CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05531643Updated Jun 10, 2026Results posted

Pilot Study of TENS for Ocular Pain

An interventional study of High frequency forehead TENS and Low frequency forehead TENS in Eye Pain, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Approximately 20% of Veterans have a diagnosis of dry eye (DE) syndrome which is often accompanied by ocular pain that significantly impacts activities of daily living. Currently very few treatments are available for chronic ocular pain, likely because the mechanisms underlying this type of pain have only recently begun to be studied. New treatments that target the neuropathic mechanisms contributing to this type of pain are needed. The proposed research provides a crucial step in addressing the lack of treatments for neuropathic ocular pain by validating the methodology needed to support a randomized controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS is a non-pharmacologic, non-addictive, non-invasive treatment that has been shown to be effective in other chronic pain conditions. The present pilot study aims to address the need for preliminary support of safety and efficacy of TENS for ocular pain, t to advance the study of new treatments for the long-term relief of chronic ocular pain and its impact on health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Eye Pain

Keywords

  • Eye pain
  • Dry Eye
  • Neuropathic Pain
  • Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
03

In context

Eye Pain

23 studies on the registry are indexed under Eye Pain; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is above the median of 35 across 20 interventional studies indexed under Eye Pain.

Browse Eye Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • male or female
  • all races and ethnicities
  • at least 18 years of age
  • persistent eye pain for at least 6 months
  • average eye pain intensity of 4 or more on a 0-10 numerical rating scale
  • on a stable medication regimen for at least the past 3 months
  • naïve to TENS use for orofacial conditions
  • eye pain having neuropathic-like characteristics

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of ocular diseases that are the likely cause of pain (i.e., corneal and conjunctival scarring, corneal edema, uveitis, iris transillumination defects, etc.)
  • contraindication to TENS (i.e., pacemaker, cardioverter defibrillator, neuro-stimulation (brain or spinal cord), bone growth stimulations, indwelling blood pressure monitors, epilepsy, pregnancy)
  • patients with confirmed signs of tear dysfunction
  • current participation in another study with an investigational drug or device within one month prior to screening
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    high frequency TENS

    high frequency (60Hz) TENS delivered for 20 minutes to the forehead; at least 3 times per week in-home; for 6 months.

    Device: High frequency forehead TENS

  • Active comparator
    low frequency TENS

    low frequency (3Hz) TENS delivered for 20 minutes to the forehead; at least 3 times per week in-home; for 6 months.

    Device: Low frequency forehead TENS

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh frequency forehead TENS

    Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device with electrode placement at the forehead. Biphasic rectangular impulses at 60Hz frequency will be delivered for a maximum of 20 minutes at a maximum amplitude of 16mA. Participant may halt amplitude before it reaches maximum amplitude. The device has previously been cleared by the FDA for use in migraine patients.

  • DeviceLow frequency forehead TENS

    Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device with electrode placement at the forehead. A 3Hz biphasic square wave will be delivered for 20 minutes up to a maximum amplitude of 16mA.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reported Device-related Side-effects

    An open-ended question of side-effects will be used to assess any bothersome changes in physical or mental health symptoms every 2 weeks during the 6-month at-home course of treatment. Presence, description of symptom, severity of symptoms, participant assessment of device/treatment-relatedness of symptoms, and desire or actual discontinuation of device use will be recorded.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Time to Peak Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10)

    Calculation of time (weeks) to peak reduction in eye pain will be made based on NRS scores obtained every two weeks after initiation of intervention protocol.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Number of Screen Failures

    The number of individuals who meet pre-screening requirements, consent to study procedures, but who do not meet full criteria after screening visit is conducted

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Treatment Compliance Rate

    Count of the number (and calculated percentage) of individuals who reported completing at least 75% of treatment sessions.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Individuals Who Score 100% on Checklist for Proper Use of TENS Device

    The percentage of individuals who, after instruction, score 100% on checklist items for safe and proper use of the device.

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Rate of Uncertainty in Participant Treatment Allocation Guess

    Percentage of individuals who rate at least moderate uncertainty in guessing which treatment arm they were allocated to.

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Beta Coefficients for Participant Demographics (Sex, Age, Race/Ethnicity) in Regression Model Predicting Adherence to Treatment Protocol

    Exploratory regression analysis to identify associations between demographic variables and number of treatment sessions completed

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Beta Coefficients for Participant Demographics (Sex, Age, Race/Ethnicity) in Regression Model Predicting Change in Pain (Numerical Rating Scale)

    Exploratory regression analysis to identify associations between demographic variables and change in pain ratings (before vs. after 6 month TENS treatment)

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted Jun 10, 2026
Limitations and caveats
This was a pilot investigation, primarily targeted to determine what methodology changes might be needed to ensure feasibility for a fully-powered clinical trial of TENS for chronic ocular pain. As such, many limitations are present within the results, and all reported information should be interpreted with caution.

Participant flow

enrollment includes all individuals who signed the informed consent form with intent to complete the study and who attended the initiating/baseline visit of the study

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHigh Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENS
Started2413
Completed1710
Not completed73

Outcome measures

PrimaryReported Device-related Side-effects

An open-ended question of side-effects will be used to assess any bothersome changes in physical or mental health symptoms every 2 weeks during the 6-month at-home course of treatment. Presence, description of symptom, severity of symptoms, participant assessment of device/treatment-relatedness of symptoms, and desire or actual discontinuation of device use will be recorded.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · partcipants
Reported Device-related Side-effects
partcipantsHigh Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENS
# of people reporting1210
# of people temporary discontinue device use42
PrimaryTime to Peak Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10)

Calculation of time (weeks) to peak reduction in eye pain will be made based on NRS scores obtained every two weeks after initiation of intervention protocol.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · weeks after start of treatment
Time to Peak Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10)
weeks after start of treatmentHigh Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENS
Time to Peak Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10)13 (6 to 17.5)10 (2 to 17)
PrimaryNumber of Screen Failures

The number of individuals who meet pre-screening requirements, consent to study procedures, but who do not meet full criteria after screening visit is conducted

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Screen Failures
ParticipantsAcross Study
Number of Screen Failures2
PrimaryTreatment Compliance Rate

Count of the number (and calculated percentage) of individuals who reported completing at least 75% of treatment sessions.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Treatment Compliance Rate
ParticipantsHigh Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENS
Treatment Compliance Rate65
SecondaryPercentage of Individuals Who Score 100% on Checklist for Proper Use of TENS Device

The percentage of individuals who, after instruction, score 100% on checklist items for safe and proper use of the device.

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Individuals Who Score 100% on Checklist for Proper Use of TENS Device
ParticipantsHigh Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENS
Percentage of Individuals Who Score 100% on Checklist for Proper Use of TENS Device2413
SecondaryRate of Uncertainty in Participant Treatment Allocation Guess

Percentage of individuals who rate at least moderate uncertainty in guessing which treatment arm they were allocated to.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Rate of Uncertainty in Participant Treatment Allocation Guess
ParticipantsHigh Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENS
Rate of Uncertainty in Participant Treatment Allocation Guess107
Other pre-specifiedBeta Coefficients for Participant Demographics (Sex, Age, Race/Ethnicity) in Regression Model Predicting Adherence to Treatment Protocol

Exploratory regression analysis to identify associations between demographic variables and number of treatment sessions completed

Time frame:
1 year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedBeta Coefficients for Participant Demographics (Sex, Age, Race/Ethnicity) in Regression Model Predicting Change in Pain (Numerical Rating Scale)

Exploratory regression analysis to identify associations between demographic variables and change in pain ratings (before vs. after 6 month TENS treatment)

Time frame:
1 year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over from initiation of first treatment session until the end of the six month intervention period. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
High Frequency TENS0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)12/24 (50%)
Low Frequency TENS0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)10/13 (76.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventHigh Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENS
headacheNervous system disorders5/247/13
forehead dysesthetic sensationNervous system disorders4/242/13
ear dysesthetic sensationsNervous system disorders2/240/13
skin rashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/241/13

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(year)High Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENSTotal
Mean59 ± 956 ± 1658 ± 12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)High Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENSTotal
Female12719
Male12618
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)High Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENSTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American5510
White18826
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)High Frequency TENSLow Frequency TENSTotal
Hispanic or Latino12517
Not Hispanic or Latino12820
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL
    Miami, Florida 33125, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shields C, Qazi S, Zaldivar A, Cabrera K, Mangwani-Mordani S, Peterson H, Bhatt S, Tang F, Galor A, Felix ER. Randomized Pilot Study of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Neuropathic/Nociplastic Ocular Pain. Am J Ophthalmol. 2026 Jun;286:318-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2026.03.008. Epub 2026 Mar 10. PubMed 41812852 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 18, 2022
  • Informed consent form · Feb 2, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05531643
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2022
Start date
Oct 3, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2024
Completion
Nov 30, 2024
Results posted
Jun 10, 2026
Last update
Jun 10, 2026

Study contacts

Elizabeth R Felix, PhD
principal investigator · Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion