ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06632145Updated Sep 21, 2026

Cog-Fun Ageing Participation-centered, Health Promotion for Older Adults

An interventional study of Cog Fun Ageing intervention in Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), sponsored by Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Completed at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Hebrew University of Jerusalem · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2024, registered Oct 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this feasibility study is to test the feasibility of a group intervention program based on health management principles for older adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD). SCD is a condition where individuals feel that their memory is worsening, although standard tests do not detect it. This perceived memory decline can lead to negative feelings and self-perception, causing people to withdraw from meaningful activities.

This study aims to answer three main questions:

  1. Is the intervention feasible in terms of fidelity, adherence, and participant satisfaction?
  2. Are the assessments used sensitive enough to identify the unique challenges faced by the SCD population and detect changes after the intervention?
  3. What are the preliminary effects of the intervention on participants' perceptions of how SCD affects their daily life, mental health, and quality of life?

Participants will:

  1. Take part in 14 weekly group sessions focused on managing the challenges of living with SCD and improving participation in daily activities.
  2. Complete assessments before and after the intervention to measure their satisfaction with the program, and track changes in their perceptions of daily life, mental health, and quality of life.
02

Conditions studied

  • Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)

Keywords

  • Occupational experience
  • Participation
  • Cognitive functional interventions
  • Functional decline
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hebrew University of Jerusalem is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Self-reported memory changes,
  • A score of 23 or higher on the (MoCA)
  • Proficiency in Hebrew to participate fully in a Hebrew-speaking group.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a significant health condition that affects functioning
  • Residence in a medical institution or nursing home
  • Current participation in another SCD treatment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cog Fun Ageing intervention

    Other: Cog Fun Ageing intervention

Interventions

  • OtherCog Fun Ageing intervention

    Cog Fun Ageing is a group-based occupation-centered intervention aimed at promoting positive occupational experiences despite cognitive challenges in day to day life. The intervention includes 14 weekly 120-minute group sessions led by experienced occupational therapists. Sessions incorporate learning about the bio-psycho-social factors of SCD and strategies to manage and cope with occupational challenges resulting from SCD.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Memory Impact Questionnaire (MIQ)

    The Memory Impact Questionnaire (MIQ) will be used to assess the impact of perceived memory changes on daily life. The questionnaire was developed for use in both clinical and research settings to better understand the impact of memory changes on the day-to-day functioning of older adults and to monitor outcomes of support programs for this population. The questionnaire includes 51-item comprised of three subscales: Lifestyle Restrictions (19 items exploring social relationships, work, volunteer and leisure activities), Positive Coping (19 items exploring participation in cognitively engaging tasks and other positive responses to memory changes), and Negative Emotions (13 items exploring negative self-perceptions and perceived negative judgments from others). The total score, calculated by reverse-coding Positive Coping items and summing all items, reflects the overall burden of memory changes, with higher scores indicating a greater negative impact.

    Time frame: After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire -4 (PHQ-4 )

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) is a brief, self-report screening tool designed to quickly assess symptoms of depression and anxiety in the general population. It includes four questions, with two focused on anxiety and two on depression. The PHQ-4 combines two well-established scales: the PHQ-2 (depression) and the GAD-2 (anxiety). Participants respond to each question based on how often they have experienced certain symptoms over the past two weeks, using a 4-point Likert scale from 0 = Not at all to 3 = Nearly every day. The total score ranges from 0 to 12, with subscale scores ranging from 0 to 6 for both anxiety and depression. Scores are rated as: 0-2- Normal; 3-5 -Mild; 6-8- Moderate; 9-12- Severe. Total score ≥3 for first 2 questions suggests anxiety. Total score ≥3 for last 2 questions suggests depression.

    Time frame: After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)

  2. SHARE version of the CASP-12

    The CASP-12 (Control, Autonomy, Self-realization, and Pleasure) is a self-report questionnaire designed to measure the quality of life (QoL) in older adults, specifically targeting individuals aged 50 and over. The CASP-12 includes 12 items spread across four dimensions: control (the ability to influence one's environment), autonomy (freedom from external influence), self-realization (personal fulfillment), and pleasure (enjoyment in life). Participants rate each item on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (often) to 4 (never), with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. The total score can range from 12 to 48, where higher scores suggest greater well-being and satisfaction in the participants' lives.

    Time frame: After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)

  3. Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS)

    The Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire used to assess how meaningful a person's daily activities are. The survey asks participants to rate statements like "The activities I do give me a sense of satisfaction"; or "The activities I do help me feel competent," using a 4-point scale where 1 means "rarely"; and 4 means "always". The total score ranges from 12 to 48, with higher scores indicating higher levels of engagement in meaningful activities. This tool is used to measure changes in how participants perceive the value and meaning of their activities. The EMAS helps identify whether interventions improve participants' sense of purpose and satisfaction in their daily lives.

    Time frame: After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
    Jerusalem, Israel
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Roheger M, Hennersdorf XS, Riemann S, Floel A, Meinzer M. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of interventions for subjective cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 Jul 12;7(1):e12180. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12180. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34268448 ↗
  • Rotenberg S, Leung C, Quach H, Anderson ND, Dawson DR. Occupational performance issues in older adults with subjective cognitive decline. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(17):4681-4688. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1916626. Epub 2021 May 14. PubMed 33989108 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Due to the preliminary nature of the study, the outcome measures are still being evaluated for their suitability for interventions for the target population.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2024 to primary completion in Jul 2024, 3 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 6, 2024
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
StartActual
Apr 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jul 30, 2024
CompletionActual
Jul 30, 2024
Last update
Sep 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06632145
Lead sponsor
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Responsible party
Adina Maeir (Prof. Adina Maeir, School of Occupational Therapy Hebrew University, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
Start date
Apr 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2024
Completion
Jul 30, 2024
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Adina Maeir, PhD
principal investigator · School of occupational therapy, faculty of medicine, Hebrew University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion