An interventional study of Simulation of Labor and No intervention in Pregnancy, Labor and Childbirth and Fear of Birth, sponsored by University of Padova. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.
Sponsored by University of Padova · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Fear of childbirth and low childbirth self-efficacy are recognized factors associated with negative birth experiences, increased anxiety, reduced maternal satisfaction, and a greater likelihood of obstetric interventions. Although antenatal education programs are widely used to prepare expectant parents for childbirth, considerable variability exists in their content and delivery, and many programs provide limited preparation for the emotional, relational, and organizational challenges encountered during labor and birth.
This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Simulation of Labor (SOL) intervention, a personalized and experiential childbirth preparation program designed for primiparous women involving their birth partners. In addition to standard antenatal education, participants allocated to the intervention group will attend a structured labor simulation that reproduces labor and birth scenarios, hospital care processes, communication with healthcare professionals, non-pharmacological pain management strategies, and potential unexpected obstetric events. The simulation is tailored to participants' individual needs, concerns, and expectations identified before the intervention.
Participants in the control group will receive standard antenatal education alone. The primary objective is to determine whether the SOL intervention reduces fear of childbirth before birth compared with standard antenatal education. Secondary objectives include evaluating childbirth self-efficacy, childbirth attitudes, birth experience, maternal participation in decision-making, obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and selected maternal and neonatal outcomes.
The study will assess whether a personalized labor simulation can improve childbirth preparedness, strengthen parental competence and confidence, and promote a more positive and empowering birth experience.
Childbirth is a major life event that can have important psychological, emotional, and physical consequences for women and their families. Fear of childbirth and low childbirth self-efficacy have been associated with increased anxiety, poorer childbirth experiences, reduced maternal satisfaction, and a greater likelihood of obstetric interventions. Although antenatal education programs are widely offered to prepare expectant parents for labor and birth, substantial heterogeneity exists in their content, delivery methods, and effectiveness. Furthermore, many currently available programs provide limited preparation for real-life hospital dynamics, communication with healthcare professionals, management of unexpected clinical situations, and emotional responses during labor and birth.
Simulation-based education is an experiential learning strategy that has been shown to improve confidence, reduce anxiety, enhance decision-making skills, and strengthen preparedness in healthcare and educational settings. Preliminary studies investigating simulation-based childbirth education have reported promising effects on childbirth-related anxiety, fear of childbirth, and childbirth self-efficacy. However, the available interventions have generally been standardized rather than individualized, have provided limited involvement of birth partners, and have not fully reproduced the clinical, organizational, and emotional context in which childbirth occurs.
The Simulation of Labor (SOL) study was developed to address these gaps. The intervention consists of a personalized labor and birth simulation designed for primiparous women and their birth partners. Prior to the simulation, couples participate in a structured interview aimed at identifying individual concerns, expectations, specific fears, and positive emotional resources. Information collected during this interview is used to tailor the simulation experience to the needs of each couple.
The simulation reproduces labor and birth scenarios within a realistic hospital environment and includes hospital admission procedures, communication with healthcare professionals, non-pharmacological pain management techniques, emotional coping strategies, decision-making processes, and selected unexpected or adverse obstetric situations that may occur during childbirth. The intervention combines experiential learning, individualized preparation, active partner involvement, and exposure to realistic labor and hospital scenarios within a psychologically safe learning environment. A structured debriefing session follows the simulation to facilitate reflection and integration of the experience.
This prospective randomized controlled trial will compare standard antenatal education alone with standard antenatal education plus the SOL intervention. Following informed consent and completion of baseline assessments, eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or control group. To ensure balance with respect to the primary prognostic factor, randomization will be stratified according to baseline fear of childbirth measured using the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire Version A (W-DEQ A), with participants classified as having severe fear of childbirth (score ≥85) or non-severe fear of childbirth (score \<85).
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether participation in the SOL intervention reduces fear of childbirth before birth compared with standard antenatal education alone. Secondary objectives include evaluating childbirth self-efficacy, childbirth attitudes, childbirth experience, maternal participation in decision-making, obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and selected maternal and neonatal outcomes. The study will assess whether a personalized labor simulation can improve childbirth preparedness, strengthen parental competence and confidence, and promote a more positive childbirth experience.
University of Padova is the lead sponsor of 215 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive a personalized labor simulation in addition to standard antenatal education. Before the intervention, all participants will complete baseline assessments evaluating fear of childbirth, childbirth attitudes, self-efficacy, pregnancy-related anxiety, general anxiety, personality traits, and preferred mode of birth. Randomization will be stratified according to baseline fear of childbirth measured with the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire Version A (WDEQ-A; score ≥85 vs. \<85). Following randomization, couples allocated to the intervention group will participate in a brief online interview (approximately 30 minutes) to identify individual fears, expectations, support needs, and positive emotional cues. This information will be used to tailor the simulation. The intervention consists of a structured, approximately 2-hour labor and birth simulation conducted in small groups (3-4 couples) with both partn
Behavioral: Simulation of Labor
Participants assigned to the control group will receive standard antenatal education according to their usual prenatal care pathway. No labor simulation will be provided. Participants will complete the same baseline, pre-birth, and postpartum assessments as the intervention group, including measures of childbirth fear, childbirth attitudes, self-efficacy, anxiety, and birth experience. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes will be collected from medical records.
Behavioral: No intervention
The intervention consists of a structured, approximately 2-hour labor and birth simulation delivered in small groups of 3-4 couples, with both partners present. The simulation is personalized according to the specific fears, concerns, and needs identified by each couple. It recreates key stages of labor and birth, including hospital procedures, communication with healthcare professionals, non-pharmacological pain management strategies, emotional coping techniques, decision-making processes, and potential obstetric scenarios. A structured debriefing session follows the simulation to facilitate reflection, discussion, and emotional processing.
Participants will complete the same baseline, pre-birth, and postpartum assessments as the intervention group, including measures of childbirth fear, childbirth attitudes, self-efficacy, anxiety, and birth experience.
Between-group difference in change in childbirth fear score
Between-group difference in change in childbirth fear score, measured using the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire A, from: Pre-intervention/baseline: assessment performed before the simulation for the intervention group and before completion of the standard childbirth preparation course for the control group. Post-intervention, before birth: assessment performed after the intervention (simulation) for the intervention group and after completion of the standard childbirth preparation course for the control group. Responses will be collected within 1 week after the intervention/course completion.
Time frame: Between enrolment (before simulation or standard antenatal education) and simulation or the completion of standard antenatal education within one week
Between-group difference in perceived childbirth self-efficacy before birth.
Between-group difference in perceived childbirth self-efficacy before birth, assessed using the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory.
Time frame: Within one week after the simulation or the completion of standard antenatal education
Between-group difference in childbirth attitude (preference)
Between-group difference in childbirth attitude (preference) before birth, assessed through preferred mode of delivery (vaginal delivery or cesarean section).
Time frame: Between enrolment (before simulation or standard antenatal education) and simulation or the completion of standard antenatal education within one week
Between-group difference in change in childbirth fear score, measured using the Childbirth Attitude Questionnaire
Between-group difference in change in childbirth fear score, measured using the Childbirth Attitude Questionnaire pre-intervention and post intervention (before birth)
Time frame: Between enrolment (before simulation or standard antenatal education) and simulation or the completion of standard antenatal education within one week
Between-group difference in childbirth fear after delivery, measured using the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire B
Between-group difference in childbirth fear after delivery, measured using the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire B at postpartum assessment.
Time frame: Within one week after delivery
Within-group change in childbirth fear scores in the intervention group before and after the intervention, measured using the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire A
Within-group change in childbirth fear scores in the intervention group before and after the intervention, measured using the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire A, assessed before simulation or standard antenatal educatione and after simulation or standard antenatal education
Time frame: Between enrolment (before simulation) and simulation within one week after the completion
Difference in the duration of labor stages between groups
Difference in the duration of labor stages between groups (in minutes) extracted from clinical records.
Time frame: Within one week after delivery
Between-group difference in the use of medical procedures to accelerate labor
Between-group difference in the use of medical procedures to accelerate labor, such as amniotomy or oxytocin administration (from clinical records).
Time frame: Within one week after delivery
Difference in mode of delivery between groups
Difference in mode of delivery between groups (vaginal birth vs cesarean or operative delivery) assessed using clinical records
Time frame: Within one week after delivery
Difference in neonatal Apgar scores between groups.
Difference in neonatal Apgar scores (at fist minute expressed from 1 to 10/10) between groups assessed using clinical records.
Time frame: Within one week after delivery
Difference in active participation and negotiation ability of the woman/couple (subjective outcome)
Difference in active participation and negotiation ability of the woman/couple, assessed through postpartum narrative interviews (birth narratives), in particular regarding the autonomous use of non-pharmacological pain-management strategies during labor (vocalizations, visualizations, warm water, emotional anchoring, acupressure, movement and position changes, music, dim lighting, and behaviors promoting hormonal regulation), negotiation and clarification regarding invasive procedures, and overall perception of a positive and satisfying birth experience.
Time frame: Within one week after delivery
Perceived effectiveness of simulation versus traditional childbirth class
Perceived effectiveness of simulation versus traditional childbirth class (10-point Likert scale), assessed through a postpartum questionnaire in both groups, including: reduction of disorientation during labor, increased partner activation and involvement, clearer understanding of professional care and obstetric procedures, reduced perception of partner uselessness during labor, and increased maternal sense of empowerment in managing childbirth.
Time frame: Within one week after delivery
Within-group change in childbirth fear scores in the intervention group before and after the intervention, measured using the Childbirth Attitude Questionnaire
Within-group change in childbirth fear scores in the intervention group before and after the intervention, measured using the Childbirth Attitude Questionnaire, assessed before simulation and after simulation
Time frame: Between enrolment (before simulation) and simulation within one week after the completion
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2028, 24 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.