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Virtual Reality (VR) With Right Side Seals First, Then Basic Behavior Guidance (BBG) With Left SideVR With Left Side Seals First, Then BBG With Seals on Right SideBBG With Right Side Sealants First, Then VR With Left Side SealantBBG With Left Side Sealants First, Then VR With Right Side SealantTotal
<=18 years448420
Between 18 and 65 years00000
>=65 years00000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Virtual Reality (VR) With Right Side Seals First, Then Basic Behavior Guidance (BBG) With Left SideVR With Left Side Seals First, Then BBG With Seals on Right SideBBG With Right Side Sealants First, Then VR With Left Side SealantBBG With Left Side Sealants First, Then VR With Right Side SealantTotal
Female324413
Male12407
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Virtual Reality (VR) With Right Side Seals First, Then Basic Behavior Guidance (BBG) With Left SideVR With Left Side Seals First, Then BBG With Seals on Right SideBBG With Right Side Sealants First, Then VR With Left Side SealantBBG With Left Side Sealants First, Then VR With Right Side SealantTotal
Count of participants————0
Heart Rate Baseline
Heart Rate Baseline(beats per minute)Virtual Reality (VR) With Right Side Seals First, Then Basic Behavior Guidance (BBG) With Left SideVR With Left Side Seals First, Then BBG With Seals on Right SideBBG With Right Side Sealants First, Then VR With Left Side SealantBBG With Left Side Sealants First, Then VR With Right Side SealantTotal
Mean87.7 (64 to 106)75.25 (63 to 92)76.6 (61 to 90)90.75 (80 to 108)82.575 (61 to 108)
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Children's Dental Health Clinic
    Long Beach, California 90806, United States
  • Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry Pediatric Department
    Los Angeles, California 90089, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sharma A, Kumar D, Anand A, Mittal V, Singh A, Aggarwal N. Factors predicting Behavior Management Problems during Initial Dental Examination in Children Aged 2 to 8 Years. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):5-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1397. Epub 2017 Feb 27. PubMed 28377646 ↗
  • Cianetti S, Lombardo G, Lupatelli E, Pagano S, Abraha I, Montedori A, Caruso S, Gatto R, De Giorgio S, Salvato R. Dental fear/anxiety among children and adolescents. A systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Jun;18(2):121-130. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.02.07. PubMed 28598183 ↗
  • Ramos-Jorge ML, Marques LS, Pavia SM, Serra-Negra JM, Pordeus IA. Predictive factors for child behaviour in the dental environment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Dec;7(4):253-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03262561. PubMed 17164071 ↗
  • Porritt J, Marshman Z, Rodd HD. Understanding children's dental anxiety and psychological approaches to its reduction. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Nov;22(6):397-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01208.x. Epub 2012 Jan 3. PubMed 22221141 ↗
  • Moore R, Brodsgaard I. Dentists' perceived stress and its relation to perceptions about anxious patients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Feb;29(1):73-80. PubMed 11153566 ↗
  • American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2021:306-24.
  • Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Balayi Gajan E. The efficacy of distraction and counterstimulation in the reduction of pain reaction to intraoral injection by pediatric patients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Sep 1;9(6):33-40. PubMed 18784857 ↗
  • Khandelwal M, Shetty RM, Rath S. Effectiveness of Distraction Techniques in Managing Pediatric Dental Patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;12(1):18-24. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1582. PubMed 31496566 ↗
  • Lopez-Valverde N, Muriel Fernandez J, Lopez-Valverde A, Valero Juan LF, Ramirez JM, Flores Fraile J, Herrero Payo J, Blanco Antona LA, Macedo de Sousa B, Bravo M. Use of Virtual Reality for the Management of Anxiety and Pain in Dental Treatments: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 5;9(4):1025. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041025. PubMed 32260538 ↗
  • Piskorz J, Czub M. Effectiveness of a virtual reality intervention to minimize pediatric stress and pain intensity during venipuncture. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Jan;23(1). doi: 10.1111/jspn.12201. Epub 2017 Nov 20. PubMed 29155488 ↗
  • Walther-Larsen S, Petersen T, Friis SM, Aagaard G, Drivenes B, Opstrup P. Immersive Virtual Reality for Pediatric Procedural Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Hosp Pediatr. 2019 Jul;9(7):501-507. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0249. Epub 2019 Jun 3. PubMed 31160472 ↗
  • Li A, Montano Z, Chen VJ, Gold JI. Virtual reality and pain management: current trends and future directions. Pain Manag. 2011 Mar;1(2):147-157. doi: 10.2217/pmt.10.15. PubMed 21779307 ↗
  • Carl E, Stein AT, Levihn-Coon A, Pogue JR, Rothbaum B, Emmelkamp P, Asmundson GJG, Carlbring P, Powers MB. Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Jan;61:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 10. PubMed 30287083 ↗
  • Lahti S, Suominen A, Freeman R, Lahteenoja T, Humphris G. Virtual Reality Relaxation to Decrease Dental Anxiety: Immediate Effect Randomized Clinical Trial. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020 Oct;5(4):312-318. doi: 10.1177/2380084420901679. Epub 2020 Jan 21. PubMed 31962052 ↗
  • Tanja-Dijkstra K, Pahl S, White MP, Andrade J, May J, Stone RJ, Bruce M, Mills I, Auvray M, Gabe R, Moles DR. Can virtual nature improve patient experiences and memories of dental treatment? A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Mar 22;15:90. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-90. PubMed 24655569 ↗
  • Hosey MT, Blinkhorn AS. An evaluation of four methods of assessing the behaviour of anxious child dental patients. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1995 Jun;5(2):87-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263x.1995.tb00170.x. PubMed 7547819 ↗
  • American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Use of nitrous oxide for pediatric dental patients. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2020:324-9.
  • Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997 May-Jun;23(3):293-7. PubMed 9220806 ↗
  • Hockenberry MJ, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML: Wong's Essentials of Pediatric Nursing, ed, 7, St Louis, 2005 p.1259. Used with permission. © Mosby

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05585905
Responsible party
Alexander Alcaaz (Principal Investigator, University of Southern California) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 19, 2022
Start date
Mar 17, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024
Completion
Jun 30, 2024
Results posted
May 18, 2026
Last update
May 18, 2026

Study contacts

Carla Angela Alvarez, DMD
study chair · Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry Pediatric Department

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion