CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05562934Updated Jan 12, 2026Results posted

An Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Dose Finding Study of XXB750 in Resistant Hypertension Patients.

A Phase 2 interventional study of XXB750 drug and Placebo in Resistant Hypertension, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 78 sites in 16 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-12.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
189
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this 20-week randomized double-blind study in patients with resistant hypertension (rHTN) is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability, of different doses of XXB750 administered as subcutaneous (SC) injections, compared to placebo. Since all study participants will be patients with rHTN, all study treatments will be given on top of maximally tolerated background antihypertensive therapy recommended by international guidelines for treatment of HTN (i.e., a thiazide or a thiazide-like diuretic, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), and a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB).

Read the detailed description

Subjects will enter run-in period which lasts for approximately 2 weeks. The study duration is for 20 weeks during which each participant will receive a total of 3 doses of study medication (in addition to 1 dose of study medication during run-in). Participants will be followed to monitor their safety for an additional 8 weeks during which time no active study medication will be given.

02

Conditions studied

  • Resistant Hypertension

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • hypertension
  • resistant hypertension
  • rHTN
  • not controlled hypertension
03

In context

Hypertension

6,689 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 965 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 189 is above the median of 90 across 4,995 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,673 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 576 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 431 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male and female participants who are ≥ 18 years old.
  2. Signed informed consent prior to participation in the study.
  3. Apparent rHTN at screening (Visit 1) defined as uncontrolled BP with an office msSBP ≥ 140 mmHg despite treatment with stable (i.e., unchanged for ≥4 weeks), optimal or maximally tolerated doses of three or four antihypertensive drugs of different classes, including an ACEI/ARB, a long-acting dihydropyridine CCB, and a thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic. Participant with documented intolerance to any doses of CCBs may be eligible if receiving another class of antihypertensive medication at an optimal or maximally tolerated dose (referred to as triple background antihypertensive therapy. An optimal dose is defined as the highest dose taking in to account participant's documented comorbidities and tolerability per investigator's clinical judgment.
  4. Mean 24hr SBP ≥135 mmHg (measured by ABPM) at the end-of Run-in-Visit (Visit 30) on treatment with optimal or maximally tolerated doses of an ACEI/ARB, a long-acting dihydropyridine CCB (or a suitable alternative in case of intolerance per inclusion criterion above), and a thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with the following blood pressures at the specified time points are not eligible to participate in the study:

    1. Office msSBP \<140 mmHg at Visit 20 OR
    2. Office msSBP ≥180 mmHg or office msDBP ≥110 mmHg at the end-of-run-in visit (Visit 30) OR
    3. 24h mean SBP >170 mmHg or 24h mean DBP >105mmHg measured by ABPM at the end of the run-in (Visit 30).
  2. Known history of secondary hypertension (moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea without receiving CPAP therapy (either face mask or nasal device), renovascular hypertension, primary aldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, Cushing syndrome, aortic coarctation or other cause of secondary hypertension).
  3. Estimated GFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m2 using CKD-Epi equation at screening (Visit 1) or at end-of-run-in visit (Visit 30).
  4. Serum potassium >5.0 mmol/L (or equivalent plasma potassium value) at screening or end-of-run-in visit (Visit 30).
  5. Current therapy with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) or sacubitril/valsartan or received an MRA or sacubitril/valsartan within the 4 weeks prior to screening.
  6. Type I diabetes mellitus or uncontrolled Type II diabetes (defined as a plasma HbA1c ≥9%)
  7. Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias (e.g., ventricular tachycardia), high-grade AV block (e.g., Mobitz type II and third-degree AV block in absence of a pacemaker) within 6 months of screening according to investigator's judgement.
  8. Chronic non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
  9. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or unstable angina, or any history of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 12 months of screening; or any percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) within 12 months of screening
  10. History of a renal denervation procedure.
  11. Mid-arm circumference ≥44 cm. The cuff should snugly fit on the arm with out the margins of cuff overhanging arm musculature.
  12. Patients with history of hospitalisation for hypertensive emergencies characterised by severe hypertension (usually grade 3) associated with funduscopic changes (flame haemorrhages and/or papilloedema), microangiopathy, disseminated intravascular coagulation, encephalopathy, acute aortic dissection, acute myocardial ischaemia, or acute heart failure any time prior to screening or hospitalisation for non-emergent/non-urgent uncontrolled hypertension without target organ damage within 3 months prior to screening
  13. Receiving more than 4 antihypertensive medications.
  14. Night shift workers.
  15. History of presence of any other disease where the life expectancy is less than 3 years.
  16. History of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or localized prostate cancer), treated or untreated, within the past 3 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases.
  17. Evidence of hepatic disease as determined by any one of the following: SGOT (AST) or SGPT (ALT) values exceeding 3x the upper limit of normal (ULN), or bilirubin >1.5 mg/dl at Visit 1.
  18. Use of other investigational drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 30 days or 5 half-lives of enrollment, whichever is longer.
  19. History of drug abuse or alcohol dependency.
  20. Lacking the ability to comprehend or follow instructions, or for any reason in the opinion of the investigator, a participant that would be unlikely or unable to comply with study protocol.
  21. Concurrent enrollment in any other investigational drug or device trial (participation in non-interventional registries is acceptable).
  22. Requiring prolonged/regular use of NSAIDs except for prophylactic use of low dose aspirin up to 325 mg QD or other prohibited medications during of the study (i.e., required use for longer than 1 week).
  23. Pregnant, nursing or planning to become pregnant (documented negative pregnancy test required within a maximum of 7 days prior to enrollment of all women of childbearing potential). Documentation of highly effective contraception is also required for women of childbearing potential (see below).

    Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception while taking study treatment and for 3 months after stopping medication. Highly effective contraception methods include:

    • Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant. Periodic abstinence (e.g. calendar, ovulation, symptom-thermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
    • Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow-up hormone level assessment.
    • Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female participants on the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that participant.
    • Use of oral, (estrogen and progesterone), injected, or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS), or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate \< 1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception.

    In case of use of oral contraception women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment.

    Women are considered post-menopausal if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g., age-appropriate history of vasomotor symptoms). Women are considered not of childbearing potential if they are post-menopausal or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow-up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential.

    If local regulations deviate from the contraception methods listed above to prevent pregnancy, local regulations apply and will be described in the ICF.

  24. History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs, excipients or drugs of similar class.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
189 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dose 1

    Lowest dose

    Biological: XXB750 drug

  • Experimental
    Dose 2

    Dose 2

    Biological: XXB750 drug

  • Experimental
    Dose 3

    Dose 3

    Biological: XXB750 drug

  • Experimental
    Dose 4

    Highest dose

    Biological: XXB750 drug

  • Placebo comparator
    Dose 5

    Placebo

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • BiologicalXXB750 drug

    SC injection

  • OtherPlacebo

    SC injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dose-response (DR) Relationship of XXB750 With Respect to Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) 24 Hours

    To evaluate the efficacy and dose-response relationship of different doses of XXB750 compared to placebo in reducing the mean 24 hours ambulatory systolic blood pressure from baseline at Week 12. Automated arterial BP determinations and pulse rate readings were made with Microlife Watch BP Office 2G, an automated digital BP device. The primary outcome measure was evaluated using an optimally weighted contrast test following the Multiple Comparison Procedure-Modeling (MCP-MOD) methodology. There were five candidate models to capture the shape of the dose-response relationship for XXB750 at Week 12 endpoint. The outcome for the single best candidate model is shown in the Statistical Analysis section.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in SBP 24 Hours at Week 12 (Difference Between Highest XXB750 Dose and Placebo)

    To evaluate the treatment effect of the highest XXB750 dose versus placebo in reducing the mean 24 hours SBP from baseline to Week 12. Automated arterial BP determinations and pulse rate readings were made with Microlife Watch BP Office 2G, an automated digital BP device.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline in SBP 24 Hours of Average of Week 9 and Week 12 (Difference Between Highest XXB750 Dose and Placebo)

    To evaluate the treatment effect of the highest XXB750 dose versus placebo in the dosing interval average of ambulatory SBP as assessed by average of mean 24 hours SBP measured at week 9 and week 12. Automated arterial BP determinations and pulse rate readings were made with Microlife Watch BP Office 2G, an automated digital BP device.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 9 and Week 12

  3. The Model-based Estimated Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure (BP) Control

    To evaluate the percentage of participants achieving ambulatory BP control defined as mean 24 hours SBP \<130 mmHg and mean 24 hours DBP \< 80 mmHg with respect to the dose-response relationship of the four XXB750 dose level groups compared to placebo at week 12. Automated arterial BP determinations and pulse rate readings were made with Microlife Watch BP Office 2G, an automated digital BP device. Percentage of participants is derived from dose response analysis, using generalized MCP-Mod methodology for binary data.

    Time frame: Week 12

07

Results

Posted Oct 24, 2025

Participant flow

Participants took part in 135 investigative sites in 16 countries.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboXXB750 30 mgXXB750 60 mgXXB750 120 mgXXB750 120 mg/240 mg
Started4232363742
Completed4230353538
Not completed02124
Withdrew: Adverse event02002
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up00001
Withdrew: Protocol violation00011
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject00110

Outcome measures

PrimaryDose-response (DR) Relationship of XXB750 With Respect to Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) 24 Hours

To evaluate the efficacy and dose-response relationship of different doses of XXB750 compared to placebo in reducing the mean 24 hours ambulatory systolic blood pressure from baseline at Week 12. Automated arterial BP determinations and pulse rate readings were made with Microlife Watch BP Office 2G, an automated digital BP device. The primary outcome measure was evaluated using an optimally weighted contrast test following the Multiple Comparison Procedure-Modeling (MCP-MOD) methodology. There were five candidate models to capture the shape of the dose-response relationship for XXB750 at Week 12 endpoint. The outcome for the single best candidate model is shown in the Statistical Analysis section.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Dose-response (DR) Relationship of XXB750 With Respect to Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) 24 Hours
mmHgPlaceboXXB750 30 mgXXB750 60 mgXXB750 120 mgXXB750 120 mg/240 mg
Dose-response (DR) Relationship of XXB750 With Respect to Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) 24 Hours-5.77 (-10.74 to -1.12)-6.41 (-10.15 to -2.85)-6.63 (-10.40 to -3.53)-6.66 (-12.57 to -3.16)-5.40 (-9.58 to -0.36)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs XXB750 30 mg vs XXB750 60 mg vs XXB750 120 mg vs XXB750 120 mg/240 mg · Multiple Comparisons Procedure-MOD · p = 0.5651 (Single best candidate model is the one with the lowest adjusted p-value of the 5 candidate models)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SBP 24 Hours at Week 12 (Difference Between Highest XXB750 Dose and Placebo)

To evaluate the treatment effect of the highest XXB750 dose versus placebo in reducing the mean 24 hours SBP from baseline to Week 12. Automated arterial BP determinations and pulse rate readings were made with Microlife Watch BP Office 2G, an automated digital BP device.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Change From Baseline in SBP 24 Hours at Week 12 (Difference Between Highest XXB750 Dose and Placebo)
mmHgPlaceboXXB750 120 mg/240 mg
Change From Baseline in SBP 24 Hours at Week 12 (Difference Between Highest XXB750 Dose and Placebo)-6.01 ± 2.42-4.64 ± 2.49
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs XXB750 120 mg/240 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.6955 · Median difference (net): 1.37 · 95% CI -5.48 to 8.21
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SBP 24 Hours of Average of Week 9 and Week 12 (Difference Between Highest XXB750 Dose and Placebo)

To evaluate the treatment effect of the highest XXB750 dose versus placebo in the dosing interval average of ambulatory SBP as assessed by average of mean 24 hours SBP measured at week 9 and week 12. Automated arterial BP determinations and pulse rate readings were made with Microlife Watch BP Office 2G, an automated digital BP device.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 9 and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Change From Baseline in SBP 24 Hours of Average of Week 9 and Week 12 (Difference Between Highest XXB750 Dose and Placebo)
mmHgPlaceboXXB750 120 mg/240 mg
Change From Baseline in SBP 24 Hours of Average of Week 9 and Week 12 (Difference Between Highest XXB750 Dose and Placebo)-5.77 ± 2.13-4.62 ± 2.21
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs XXB750 120 mg/240 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.7108 · Median difference (net): 1.14 · 95% CI -4.90 to 7.18
SecondaryThe Model-based Estimated Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure (BP) Control

To evaluate the percentage of participants achieving ambulatory BP control defined as mean 24 hours SBP \<130 mmHg and mean 24 hours DBP \< 80 mmHg with respect to the dose-response relationship of the four XXB750 dose level groups compared to placebo at week 12. Automated arterial BP determinations and pulse rate readings were made with Microlife Watch BP Office 2G, an automated digital BP device. Percentage of participants is derived from dose response analysis, using generalized MCP-Mod methodology for binary data.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage
The Model-based Estimated Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure (BP) Control
percentagePlaceboXXB750 30 mgXXB750 60 mgXXB750 120 mgXXB750 120 mg/240 mg
The Model-based Estimated Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure (BP) Control13.215.017.722.025.9

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus follow up period, up to a maximum duration of approximately 20 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/42 (0%)1/42 (2.4%)27/42 (64.3%)
XXB750 30 mg0/32 (0%)2/32 (6.3%)19/32 (59.4%)
XXB750 60 mg0/36 (0%)3/36 (8.3%)18/36 (50%)
XXB750 120 mg0/37 (0%)1/37 (2.7%)16/37 (43.2%)
XXB750 120 mg/240 mg0/42 (0%)3/42 (7.1%)18/42 (42.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboXXB750 30 mgXXB750 60 mgXXB750 120 mgXXB750 120 mg/240 mg
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/421/320/360/373/42
Infectious pleural effusionInfections and infestations0/421/320/360/370/42
SyncopeNervous system disorders0/421/320/360/370/42
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders0/421/320/360/370/42
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders0/420/321/360/370/42
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders0/420/321/360/370/42
Device related infectionInfections and infestations0/420/321/360/370/42
Osteomyelitis acuteInfections and infestations0/420/321/360/370/42
Plasma cell myelomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/420/321/360/370/42
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/420/320/361/370/42
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 140
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboXXB750 30 mgXXB750 60 mgXXB750 120 mgXXB750 120 mg/240 mg
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations4/421/320/364/371/42
COVID-19Infections and infestations4/421/320/360/373/42
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/423/322/361/372/42
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders0/420/323/362/371/42
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/420/322/363/370/42
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/421/320/363/370/42
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders3/420/320/360/370/42
Blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations3/420/320/360/370/42
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/422/320/360/370/42
Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations1/422/320/360/371/42

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboXXB750 30 mgXXB750 60 mgXXB750 120 mgXXB750 120 mg/240 mgTotal
Mean60.14 ± 10.86258.53 ± 11.56563.44 ± 10.19162.41 ± 11.64260.64 ± 10.08561.05 ± 10.863
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboXXB750 30 mgXXB750 60 mgXXB750 120 mgXXB750 120 mg/240 mgTotal
Female1386181358
Male2924301929131
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)PlaceboXXB750 30 mgXXB750 60 mgXXB750 120 mgXXB750 120 mg/240 mgTotal
Black Or African American6744627
White2716242425116
Asian85681037
Other142119
08

Study locations

78 sites
  • Pinnacle Research Group Llc
    Anniston, Alabama 36207, United States
  • Parkway Medical Center
    Birmingham, Alabama 35206, United States
  • Clinical Trials Research Sacramento
    Sacramento, California 95821-2134, United States
  • Orange County Research Center
    Tustin, California 92780, United States
  • Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Canvas Clinical Research
    Lake Worth, Florida 33467, United States
  • Inpatient Research Clinical LLC
    Miami Lakes, Florida 33014, United States
  • Cardiology Partners Clinical Research Institute
    Wellington, Florida 33449, United States
  • American Clinical Trials
    Acworth, Georgia 30101, United States
  • Alliance for Multispecialty Resrch
    Wichita, Kansas 67207, United States
  • Anderson Medical Research
    Ft. Washington, Maryland 20744, United States
  • Capitol Cardiology Associates
    Lanham, Maryland 20706, United States
  • MD Medical Research
    Oxon Hill, Maryland 20745, United States
  • NexGen Research
    Lima, Ohio 45801, United States
  • The Research Center of the Upstate
    Greenville, South Carolina 29607, United States
  • Tennessee Center For Clinical Trials
    Tullahoma, Tennessee 37388, United States
  • Manassas Clinical Research Center
    Manassas, Virginia 20110, United States
  • Dominion Medical Associates
    Richmond, Virginia 23219, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Graz, 8036, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vienna, 1190, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pleven, 5800, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1202, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1233, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1709, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Baotou, Inner Mongolia 014010, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Beijing, 101200, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Qingdao, 266000, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shanghai, 200025, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Brandýs nad Labem, Czech Republic 250 01, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Prague, 128 08, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bobigny, 93009, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lille, 59000, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Paris, 75015, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tours, 37044, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Elsterwerda, Brandenburg 04910, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse 60594, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Berlin, 10787, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ulm, 89077, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bologna, BO 40138, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Brescia, BS 25123, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Milan, MI 20122, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Milan, MI 20162, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pisa, PI 56124, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chikushino-shi, Fukuka 818-8516, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken 920 8650, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Yokohama, Kanagawa 232 0024, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Yokosuka, Kanagawa 239-8567, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kishiwada, Osaka 596-0042, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chuo Ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chuo Ku, Tokyo 104-0031, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Amsterdam, North Holland 1105 AZ, Netherlands
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Gdynia, 81-157, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Katowice, 40-648, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Krakow, 30-002, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Wroclaw, 52-416, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bardejov, 085 01, Slovakia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Košice, 040 01, Slovakia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nitra, 949 11, Slovakia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Svidník, 089 01, Slovakia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Seville, Andalusia 41014, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Barcelona, Catalonia 08035, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Terrassa, Catalonia 08221, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pamplona, Navarre 31008, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Barcelona, 08025, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Valencia, 46010, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Taipei, 110, Taiwan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    London, GBR EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    London, W1T 7HA, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Salford, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • White WB, Azizi M, Ferdinand K, Cohen DL, Nuhrenberg T, Lefkowitz M, Jiao R, Rizkala AR, Maboudian M, Williams B. Natriuretic Peptide Receptor-1 Agonist for Resistant Hypertension: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 May 12;87(18):2373-2387. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.11.045. Epub 2026 Jan 21. PubMed 41563174 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 5, 2024
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 26, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05562934
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 3, 2022
Start date
Nov 8, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2024
Completion
Aug 27, 2024
Results posted
Oct 24, 2025
Last update
Jan 12, 2026

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion