A Phase 2 interventional study of INM004 and SoC in Diarrhea-Associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome, Pediatric Kidney Disease and Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome, sponsored by Inmunova S.A.. Completed at 16 sites in Argentina. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-21.
Sponsored by Inmunova S.A. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) is a foodborne disease which mainly affects children. It is caused by Escherichia coli bacteria, which release a toxin called Shiga toxin within the body. This infectious form of HUS, defined as STEC-HUS, can cause sporadic cases or outbreaks, as observed in different countries. Argentina has the highest incidence of STEC-HUS worldwide. The disease is endemic, representing approximately 95% of all HUS cases nationwide.
STEC-HUS generally begins with diarrhea (with or without blood), and can also cause fever, abdominal pain, and cramps. Then the child may have pallor, altered consciousness, decreased urine output, seizures, and other symptoms. Although death is uncommon (it occurs in 2-4% of cases), it is a very serious disease that mainly affects the kidneys, and also other organs such as the brain. About half of children need to undergo a risky procedure such as dialysis (due to malfunctioning kidneys); and most of them also receive blood transfusions.
Around 30% of the patients are left with lifelong consequences that can range from permanent kidney damage to the need for a transplant.
So far there is no drug, antibiotic or vaccine to prevent or treat HUS. Current treatment protocols include hospitalization for all patients with HUS, and supportive therapy such as hydration and salt intake. Support therapy is not a specific treatment, but rather helps the body better defend itself against the disease.
The purpose of this study is to establish whether it is safe and effective to treat patients who are diagnosed with STEC-HUS, with INM004 (study drug). INM004 is an investigational product "Fraction F(ab')2 of Equine Shiga Antitoxin Immunoglobulin". It is a concentrated and sterile serum obtained from healthy horses immunized against Shiga toxin that contains antibodies capable of neutralizing it.
The initial hypothesis is that INM004 would neutralize the entry of Shiga toxin into the body's cells thus preventing the consequent toxic damage. With the proposed treatment, INM004 would eliminate the Shiga toxin, preventing the progression of HUS symptoms and its serious complications (such as the need for and duration of dialysis, duration of hospital stays, as well as neurological, cardiovascular, intestinal complications, among others) which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. This treatment could then have an impact in health costs of STEC-HUS as well as the social costs.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure. HUS of infectious origin, associated with infection by Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli.
This disease can cause sporadic cases or outbreaks. Argentina is the country with the highest incidence of STEC-HUS worldwide. The disease is endemic, representing approximately 95% of all HUS cases.
There is no specific treatment capable of preventing or controlling renal and extrarenal damage caused by Stx. The treatment is mainly symptomatic. Therapy for patients with acute kidney injury is supportive and includes hydric and electrolyte management; thus, most cases require red blood cell transfusions and approximately half of cases require dialysis.
INM004 is a neutralizing serum consisting of the F(ab')2 fragment of equine immunoglobulins with specificity against the B subunits of Stx1 and Stx2. The F(ab')2 fragments are obtained through the processing of serum from horses immunized with Stx1B and Stx2B immunogens, obtained through genetic engineering techniques. A polyclonal therapy based on INM004 offers the advantage that the different subtypes of Stx could be recognized by multiple antibodies simultaneously, even when the toxin circulates bound to neutrophils or microvesicles derived from them.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of INM004 administered in patients between 1 and 12 years of age who are in the early stage of the disease.
The initial hypothesis is that INM004 would reduce the complications associated with STEC-HUS by neutralizing the harmful effect of Stx on the body. Intravenous administration of INM004 is expected to interrupt the Stx-mediated cascade, reducing the occurrence of renal and extrarenal complications (such as the need for and duration of dialysis, number of transfusions, CNS complications, and length of hospitalization).
Two doses of 4 mg/kg of INM004 will be administered as an intravenous infusion over a period of 50 min, with an interval of 24 h (± 2 h) from each other. The selection of the exposure level is based on preclinical in vitro data regarding the affinity of INM004, its neutralizing capacity for both Stx toxins, and clinical data obtained from the previous Phase I study in adult volunteers and the Phase 2/3 study in children with STEC bloody diarrhea.
Study design: A Phase II, multicenter, controlled study, with a prospective open "treatment group" (with INM004 and Standard of Care -SoC-), and a retrospective "control group" (only treated with SoC). Considering that STEC-HUS is an orphan disease currently without treatment, the design with retrospective control has been chosen.
The treatment group will enroll 100 patients hospitalized in 16 healthcare centers in Argentina, between September 2022 and May 2023, time of highest incidence of STEC-HUS. The data of the control group will be obtained retrospectively from 200 cases of STEC-HUS treated in the same centers, in the same seasonal period in the years 2018, 2019 and until March 2020 (COVID-19 pre-pandemic), with the same screening criteria as the subjects in the treatment group.
Primary Objectives: To assess: 1) the efficacy of INM004, plus SoC, in the treatment of STEC-HUS, in terms of improvement of renal involvement; 2) the safety of the administration of INM004; 3) the pharmacokinetics (PK) of INM004.
Secondary Objectives: To assess the efficacy of INM004: 1) in the mortality reduction; 2) in the improvement of the STEC-HUS associated thrombotic microangiopathy, plus SoC; 3) in the treatment of STEC-HUS, in the prevention and reduction of renal involvement in the short term, plus SoC; 4) in the treatment of STEC-HUS, in the prevention and reduction of extrarenal involvement in the short term, plus SoC; 5) the in the prevention and reduction of the complications not associated to thrombotic microangiopathy, plus SoC; 6) in terms of the length of hospital stay; and 7) the evolution of laboratory parameters of interest after the administration of INM004.
Exploratory Objectives: To assess: 1) the immunogenicity of INM004; 2) the presence of circulating Stx before the administration of INM004; 3) the immune response to STEC infection over 4 weeks follow-up; 4) the correlation between serotype/ genotype of isolated STEC strains and disease severity.
Study Procedures:
For the control group: Data will be collected from the medical records of the subjects who have been eligible from the "Potential Subjects Selection List" of the year's corresponding to this population. The data to be collected for this group will be the same as for the treatment group, except for that related to the specific procedure of the intervention: basal ECG and post dose control; 1st dose and 2nd dose, and associated controls (vital signs and AESI evaluation); blood samples for biological and/or pharmacokinetic studies; adverse events.
The inclusion of subjects in the treatment group will be conducted in two stages: Stage 1 (Safety): A safety analysis will be performed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) after the first 12 subjects have been enrolled and 24 h after the administration of the second dose of INM004 have occurred. Stage 2 (Safety and Efficacy): Enrollment will continue until May 2023, and it is estimated that 88 more subjects will enroll in this stage.
Once the participant was included the following data will be collected:
Demographic data, medical history data, data of the current illness (related to the prodromal period of STEC-HUS and to the clinical features compatible with STEC-HUS at the time of diagnosis); Complications associated with STEC-HUS at the time of diagnosis and before: renal, neurological, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, endocrinological, hematologic, lung involvement, infectious compromise. The follow up will continue to the day 28 after diagnosis.
For statistical analyses, the following populations will be considered:
Statistical methods:
Statistical analyzes will be mainly descriptive. For continuous variables, mean, median, standard deviation, quartiles, maximum and minimum will be presented. Categorical variables will be described by absolute frequencies and percentages.
Baseline parameters, demographics, clinical history and previous treatments will be described in a cross-sectional manner prior to the start of treatment. The continuous evaluations carried out throughout the study will be described longitudinally by the change from baseline. For categorical variables, shift tables can be generated.
In the treatment group, the last measure performed prior to the administration of the first dose of INM004 will be considered as the baseline measure of efficacy and safety. If a generalized delay in the administration of the INM004 treatment is observed, the closest measurement available to the diagnosis of symptoms compatible with STEC-HUS may be considered as the baseline measurement. For the control group, the baseline assessments will be those at the time of diagnosis of symptoms compatible with STEC-HUS.
Multivariate analyzes will be assessed to identify risk factors related to the evolution and severity of the disease.
Safety will be assessed throughout the study describing subjects with at least one AE, serious adverse events (SAE) and AESI, and subjects with at least one major safety deviation for each of the parameters: ECG, vital signs, clinical laboratory evaluations, including liver function tests.
Efficacy and sensitivity analyzes will be performed to detect possible subjects who could benefit more from treatment in subgroups defined according to levels of severity at admission Comparative multivariate analyzes of the main efficacy variables against the control group will be performed. These comparisons will be duly adjusted using propensity scoring techniques in order to minimize any confusion bias between both groups. Among the potential confounders to consider as adjustment variables in the model will be age, sex and severity levels at admission. Due to the exploratory nature of the comparisons, no adjustments will be made for multiple comparisons.
Due to the exploratory nature of this study, a sample of approximately 100 evaluable subjects in the treatment group would be sufficient to detect any existing trends regarding the efficacy and safety of INM004. In the control group, 200 subjects are expected to be evaluated.
With 100 evaluable subjects we will obtain a precision (distance from the mean to the end of the bilateral confidence interval at 95%) of ±1.2 for the days on dialysis (SD 6.1 days) and ±2.4 for the days of admission (SD 12 days).
28 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome; 7 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 57 is close to the median of 60 across 13 interventional studies indexed under Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome.
Browse Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome studies →Inmunova S.A. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Clinical event with a diagnosis compatible with STEC-HUS defined as:
Presence of signs of kidney injury defined as:
And at least 1 of the following 2 criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Platelets
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
2 doses of 4 mg/kg separated by 24 h
Drug: INM004 · Other: SoC
Two 4 mg/kg doses of INM004, 24 h (±2 h) apart, will be assessed. Each dose will be administered as an intravenous infusion during 50 min.
Also known as: Equine immunoglobulin fragment F(ab')2 anti-Shiga toxin
Standard of care
Days of dialysis
Days of dialysis recorded as a continuous variable from 0 to 28 days
Time frame: 28 days
Adverse events (AEs)
Incidence of AEs classified according to affected organ systems and according to severity Incidence of AEs of special interest: incidence of injection site reactions and hypersensitivity reactions (ie, allergic reaction, anaphylaxis, and serum sickness).
Time frame: 28 days
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Evaluation of INM004
Serum concentration of INM004 at different time intervals in subjects participating in this substudy
Time frame: 0, 1, 24, 26, 48 and 120 hours post-dose
Mortality
Number of participants who survive after 4 weeks of follow-up
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Creatinine %)
Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for Creatinine
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Creatinine)
Days until normalization and/or stabilization for Creatinine
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Hematuria %)
Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for Hematuria
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Hematuria)
Days until normalization and/or stabilization for Hematuria
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Proteinuria %)
Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for Proteinuria
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Proteinuria)
Days until normalization and/or stabilization for Proteinuria
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (GFR)
Days until normalization and/or stabilization for glomerular filtration rate
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (GFR %)
Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for glomerular filtration rate
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (LDH %)
Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for LDH
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (LDH)
Days until normalization and/or stabilization for LDH
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Platelet)
Days until normalization and/or stabilization for platelet
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Platelet %)
Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for platelet
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Hemoglobin %)
Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for Hemoglobin
Time frame: 28 days
Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Hemoglobin)
Days until normalization and/or stabilization for Hemoglobin
Time frame: 28 days
Change in renal involvement (dialysis)
Assessed as a dichotomous variable (yes/no)
Time frame: 28 days
Change in renal involvement (dialysis subgroups)
Assessed as an ordinal variable (subjects without dialysis, with dialysis between 1-10 days, and subjects with dialysis \>10 days).
Time frame: 28 days
Change in renal involvement (anuria)
Days of anuria (diuresis \< 0.5 ml/kg/d)
Time frame: 28 days
Change in renal involvement (hypertension)
Number of participants with hypertension
Time frame: 28 days
Change in extrarenal involvement (hematological Interventions)
Number of participants with Requirement for red blood cell transfusions, Requirement for platelet transfusions
Time frame: 28 days
Change in extrarenal involvement (hematological Clinical)
Number of participants with Petechiae and/or bruising.
Time frame: 28 days
Change in extrarenal involvement (neurological)
Number of participants with Impaired consciousness, Seizure, Focal deficit
Time frame: 28 days
Change in extrarenal involvement (cardiovascular)
Number of participants with Cardiovascular instability, Acute myocardial infarction, Myocarditis, Arrhythmia
Time frame: 28 days
Change in extrarenal involvement (gastrointestinal)
Number of participants with Hemorrhagic colitis, Ischemic colitis, Bowel perforation, Intussusception, Pancreatitis, Hepatitis, Ilium
Time frame: 28 days
Change in extrarenal involvement (endocrine)
Number of participants with Hyperglycemia with insulin requirement
Time frame: 28 days
Change in secondary complications (pulmonary)
Number of participants with Pulmonary edema, Respiratory distress syndrome
Time frame: 28 days
Change in secondary complications (infectious involvement)
Number of participants with Peritonitis, Urinary tract infection, Bacteremia, Abscesses
Time frame: 28 days
Change in the length of hospital stay
Days of hospital stay (between hospital admission and discharge)
Time frame: 28 days
Change in laboratory parameters associated with worse prognosis
Changes in values of laboratory parameters of interest
Time frame: 28 days
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Oct 2022 to primary completion in May 2023, 7 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: INM004
Inmunova S.A.