ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05542030Updated Sep 28, 2023

CAD EYE Detection of Remaining Lesions After EMR

An interventional study of EMR with CAD-Eye™ and EMR without CAD-Eye™ in Colorectal Dysplasia and Colorectal Neoplasms, sponsored by Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas. Recruiting at 1 site in Ecuador. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-28.

Sponsored by Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2024, 2 years 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the last decade, many innovative systems have been developed to support and improve the diagnosis accuracy during endoscopic studies. CAD-Eye™ (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) is a computer-assisted diagnostic (CADx) system that uses artificial intelligence for the detection and characterization of polyps during colonoscopy. However, the accuracy of CAD-Eye™ in the recognition of remaining lesions after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has not been broadly evaluated.

Finally, based on the importance of complete resection of the colonic mucosal lesions, namely suspicious high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer, the investigators aimed to assess the accuracy of CAD-Eye™ in the detection of remaining lesions after the procedure.

Read the detailed description

Nowadays, the increased polyp and adenoma detection rate, and its early treatment have reduced considerably colorectal cancer-related mortality. For lesions suspicious of high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer, the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), along with snare polypectomy, is now considered one of the established standard treatments. However, there are many ´difficult-to-treat lesions´ such as the large and fibrotic ones, which can lead to incomplete resections.

Based on the above, many newly diagnostic techniques guided by artificial intelligence (AI), currently proposed to improve the polyp detection rate during colonoscopy, can be applied for the detection of remaining lesions after endoscopic treatment.

CAD-Eye™ is CADx for polyp detection and characterization. It improves polyp visualization by using techniques such as blue-laser imaging (BLI-LASER), blue-light imaging (BLI-LED), and linked-color imaging (LCI). This device aimed to improve real-time polyp detection, helping experts identify multiple polyps simultaneously and common inadvertently missed lesions (flat lesions, polyps in difficult areas).

CAD-Eye™ had demonstrated in previous studies an accuracy of 89% to 91.7% in polyp detection. However, few studies had demonstrated its performance in the detection of remaining lesions after EMR. The investigators aimed to take advantage of this system in the detection of remaining lesions immediately after EMR and in its endoscopic control after three months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Dysplasia
  • Colorectal Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Colonoscopy
  • Endoscopic mucosal resection
  • Computer-assisted diagnosis
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 76 across 4,800 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients referred to our center with an indication of colonoscopy and EMR for the treatment of lesions suspicious of high-grade dysplasia and early invasive cancer.
  • Patients who authorize EMR and colonoscopy.
  • Signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any clinical condition which makes EMR inviable.
  • Poor bowel preparation score defined as the total Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS) \<6 and the right-segment score \<2
  • Patients with more than one previous EMR
  • Lost on a three-month follow-up after EMR
  • Pregnancy or nursing
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Endoscopic mucosal resection + CAD-Eye™

    This group constitutes patients with lesions suggestive of high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer approached with endoscopic mucosal resection, subjected to colonoscopy + CAD-Eye™ system evaluation for the detection of remaining malignant tissue. For this group, the investigators used as a complement tool an AI system (CAD-Eye™) for the detection of remaining lesions immediately after EMR and in a three-month follow-up.

    Diagnostic Test: EMR with CAD-Eye™ · Diagnostic Test: Follow-up colonoscopy with CAD-Eye™

  • Active comparator
    Endoscopic mucosal resection without CAD Eye

    This group constitutes patients with lesions suggestive of high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer approached with endoscopic mucosal resection and subjected to colonoscopy. The detection of remaining lesions immediately after EMR is based on the visual impression of the expert. For this group, the investigators used as a complement tool an AI system (CAD-Eye™) only for the evaluation of the post-procedure scar to detect remaining lesions in the three-month follow-up.

    Diagnostic Test: EMR without CAD-Eye™ · Diagnostic Test: Follow-up colonoscopy with CAD-Eye™

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testEMR with CAD-Eye™

    Patients of group 1 undergoing Intervention 1 are subjected to an EMR with CAD-Eye™ to detect the remaining lesions immediately after the endoscopic procedure. The suspected remaining lesions in the post-procedure defect detected with CAD-Eye™ are removed and sent to pathology to confirm the diagnosis.

  • Diagnostic testEMR without CAD-Eye™

    Patients of group 2, undergoing intervention 2, subjected to an EMR alone. The immediate detection of remaining lesions is based on the visual impression of the expert. The suspected remaining lesions in the post-procedure defect are removed and sent to pathology to confirm the diagnosis.

  • Diagnostic testFollow-up colonoscopy with CAD-Eye™

    Patients undergoing Interventions 1 and 2, with a previous EMR, are assigned for a three-month follow-up using the CAD-Eye™ as a complementary procedure to detect remaining lesions. For the detection of residual lesions, the colonoscope with the CAD-Eye™ assistance is used during the post-procedural scar evaluation. Suspicious lesions detected are removed and sent to pathology for final diagnosis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lesions recurrence after EMR

    Detection of remaining lesions immediately after EMR procedure based on endoscopist expertise (EMR without CAD-Eye™ group) or CAD-Eye™ (EMR + CAD-Eye™ group). Lesions will be confirmed by biopsy. Data will be summarized as frequencies.

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  2. Lesions recurrence in a three-month follow-up after EMR

    Evaluation of CAD-Eye™ in the detection of recurrent lesions after EMR procedure. Remaining lesions detected by CAD-Eye™ in the three-month follow-up. Lesions will be confirmed by biopsy. Data will be summarized as frequencies.

    Time frame: up to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence risk after EMR

    Calculate de recurrence risk by the Sydney EMR recurrence tool (SERT) in a scale from 0 to 4 * 2 points: size of 40 mm or larger * 1 point: Intraprocedural bleeding (IPB) * 1 point: high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in histopathology

    Time frame: up to 1 week

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Carlos Robles-Medranda
    Guayaquil, Guayas 090505, Ecuador
    Recruiting
    • Carlos Robles-Medranda, MD FASGE · Contactcarlosoakm@yahoo.es · +59342109180
    • Hannah P. Lukashok, MD · Sub investigator
    • Juan Alcivar-Vasquez, MD · Sub investigator
    • Miguel Puga-Tejada, MD · Sub investigator
    • Maria Egas-Izquierdo, MD · Sub investigator
    • Jorge Baquerizo-Burgos, MD · Sub investigator
    • Martha Arevalo-Mora, MD · Sub investigator
    • Domenica Cunto, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kliegis L, Obst W, Bruns J, Weigt J. Can a Polyp Detection and Characterization System Predict Complete Resection? Dig Dis. 2022;40(1):115-118. doi: 10.1159/000516974. Epub 2021 May 6. PubMed 33940578 ↗
  • Yoshida N, Inoue K, Tomita Y, Kobayashi R, Hashimoto H, Sugino S, Hirose R, Dohi O, Yasuda H, Morinaga Y, Inada Y, Murakami T, Zhu X, Itoh Y. An analysis about the function of a new artificial intelligence, CAD EYE with the lesion recognition and diagnosis for colorectal polyps in clinical practice. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2237-2245. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04006-5. Epub 2021 Aug 18. PubMed 34406437 ↗
  • Dumoulin FL, Hildenbrand R. Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 21;25(3):300-307. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.300. PubMed 30686899 ↗
  • Neumann H, Kreft A, Sivanathan V, Rahman F, Galle PR. Evaluation of novel LCI CAD EYE system for real time detection of colon polyps. PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0255955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255955. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34437563 ↗
  • Min M, Deng P, Zhang W, Sun X, Liu Y, Nong B. Comparison of linked color imaging and white-light colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Oct;86(4):724-730. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.035. Epub 2017 Mar 9. PubMed 28286095 ↗
  • Tate DJ, Desomer L, Klein A, Brown G, Hourigan LF, Lee EY, Moss A, Ormonde D, Raftopoulos S, Singh R, Williams SJ, Zanati S, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):647-656.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Nov 28. PubMed 27908600 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05542030
Lead sponsor
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas
Responsible party
Carlos Robles-Medranda (Head of the Endoscopy Division, Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2022
Start date
Sep 12, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 12, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2023

Study contacts

Carlos Robles-Medranda, MD FASGE
Contact
carlosoakm@yahoo.es
+59342109180
Carlos Robles-Medranda, MD FASGE
principal investigator · Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas (IECED)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion