ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05583461RIGHTENARDSUpdated May 7, 2026

Ventilator-induced Right Ventricular Injury During EIT-based PEEP Titration in Patients With ARDS

An interventional study of Positive end-expiratory pressure titration in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Right Ventricular Dysfunction, sponsored by University of Padova. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-07.

Sponsored by University of Padova · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Right ventricular failure may be associated with mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Mechanical ventilation may promote right ventricular failure by inducing alveolar overdistention and atelectasis. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a bedside non-invasive technique assessing the regional distribution of lung ventilation, thus helping titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to target the minimum levels of alveolar overdistension and atelectasis. The aim of this physiologic randomized crossover trial is to assess right ventricular size and function with transthoracic echocardiography with different levels of PEEP in adult patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS undergoing controlled invasive mechanical ventilation: the level of PEEP determined according to the ARDS Network low PEEP-FiO2 table, the PEEP value that minimizes the risk of alveolar overdistension and atelectasis (as determined by EIT), the highest PEEP value minimizing the risk of alveolar overdistension (as determined by EIT), and the lowest PEEP level that minimizes the risk of alveolar atelectasis (as determined by EIT). Our findings may offer valuable insights into the level of PEEP favoring right ventricular protection during mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS.

Read the detailed description

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a diffuse pulmonary inflammatory disease with multifactorial etiology that is very common in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with unsatisfactory short- and long-term prognosis. Patients with ARDS can develop right ventricular (RV) failure, which occurs in 22-50% of patients despite lung protective ventilation and is associated with increased mortality. Despite being required to ensure survival of patients with ARDS, mechanical ventilation itself may have injurious effects on RV function. First, high transpulmonary pressure, secondary to the use of high tidal volume, plateau pressure or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), can cause alveolar overdistension, especially in the aerated parenchymal regions, and collapse of alveolar vessels. The consequent increase in pulmonary arterial pressure may lead to excessively high RV afterload and reduced systolic function. Second, the development of parenchymal atelectasis potentially secondary to the application of low tidal volumes and/or PEEP may increase pulmonary vascular resistance because of extra-alveolar vascular collapse. Finally, mechanical ventilation can have indirect effects on pulmonary circulation and RV function, mediated by alveolar oxygenation, acidosis, and hypercapnia.

The application of PEEP can prevent cyclic opening and closing of the alveoli (i.e., atelectrauma) and improve oxygenation. Ideally, PEEP should maintain lung recruitment and optimize oxygenation and dead space, while at the same time avoiding alveolar overdistension and hemodynamic complications. However, the PEEP titration strategy in patients with ARDS is still widely debated, due to the variability of the effects of PEEP in different patients and different lung parenchymal regions in the same patient. Depending on the extent of potentially recruitable lung parenchyma and the distribution of lung damage, the application of PEEP can cause alveolar overdistension and promote RV failure and/or favor alveolar recruitment and improve RV function. Therefore, it is stil unclear what level of PEEP is associated with the optimization of RV function in patients with ARDS. We may hypothesize that the level of PEEP able to reduce alveolar collapse without increasing overdistension may improve RV function.

Several strategies have been suggested to assess lung recruitability and PEEP responsiveness in patients with ARDS. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a bedside non-invasive technique that monitors the regional distribution of lung ventilation. The choice of the PEEP value that minimizes the extent of overdistension and atelectasis, as assessed with EIT, was associated with better respiratory mechanics and survival in patients with severe ARDS in some pilot studies.

The aim of this prospective pathophysiological interventional study is to evaluate the variation of RV size and function with transthoracic echocardiography in adult patients requiring invasive controlled mechanical ventilation for moderate-to-severe ARDS with four different PEEP values applied according to a randomized sequence in each patient:

  • The level of PEEP determined according to the ARDS Network low PEEP-fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) table;
  • The PEEP value that minimizes the risk of overdistension and atelectasis, as determined by EIT;
  • The highest PEEP value that minimizes the risk of overdistension, as determined by EIT;
  • The lowest PEEP level that minimizes the risk of atelectasis, as determined by EIT.

The primary hypothesis of the study is that the level of PEEP that simultaneously minimizes alveolar overdistension and collapse is associated with better RV function than the PEEP level selected based on the low PEEP-FiO2 table and PEEP levels that minimize overdistension and collapse, separately. The secondary hypotheses of the study are that: 1) the level of PEEP that minimizes overdistension is associated with better RV function than the level of PEEP that minimizes collapse; 2) the PEEP level that minimizes alveolar collapse is associated with greater pulmonary air content, as assessed by lung ultrasound, compared to the PEEP levels chosen based on the low PEEP-FiO2 table, the PEEP level that minimizes overdistension and collapse simultaneously, and the PEEP level that minimizes overdistension.

The physiological data obtained from this study may offer valuable insights into the right ventricular-protective level of PEEP in patients with ARDS and support future large randomized studies investigating PEEP levels associated with improved patient survival.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Right Ventricular Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Right ventricular dysfunction
  • Positive end-expiratory pressure
  • Electrical impedance tomography
  • Echocardiography
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,387 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 60 across 822 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Padova is the lead sponsor of 215 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
  2. Inclusion within 72 hours of acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis
  3. Endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Age lower than 18 years old
  2. Pregnancy
  3. Absence of
  4. Thoracic surgery or lung transplant during the admission
  5. to recruitment maneuvers (mean arterial pressure lower than 65 mmHg despite administration of fluids or vasopressors, active air leaks through a chest tube, pneumothorax or subcutaneous or mediastinal emphysema in absence of chest drainage)
  6. Contraindications to electrical impedance tomography (contraindication to recruitment maneuvers, presence of pacemakers or other electronic devices in the chest, injuries or burns in the electrode placement area)
  7. ACEP quality \< 4
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEEP level according to the low PEEP-FiO2 table

    Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level selected based on patient's fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) according to the low PEEP-FiO2 table proposed by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network Guidelines

    Procedure: Positive end-expiratory pressure titration

  • Experimental
    PEEP minimizing the risk of overdistension and atelectasis

    Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level selected based on the intersection between the curves of the cumulative percentages of compliance loss due to alveolar overdistension and atelectasis, respectively, as assessed with an electrical impedance tomography-based decremental PEEP trial

    Procedure: Positive end-expiratory pressure titration

  • Experimental
    PEEP minimizing the risk of overdistension

    Highest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level associated with no alveolar overdistention selected based on the curve of the cumulative percentage of compliance loss due to alveolar overdistension, as assessed with an electrical impedance tomography-based decremental PEEP trial

    Procedure: Positive end-expiratory pressure titration

  • Experimental
    PEEP minimizing the risk of atelectasis

    Lowest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level associated with no alveolar collapse selected based on the curve of the cumulative percentage of compliance loss due to alveolar collapse, as assessed with an electrical impedance tomography-based decremental PEEP trial

    Procedure: Positive end-expiratory pressure titration

Interventions

  • ProcedurePositive end-expiratory pressure titration

    Positive end-expiratory pressure level

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Right ventricle diameter 1

    Maximal transversal dimension in the basal one third of right ventricular inflow at end-diastole in the right ventricle-focused apical four-chamber view

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  2. Right ventricle diameter 2

    Transversal right ventricular diameter in the middle third of right ventricular inflow, approximately halfway between the maximal basal diameter and the apex, at the level of papillary muscles at end-diastole.

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  3. Right ventricle fractional area change

    Ratio of the difference between end-diastolic area and end-systolic area to end-diastolic area, which are determined after manual tracing of right ventricular endocardial border from the lateral tricuspid annulus along the free wall to the apex and back to medial tricuspid annulus, along the interventricular septum at end-diastole and at end-systole, in the right ventricle-focused apical four-chamber view

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  4. Eccentricity index

    Ratio between two left ventricular axes, one parallel to the interventricular septum and one perpendicular to this, in the mid-papillary parasternal short axis view

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  5. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion

    Tricuspid annular longitudinal excursion by M-mode, measured between end-diastole and peak systole in the apical four-chamber view that achieves parallel alignment of Doppler beam with right ventricular free wall longitudinal excursion

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  6. Systolic velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus derived from tissue Doppler imaging

    Peak systolic velocity of lateral tricuspid annulus by pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging in the apical four-chamber view that achieves parallel alignment of Doppler beam with right ventricular free wall longitudinal excursion

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  7. Right ventricular index of myocardial performance

    The ratio of the sum between isovolumic contraction and relaxation times to ejection time measured by pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging in the apical four-chamber view that achieves parallel alignment of Doppler beam with right ventricular free wall longitudinal excursion

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  8. Right ventricle systolic pressure

    Calculated from the velocity of tricuspid regurgitation jet, measured in the view allowing the highest value, by applying simplified Bernoulli equation and adding right atrial pressure estimated from central venous pressure

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  9. Myocardial isovolumic acceleration

    Ratio of lateral tricuspid annulus peak velocity during isovolumic contraction to acceleration time by pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging in the apical four-chamber view that achieves parallel alignment of Doppler beam with right ventricular free wall longitudinal excursion

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  10. Right ventricle stroke index

    Ratio of right ventricular stroke volume, calculated as product between velocity-time integral at the level of pulmonary valve and transverse area of right ventricular outflow tract in the aortic valve-level parasternal short axis view during systole, and body surface area

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  11. Right ventricle stroke work index

    Product between right ventricle stroke index and right ventricle systolic pressure

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  12. Right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain

    Peak value of longitudinal speckle-tracking-derived strain, averaged over the three segments of the right ventricular free wall, after manual tracing of right ventricular endocardial border from the lateral tricuspid annulus along the free wall to the apex and back to medial tricuspid annulus in right ventricle-focused apical four-chamber view

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ventilator settings

    Tidal volume, respiratory rate, fraction of inspired oxygen, inspiratory to expiratory time

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  2. Respiratory mechanics

    Plateau pressure, total positive end-expiratory pressure, driving pressure, mechanical power

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  3. Arterial blood gas analysis

    pH, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, arterial partial pressure of oxygen, arterial oxygen saturation, bicarbonate, lactate

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  4. Dead space

    Estimated from the Bohr-Enghoff equation (ratio of the difference between arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide and end-tidal carbon dioxide to arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide)

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  5. Ventilatory ratio

    Product between minute ventilation and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, divided by predicted body weight x 100 x 37.5

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of each of the four levels of PEEP

  6. Shunt

    Calculated as (1 - arterial oxygen saturation) divided by (1 - central venous oxygen saturation)

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of the intervention

  7. Hemodynamics

    Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure, dosage of vasoactive agents

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of the intervention

  8. Pleural and lung ultrasound

    Lung ultrasound score, lung reaeration score

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of the intervention

  9. Renal ultrasound

    Renal resistive index, renal venous stasis index

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of the intervention

  10. Ultrasound image quality

    Quality assessed according to the 2018 American College of Emergency Physicians Guidelines

    Time frame: Measured after 20 minutes from the application of the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital of Padua
    Padua, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA. 2018 Feb 20;319(7):698-710. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21907. PubMed 29466596 ↗
  • ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669. PubMed 22797452 ↗
  • Gattinoni L, Marini JJ, Pesenti A, Quintel M, Mancebo J, Brochard L. The "baby lung" became an adult. Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):663-673. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4200-8. Epub 2016 Jan 18. PubMed 26781952 ↗
  • Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. PubMed 26903337 ↗
  • Bein T, Grasso S, Moerer O, Quintel M, Guerin C, Deja M, Brondani A, Mehta S. The standard of care of patients with ARDS: ventilatory settings and rescue therapies for refractory hypoxemia. Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):699-711. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4325-4. Epub 2016 Apr 4. PubMed 27040102 ↗
  • Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Kudlow P, Cook D, Slutsky AS, Cheung AM; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1293-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802. PubMed 21470008 ↗
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. PubMed 10793162 ↗
  • Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20. PubMed 23688302 ↗
  • Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guerin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372. PubMed 20843245 ↗
  • Tremblay LN, Slutsky AS. Ventilator-induced lung injury: from the bench to the bedside. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan;32(1):24-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2817-8. Epub 2005 Oct 18. No abstract available. PubMed 16231069 ↗
  • Kuipers MT, van der Poll T, Schultz MJ, Wieland CW. Bench-to-bedside review: Damage-associated molecular patterns in the onset of ventilator-induced lung injury. Crit Care. 2011;15(6):235. doi: 10.1186/cc10437. Epub 2011 Nov 30. PubMed 22216838 ↗
  • Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2126-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707. No abstract available. PubMed 24283226 ↗
  • Del Sorbo L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011 Feb;17(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283427295. PubMed 21157315 ↗
  • Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Chiurazzi C, Amini M, Gallazzi E, Marino A, Brioni M, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M, Bugedo G, Gattinoni L. Lung inhomogeneity in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan 15;189(2):149-58. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201308-1567OC. PubMed 24261322 ↗
  • Yoshida T, Fujino Y, Amato MB, Kavanagh BP. Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Spontaneous Breathing during Mechanical Ventilation. Risks, Mechanisms, and Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 15;195(8):985-992. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0748CP. PubMed 27786562 ↗
  • Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa EL, Schoenfeld DA, Stewart TE, Briel M, Talmor D, Mercat A, Richard JC, Carvalho CR, Brower RG. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639. PubMed 25693014 ↗
  • Gattinoni L, Pelosi P, Crotti S, Valenza F. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on regional distribution of tidal volume and recruitment in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;151(6):1807-14. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767524. PubMed 7767524 ↗
  • Santa Cruz R, Rojas JI, Nervi R, Heredia R, Ciapponi A. High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD009098. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009098.pub2. PubMed 23740697 ↗
  • Carpenter TC, Stenmark KR. Hypoxia decreases lung neprilysin expression and increases pulmonary vascular leak. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001 Oct;281(4):L941-8. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2001.281.4.L941. PubMed 11557598 ↗
  • Madjdpour C, Jewell UR, Kneller S, Ziegler U, Schwendener R, Booy C, Klausli L, Pasch T, Schimmer RC, Beck-Schimmer B. Decreased alveolar oxygen induces lung inflammation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2003 Feb;284(2):L360-7. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00158.2002. Epub 2002 Oct 11. PubMed 12388372 ↗
  • Mekontso Dessap A, Voiriot G, Zhou T, Marcos E, Dudek SM, Jacobson JR, Machado R, Adnot S, Brochard L, Maitre B, Garcia JG. Conflicting physiological and genomic cardiopulmonary effects of recruitment maneuvers in murine acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012 Apr;46(4):541-50. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2011-0306OC. Epub 2011 Dec 1. PubMed 22135358 ↗
  • Vieillard-Baron A, Matthay M, Teboul JL, Bein T, Schultz M, Magder S, Marini JJ. Experts' opinion on management of hemodynamics in ARDS patients: focus on the effects of mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):739-749. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4326-3. Epub 2016 Apr 1. PubMed 27038480 ↗
  • Fan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, Hodgson CL, Munshi L, Walkey AJ, Adhikari NKJ, Amato MBP, Branson R, Brower RG, Ferguson ND, Gajic O, Gattinoni L, Hess D, Mancebo J, Meade MO, McAuley DF, Pesenti A, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Rubin E, Seckel M, Slutsky AS, Talmor D, Thompson BT, Wunsch H, Uleryk E, Brozek J, Brochard LJ; American Thoracic Society, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and Society of Critical Care Medicine. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1253-1263. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0548ST. PubMed 28459336 ↗
  • Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, Chiumello D, Ranieri VM, Quintel M, Russo S, Patroniti N, Cornejo R, Bugedo G. Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 27;354(17):1775-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052052. PubMed 16641394 ↗
  • Gattinoni L, Marini JJ. In search of the Holy Grail: identifying the best PEEP in ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jun;48(6):728-731. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06698-x. Epub 2022 May 5. No abstract available. PubMed 35513707 ↗
  • Repesse X, Charron C, Vieillard-Baron A. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the heart side of the moon. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016 Feb;22(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000267. PubMed 26627538 ↗
  • Zochios V, Parhar K, Tunnicliffe W, Roscoe A, Gao F. The Right Ventricle in ARDS. Chest. 2017 Jul;152(1):181-193. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Mar 4. PubMed 28267435 ↗
  • Schmitt JM, Vieillard-Baron A, Augarde R, Prin S, Page B, Jardin F. Positive end-expiratory pressure titration in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: impact on right ventricular outflow impedance evaluated by pulmonary artery Doppler flow velocity measurements. Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;29(6):1154-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200106000-00012. PubMed 11395592 ↗
  • Suter PM, Fairley B, Isenberg MD. Optimum end-expiratory airway pressure in patients with acute pulmonary failure. N Engl J Med. 1975 Feb 6;292(6):284-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197502062920604. PubMed 234174 ↗
  • Zochios V, Yusuff H, Schmidt M; Protecting the Right Ventricle Network (PRORVnet). Acute right ventricular injury phenotyping in ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jan;49(1):99-102. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06904-w. Epub 2022 Oct 11. No abstract available. PubMed 36219228 ↗
  • Zapol WM, Snider MT. Pulmonary hypertension in severe acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 1977 Mar 3;296(9):476-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197703032960903. PubMed 834225 ↗
  • Sato R, Dugar S, Cheungpasitporn W, Schleicher M, Collier P, Vallabhajosyula S, Duggal A. The impact of right ventricular injury on the mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2021 May 21;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03591-9. PubMed 34020703 ↗
  • Mekontso Dessap A, Boissier F, Charron C, Begot E, Repesse X, Legras A, Brun-Buisson C, Vignon P, Vieillard-Baron A. Acute cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact. Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):862-870. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4141-2. Epub 2015 Dec 9. PubMed 26650055 ↗
  • Lemarie J, Maigrat CH, Kimmoun A, Dumont N, Bollaert PE, Selton-Suty C, Gibot S, Huttin O. Feasibility, reproducibility and diagnostic usefulness of right ventricular strain by 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in ARDS patients: the ARD strain study. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Feb 13;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-0636-2. PubMed 32056017 ↗
  • Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, Melniker L, Gargani L, Noble VE, Via G, Dean A, Tsung JW, Soldati G, Copetti R, Bouhemad B, Reissig A, Agricola E, Rouby JJ, Arbelot C, Liteplo A, Sargsyan A, Silva F, Hoppmann R, Breitkreutz R, Seibel A, Neri L, Storti E, Petrovic T; International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound (ILC-LUS) for International Consensus Conference on Lung Ultrasound (ICC-LUS). International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr;38(4):577-91. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2513-4. Epub 2012 Mar 6. PubMed 22392031 ↗
  • Quisi A, Harbalioglu H, Ozel MA, Alici G, Genc O, Kurt IH. The association between the renal resistive index and the myocardial performance index in the general population. Echocardiography. 2020 Sep;37(9):1399-1405. doi: 10.1111/echo.14702. Epub 2020 Aug 10. PubMed 32777128 ↗
  • Husain-Syed F, Birk HW, Ronco C, Schormann T, Tello K, Richter MJ, Wilhelm J, Sommer N, Steyerberg E, Bauer P, Walmrath HD, Seeger W, McCullough PA, Gall H, Ghofrani HA. Doppler-Derived Renal Venous Stasis Index in the Prognosis of Right Heart Failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013584. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013584. Epub 2019 Oct 19. PubMed 31630601 ↗
  • Sella N, Pettenuzzo T, Zarantonello F, Andreatta G, De Cassai A, Schiavolin C, Simoni C, Pasin L, Boscolo A, Navalesi P. Electrical impedance tomography: A compass for the safe route to optimal PEEP. Respir Med. 2021 Oct;187:106555. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106555. Epub 2021 Jul 30. PubMed 34352563 ↗
  • Chiumello D, Gotti M, Guanziroli M, Formenti P, Umbrello M, Pasticci I, Mistraletti G, Busana M. Bedside calculation of mechanical power during volume- and pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2020 Jul 11;24(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03116-w. PubMed 32653011 ↗
  • Sinha P, Calfee CS, Beitler JR, Soni N, Ho K, Matthay MA, Kallet RH. Physiologic Analysis and Clinical Performance of the Ventilatory Ratio in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb 1;199(3):333-341. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201804-0692OC. PubMed 30211618 ↗
  • Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, Solomon SD, Louie EK, Schiller NB. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23(7):685-713; quiz 786-8. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.010. No abstract available. PubMed 20620859 ↗
  • Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, Lancellotti P, Muraru D, Picard MH, Rietzschel ER, Rudski L, Spencer KT, Tsang W, Voigt JU. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003. PubMed 25559473 ↗
  • American College of Emergency Physicians 2018 Guidelines. Accessible from www.acep.org.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2022 to primary completion in Dec 2025, 38 months.

Of 263 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Respiratory Distress Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42. This study's 38 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 270 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 13, 2022
First posted
Oct 17, 2022
StartActual
Oct 26, 2022
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
May 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05583461
Responsible party
Tommaso Pettenuzzo (MD, University of Padova) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 17, 2022
Start date
Oct 26, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
May 7, 2026

Study contacts

Tommaso Pettenuzzo, MD
principal investigator · Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Padova University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion