ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05564871Updated Oct 4, 2022

Effectiveness of Occupational Therapy Teleintervention in Pediatric

An interventional study of occupation-based teleintervention in Telerehabilitation and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, sponsored by Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 9 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-04.

Sponsored by Hebrew University of Jerusalem · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
5 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The high prevalence of children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD's; 5-29%) combined with the low accessibility and availability of child development services in Israel raises an urgent need to develop innovative, effective and accessible models of intervention. Teleintervention is an innovative and practical option for providing developmental services, however the evidence for its effectiveness among this population are insufficient. Study goals are: (1) to adapt an occupation therapy intervention for remote delivery; (2) to assess its feasibility (in terms of adherence, treatment fidelity and satisfaction with care); (3) to assess its efficacy in promoting personal functional goals, participation in daily activities and QOL in children aged 5-8 years with NDD's. We will conduct a controlled study without randomization using mixed methods. Participants will include 40 children with NDD's and functional difficulties in daily life that will assigned to study group (teleintervention; n=20) or control group (in person intervention; n=20). The intervention program will include 12 weekly sessions based on an evidence-based approach (CO-OP), that will take place in videoconference or in personal meetings formats. The main outcome measures will include standard assessment tools aim to assess participation and QOL. Feasibility will be assessed in terms of adherence, fidelity and satisfaction with care using a descriptive statistics and feedback interviews. Effectiveness will be evaluated by group X time interaction using a repeated measure MANOVA. To examine the variables that predict adherence and success in treatment, linear regression will be used. In addition, a thematic analysis of the qualitative information will be performed.

Read the detailed description

Background and aims: The high prevalence of children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD's; 5-29%) combined with the low accessibility and availability of child development services in the south region of Israel raises an urgent need to develop innovative, effective and accessible models of intervention. Teleintervention is an innovative and practical option for providing developmental services for people who are in their home, however the evidence for its effectiveness among this population are insufficient. Study goals are: (1) to adapt an occupation therapy intervention for remote delivery; (2) to assess its feasibility (in terms of adherence, treatment fidelity and satisfaction with care); (3) to assess its efficacy in promoting personal functional goals, participation in daily activities and QOL in children aged 5-8 years with NDD's. Methods: We will conduct a controlled study without randomization using mixed methods. Participants will include 40 children with NDD's and functional difficulties in daily life that will assigned to study group (teleintervention; n=20) or control group (in person intervention; n=20). Participants will be recruited from the child development unites at "Meuhedet" HMO in the southern district. The intervention program will include 12 weekly sessions based on an evidence-based approach (CO-OP), that will take place in videoconference or in personal meetings formats. The purpose of the intervention model is to improve personal goals that will be defined by each child and his/her parents. The main outcome measures will include standard assessment tools aim to assess participation and QOL. Participants will undergo baseline and post-intervention assessments. Feasibility will be assessed in terms of adherence, fidelity and satisfaction with care using a descriptive statistics and feedback interviews. Effectiveness will be evaluated by group X time interaction using a repeated measure MANOVA. To examine the variables that predict adherence and success in treatment, linear regression will be used. In addition, a thematic analysis of the qualitative information will be performed. Preliminary results from a pilot study (N= 14) conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and military escalation demonstrated the feasibility of occupation therapy teleintervention. The results also suggest the protentional efficacy of the program, thus a clinically significant improvement was achieved in 80% / 73.68% of the personal goals practiced during the treatment according to the child and parent report (respectively). Expected results: the results of the study could constitute a theoretical and practical infrastructure for the establishment of occupational therapy teleintervention services in addition to face-to-face services that currently exist exclusively, for the large population of children with NDD's and to allow immediate implementation of the intervention program as part of the child development services in Israel. Importance to Medicine: This innovative, cost-effective format will improve accessibility to occupational therapy services for children with NDD's and their families in the peripheral regions of Israel. In the long run, it can be assumed that the integration of accessible and effective services in child development units will help reduce the burden on their families, promote their functioning and reduce the need for medical and social assistance services in the future.

02

Conditions studied

  • Telerehabilitation
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Keywords

  • Telemedicine, NDD's, Occupational Therapy
03

In context

Neurodevelopmental Disorders

352 studies on the registry are indexed under Neurodevelopmental Disorders; 141 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 88 across 217 interventional studies indexed under Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Browse Neurodevelopmental Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Hebrew University of Jerusalem is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hebrew at mother tongue level
  • Child's ability to identify at least three functional difficulties for the purpose of setting treatment goals
  • Availability of computer with web camera and an IPad connected to broadband or Wi-Fi in their home

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with somatic or physical disabilities, children diagnosed with ASD, following a brain injury or children with mental health disorders.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Occupation-based teleintervention

    20 children and their parents will be participate in Occupation-based teleintervention.

    Other: occupation-based teleintervention

  • Experimental
    Occupation-based in person intervention

    20 children and their parents will be participate in Occupation-based in person intervention.

    Other: occupation-based teleintervention

Interventions

  • Otheroccupation-based teleintervention

    Intervention protocol will include 12 weekly based on the principles of the CO-OP approach. The intervention will focus on solving problems in the participant's daily life and implementing strategies in accordance with the goals set according to the COPM (Law et al., 2017). In the research group, the intervention will be carried out through videoconference sessions between an occupational therapist located at one of the child development units and the participant and their parents who are at home. The control group will receive a weekly session of CO-OP intervention in-person in one of the child development units.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure - COPM (Law et al., 2017)

    Hebrew version. The COPM is a widely used valid outcome measure in rehabilitation research, designed to measure the clients' self-perceptions of their activity performance and satisfaction with performance and detect changes over time. Participants in collaboration with the parents will be asked to identify goals and then rate their performance and satisfaction with performance on a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 indicates optimal performance or satisfaction. A minimal clinically significant difference is a 2-point change on the COPM performance ratings (Law et al., 2017).

    Time frame: Change from baseline occupational performance at 6 months

  2. Performance Quality Rating Scale - PQRS (Miller et al., 2001)

    is an observational measure of performance quality of client-selected, personally meaningful activities (therapeutic goals) originally developed for children with NDD's. The PQRS complements the COPM by assessing actual rather than perceived performances of the activities that were identified. The therapist will score each activity, using a 10-point performance rating scale between 1 (unable to perform) and 10 (performs well). The instrument is commonly used in studies involving intervention according to the CO-OP approach (Polatajko, 2017)

    Time frame: Change from baseline performance quality at 6 months

  3. The Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP; Bedell, 2004).

    The CASP assesses children's extent of participation and restrictions in home, school and community life situations and activities compared to same-age peers as reported by family caregivers. The CASP consist of 20 items divided into four sub-sections: (1) Home participation; (2) School participation; (3) Community participation; and (4) Home and community living activities. Each item addresses a broad participation domain with examples provided for each domain. The items are rated on a 4-point scale (4 = 'Age expected/full participation', 3 = 'Somewhat limited', 2 = 'Very limited',1 = 'Unable') or as "Not applicable". There are additional open-ended questions that identify additional supports and barriers to participation. Total scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better participation. The CASP was found to be f reliable and valid, with high internal consistency (α = 0.96).

    Time frame: Change from baseline participation at 6 months

  4. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; Varni & Limbers, 2009).

    The PedsQL is used to assess health-related quality of life in children and adolescents (ages 2-18). The PedsQL consists of a 23-item in 4 domains: physical, emotional, social and school functioning. The items are rated on a 5-point scale (0 = 'Never'; 4 = 'Almost always') and linearly transformed to 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. The PedsQL was found to be a reliable and valid measure (high internal consistency, discriminates between groups such as children with and without a chronic condition, and responsive to change over time).

    Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Socio-Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

    Demographic and medical details will be collected from the patients' personal medical records.

    Time frame: 1 year (before the intervention)

  2. Feasibility Therapist Log Book

    the occupational therapists who will conduct the intervention will write field notes following each session regarding the number, durations of the meetings performed, the number and reasons for cancellations cancelations. As well as the use of the key elements of the approach to ensure the implementation of the critical components of CO-OP, as described in the fidelity checklists (McEwen et al., 2012)

    Time frame: 1-2 years (during the intervention)

  3. Parents as Partners in Intervention- Satisfaction Questionnaire - PAPI- Q (Hirsch, Waldman-Levy and Parush, 2005)

    a structured questionnaire developed in Israel designed to assess (a) parental satisfaction and involvement with occupational therapy service, for example involvement in treatment procedure, sessions attendance and general satisfaction. In the present study will ask the parents to fulfill the questionnaire following the intervention. And (b) occupational therapist following the intervention aiming to assess the levels of cooperation and involvement of the child and his family throughout the treatment process. such as their presence, participation and implementation of the guidance provided. The questioners include 17 items rank on a 1-5 Likert scale, with a higher score indicating a higher level of satisfaction. Cronbach's alpha was good (α = 0.80), suggesting that the items were inter-related and related to the scale as a whole.

    Time frame: 2 years (after the intervention)

  4. Qualitative feedback interview

    a short structured interview will be conducted post intervention to obtain the parents' perception of the teleCO-OP intervention program. In the feedback interview, the parents will be asked three open-ended questions regarding a) their experience with the teleCO-OP intervention in general, b) the benefits or advantages, and c) disadvantages or barriers of this treatment method.

    Time frame: 2 years (after the intervention)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: study protocol - 1 year SAP, ICF, CSR - 3-3.5 years the data will be available until the end of the research

Access criteria: anonyms PDF's or outputs of the statistical analysis by SPSS. the information will be sent by personal requests consider the purpose and relevant to the current research.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2022; primary completion for Jun 2024, 20 months later.

Of 142 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neurodevelopmental Disorders, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 148 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 14, 2022
First posted
Oct 4, 2022
StartEst.
Oct 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2024
CompletionEst.
Jun 2026
Last update
Oct 4, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 4, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05564871
Lead sponsor
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Responsible party
Stav Ben Zagmi (Occupational therapist, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 4, 2022
Start date
Oct 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 4, 2022

Study contacts

Stav Ben-Zagmi, MsC
Contact
stav.benzagni@mail.huji.ac.il
0526513215
Yafit Gilboa, PhD
study director · Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion