ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05578326Updated Sep 21, 2026

Study of Trilaciclib and Lurbinectidin

A Phase 2 interventional study of Trilaciclib and Lurbinectedin in Lung Cancer and Small-cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Primary conditionSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaRegistry: Lung NeoplasmsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Lung Neoplasms — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, a narrower term within Lung Neoplasms.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 16 studies testing PM 01183 in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma — 9 open to participants now, 11 under way, 3 of them phase 3. PM 01183 · Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Planned enrollment
12th of 16
30 · median 69
Started
2022
with 1 other
Phase 2
6 of 16
5 open now
Primary completion
2026-12
later than 2 of 10 live
Registered
8th of 16
by date

Among the 16 studies testing PM 01183 in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, this one is the 12th largest by planned enrollment, is one of 2 that started in 2022, is one of 6 in phase 2, reaches primary completion later than 2 of the 10 other live ones, and was the 8th registered.

Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

1,301 studies on the registry are indexed under Small Cell Lung Carcinoma; 367 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 56 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Browse Small Cell Lung Carcinoma studies →

Open to participants now

9 of the 16 studies testing PM 01183 in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma are open now, in 12 countries. Each count lists the studies.

All 9 open studies →

About PM 01183

PM 01183: first FDA approval 2020 (ZEPZELCA), first EMA approval 2026. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 264 Small Cell Lung Carcinoma studies recruiting now, 173 (66%) set no upper age limit and 67 (25%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 8 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →
Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 16 studies testing PM 01183 in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Lung cancer is by far the leading cause of cancer death among both men and women worldwide and the second most common cancer in terms of new cases. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the deadliest form of lung cancer. The standard first-line treatment is the combination of carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. While response rates for this regimen are high (roughly 60%), the duration of response is short, typically 4 months. Following progression after the 1st line treatment of SCLC, there is no consensus regarding subsequent therapy. Lurbinectedin is FDA approved and is increasingly preferred in clinical practice. Toxicity was significant, but appeared favorable compared to historic results with topotecan, leading to the adoption of this therapy for second-line SCLC. The toxicity profile was dominated by myelosuppression.

This study investigates the effect of Trilaciclib on myelosuppression rate in subjects with platinum refractory extensive stage (ES)- SCLC receiving Lurbinectedin as well as the clinical synergy of Trilaciclib and Lurbinectedin combination.

03

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer
  • Small-cell Lung Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lurbinectedin
  • Trilaciclib
  • myelosuppression
  • neutropenia
04

In context

Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Reclassified

1,301 studies on the registry are indexed under Small Cell Lung Carcinoma; 367 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 56 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Browse Small Cell Lung Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 429 studies on the registry; 97 are open to participants now.

Of its 33 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 26 (79%) have results posted.

Compared within Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Lung Neoplasms. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

In order to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the eligibility criteria outlined below.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written obtained to participate in the study and HIPAA authorization for release of personal health information.
  • Age ≥ 18 years at the time of consent.
  • (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-1
  • according to v1.1 within 28 days prior to start of treatment.
  • Previous treatment with a platinum agent, PD1 or PDL1 agent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active infection requiring systemic therapy.

    • Pregnant or breastfeeding (NOTE: breast milk cannot be stored for future use while the mother is being treated on study).
    • Treatment with any drug within 4 weeks prior to start of treatment.
    • A known allergy or sensitivity to either study drug or its .
    • Subject is receiving prohibited medications or treatments as listed in the protocol.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

06

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Trilaciclib and Lurbinectedin

    Subjects with platinum refractory extensive stage small cell lung cancer receiving laciclib and Lurbinectedin

    Drug: Trilaciclib · Drug: Lurbinectedin

Interventions

  • 240 mg/m2 intravenous, over 30 minutes at day 1 of each cycle

  • 3.2 mg/m2, over 60 minutes at day 1 of each cycle

07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of grade 4 neutropenia

    The proportion of subjects that experience grade 4 neutropenia as graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 will be determined. CTCAE is descriptive terminology that can be used for Adverse Event (AE) grading and reporting. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.

    Time frame: Up to 21 days

  2. The duration of grade 4 neutropenia

    The median duration of subjects that experience grade 4 neutropenia as graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 will be reported.

    Time frame: Up to 21 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. The mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia

    The mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 will be defined as the start of grade 4 neutropenia to the time of decreased grade as measured in days or censored at the time of death if a subject dies with Grade 4 neutropenia in Cycle 1.

    Time frame: Up to 21 days

  2. The number of grade 3/4 anemia, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia

    Toxicity will be evaluated, as the number of grade 3/4 anemia, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 criteria, in any cycle (including cycle 1).

    Time frame: Up to 8 months

  3. Use of secondary/reactive supportive measures

    To characterize use of secondary/reactive supportive measures any supportive measures such as Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ( G-CSF) and erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) administration, red blood cell and platelet transfusion will be recorded.

    Time frame: Up to 8 months

  4. Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy/ Number of chemotherapy dose reductions

    The dose Intensity of Chemotherapy/ Number of chemotherapy dose reductions will be defined as the ratio of the subjects who required chemotherapy dose reductions to all subjects who received study treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 8 months

  5. Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy/ Number of chemotherapy cycles

    The dose Intensity of Chemotherapy/ Number of chemotherapy cycles will be defined as the median number of chemotherapy cycles among the subject who received study treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 8 months

  6. Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy/ Number of chemotherapy delays

    The dose Intensity of Chemotherapy/ Number of chemotherapy delays will be defined as the median number of chemotherapy cycle delays dates among the subject who received study treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 8 months

  7. Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy/ the total chemotherapy dose

    The dose Intensity of Chemotherapy/ the total chemotherapy dose will be defined as the median chemotherapy dose among the subject who received study treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 8 months

  8. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    To estimate the ORR, the proportion of subjects that respond (CR + PR) will be measured according to RESIST 1.1 will be calculated. RECIST: Radiographic response will be measured by RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria, indicating if the subject experienced a Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), no response or less response than Partial or Progressive; or Progressive Disease (PD), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  9. Progression-free survival (PFS)

    PFS will be measured from the initiation of study therapy until progression per RECIST 1.1 or death of any cause or at last date of disease assessment if no progression is observed during the study period.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  10. Overall survival (OS)

    OS will be measured from the initiation of therapy until death of any cause or censored at the last time known to be alive.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  11. The kinetics of response

    The kinetics of response will be reported as tumor size over time for all patients, including the pace of progression from prior therapy.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  12. QOL assessments FACT-L

    Scores from QOL assessments FACT-L version 4, from prior to study therapy through cycle 12 will be obtained, as described in the protocol. The FACT-L is a lung cancer specific subscale given at baseline, after each cycle and at end of treatment. Items are rated by patients on a Likert scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent better QOL.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  13. QOL assessments FACT-An

    Scores from QOL assessments FACT-An version 4, from prior to study therapy through cycle 12 will be obtained, as described in the protocol. The FACT-An is an anemia specific subscale given at baseline, after each cycle and at end of treatment. Items are rated by patients on a Likert scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent better QOL.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

08

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
09

References and documents

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 50 months after the start.

Of 150 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, half reached primary completion within 53 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 36 and three quarters within 87. This study's planned 50 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 203 studies reached it within 47 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 84.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 23, 2022
First posted
Oct 13, 2022
StartActual
Oct 12, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 25, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 25, 2028
Last update
Sep 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05578326
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 13, 2022
Start date
Oct 12, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 25, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 25, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Shamina Williams
Contact
shamina_williams@med.unc.edu
919-966-4432
Lauren Higgins
Contact
Lauren_Higgins@med.unc.edu
919-966-4432
Jared Weiss, MD
principal investigator · UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Trilaciclib · PM 01183

Start the discussion