ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05569746Updated Aug 21, 2023

A Study to Assess Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of INM004 in Pediatric Patients With STEC-HUS

A Phase 2 interventional study of INM004 and SoC in Diarrhea-Associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome, Pediatric Kidney Disease and Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome, sponsored by Inmunova S.A.. Completed at 16 sites in Argentina. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-21.

Sponsored by Inmunova S.A. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
1 Year to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) is a foodborne disease which mainly affects children. It is caused by Escherichia coli bacteria, which release a toxin called Shiga toxin within the body. This infectious form of HUS, defined as STEC-HUS, can cause sporadic cases or outbreaks, as observed in different countries. Argentina has the highest incidence of STEC-HUS worldwide. The disease is endemic, representing approximately 95% of all HUS cases nationwide.

STEC-HUS generally begins with diarrhea (with or without blood), and can also cause fever, abdominal pain, and cramps. Then the child may have pallor, altered consciousness, decreased urine output, seizures, and other symptoms. Although death is uncommon (it occurs in 2-4% of cases), it is a very serious disease that mainly affects the kidneys, and also other organs such as the brain. About half of children need to undergo a risky procedure such as dialysis (due to malfunctioning kidneys); and most of them also receive blood transfusions.

Around 30% of the patients are left with lifelong consequences that can range from permanent kidney damage to the need for a transplant.

So far there is no drug, antibiotic or vaccine to prevent or treat HUS. Current treatment protocols include hospitalization for all patients with HUS, and supportive therapy such as hydration and salt intake. Support therapy is not a specific treatment, but rather helps the body better defend itself against the disease.

The purpose of this study is to establish whether it is safe and effective to treat patients who are diagnosed with STEC-HUS, with INM004 (study drug). INM004 is an investigational product "Fraction F(ab')2 of Equine Shiga Antitoxin Immunoglobulin". It is a concentrated and sterile serum obtained from healthy horses immunized against Shiga toxin that contains antibodies capable of neutralizing it.

The initial hypothesis is that INM004 would neutralize the entry of Shiga toxin into the body's cells thus preventing the consequent toxic damage. With the proposed treatment, INM004 would eliminate the Shiga toxin, preventing the progression of HUS symptoms and its serious complications (such as the need for and duration of dialysis, duration of hospital stays, as well as neurological, cardiovascular, intestinal complications, among others) which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. This treatment could then have an impact in health costs of STEC-HUS as well as the social costs.

Read the detailed description

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure. HUS of infectious origin, associated with infection by Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli.

This disease can cause sporadic cases or outbreaks. Argentina is the country with the highest incidence of STEC-HUS worldwide. The disease is endemic, representing approximately 95% of all HUS cases.

There is no specific treatment capable of preventing or controlling renal and extrarenal damage caused by Stx. The treatment is mainly symptomatic. Therapy for patients with acute kidney injury is supportive and includes hydric and electrolyte management; thus, most cases require red blood cell transfusions and approximately half of cases require dialysis.

INM004 is a neutralizing serum consisting of the F(ab')2 fragment of equine immunoglobulins with specificity against the B subunits of Stx1 and Stx2. The F(ab')2 fragments are obtained through the processing of serum from horses immunized with Stx1B and Stx2B immunogens, obtained through genetic engineering techniques. A polyclonal therapy based on INM004 offers the advantage that the different subtypes of Stx could be recognized by multiple antibodies simultaneously, even when the toxin circulates bound to neutrophils or microvesicles derived from them.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of INM004 administered in patients between 1 and 12 years of age who are in the early stage of the disease.

The initial hypothesis is that INM004 would reduce the complications associated with STEC-HUS by neutralizing the harmful effect of Stx on the body. Intravenous administration of INM004 is expected to interrupt the Stx-mediated cascade, reducing the occurrence of renal and extrarenal complications (such as the need for and duration of dialysis, number of transfusions, CNS complications, and length of hospitalization).

Two doses of 4 mg/kg of INM004 will be administered as an intravenous infusion over a period of 50 min, with an interval of 24 h (± 2 h) from each other. The selection of the exposure level is based on preclinical in vitro data regarding the affinity of INM004, its neutralizing capacity for both Stx toxins, and clinical data obtained from the previous Phase I study in adult volunteers and the Phase 2/3 study in children with STEC bloody diarrhea.

Study design: A Phase II, multicenter, controlled study, with a prospective open "treatment group" (with INM004 and Standard of Care -SoC-), and a retrospective "control group" (only treated with SoC). Considering that STEC-HUS is an orphan disease currently without treatment, the design with retrospective control has been chosen.

The treatment group will enroll 100 patients hospitalized in 16 healthcare centers in Argentina, between September 2022 and May 2023, time of highest incidence of STEC-HUS. The data of the control group will be obtained retrospectively from 200 cases of STEC-HUS treated in the same centers, in the same seasonal period in the years 2018, 2019 and until March 2020 (COVID-19 pre-pandemic), with the same screening criteria as the subjects in the treatment group.

Primary Objectives: To assess: 1) the efficacy of INM004, plus SoC, in the treatment of STEC-HUS, in terms of improvement of renal involvement; 2) the safety of the administration of INM004; 3) the pharmacokinetics (PK) of INM004.

Secondary Objectives: To assess the efficacy of INM004: 1) in the mortality reduction; 2) in the improvement of the STEC-HUS associated thrombotic microangiopathy, plus SoC; 3) in the treatment of STEC-HUS, in the prevention and reduction of renal involvement in the short term, plus SoC; 4) in the treatment of STEC-HUS, in the prevention and reduction of extrarenal involvement in the short term, plus SoC; 5) the in the prevention and reduction of the complications not associated to thrombotic microangiopathy, plus SoC; 6) in terms of the length of hospital stay; and 7) the evolution of laboratory parameters of interest after the administration of INM004.

Exploratory Objectives: To assess: 1) the immunogenicity of INM004; 2) the presence of circulating Stx before the administration of INM004; 3) the immune response to STEC infection over 4 weeks follow-up; 4) the correlation between serotype/ genotype of isolated STEC strains and disease severity.

Study Procedures:

For the control group: Data will be collected from the medical records of the subjects who have been eligible from the "Potential Subjects Selection List" of the year's corresponding to this population. The data to be collected for this group will be the same as for the treatment group, except for that related to the specific procedure of the intervention: basal ECG and post dose control; 1st dose and 2nd dose, and associated controls (vital signs and AESI evaluation); blood samples for biological and/or pharmacokinetic studies; adverse events.

The inclusion of subjects in the treatment group will be conducted in two stages: Stage 1 (Safety): A safety analysis will be performed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) after the first 12 subjects have been enrolled and 24 h after the administration of the second dose of INM004 have occurred. Stage 2 (Safety and Efficacy): Enrollment will continue until May 2023, and it is estimated that 88 more subjects will enroll in this stage.

Once the participant was included the following data will be collected:

Demographic data, medical history data, data of the current illness (related to the prodromal period of STEC-HUS and to the clinical features compatible with STEC-HUS at the time of diagnosis); Complications associated with STEC-HUS at the time of diagnosis and before: renal, neurological, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, endocrinological, hematologic, lung involvement, infectious compromise. The follow up will continue to the day 28 after diagnosis.

For statistical analyses, the following populations will be considered:

  • Full Analysis Set (FAS): For the treatment group, defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of INM004 with available follow-up evaluation on at least one efficacy parameter. This population will be used for all main efficacy analyses. All subjects included in the control group will be part of the FAS for the comparative analyses.
  • Population by Correct Protocol (PCP): includes all the subjects in the FAS who did not present major deviations from the protocol that could affect the measures of efficacy. This population will be analyzed as a sensitivity evaluation for the main analyzes of the study.
  • Safety Population (SP): For the treatment group, it is defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of INM004.

Statistical methods:

Statistical analyzes will be mainly descriptive. For continuous variables, mean, median, standard deviation, quartiles, maximum and minimum will be presented. Categorical variables will be described by absolute frequencies and percentages.

Baseline parameters, demographics, clinical history and previous treatments will be described in a cross-sectional manner prior to the start of treatment. The continuous evaluations carried out throughout the study will be described longitudinally by the change from baseline. For categorical variables, shift tables can be generated.

In the treatment group, the last measure performed prior to the administration of the first dose of INM004 will be considered as the baseline measure of efficacy and safety. If a generalized delay in the administration of the INM004 treatment is observed, the closest measurement available to the diagnosis of symptoms compatible with STEC-HUS may be considered as the baseline measurement. For the control group, the baseline assessments will be those at the time of diagnosis of symptoms compatible with STEC-HUS.

Multivariate analyzes will be assessed to identify risk factors related to the evolution and severity of the disease.

Safety will be assessed throughout the study describing subjects with at least one AE, serious adverse events (SAE) and AESI, and subjects with at least one major safety deviation for each of the parameters: ECG, vital signs, clinical laboratory evaluations, including liver function tests.

Efficacy and sensitivity analyzes will be performed to detect possible subjects who could benefit more from treatment in subgroups defined according to levels of severity at admission Comparative multivariate analyzes of the main efficacy variables against the control group will be performed. These comparisons will be duly adjusted using propensity scoring techniques in order to minimize any confusion bias between both groups. Among the potential confounders to consider as adjustment variables in the model will be age, sex and severity levels at admission. Due to the exploratory nature of the comparisons, no adjustments will be made for multiple comparisons.

Due to the exploratory nature of this study, a sample of approximately 100 evaluable subjects in the treatment group would be sufficient to detect any existing trends regarding the efficacy and safety of INM004. In the control group, 200 subjects are expected to be evaluated.

With 100 evaluable subjects we will obtain a precision (distance from the mean to the end of the bilateral confidence interval at 95%) of ±1.2 for the days on dialysis (SD 6.1 days) and ±2.4 for the days of admission (SD 12 days).

02

Conditions studied

  • Diarrhea-Associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
  • Pediatric Kidney Disease
  • Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome

Keywords

  • STEC-HUS
03

In context

Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome

28 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 57 is close to the median of 60 across 13 interventional studies indexed under Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome.

Browse Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Inmunova S.A. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age: ≥1 and \<12 years.
  2. With hospitalization criterion in the participating facility.
  3. Clinical event with a diagnosis compatible with STEC-HUS defined as:

    1. Presence of signs of kidney injury defined as:

      • Serum creatinine value above the UNL for age and sex, and/or
      • Hematuria (≥5 red blood cells per field or ≥27 red blood cells/μL in urine sediment),
    2. And at least 1 of the following 2 criteria:

      • Presence of hemolysis documented by: LDH levels above the UNL for age, and/or presence of schistocytes in peripheral blood smears.
      • consumption according to any of the following laboratory criteria: Platelet count \<150 × 103/μl, in peripheral blood, and/or ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood platelet count compared to the baseline sample or within the previous 24 h.
  4. Onset of diarrhea no more than 13 days at the time of diagnosis of a condition compatible with STEC-HUS at the participating facility.
  5. For the treatment group, form signed and dated by the parent(s) or legal guardian with the assent of the subject as appropriate based on age and regulatory guidelines.
  6. For the treatment group, female girls/adolescents who are already fertile must have a negative pregnancy test. Note: They will be considered fertile when they have already had menarche.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. With dialysis for more than 48 h at the time of diagnosis of a condition compatible with STEC-HUS in the participating facility.
  2. History of chronic/recurrent hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, or chronic renal failure.
  3. Personal and/or family history of atypical HUS.
  4. Suspected HUS secondary to other infectious processes not from gastrointestinal origin.
  5. Evidence of chronic active disease that is not medically controlled whose symptoms/signs may interfere with the treatment/diagnosis of this study, in the opinion of the investigator.
  6. For the interventional group, history of: a) anaphylaxis of any type; b) previous administration of equine serum (for example, anti-venom serum, anti-spider toxin serum, anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum, etc.) or an allergic reaction from contact or exposure to horses.
  7. Pregnant or lactating women.
  8. For the interventional group, the impossibility of hospitalization in the participating institution.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    INM004

    2 doses of 4 mg/kg separated by 24 h

    Drug: INM004 · Other: SoC

Interventions

  • DrugINM004

    Two 4 mg/kg doses of INM004, 24 h (±2 h) apart, will be assessed. Each dose will be administered as an intravenous infusion during 50 min.

    Also known as: Equine immunoglobulin fragment F(ab')2 anti-Shiga toxin

  • OtherSoC

    Standard of care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Days of dialysis

    Days of dialysis recorded as a continuous variable from 0 to 28 days

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. Adverse events (AEs)

    Incidence of AEs classified according to affected organ systems and according to severity Incidence of AEs of special interest: incidence of injection site reactions and hypersensitivity reactions (ie, allergic reaction, anaphylaxis, and serum sickness).

    Time frame: 28 days

  3. Pharmacokinetics (PK) Evaluation of INM004

    Serum concentration of INM004 at different time intervals in subjects participating in this substudy

    Time frame: 0, 1, 24, 26, 48 and 120 hours post-dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Number of participants who survive after 4 weeks of follow-up

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Creatinine %)

    Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for Creatinine

    Time frame: 28 days

  3. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Creatinine)

    Days until normalization and/or stabilization for Creatinine

    Time frame: 28 days

  4. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Hematuria %)

    Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for Hematuria

    Time frame: 28 days

  5. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Hematuria)

    Days until normalization and/or stabilization for Hematuria

    Time frame: 28 days

  6. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Proteinuria %)

    Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for Proteinuria

    Time frame: 28 days

  7. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Proteinuria)

    Days until normalization and/or stabilization for Proteinuria

    Time frame: 28 days

  8. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (GFR)

    Days until normalization and/or stabilization for glomerular filtration rate

    Time frame: 28 days

  9. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (GFR %)

    Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for glomerular filtration rate

    Time frame: 28 days

  10. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (LDH %)

    Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for LDH

    Time frame: 28 days

  11. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (LDH)

    Days until normalization and/or stabilization for LDH

    Time frame: 28 days

  12. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Platelet)

    Days until normalization and/or stabilization for platelet

    Time frame: 28 days

  13. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Platelet %)

    Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for platelet

    Time frame: 28 days

  14. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Hemoglobin %)

    Percentage of subjects with normalization and/or stabilization for Hemoglobin

    Time frame: 28 days

  15. Change in thrombotic microangiopathy involvement (Hemoglobin)

    Days until normalization and/or stabilization for Hemoglobin

    Time frame: 28 days

  16. Change in renal involvement (dialysis)

    Assessed as a dichotomous variable (yes/no)

    Time frame: 28 days

  17. Change in renal involvement (dialysis subgroups)

    Assessed as an ordinal variable (subjects without dialysis, with dialysis between 1-10 days, and subjects with dialysis \>10 days).

    Time frame: 28 days

  18. Change in renal involvement (anuria)

    Days of anuria (diuresis \< 0.5 ml/kg/d)

    Time frame: 28 days

  19. Change in renal involvement (hypertension)

    Number of participants with hypertension

    Time frame: 28 days

  20. Change in extrarenal involvement (hematological Interventions)

    Number of participants with Requirement for red blood cell transfusions, Requirement for platelet transfusions

    Time frame: 28 days

  21. Change in extrarenal involvement (hematological Clinical)

    Number of participants with Petechiae and/or bruising.

    Time frame: 28 days

  22. Change in extrarenal involvement (neurological)

    Number of participants with Impaired consciousness, Seizure, Focal deficit

    Time frame: 28 days

  23. Change in extrarenal involvement (cardiovascular)

    Number of participants with Cardiovascular instability, Acute myocardial infarction, Myocarditis, Arrhythmia

    Time frame: 28 days

  24. Change in extrarenal involvement (gastrointestinal)

    Number of participants with Hemorrhagic colitis, Ischemic colitis, Bowel perforation, Intussusception, Pancreatitis, Hepatitis, Ilium

    Time frame: 28 days

  25. Change in extrarenal involvement (endocrine)

    Number of participants with Hyperglycemia with insulin requirement

    Time frame: 28 days

  26. Change in secondary complications (pulmonary)

    Number of participants with Pulmonary edema, Respiratory distress syndrome

    Time frame: 28 days

  27. Change in secondary complications (infectious involvement)

    Number of participants with Peritonitis, Urinary tract infection, Bacteremia, Abscesses

    Time frame: 28 days

  28. Change in the length of hospital stay

    Days of hospital stay (between hospital admission and discharge)

    Time frame: 28 days

  29. Change in laboratory parameters associated with worse prognosis

    Changes in values of laboratory parameters of interest

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

16 sites
  • Hospital Interzonal Dr. José Penna
    Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires 8000, Argentina
  • Hospital El Cruce - Néstor Kirchner
    Florencio Varela, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Hospital De Niños Sor María Ludovica
    La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Hospital Interzonal Especializado Materno Infantil Don Victorio Tetamanti
    Mar Del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Hospital Dr. Lucio Molas
    Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina
  • Sanatorio de Niños
    Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
  • Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos aires, 1270, Argentina
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, 1199, Argentina
  • Hospital de Niños Dr. Ricardo Gutierrez
    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, Argentina
  • Sanatorio Güemes
    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, Argentina
  • Clínica Zabala Swiss Medical
    Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
    Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Hospital de Niños de la Santísima Trinidad
    Córdoba, Argentina
  • Sanatorio Allende
    Córdoba, Argentina
  • Hospital Pediátrico Dr. Humberto Notti
    Mendoza, Argentina
  • Hospital Provincial Neuquén Dr. Eduardo Castro Rendón
    Neuquén, Argentina
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2022 to primary completion in May 2023, 7 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 22, 2022
First posted
Oct 6, 2022
StartActual
Oct 6, 2022
Primary completionActual
May 15, 2023
CompletionActual
Jul 14, 2023
Last update
Aug 21, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05569746
Lead sponsor
Inmunova S.A.
Collaborators
KLIXAR, Linical Co., Ltd., PHV LATAM
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 6, 2022
Start date
Oct 6, 2022
Primary completion
May 15, 2023
Completion
Jul 14, 2023
Last update
Aug 21, 2023

Study contacts

Fernando Goldbaum, PhD
study director · Inmunova S.A.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: INM004

Start the discussion