ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05576974Updated Apr 14, 2026

A Phase 2a, Single-dose, Open-label Study to Evaluate Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Pegsitacianine, an Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging Agent for the Detection of Cancer, in Patients With Unknown Primary Head and Neck Cancer (ILLUMINATE STUDY)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Pegsitacianine in Head and Neck Cancer, Unknown Primary Cancer and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.

Primary conditionSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckRegistry: Head and Neck NeoplasmsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Head and Neck Neoplasms — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, a narrower term within Head and Neck Neoplasms.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a non-randomized, open-label, single-center, safety and imaging feasibility study of Pegsitacianine, an intraoperative fluorescence imaging agent.

Read the detailed description

This is a non-randomized, open-label, single-center, safety and imaging feasibility study of Pegsitacianine, an intraoperative fluorescence imaging agent.

The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether Pegsitacianine can be used to image head and neck cancers as well as unknown primary cancer of the head and neck 6-300 hours post dose in patients undergoing routine surgery for biopsy, evaluation, detection or removal of their primary cancer.

The study consists of two Parts.

  • Part 1 will be performed in a single dose of 1 mg/kg given such that Pegsitacianine fluorescence can be used to image primary tumors in patients with HNSCC undergoing routine surgery at 6-300 hours, and if needed at an alternate imaging schedule post dose.
  • Part 2 will be performed in a single dose of 1 mg/kg given such that Pegsitacianine fluorescence can be used to image primary tumors in patients with unknown primary cancer of the head and neck (UPC) at 6-300 hours, and if needed at an alternate imaging schedule post dose.
02

Conditions studied

  • Head and Neck Cancer
  • Unknown Primary Cancer
  • Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
03

In context

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck Reclassified

2,018 studies on the registry are indexed under Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; 573 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 48 across 1,653 interventional studies indexed under Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck.

Browse Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 1,010 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 105 (76%) have results posted.

Compared within Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Head and Neck Neoplasms. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults ≥18 years of age
  2. -confirmed diagnosis, for primary or recurrent disease (or high clinical suspicion in the opinion of the Investigator)

    1. Part 1: Stage 1 to 4 HNSCC
    2. Part 2: UPC squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with disease to at least a single cervical node, AND no biopsy proven evidence of the primary cancer's location.
  3. Acceptable hematologic status (as standard surgery protocol requires, as determined by the Investigator), kidney function and liver function. Elevations of creatinine, , aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, or total >1.5× the [ULN] must be determined to be not by the Investigator and approved by the Medical Monitor.
  4. Documented negative serum pregnancy test for women of (i.e., premenopausal women with intact reproductive organs and women \<2 years after menopause)
  5. Male patients and female patients of child-bearing potential (i.e., premenopausal women with intact reproductive organs and women \<2 years after menopause) must agree to and comply with using medically acceptable including surgical sterilization (e.g., hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation), intrauterine device, oral contraceptive, contraceptive patch, long acting injectable contraceptive, partner's vasectomy, double-barrier method (condom or diaphragm plus spermicide or condom plus diaphragm), or abstinence during the trial and for 6 months thereafter
  6. Agree to abstain from alcohol consumption from 72 hours before Pegsitacianine administration through completion of Study Day 10 (±48 hours) visit in Part 1 and Part 2.
  7. Adequate potential for follow up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tumors at sites of which the surgeon would assess that in vivo intraoperative imaging would not be feasible.
  2. \<12 weeks
  3. Performance Status \<70%
  4. Hepatic impairment ( score >5) or significant liver disease including active hepatitis or cirrhosis
  5. Lab values or any sign, symptom, or medical condition that in the opinion of the PI would prevent surgical resection
  6. Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patient's ability to give .
  7. Pregnant or lactating women
  8. Receiving or planned to receive, during the duration of the study, concomitant medication with a high chance of hepatotoxicity, as judged by the PI based on standard protocols within the study center
  9. Alcohol consumption within 72 hours before Pegsitacianine administration
  10. Received an agent within the shorter of 5 half-lives or 30 days before Pegsitacianine dosing
  11. Inability to adhere to the schedule of assessments or any circumstance that would interfere with the validity of assessments performed in the study
  12. The PI considers that the patient should not participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Part 1 - Cohort A

    In Part 1 the single dose of 1 mg/kg of pegsitacianine given 6-300 hours prior to surgery will be used to image primary tumors in patients with HNSCC to evaluated to verify the diagnostic performance of pegsitacianine fluorescence imaging for detecting primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes.

    Drug: Pegsitacianine

  • Active comparator
    Part 2 - Cohort B

    In Part 2, pegsitacianine the single dose of 1 mg/kg of given 6-300 hours prior to surgery will be used to in patients with unknown primary cancer of the head and neck. These patients typically undergo exam under anesthesia with a laryngoscopy as well as panendoscopy for identifying the source of the metastatic cancer found in the cervical nodes. The diagnostic performance of pegsitacianine fluorescence imaging for detecting primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes in these patients will be evaluated. All the available data to date will be used to decide the additional tumor type(s), number of patients per tumor type, and number of Group(s) to be enrolled.

    Drug: Pegsitacianine

Interventions

  • Infusion of the Pegsitacianine-Intraoperative fluorescence imaging

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostics performance and safety of 1 mg/kg Pegsitacianine in patients with HNSCC

    Pegsitacianine fluorescence from in vivo and excised tissues will be imaged using intraoperative and post-operative NIR cameras and will be correlated with the histopathological confirmation of tumor and normal tissues to determine Pegsitacianine's diagnostic performance. Patient safety will be assessed for 10 days (±48 hours) post dose. All patients will be monitored for vital signs and physical examination pretreatment and at various time points up to Day 6 (±24 hours). All patients will be monitored for comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) and complete blood count (CBC) with differentials pretreatment and at various time points up to Day 10 (±48 hours). All patients will be monitored for TEAEs, and concomitant medication use from the start of dosing up to Day 10 (±48 hours). TEAEs will be followed closely during the study to identify any potential DLTs

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Diagnostics performance and safety of 1 mg/kg Pegsitacianine in patients with UPC

    Pegsitacianine fluorescence from in vivo and excised tissues will be imaged using intraoperative and post-operative NIR cameras and will be correlated with the histopathological confirmation of tumor and normal tissues to determine Pegsitacianine's diagnostic performance. Patient safety will be assessed for 10 days (±48 hours). All patients will be monitored for vital signs and physical examination pretreatment and at various time points up to Day 6 (±48 hours). All patients will be monitored for comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) and complete blood count (CBC) with differentials pretreatment and at various time points up to Day 10 (±48 hours). All patients will be monitored for TEAEs, and concomitant medication use from the start of dosing up to Day 10 (±48 hours). TEAEs will be followed closely during the study to identify any potential DLTs

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pegsitacianine fluorescence imaging in HNSCC, UPC primary cancers that are HPV positive and HPV negative

    Pegsitacianine fluorescence from in vivo and excised tissues will be imaged using intraoperative and post-operative NIR cameras and will be correlated with the histopathological confirmation of tumor and normal tissues to determine Pegsitacianine's diagnostic performance. Assessment of use of Pegsitacianine for intra-operative imaging of HNSCC, UPC and metastatic lymph nodes will include quantification of intraoperative and postoperative fluorescence signals from histology confirmed tumor and normal tissues, calculation of TBR and diagnostic performance. Feasibility determination will be based on a combined assessment of intraoperative in vivo and ex vivo fluorescent signals together with ex vivo examinations (histological examination, NIR flatbed scanning).

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Amit M, Yen TC, Liao CT, Chaturvedi P, Agarwal JP, Kowalski LP, Kohler HF, Ebrahimi A, Clark JR, Cernea CR, Brandao JS, Kreppel M, Zoller JE, Leider-Trejo L, Bachar G, Shpitzer T, Bolzoni AV, Patel RP, Jonnalagadda S, Robbins TK, Shah JP, Patel SG, Gil Z. The origin of regional failure in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with pathologically negative neck metastases. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec;140(12):1130-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1539. PubMed 25074731 ↗
  • Dacosta RS, Wilson BC, Marcon NE. Spectroscopy and fluorescence in esophageal diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;20(1):41-57. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2005.08.003. PubMed 16473800 ↗
  • Davies B, Morris T. Physiological parameters in laboratory animals and humans. Pharm Res. 1993 Jul;10(7):1093-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1018943613122. No abstract available. PubMed 8378254 ↗
  • Denaro N, Russi EG, Adamo V, Merlano MC. State-of-the-art and emerging treatment options in the management of head and neck cancer: news from 2013. Oncology. 2014;86(4):212-29. doi: 10.1159/000357712. Epub 2014 May 10. PubMed 24820548 ↗
  • d'Alessandro AF, Pinto FR, Lin CS, Kulcsar MA, Cernea CR, Brandao LG, Matos LL. Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: factors related to occult lymph node metastasis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 May-Jun;81(3):248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 30. PubMed 25890681 ↗
  • Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9. PubMed 25220842 ↗
  • Gioux S, Choi HS, Frangioni JV. Image-guided surgery using invisible near-infrared light: fundamentals of clinical translation. Mol Imaging. 2010 Oct;9(5):237-55. PubMed 20868625 ↗
  • Haka AS, Volynskaya Z, Gardecki JA, Nazemi J, Lyons J, Hicks D, Fitzmaurice M, Dasari RR, Crowe JP, Feld MS. In vivo margin assessment during partial mastectomy breast surgery using raman spectroscopy. Cancer Res. 2006 Mar 15;66(6):3317-22. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2815. PubMed 16540686 ↗
  • Jonkman A, Kaanders JH, Terhaard CH, Hoebers FJ, van den Ende PL, Wijers OB, Verhoef LC, de Jong MA, Leemans CR, Langendijk JA. Multicenter validation of recursive partitioning analysis classification for patients with squamous cell head and neck carcinoma treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 May 1;68(1):119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.002. PubMed 17448870 ↗
  • Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis. Cancer. 2006 Jan 1;106(1):4-16. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21568. PubMed 16329134 ↗
  • Koller M, Qiu SQ, Linssen MD, Jansen L, Kelder W, de Vries J, Kruithof I, Zhang GJ, Robinson DJ, Nagengast WB, Jorritsma-Smit A, van der Vegt B, van Dam GM. Implementation and benchmarking of a novel analytical framework to clinically evaluate tumor-specific fluorescent tracers. Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 18;9(1):3739. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05727-y. PubMed 30228269 ↗
  • Kumar R, Roy I, Ohulchanskky TY, Vathy LA, Bergey EJ, Sajjad M, Prasad PN. In vivo biodistribution and clearance studies using multimodal organically modified silica nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2010 Feb 23;4(2):699-708. doi: 10.1021/nn901146y. PubMed 20088598 ↗
  • Li Y, Zhao T, Wang C, Lin Z, Huang G, Sumer BD, Gao J. Erratum: Molecular basis of cooperativity in pH-triggered supramolecular self-assembly. Nat Commun. 2016 Dec 16;7:13777. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13777. No abstract available. PubMed 27981971 ↗
  • Ma X, Wang Y, Zhao T, Li Y, Su LC, Wang Z, Huang G, Sumer BD, Gao J. Ultra-pH-sensitive nanoprobe library with broad pH tunability and fluorescence emissions. J Am Chem Soc. 2014 Aug 6;136(31):11085-92. doi: 10.1021/ja5053158. Epub 2014 Jul 29. PubMed 25020134 ↗
  • Milenovic A, Virag M, Knezevic P, Boras VV, Ostovic KT, Panduric DG, Susic M. Evaluation of sentinel node biopsy in oral carcinomas. Coll Antropol. 2014 Mar;38(1):279-82. PubMed 24851630 ↗
  • Mo J, Zheng W, Low JJ, Ng J, Ilancheran A, Huang Z. High wavenumber Raman spectroscopy for in vivo detection of cervical dysplasia. Anal Chem. 2009 Nov 1;81(21):8908-15. doi: 10.1021/ac9015159. PubMed 19817391 ↗
  • Pedersen NJ, Jensen DH, Hedback N, Frendo M, Kiss K, Lelkaitis G, Mortensen J, Christensen A, Specht L, von Buchwald C. Staging of early lymph node metastases with the sentinel lymph node technique and predictive factors in T1/T2 oral cavity cancer: A retrospective single-center study. Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E1033-40. doi: 10.1002/hed.24153. Epub 2015 Sep 2. PubMed 26040238 ↗
  • Rosenthal EL, Warram JM, de Boer E, Basilion JP, Biel MA, Bogyo M, Bouvet M, Brigman BE, Colson YL, DeMeester SR, Gurtner GC, Ishizawa T, Jacobs PM, Keereweer S, Liao JC, Nguyen QT, Olson JM, Paulsen KD, Rieves D, Sumer BD, Tweedle MF, Vahrmeijer AL, Weichert JP, Wilson BC, Zenn MR, Zinn KR, van Dam GM. Successful Translation of Fluorescence Navigation During Oncologic Surgery: A Consensus Report. J Nucl Med. 2016 Jan;57(1):144-50. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.158915. Epub 2015 Oct 8. PubMed 26449839 ↗
  • Schwarz RA, Gao W, Redden Weber C, Kurachi C, Lee JJ, El-Naggar AK, Richards-Kortum R, Gillenwater AM. Noninvasive evaluation of oral lesions using depth-sensitive optical spectroscopy. Cancer. 2009 Apr 15;115(8):1669-79. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24177. PubMed 19170229 ↗
  • Sibille M, Patat A, Caplain H, Donazzolo Y. A safety grading scale to support dose escalation and define stopping rules for healthy subject first-entry-into-man studies: some points to consider from the French Club Phase I working group. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;70(5):736-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03741.x. PubMed 21039768 ↗
  • Thompson CF, St John MA, Lawson G, Grogan T, Elashoff D, Mendelsohn AH. Diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jul;270(7):2115-22. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2320-0. Epub 2012 Dec 22. PubMed 23263205 ↗
  • Vahrmeijer AL, Hutteman M, van der Vorst JR, van de Velde CJ, Frangioni JV. Image-guided cancer surgery using near-infrared fluorescence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep;10(9):507-18. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.123. Epub 2013 Jul 23. PubMed 23881033 ↗
  • Wang Y, Zhou K, Huang G, Hensley C, Huang X, Ma X, Zhao T, Sumer BD, DeBerardinis RJ, Gao J. A nanoparticle-based strategy for the imaging of a broad range of tumours by nonlinear amplification of microenvironment signals. Nat Mater. 2014 Feb;13(2):204-12. doi: 10.1038/nmat3819. Epub 2013 Dec 8. PubMed 24317187 ↗
  • Webb BA, Chimenti M, Jacobson MP, Barber DL. Dysregulated pH: a perfect storm for cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Aug 11;11(9):671-7. doi: 10.1038/nrc3110. PubMed 21833026 ↗
  • Zhao T, Huang G, Li Y, Yang S, Ramezani S, Lin Z, Wang Y, Ma X, Zeng Z, Luo M, de Boer E, Xie XJ, Thibodeaux J, Brekken RA, Sun X, Sumer BD, Gao J. A Transistor-like pH Nanoprobe for Tumour Detection and Image-guided Surgery. Nat Biomed Eng. 2016;1:0006. doi: 10.1038/s41551-016-0006. Epub 2016 Dec 19. PubMed 28966871 ↗
  • Zhang H, Xu X, Ta C, Zurutuza I, Gautam KS, Hongsermeier C, Blasi N, Voorugonda S, Mukherjee-Roy N, Gao J, Sumer B, Akers WJ, Achilefu S. Bridging preclinical and clinical fluorescence-guided surgery with advanced cancer vision goggles. Npj Imaging. 2026 May 25;4(1):36. doi: 10.1038/s44303-026-00170-x. PubMed 42185570 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05576974
Responsible party
Baran Sumer (Professor and Chief, Division of Head and Neck Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 13, 2022
Start date
Apr 17, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 14, 2026

Study contacts

Baran Sumer, MD
Contact
Baran.Sumer@UTSouthwestern.edu
2146482904
Sindhu Voorugonda, MBBS
Contact
Sindhunikhila.voorugonda@utsouthwestern.edu
2146488096

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Pegsitacianine

Start the discussion