ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05536076RECOV2SCIUpdated Apr 2, 2026

Effect of Hypercapnia Treatment on Respiratory Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of Hypercapnia treatment in Sleep Apnea, SCI/D and Hypercapnia, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-02.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2023; still recruiting 3 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It is estimated that 1,275,000 people in the United States alone live with spinal cord injury, including around 100,000 Veterans with spinal cord injury, making the V.A. the largest integrated health care system in the world for spinal cord injuries injury care. New therapies are needed to prevent the morbidities and mortalities associated with the high prevalence of respiratory disorders in Veterans with spinal cord injury. The current research project and future studies would set the base for developing innovative therapies for this disorder. This proposal addresses a new therapeutic intervention for sleep apnea in spinal cord injury. The investigators hypothesized that daily hypercapnia treatments improve respiratory symptoms and alleviate sleep apnea in patients with chronic spinal cord injury. The investigators will perform a pilot study to examine the impact of daily hypercapnia treatments for-two week durations among Veterans with spinal cord injury. The investigators believe that this novel approach to treating sleep apnea and will yield significant new knowledge that improves the health and quality of life of these patients.

Read the detailed description

One of the most devastating consequences of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is damage to the phrenic motor network, controlling the diaphragm (primary muscle of breathing). Subsequent diaphragm paralysis or paresis results in life-threatening impairments in breathing and can necessitate a need for ventilator assistance. Respiratory and cardiovascular complications are the most common causes of death in the first year post-injury (51% combined). Thus, there is an urgent need to develop strategies for improving function for people with acute and chronic spinal cord injury. Currently, treatments for respiratory dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients are limited to mechanical devices or nerve pacing. Moreover, the proposed plan of studying respiratory muscle training in spinal cord injury patients is novel. However, it is based on animal and human studies that have shown with validity that respiratory muscle training using mild intermittent hypoxia improves respiratory function following SCI. However, the effect of intermittent hypoxia has shown to be dependent on the level of alveolar CO2 and may pose undesirable cardiovascular effects. Previous studies showed that respiratory recovery following SCI manifests by a delayed and partial restorative spontaneous plasticity. The current research project and future anticipated studies would set the base for developing innovative therapies that can stimulate respiratory plasticity hence recovery for this prevalent disorder.

The proposed pilot/feasibility study will test the effect of daily acute intermittent hypercapnia (dAIHc) in individuals with SCI. The objectives of this study are to (1) determine recruitment rates and test the feasibility of recruitment, (2) calculate withdrawal and dropout rates, (3) test the feasibility and tolerability and acceptability of the proposed intervention in an SCI population, (4) develop and refine a new respiratory training intervention using dAIHc paradigm (5) derive effect size estimates for clinical endpoints and their associated variability at the end of treatment to calculate an appropriate sample size for an adequately powered clinical trial. Compared to sham therapy, the central hypothesis is that the daily respiratory muscle training (dAIHc) approach is acceptable and feasible in patients with SCI and will strengthen respiratory muscles and reduce the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), and will improve daytime symptoms.

This study is highly innovative and the first of its kind in patients with SCI, as it seeks first to use a new set of rehabilitative exercises to improve ventilation and respiratory muscles strength; secondly, it aims to use controlled randomized design; finally, it will determine the role of respiratory muscle exercises in reducing the severity of sleep symptoms and daytime function in SCI. Each aim is independently testable and does not depend on the result of the other aims. The findings will likely apply to a broad range of other neuromuscular diseases (such as Multiple Sclerosis and Stroke). The team of this pilot project has the resources and IRB approval necessary to execute the project.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Apnea
  • SCI/D
  • Hypercapnia

Keywords

  • Sleep apnea
  • SCI/D
  • Hypercapnia
03

In context

Sleep Apnea Syndromes

1,084 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea Syndromes; 171 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 673 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Apnea Syndromes.

Browse Sleep Apnea Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,771 studies on the registry; 392 are open to participants now.

Of its 213 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 185 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with chronic SCI/D (>6 months post-injury)
  • American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification A-D who have evidence of SDB (excluding those with no evidence of a neurologic deficit based on ASIA classification)
  • Able-bodied patients (without SCI/D0 who have OSA.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving continuous mechanical ventilation (except PAP therapy which is considered usual treatment for SDB
  • Severe congestive heart failure with \<35%
  • Recent health event that may affect sleep
  • stroke
  • acute myocardial infarction
  • recent surgery
  • hospitalization
  • Alcohol or substance abuse (\<90 days sobriety)
  • Self-described as too ill to engage in study procedures
  • Evidence of hypercapnia on spontaneous breathing (end-tidal CO2 >50 mmHg)
  • Unable to provide self-consent for participation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intervention hypercapnia arm

    Intermittent hypercapnia treatment five days per week for two weeks.

    Other: Hypercapnia treatment

  • Experimental
    SCD

    Intermittent hypercapnia treatment five days per week for two weeks.

    Other: Hypercapnia treatment

  • Experimental
    Able-Bodoed

    Intermittent hypercapnia treatment five days per week for two weeks.

    Other: Hypercapnia treatment

Interventions

  • OtherHypercapnia treatment

    Intermittent hypercapnia treatment five days per week for two weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment rate

    Determine the recruitment rate in the intervention arm and determine how many continue into the sham arm. (Number of patients enrolled and completed the study)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Minute Ventilation

    To measure the change in minute ventilation (L/min)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. Change in sleep apnea severity

    Severity of sleep apnea (Apnea-hypopnea index -events/hour)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Publications from research will be made available to the public through the national Library of Medicine PubMed within one year after the date of publication. Final data sets underlying all publications resulting form the proposed research will be shared outside if the following criteria is met: A limited Dataset will be created and shared pursuant to Data Use Agreement (DUA) appropriately limiting use for dataset and prohibiting the recipient from identifying or re-identifying any individuals whose data are included in the dataset.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Within one year of the publication

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 47 months after the start.

Of 200 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sleep Apnea Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 47 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 268 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 28, 2022
First posted
Sep 10, 2022
StartActual
Mar 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Feb 28, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 28, 2027
Last update
Apr 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05536076
Collaborators
VA Detroit Healthcare System
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 10, 2022
Start date
Mar 1, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 2, 2026

Study contacts

Abdulghani Sankari, MD PhD
Contact
Abdulghani.Sankari@va.gov
(313) 576-1000 ext. 63499
Abdulghani Sankari, MD PhD
principal investigator · John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion