ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05564793ICONIC-MUpdated Aug 7, 2025

Improving CRT Outcome With Non-Invasive Cardiac Mapping

An interventional study of Pre-implantation planning and Post-implantation assessment in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, sponsored by EP Solutions SA. Recruiting at 11 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-07.

Sponsored by EP Solutions SA · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2023; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
330
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ICONIC-M study is a multicenter randomized controlled study to assess patient response to CRT comparing ECGI map guided left ventricular lead placement with empirical lead placement.

The hypothesis of the investigation is to demonstrate that CRT LV lead implantation guided by a map obtained with the Amycard 01C System and showing LV Latest Electrical Activated Site (LEAS) in combination with a CT cardiac venogram improves CRT outcome. An improved CRT outcome is defined as a ≥30% increase in LVESVi reduction compared to empiric CRT LV lead implantation.

The sample size will be 136 in the Control arm and 194 in the Active arm. A total of 330 subjects.

The study follows an adaptive design, in where one interim analysis at 70% enrollment will be performed. The sponsor may stop enrollment when either one of the following conditions apply:

  • Statistical significant difference between groups in the primary endpoint has been reached confirming a difference in reduction of the LVESVi of ≥30% in the Active arm compared to the Control arm
  • There is no trend or reason to believe statistical significance will be reached with a higher sample size.

Statistical significance (primary endpoint) is reached at interim (70%) or at total (100%) of enrollment with a significance value P lower than 0.025.

Read the detailed description

The study is conducted at European sites as a Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up study of a CE marked device (Amycard 01C). Its aim is to strengthen clinical evidence by assessing whether the use of this device for CRT planning improves clinical outcome in a statistically significant number of patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
  • Left Bundle Branch Block
03

In context

Bundle-Branch Block

94 studies on the registry are indexed under Bundle-Branch Block; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 330 is above the median of 60 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Bundle-Branch Block.

Browse Bundle-Branch Block studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with EP Solutions SA as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Appropriately signed and dated .
  2. Age ≥18 years at time of consent.
  3. Received optimal medical therapy for HF for at least 3 months before screening
  4. Patient in sinus rhythm at the time of screening fulfilling Class I or IIa criteria per ESC CRT guidelines 2013 .
  5. Patient is intended for placement of a CRT device with biventricular (BiV) pacing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous cardiac pacemaker/CRT/ICD implantation
  2. Acute diseases or exacerbations of chronic diseases (as per the investigator's discretion)
  3. to CT scanning
  4. Contraindications to body surface mapping: (ongoing wound healing on the chest (e.g. recent surgery), skin diseases, allergic reactions to surface mapping electrodes and medical band-aid)
  5. Pregnant, or subjects planning to become pregnant within 6 months after signing (a documented negative pregnancy test (serum or blood) is required for women of )
  6. Incapacitated individuals, defined as persons who are mentally ill, mentally handicapped, or individuals without legal authority, are excluded from the study population
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
330 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control

    The CRT device is implanted according to clinical practice, without pre-implantation planning. The outcome of the procedure is assessed via echography as per clinical practice. In addition to clinical practice, the subjects are required to fill in a quality-of-life questionnaire and are subject to an ECG mapping procedure with the Amycard 01C device, including non-contrast CT, to assess the distance between left ventricular lead placement and the latest electrical activation site in the absence of planning information.

    Device: Post-implantation assessment

  • Experimental
    Active

    A pre-implantation ECG mapping with the Amycard 01C device, including CT, is performed prior to the CRT device implantation. The resulting target area for the left ventricular lead placement is communicated to the implanting physician, who will attempt to reach a point close to the target, using the available venous access. At six-month follow-up, response to the therapy is assessed using echocardiography, and a second ECG mapping with Amycard 01C is performed, to assess the distance between actual implantation site and target in the presence of pre-implantation planning information.

    Device: Pre-implantation planning · Device: Post-implantation assessment

Interventions

  • DevicePre-implantation planning

    ECGi mapping using the CE marked Amycard 01C device and a contrast enhanced CT

    Also known as: ECGI mapping

  • DevicePost-implantation assessment

    ECGi mapping using the CE marked Amycard 01C device and a non-contrast CT

    Also known as: ECGI mapping

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi)

    Reduction versus baseline of LVESVi as measured by transthoracic echocardiography

    Time frame: 6 months post CRT implantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Successfully placed LV leads

    Rate of successfully placed LV leads in the control and active arms

    Time frame: 6 months post CRT implantation

  2. Correctly predicted distance between latest activation site and LV lead

    Rate of correctly predicted distance between the latest electrical activation site, as identified with Amycard 01C, and the LV lead, as identified on CT

    Time frame: 6 months post implantation

Other outcomes

  1. Clinical Composite Score

    Clinical composite score consisting of Quality of life questionnaire, mortality rate and heart failure hospitalization rate

    Time frame: 6 months post CRT implantation

  2. ECGi acquisition procedural failure rate

    Rate of unsuccessful ECGi mapping procedures using the Amycard 01C device

    Time frame: 6 months post CRT implantation

  3. Subgroup analysis

    Subgroup analysis including stratification based on various conditions or habits (ischemia, diabetes, smoking, pulmonary disease, impaired right ventricular function, etc)

    Time frame: 6 months post CRT implantation

  4. Shift of Latest Electrical Activation Site

    Degree of shift of the latest electrical activation site, as identified using the Amycard 01C device, between baseline and the six-months follow-up

    Time frame: 6 months post CRT implantation

07

Study locations

1 of 11 sites recruiting
  • Amsterdam University Medical Center
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Cornelius Allaart, Dr · Contact
  • Groningen University Medical Center
    Groningen, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Alexander Maas, Dr · Contact
  • Leids Universitair Medical Center
    Leiden, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Anastasia Egorova, Dr · Contact
  • Maastricht University Hospital
    Maastricht, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Twan van Stipdonk, Dr · Contact
  • Utrecht University Medical Center
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Mathias Meine, Dr · Contact
  • Hospital da Luz
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Not yet recruiting
    • Ana Leonor Parreira, Dra · Contact
  • Lund University Hospital
    Lund, Sweden
    Not yet recruiting
    • Rasmus Borgquist, Dr · Contact
  • Karolinska University Hospital
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Not yet recruiting
    • Fredrik Gadler, Dr · Contact
  • Bart's Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
    • Pier Lambiase, Dr · Contact
  • King's College
    London, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
    • Aldo Rinaldi, Dr · Contact
  • Oxford University Hospital
    Oxford, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
    • Tim Betts, Dr · Contact
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05564793
Lead sponsor
EP Solutions SA
Collaborators
QserveCRO
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 4, 2022
Start date
Dec 20, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2025

Study contacts

Matthias Egger, PhD
Contact
matthias.egger@ep-solutions.ch
+41 78 659 22 75
Adrian Maciejewski, Dr
Contact
adrian.maciejewski@ep-solutions.ch
Niraj Varma, Prof.
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion