An interventional study of Total Ankle Replacement in Ankle Osteoarthritis, sponsored by John Femino. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-20.
Sponsored by John Femino · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
A minimum of 50 patients with ankle end-stage arthritis will be randomized in two parallel groups for surgery. One group will receive a total ankle replacement through an anterior approach and the other group a total ankle replacement via a lateral approach. Patients will be evaluated for a mean follow-up of two years in terms of complications, implant survival and functional results. One of the primary objectives of the study is analyzing the safety of the lateral and anterior approaches for total ankle replacement.
A minimum of 50 patients with ankle end-stage arthritis will be randomized in two parallel groups for surgery. One group will receive a total ankle replacement through an anterior approach and the other group a total ankle replacement via a lateral approach. Patients will be evaluated for a mean follow-up of two years in terms of complications, implant survival and functional results. One of the primary objectives of the study is analyzing the safety of the lateral and anterior approaches for total ankle replacement.
The anterior approach uses an interval between the anterior tibial tendon and the extensor digitorum longus tendon to reach the joint. The anterior tibial artery and the deep peroneal nerve must be identified and protected. Once the ankle is reached, the joint is roughly prepared and the cutting guides for the implants are inserted. The position is checked, and the size of the prosthesis is determined. There are several commercial prostheses designed for this approach, although we decided to use the Infinity™ Total Ankle System (Stryker Medical®) to minimize bias. After alignment examination, the implants are inserted, the planes are closed, and the wound is covered. The patient is placed in a cast for three weeks and starts weight-bearing in a boot after this period, using it for three more weeks.
The lateral approach utilizes an incision over the posterior aspect of the fibula. The lateral malleolus is osteotomized 1.5cm proximal to the joint and reflected distally to provide access to the articulation. An external frame is placed around the limb that supplies guidance for the prosthesis cuts. The sizing and position are determined and a Trabecular Metal Total Ankle™ (ZimmerBiomet®) is placed, the only available implant for the lateral approach. The fibula is reduced and fixed using a low profile anatomical lateral plate and screws. Planes are closed, the wound protected, and a cast placed. The post-operative carry is the same as the anterior approach.
Weight bearing CT (WBCT) scans will be used to evaluate outcomes. WBCT is the standard of care for the preoperative and postoperative assessment of patients undergoing total ankle replacement in our institution. Many secondary outcomes will be also evaluated through WBCT since they can better depict alignment, predict failure and diagnose complications (subsidence, cysts). No extra WBCT will be performed other than what we normally do for patients.
Randomization will be performed previously at the beginning of the study and will be performed by an outside researcher. Allocation will happen during surgery scheduling.
4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.
Browse Osteoarthritis studies →John Femino is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Procedure: Total Ankle Replacement
Procedure: Total Ankle Replacement
Participants will undergo either lateral approach or anterior approach when having a total ankle replacement
Complications
To compare major and minor complications of patients undergoing TAR through lateral and anterior approaches.
Time frame: 6 months post-surgery
Survival
To compare survival rate between the two techniques.
Time frame: 6 months post-surgery
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
To compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) between the two groups.
Time frame: 96 weeks post-surgery
PROMIS Global Health
To compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) between the two groups.
Time frame: 96 weeks post-surgery
PROMIS Depression - Short Form
To compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) between the two groups.
Time frame: 96 weeks post-surgery
PROMIS Physical Function 8B
To compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) between the two groups.
Time frame: 96 weeks post-surgery
PROMIS Pain Interference 8A
To compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) between the two groups.
Time frame: 96 weeks post-surgery
Pain VAS Scale
To compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) between the two groups.
Time frame: 96 weeks post-surgery
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
To compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) between the two groups.
Time frame: 96 weeks post-surgery
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is withdrawn, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
John Femino