ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05537545Updated Oct 3, 2023

Timing of Soft Tissue Grafting Following Immediate Implant Placement

An interventional study of Soft tissue grafting in Bone Resorption, sponsored by University Ghent. Recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-03.

Sponsored by University Ghent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2024, 2 years 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Aug 2022; still recruiting 4 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients undergoing single immediate implant placement (IIP) in the premaxilla will be invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). Prior to surgery, a small- field low-dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is taken to verify the integrity of the facial bone wall and an adequate amount of apical and palatal bone availability for implant anchorage.

In all of the patients, a connective tissue graft (CTG) will be harvested and inserted into the buccal mucosa to increase soft tissue thickness around the immediately installed implant. However, included patients will be randomly allocated to either receive the CTG immediately after implant installation (Immediate soft tissue grafting, ISG = control group) or 3 months after implant installation (Delayed soft tissue grafting, DSG = test group).

Forty sealed envelopes are prepared for that purpose, of which 20 are internally labeled as "DSG" and 20 as "ISG". Following IIP, a sealed envelope will be opened to reveal the treatment concept In both groups, a cutting implant is installed in an optimal 3D position. Socket grafting is performed with deproteinized bovine bone mineral to limit buccal bone resorption and to optimize soft tissue stability.

In the ISG group, a pouch is made in the buccal mucosa using microsurgical instruments. Thereupon, a free gingival graft is harvested from the palatal mucosa in the premolar area and de-epithelialized to arrive at a CTG of about 1 mm thickness. Height and length are tailored to the dimensions of the site. Then, the CTG is brought into the pouch and fixed with two single sutures onto the buccal mucosa. Finally, a healing abutment is installed, which is replaced by a provisional implant crown 2 days later.

In the DSG group, implant placement, socket grafting and installation of a provisional implant crown occur as described above. In contrast, a buccal pouch is performed 3 months after implant installation. Graft harvesting, adaptation and fixation are performed as described above.

A small-field low-dose CBCT is taken at the 1-year and 5-year follow-up in order to measure buccal bone resorption as compared to the baseline dimensions in designated software.

Read the detailed description

Patients with a single failing tooth in the anterior maxilla will be included after a clinical examination and evaluation of a small-field low-dose CBCT. An intra-oral scan will be taken in order to make a surgical guide. A cutting implant with variable thread design (BLX, Straumann) will be installed using the surgical guide in order to sufficient primary implant stability.

Thereafter, the gap between the implant surface and buccal bone wall is filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss, Gheistlich Pharma).

At this point, a closed envelope is opened and the patient gets assigned to either ISG or DSG group.

In the immediate soft tissue grafting group, a de-epithelialized free gingival graft was inserted in a buccal pouch to augment the buccal soft tissues. The graft was fixed with single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Wiessner, Naila, Germany).

In the delayed soft tissue grafting group, the same procedure was performed 3 months after implant placement.

In both groups, patients received an immediate, screw-retained temporary crown. Restorations were installed within the first 48h after implant placement.

Sutures were removed 1 week after soft tissue grafting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bone Resorption

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • dental implant, single tooth
  • immediate
  • connective tissue graft
03

In context

Bone Resorption

167 studies on the registry are indexed under Bone Resorption; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is above the median of 24 across 146 interventional studies indexed under Bone Resorption.

Browse Bone Resorption studies →

Lead sponsor

University Ghent is the lead sponsor of 350 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 20 years old
  • Good oral hygiene defined as full-mouth plaque score ≤ 25% (O'Leary et al. 1972)
  • Presence of an incisor, cuspid or premolar in the maxilla that needs to be extracted for any reason with at least one neighboring tooth present
  • At least 3 mm bone available at the apical or palatal aspect of the alveolus as assessed on CBCT to ensure primary implant stability
  • Intact buccal bone wall at the time of extraction
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Systemic diseases
  • Smoking
  • Suppuration
  • > 1 mm gingival asymmetry between the failing and contralateral tooth
  • Untreated periodontal disease; untreated caries lesions
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Immediate soft tissue grafting

    A connective tissue graft is immediately harvested and inserted in the buccal mucosa at the moment of implant placement

    Procedure: Soft tissue grafting

  • Experimental
    Delayed soft tissue grafting

    Three months after implant placement, a connective tissue graft is harvested and inserted in the buccal mucosa

    Procedure: Soft tissue grafting

Interventions

  • ProcedureSoft tissue grafting

    A pouch is made in the buccal mucosa using microsurgical instruments. Thereupon, a free gingival graft is harvested from the palatal mucosa in the premolar area and de-epithelialized to arrive at a CTG of about 1 mm thickness. Height and length are tailored to the dimensions of the site. Then, the CTG is brought into the pouch and fixed with two single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Wiessner, Naila, Germany) onto the buccal mucosa.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Buccal bone resorption (mm)

    Changes in buccal bone dimension as measured on superimposed CBCT slides

    Time frame: 1-, 5-year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in buccal soft tissue profile (mm)

    Changes in buccal soft tissue profile as measured on superimposed digital surface models. An intra-oral scan is taken prior to implant surgery and at 1- and 5- year follow up. On the obtained digital models, an area of interest (AOI) at the buccal aspect was drawn for each site. The AOI extends from 0.5 mm below the soft tissue margin to 4 mm more apical. In mesio-distal dimension, the AOI reaches from the mesial to the distal line angle. The AOI may vary between sites because of individual anatomic differences but must be kept constant in each site across time points. A volumetric change (mm3) was calculated by designated software within the AOI and divided by the AOI surface (mm2). This results in the mean change in buccal soft tissue profile (mm).

    Time frame: 1-, 5-year

  2. Changes in midfacial soft tissue level (mm)

    Changes in buccal mucosal margin position as measured on superimposed digital surface models

    Time frame: 1-, 5-year

  3. Pink Esthetic Score

    Pink Esthetic score as defined by Fürhauser et al., 2005. Within this scale, 7 variables are evaluated ( mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft-tissue level, soft-tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft-tissue color and texture) using a 0-1-2 scoring system, 0 being the lowest, 2 being the highest value, the maximum achievable PES was 14. A 0 relates to the least esthetic result, while a 14 relates to a perfect outcome for all parameters.

    Time frame: 1-year

  4. Mucosal Scarring Index

    Mucosal Scarring Index as defined by Wessels et al., 2019. Within this scale, 5 parameters are assessed (width, height/contour, color, suture marks, and overall appearance) using a 0-1-2 scoring system. The MSI score may range from 0 (no scar) to 10 (most extreme scar).

    Time frame: 1-year

  5. Marginal bone level changes (mm)

    Changes in the distance from the implant-abutment interface to the first bone-to-implant contact (so-called marginal bone level) at the mesial and distal aspect of each implant as measured on 2D intra-oral radiographs

    Time frame: 1-,5-year

  6. Probing depth (mm)

    Measured with a periodontal probe at four locations (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal and oral) around the implant at 1- and 5-year follow-up. Measurements are rounded up to the nearest 0.5 mm. A mean value is calculated per implant.

    Time frame: 1-,5-year

  7. Plaque (%)

    Presence of plaque at four locations (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal and oral) around the implant. Each location is scored 0 or 1

    Time frame: 1-,5-year

  8. Bleeding on probing (%)

    Presence of bleeding on probing at four locations (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal and oral) around the implant. Each location is scored 0 or 1

    Time frame: 1-,5-year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38. No abstract available. PubMed 4500182 ↗
  • Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x. PubMed 16307569 ↗
  • Zuiderveld EG, van Nimwegen WG, Meijer HJA, Jung RE, Muhlemann S, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Effect of connective tissue grafting on buccal bone changes based on cone beam computed tomography scans in the esthetic zone of single immediate implants: A 1-year randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2021 Apr;92(4):553-561. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0217. Epub 2020 Sep 11. PubMed 32918332 ↗
  • Seyssens L, Eghbali A, Christiaens V, De Bruyckere T, Doornewaard R, Cosyn J. A one-year prospective study on alveolar ridge preservation using collagen-enriched deproteinized bovine bone mineral and saddle connective tissue graft: A cone beam computed tomography analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):853-861. doi: 10.1111/cid.12843. Epub 2019 Aug 28. PubMed 31456345 ↗
  • Wessels R, De Roose S, De Bruyckere T, Eghbali A, Jacquet W, De Rouck T, Cosyn J. The Mucosal Scarring Index: reliability of a new composite index for assessing scarring following oral surgery. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1209-1215. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2535-6. Epub 2018 Jul 3. PubMed 29971512 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2024, 23 months after the start.

Of 82 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bone Resorption, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 23 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 83 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 1, 2022
First posted
Sep 13, 2022
StartActual
Aug 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2028
Last update
Oct 3, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05537545
Lead sponsor
University Ghent
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2022
Start date
Aug 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 3, 2023

Study contacts

Jan Cosyn, Professor
Contact
jan.cosyn@ugent.be
+3293324000
Lorenz Seyssens, Phd candidate
Contact
lorenz.seyssens@ugent.be

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion